
More vaccinations needed to curb Alberta measles cases: infectious diseases expert
University of Calgary Microbiology, Immunology & Infectious Diseases Professor Craig Jenne speaks with Alberta Primetime host Michael Higgins about the rising measles case numbers in the province
This interview has been edited for clarity and length.
Michael Higgins: The last time we spoke was in late March. At the time it was below the 50-case mark. Now it's more than 10 times that.
What's to be made of the rate of growth or progression and what might that say about how it's spreading?
Craig Jenne: I think what we've seen in the last two months is the transition from these localized exposures, so within family, households or single businesses, to now community level spread, and unfortunately measles is the most contagious virus we deal with.
Now that it does have a toehold in the community, we can continue to expect these 100+ case weeks for the foreseeable future.
MH: The province has released some stats on vaccination rates, telling CTV News more than 47,000 vaccines were administered province wide between March 16 and May 11. A 57 per cent increase over the same period last year.
How much of an impact might that have on dynamics?
CJ: Ultimately, vaccination is the single best tool we have to bring this in, but we have a long ways to go. There are a number of regions in the province where vaccine rates are below 50 per cent, and we know from past experience that to control measles, we need the community to have 95 per cent of the individuals vaccinated.
So 45,000 doses, good start, but when we're talking about literally having to vaccinate millions of people, we still have a long ways to go.
MH: Does there come a point where the case count peaks or levels off, or should Albertans just expect it to keep growing and growing and growing?
CJ: I think unfortunately for the near future, they're going to continue to grow. We base this largely on what we see in other places of the world.
In Ontario, they've been dealing with measles since early fall of last year, and if we look at Alberta's numbers on a per capita basis, recognizing we're smaller than Ontario, we've now eclipsed them in a matter of under three months.
So the cases grow quite rapidly here, and as a result, it's going to require significant effort to bring that back under control.
MH: How worrisome is that from a health standpoint?
CJ: It's quite worrisome. We do know that, typically, we can tolerate a few measles cases every year. But as those numbers go up, again, previous outbreaks have shown us one to three children out of every 1,000 infections will likely lose their lives.
So as the numbers grow, the risk of those severe outcomes, unfortunately, grows proportionally.
MH: There had been site specific exposure advisories in the South Zone but since last Friday, that became a standing advisory.
If it is that the exposure source isn't known, what comes of the challenge of tracking and attempting to contain it?
CJ: Right now it's nearly impossible to track them in the South Zone. We are seeing measles acquisition in many different public places, and as a result, these health advisories are simply stating that there's a risk of measles pretty much anywhere in the community.
We have seen cases from the B.C. border, through the province, and the south, to the Saskatchewan border. We do know it's there, we do know it's circulating in the community, and really the only personal defense when we don't have these localized exposures is immunization.
MH: The South Zone, south of Calgary, includes cities like Lethbridge and Medicine Hat.
If you don't live there, but you do plan on visiting, or maybe working in the region, what's advisable?
CJ: Check your immunization status or if you, for whatever reason, are not immunized or cannot be immunized, you may have to reevaluate travel. We do also have to appreciate that in Alberta, we do have a lot of mobility, which is fantastic, but it means that if there's community level transmission in the south, that can move to other regions of the province.
We continue to see cases in the north this week and we have large events coming. Between events such as Calgary Stampede and Rotary International that will see a lot of people come into the cities, there's a risk of measles transmission.
MH: During the pandemic, there was much made of the impact on the health system, overloaded hospitals.
If these measles cases are showing up in hospitals now and into the future, and in health clinics, what kind of impact does that have on the system itself?
CJ: Measles presents a huge strain, largely because we do not want people who are feeling under the weather or potentially exposed, just to walk into a walk-in health clinic or assessment centre.
We have to have special facilities or special handling for these cases. People who are sick with measles and require hospitalization.
Again, the infection controls are quite labour intensive. It requires a lot of space and a lot of staff in order to ensure that that virus does not spread to others in the hospital, often others who may be immunocompromised for various reasons.
MH: The province launched a new awareness campaign earlier this month. Changes have been made in making it easier to get vaccinated. How much of an impact is that having on the situation?
CJ: Advertising and advocacy are really the best tools we have. We just need to ensure there is a full press on this, and what I mean by that is although there are some commercials out there, they're not coming up every day in multiple formats.
In Calgary, I've only seen two or three of these commercials, despite the fact the campaign was launched nearly two weeks ago. So we really need to double down on this, we really need to convey that vaccines work, they're safe.
We've been vaccinated for measles now for about four decades and it was through vaccination that we were able to achieve a measles-free status for Canada, a status that you know we're at risk of losing over the next several months.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
21 minutes ago
- CTV News
Third Link: Quebec again beguiles possibility of new project
Quebec Transport Minister Geneviève Guilbault talks about the Third Link on June 12, 2025. (LA PRESSE CANADIENNE/Jacques Boissinot) With less than a year and a half to go before the provincial election, the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) government is once again dangling the prospect of a Third Link project – without committing to any potential costs. The corridor, chosen by Transport Minister Geneviève Guilbault, is farther west and closer to the two existing bridges than previous proposed routes. A third link farther east would have been more expensive, according to the minister. The proposed project is a bridge-tunnel that accommodates both freight trucks and public transportation. The precise route and 'target budget' are not expected to be unveiled until the fall. From east to west The CAQ government has been very indecisive about the Third Link project in the past. In 2019, it proposed a tunnel to the east that would pass under Île d'Orléans. Then, the government changed its mind and floated the idea of a route farther west that would connect the two city centres of Quebec City and Lévis. In April 2023, Guilbault announced that her government was abandoning the project for a highway link between the cities. Instead, she proposed a tunnel dedicated to public transit. Then, in October 2023, less than 24 hours after his crushing defeat in Jean-Talon by the Parti Québécois (PQ), Premier François Legault took everyone by surprise by announcing that he, again, wanted to consult the people of Quebec City about the Third Link, and all options were on the table. The project was revived in June 2024 despite an unfavourable report from the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, which had analyzed several potential corridors. – This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French on June 12, 2024.


CBC
22 minutes ago
- CBC
Bike lane proponents decry 'overreach' after committee votes not to hear them until July
Social Sharing Proponents of a protected bike lane along Winnipeg's Wellington Crescent accused city council's public works committee of a "gross overreach of power" after dozens of people slated to speak at city hall on Thursday had their delegations cancelled and put off until a meeting in July. No fewer than 27 people signed up to speak to the committee about a proposal to create a temporary bike lane on Wellington, where cyclist Rob Jenner was killed last year by a speeding motorist who lost control of his vehicle. The item was on the agenda to allow the committee to consider a request by city transportation engineers to have another month to complete a report about the temporary bike lane. Citing the request for the extension, committee chair Janice Lukes (Waverley West) moved to suspend city council rules and hear the delegations at the next public works committee meeting, slated for July 3. Lukes, as well as councillors Markus Chambers (St. Norbert-Seine River) and Ross Eadie (Mynarski), then voted not to hear the delegations. The fourth member of the committee, council speaker Devi Sharma (Old Kildonan) left the committee floor and did not take part in the vote. The decision led some people watching in the council gallery to shout at the committee, prompting Chambers to ask security to clear the council gallery of some spectators. This proved to be temporary. Linda van de Laar, who took a day off from her job as a cardiac nurse at St. Boniface Hospital to attend the meeting, said she was upset city councillors effectively silenced people unhappy with the time the city is taking to improve safety along Wellington Crescent. She accused the committee of overreaching its powers and engaging in an unprecedented move by shutting out registered delegates. "The councillors are here to represent the citizens and the residents, so I do not understand it," van de Laar said outside city hall. "A lot of people here took time off from work to be here. I personally cannot make it on July 3. I'll be on a night shift," she said. Ian McCausland, a Bike Winnipeg board member who was able to address the committee because he also registered to speak about another item on the agenda, said he is concerned about the message sent by the committee to people who take the time to engage with city councillors. "It speaks to how much the city might value the input from the average citizen," he said. "I'm hoping that this is a one-time thing and that they actually continue to engage with all stakeholders on the project." Van de Laar said she was especially upset Lukes told CBC Radio on Wednesday she would hear delegates on Thursday. 'I'm disappointed too,' councillor says Lukes, who volunteered as a bike and pedestrian trail activist prior to running for council in 2014, said she knows what it's like being on the outside of council, looking in. "I don't think there's anyone here that understands the level of frustration like I do, because I was an advocate and came down 50 to 60 times, very frustrated," she said during a break in the committee meeting. "Then I actually decided to put my name on a ballot and see if I can make change on this side of the table. Making change is not easy, I've come to learn, on either side of the table." Lukes said she was the councillor who originally pushed to reduce the speed on Wellington Crescent and she too is disappointed. "Everyone's disappointed. I'm disappointed in some of the things that have been said to me and to the committee members. They're disappointed that we don't have a plan in place," she said, referring to the delegates. "I'm disappointed too, but we will have a full report next month." Lukes said the city is moving more quickly on a protected bike lane on Wellington Crescent than it has on other protected lanes. She said a temporary barrier is the only option right now because permanent barriers are built when streets undergo full renewals — and Wellington Crescent is not slated for this work any time soon.


CBC
22 minutes ago
- CBC
City of Hamilton infrastructure deficit is somewhere between $3 billion and $8 billion
Social Sharing The City of Hamilton could be short $5.2 billion needed to replace and repair existing infrastructure over the next 10 years – but that number could also be as low as $3.18 billion or as high as $7.42 billion. City officials don't really know. "We're focused on improving data confidence," Amber Dewar, a senior program analyst in corporate asset management, told city councillors at Wednesday's General Issues Committee meeting. "Our data confidence is low-to-medium, indicating these values could change," she added, noting they could swing up to 40 per cent in either direction. According to Dewar's presentation to councillors, "the 10-year infrastructure funding gap represents the difference between the total available budget and the estimated lifecycle forecast needs over 10 years to maintain current levels of service targets. If the forecasted lifecycle needs exceed the available budget, it indicates there is a funding shortfall between what is required and what is available to fund service levels." Deficit estimate increased due to new data and inflation: analyst City infrastructure includes water and wastewater systems, roads and city-owned buildings and properties, among numerous other categories. The total replacement value for the assets in question is valued at $39.4 billion. The biggest gaps are in CityHousing Hamilton, roads, water and Hamilton Police. Dewar said there are other ways to move forward than jumping immediately to hiking residential taxes, noting that making up the gap all at once would require a significant jump. "We can prioritize different projects differently," she said. "We can consider reducing expected levels of service where we are not seeing value… We are going to have to increase funding allocations but if we do all this work first, we know what areas we have to be targeting." Dewar said the infrastructure deficit jumped from the city's previous estimate of $3.8 billion because of data improvements that helped assessors better understand the situation, but also because of inflation. She added that there are areas where the gap has decreased since the last update, also due to access to more precise data from some departments, as well as budget allocations from council that reduced the gap between what was needed and what was allocated. The update was included in a report on the city's asset management plans, part of a process mandated by the provincial government. Councillors were presented with multiple, dense documents as well as several recommendations. Ward 4 Coun. Tammy Hwang noted that the information isn't presented in a way that helps her know how to apply it to city budgeting and decision-making, something other councillors appeared to concur with. "Is there a way to make this a little more legible to me, and also to members of the public" she asked. "How would we understand how to adjust levels of service given these recommendations?" Earlier this year, the city earned a failing grade in a think-tank report on budget transparency, partially because its reporting was difficult to understand for the average person. Dewar told councillors that the latest reports and updated numbers are just one step along a longer-term journey to create a financial plan that addresses the shortfall. Mike Zegarac, the city's general manager of finance and corporate services, noted that council directed staff to begin to address this funding gap last year, a practice that had not taken place with past councils. He said that about 20 per cent of this year's residential tax increase is going toward addressing these needs. Councillors voted Wednesday to have a special, full-day GIC session solely focused on asset management, service levels, and the city's financial plans. That will be scheduled sometime before July 1, when the province requires all municipalities to submit their proposed levels of service and a financial strategy. Ward 1 Coun. Maureen Wilson noted that needs such as road repairs are much greater in the lower city. She said there is a "narrative on social media that this council doesn't have its head on straight and is not tethered to reality," and that "the city is falling apart and is neglecting its core assets," but council should in fact be recognized for making plans to tackle the problem. "It is this term of council that has made the adult decision, based on evidence, that we are not going to ignore this reality anymore," she said.