Hamptons gears up for another summer of vacation and regulation
Memorial Day kicks off summer — and the influx of seasonal residents to the Hamptons.
But it's not all sunshine and revelry. Prompted by a vocal group of year-round residents, several towns on Long Island's East End are imposing ever stricter laws and regulations, casting a shadow over the region's vibrant summer scene.
Perhaps the most visible example to residents and tourists alike is Duryea's, which was only allowed to open this summer because the New York state supreme court stepped in, sources told me.
As I've previously reported, the beloved Montauk restaurant, which is owned by Marc Rowan, has faced years of legal action. First the Town of East Hampton demanded it upgrade the septic system and then prohibited it from getting the permits needed to do so. Earlier this month, it looked like Duryea's might be closed for the whole summer.
3 The New York State Supreme Court had to step in to ensure Duryea's in Montauk could open.
But, I'm told, the State Supreme Court has intervened and allowed the installation of a state-of-the art septic system, enabling the restaurant to open for the upcoming holiday weekend, though litigation with the town is still pending.
The Duryea's drama is just the latest in a string of sagas. Town boards in the Hamptons are infamous for trying to micromanage everything from leaf blower usage and landscape lighting wattage to whether people can spontaneously dance at a tavern.
3 Pickleball has become another sore spot for residents as towns clamp down on new and existing courts.
Tamara Beckwith
Over the past year, pickleball courts, house size and who can fly into the public airport have been primary targets. The regulations have frustrated businesses and restaurants, pushing some to flee to summer locales with less red tape.
Last fall, East Hampton and Southampton cracked down on residential pickleball courts and their noise. A new law demands that 'Pickleball courts must be surrounded on three sides by an eight-foot sound-attenuation wall, placed no further than 10 feet from the edge of the court, constructed of a minimum of ¾-inch planking.' Such soundproofing can cost homeowners upwards of $100,000.
This story is part of NYNext, an indispensable insider insight into the innovations, moonshots and political chess moves that matter most to NYC's power players (and those who aspire to be).
This comes after towns like North Haven enacted a six-month moratorium on any residential pickleball courts being built — or tennis courts being transformed to pickleball courts.
In December, the town of East Hampton passed a law that will not only prevent anyone from building a home larger than 10,000-square-foot, in an effort to preserve the town's 'rural character,' but also limit any new homes (or expansion) to just 10% of a lot's square footage. For instance, a quarter-acre lot would now only allow a 2,000-square-foot home, while a half-acre would only permit a 3,600 square foot home, making it impossible for residents to work towards building a sun room or remodel a smaller home. The new law goes into effect July 1.
3 East Hampton has been embroiled with the local airport about noise complaints and the number of flights.
Dennis A. Clark
The Town of East Hampton is also still embroiled in a legal dispute over its airport — the Hampton's primary airport. Over the past three years, the town has spent more than $5 million on lawyers as it tries to limit flights and noise. It is just the latest move in the decade-old legal battle.
Of course, the town putting the squeeze on business owners is not new. Business owners tell me they still keep the flame alive for iconic advertising executive Jerry Delefemaina. In 1997, he was arrested and handcuffed for placing Thanksgiving decorations — hay bales, corn stalks and pumpkins — outside his Redhorse Food Market in East Hampton. The town said it violated a rule that prohibits stores from advertising on the property outside their storefront.
While it's still a rallying cry, it's also a sign that over the decades not much seems to have changed.
Send NYNext a tip: nynextlydia@nypost.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House stands by tax bill after Musk calls it a 'disgusting abomination'
The White House defended the President Donald Trump-endorsed "big, beautiful bill" Tuesday after outgoing DOGE chief Elon Musk doubled down on his criticism, calling the legislation a "disgusting abomination." Musk, who has been openly critical of the proposed reconciliation bill, said Tuesday afternoon that he "just can't stand it anymore." "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk added in a Tuesday afternoon post on X. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." 'American Hero' Or 'Failure': Elon Musk's Doge Departure Divides Capitol Hill The bill passed the House in late May, ahead of Memorial Day, largely along party lines. However, two Republicans did vote against the measure, citing insufficient spending cuts and a rising national debt. GOP Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul has also signaled he likely will not vote in favor of the bill in its current form, citing a debt ceiling increase that is a red line for him. Trump has lashed out at Paul and others for opposing the bill, but he has taken a more measured approach to Musk's criticism. Read On The Fox News App "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a Tuesday afternoon briefing when asked about Musk's most recent criticism. "It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill and he's sticking to it," she said. Elon Musk Criticism Of Trump Tax Bill Frustrates Some Republicans: 'No Place In Congress' Musk, who led the cost-cutting efforts at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), previously criticized the bill during an interview with CBS, noting he was "disappointed" in the spending bill because "it undermines" all the work his DOGE team was doing. In May, when Trump was asked about Musk's criticism of the bill on CBS, he responded, "Well, our reaction's a lot of things," before pivoting to talk about the votes needed to pass the bill. "Number one, we have to get a lot of votes, we can't be cutting – we need to get a lot of support and we have a lot of support," he said. "We had to get it through the House, the House was, we had no Democrats. You know, if it was up to the Democrats, they'll take the 65% increase." Following Musk's Tuesday afternoon criticism, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters he hopes Musk "will come to a different conclusion" about the GOP's "big, beautiful" spending bill, adding the two have a "difference of opinion" about the legislation. Trump Criticizes Rand Paul Over Tax Bill Opposition: 'Votes No On Everything' In a recent interview, Thune addressed Musk's criticism in more detail, particularly the point that the current version of the GOP's spending bill "undermines" the work he has done with DOGE. "A lot of what Elon was working on was on the discretionary side of the budget, which this doesn't touch. The reconciliation bill just deals with mandatory spending," Thune said. "But we want to incorporate a lot of the savings that he found, and there are ways to do that." Thune said he hoped, through other legislative efforts, discretionary spending Musk is concerned about will be addressed. He pointed to a proposed "rescissions bill" expected to be pushed by the White House that Thune said will try "to capture a lot of what Elon found in these various agencies and puts it in a bill that's submitted to Congress." Fox News' Chad Pergram contributed to this article source: White House stands by tax bill after Musk calls it a 'disgusting abomination'
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's tax and spending bill faces Senate scrutiny amid public discontent
The Senate will return from recess next week to consider the fate of Donald Trump's big tax and spending bill which the House of Representatives passed just before Memorial Day. The break doesn't mean all is quiet on the fiscal front. The few MAGA members who are brave enough to meet their constituents are getting an earful of hostility and scorn. Meanwhile, Democrats and progressive groups are airing TV ads against the cuts to the tune of millions of dollars. The president likes to call it his 'big beautiful bill,' but many Americans and even some GOP senators find it oversized and ugly. The House bill which only passed by one vote extends the 2017 Trump tax cuts for wealthy Americans and large corporations for another ten years. It pays for the tax breaks with sharp reductions in spending for health care and nutrition programs. Even with the deep cuts, the nonpartisan analysis by the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the plan would increase the national budget deficit by almost $4 trillion. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) says he doesn't expect any major surprises from his party colleagues in the upper chamber. He is either willingly ignorant or completely delusional. Concerns about the deficit have frightened MAGA budget hawks like Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). Conservative Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) who opposes the Medicaid cuts in the House legislation described them as 'morally wrong and politically suicidal.' I rarely agree with the senator from the Show Me State but this time he's dead right. Supporters of Trump's reckless fiscal plan aren't doing themselves any favors either. Back in her home state during the recess, Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) lamely tried to defend the indefensible last week when she responded to constituent concerns about deaths caused by health care cuts. She said, 'Well, we are all going to die anyway.' Her snide comment betrays GOP indifference to the suffering of the Americans who will die before their times because they can't afford care. The public outrage over the cuts and her callous comment is exactly why congressional Republicans are reluctant to do town meetings and why Democrats like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) are trying to fill the void to capitalize on the hostility. The Economist and YouGov conducted a national survey in mid-May which shed considerable light on attitudes towards the draconian proposal. A plurality of Americans opposed the bill but the really striking thing about the survey is how strongly attached Americans are to specific government agencies and their programs. Americans are philosophical conservatives but operational liberals. Trump plays on fears of big government but ignores the public's deep devotion to specific federal programs. Crap rolls down, not up the food chain. Trump aristocrats and plutocrats will do just fine, but his budget requires severe cuts in food aid and health care for the poor that will insidiously work their way down to struggling families in the middle. Meanwhile, three out of every four Americans want to maintain or even increase spending on Medicaid. Seven tenths of the population want to maintain or increase funding for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. The president would reduce the Department of Education to a pile of rubble but two thirds (67 percent) of the public wishes to expand (42 percent) or maintain (25 percent) it. Hardy anybody (5 percent) supports Trump in his quest to gut the department. In contrast, less than half (47 percent) of the public wants to expand or maintain Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. Musk got out of DOGE last week and on his way out blasted the president's deficit raising tax and budget bill. Americans share Musk's concerns. Most people don't believe Trump's riverboat gamble will drain the sea of federal red ink. But in the last month, the number of people who think the big beneficiaries of the budget blaster will primarily be the rich has risen significantly. Why are Trump and congressional Republicans feverishly pushing such a massive piece of legislation that has so little public support? The answer is they are blind ideologues who are hell-bent on destroying the good works of Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal regardless of the pain and suffering the ruin rains on the American people. The president may not pay the price for his ignorance, but some GOP members of Congress will in 2026.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Ivanka Trump Promotes Book by Author Who Warned About Donald's Presidency
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ivanka Trump shared a photograph on Instagram promoting a book written by a vocal critic of her father, President Donald Trump. Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment via email. The Context Ivanka Trump, who played a key role in the first Trump White House, has taken a step back from politics in recent years. Although she has continued to show support for her father, including attending his inauguration in January, she is not outwardly mixing politics and her personal life. Last year, she attended a Taylor Swift concert in Miami despite the pop star's endorsement of former Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Ivanka Trump leaves the New York State Supreme Court on November 8, 2023. Ivanka Trump leaves the New York State Supreme Court on November 8, 2023. James Devaney/GC Images via Getty Images What to Know Over the weekend, Ivanka shared photos of family and friends on Instagram, as well as one of the book Untamed by Glennon Doyle. The author has previously spoken out against the Trump administration. Untamed is Doyle's memoir, described on Amazon as a story about how she "learned that a responsible mother is not one who slowly dies for her children, but one who shows them how to fully live. It is the story of navigating divorce, forming a new blended family, and discovering that the brokenness or wholeness of a family depends not on its structure but on each member's ability to bring her full self to the table." In August, Doyle shared a photo on Instagram at the Democratic National Convention voicing support for Harris. "Because in 76 days, when the votes are being counted, we will watch knowing we did everything, everything in our power to keep our children, your children, all children protected from Donald Trump and JD Vance having any power at all over their planet, their families, their bodies, their futures," Doyle wrote. The author wrote in an October post that if "Trump wins, we lose." "There are 19 Days until Election Day: The day that will determine whether we will – or will not – have the right to make decisions about our bodies and our lives. And whether future generations will have fundamental freedoms," she wrote. Ivanka Trump has generally avoided discussing politics after her father left the White House in January 2021. Earlier this year, she stated during an interview on the Skinny Confidential podcast that she does not intend to return to politics for the sake of her children. What People Are Saying Ivanka Trump, on the Skinny Confidential podcast in January: "I love policy and impact. I hate politics. And unfortunately, the two are is a darkness to that world that I don't really want to welcome into mine. To some degree, I'm at the center of the storm because my father is about to be president. It's a very dark negative. And some people love like the gladiator aspect of it, you know, the fight that, that was never me." Ivanka Trump in November 2022: "While I will always love and support my father, going forward, I will do so outside the political arena." Glennon Doyle wrote on Instagram in July 2024: "On Sunday night, 44,000 women gathered with @winwithblackwomen to support Kamala Harris, and raised over $1 million. It's our turn to show up." What Happens Next Ivanka Trump has not signaled that she plans to return to politics anytime soon.
