
Skulls of 19 Black Americans Return to New Orleans After 150 Years in Germany
Sometime before Jan. 10, 1872, a young Black laborer named William Roberts checked himself into Charity Hospital in New Orleans. Just 23 years old, he was from Georgia and had a strong build, according to hospital records. His only recorded sickness was diarrhea.
He was one of 19 Black patients who died at the hospital in December 1871 and January 1872, and whose skulls were sent to Germany to be studied by a doctor researching a now wholly discredited science that purported a correlation between the shape and size of a skull and a person's intellect and character.
The skulls languished in Germany for about 150 years until Leipzig University contacted the city of New Orleans two years ago to repatriate them.
They were returned to New Orleans this month, and the 19 people are being honored on Saturday morning with a jazz funeral before the skulls are interred.
While the return of human remains from museum collections has become more common, the repatriation of these 19 Black cranial remains to New Orleans is believed to be the first major international restitution of the remains of Black Americans from Europe, according to Paul Wolff Mitchell, a researcher at the University of Amsterdam who studies the 19th century history of race and science in the United States and Europe.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
10 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Pardons ‘Chrisley Knows Best' Stars, Yet IRS Tax Lessons Remain
Todd and Julie Chrisley were convicted of tax evasion and bank fraud, and have been in prison since January 2023. Todd was sentenced to twelve years, and Julie was sentenced to seven years. But their long sentences ended when they were issued full pardons by President Trump. The President said he thought they had been treated harshly, but that is not unusual for the kind of bank fraud and tax evasion charges of which they were convicted. The Chrisleys may no longer need to worry about the big mistakes that landed them in jail, but there are still some big lessons in their case that remain important for observers. According to The Department of Justice Press Release when they were sentenced: False statements to auditors are a huge mistake. Conduct during the audit can be pivotal, and is one reason to hire professionals to handle it. Some people end up in criminal tax trouble because they mishandle a civil IRS audit. Whether it is the FBI or the IRS asking questions, don't lie. And don't engage in evasive or obstructionist behavior during an IRS audit. You may think you can outsmart the IRS or manipulate the government to come out ahead, but above-board communications with the IRS are best. Evasive or obstructive behavior during a tax audit can land you in very hot water. IRS criminal tax cases can start with an investigation, but sometimes, criminal tax cases come out of civil IRS audits. Sometimes even simple interactions with the IRS can go south. If an IRS auditor discovers something suspicious in a civil audit, the auditor can notify the IRS's Criminal Investigation Division. The IRS is not obligated to tell you that this criminal 'referral' is occurring. The IRS auditor might suspend the audit without explanation, and you might think that the audit is over, or is stalled and might not ever resume. Meanwhile, the IRS can be quietly building a criminal case against you. Saying different things to your bank and to the IRS was one of the Chrisleys problems. Prosecutors showed that the Chrisleys provided banks with personal financial statements containing false information, and that they fabricated bank statements to get millions of dollars in loans. You don't want to lie on either a loan application or a tax return, and having two documents side by side can easily show that at least one of them is wrong. The Chrisleys lost in the face of government claims that they lied to get $30 million in bank loans, and then spent it on a lavish lifestyle that they could not afford. Although the Chrisleys were raking in the cash, they failed to pay federal income taxes for multiple years. The Chrisleys drew enormous attention to themselves over and over again. Avoid lavish spending, especially publicly. It's bad enough if you are skirting your tax obligations, but, if you are doing that and simultaneously living lavishly, it can look even worse.


Fox News
24 minutes ago
- Fox News
Girls' track and field athletes don't stand on podium next to trans athlete at Oregon state championship
A pair of girls' track and field athletes did not stand on the medal podium alongside a transgender athlete for high jump at the Oregon state championship on Saturday night. Footage obtained by Fox News Digital showed the two high school seniors, Reese Eckard of Sherwood High School and Alexa Anderson of Tigard High School, step down from their respective spots on the podium next to a trans athlete who represented Ida B. Wells High School. Eckard, in fourth place, and Anderson, in third, each finished ahead of the trans athlete, who tied for fifth place. But the two females faced the opposite direction as the other competitors received their medals from officials. The footage then showed an official confront the two young women, and gesture for them to move away. Eckard and Anderson were then seen walking away from the podium and standing off to the side. Fox News Digital has reached out to the Oregon School Activities Association for a response. The trans athlete previously competed in the boys' category in 2023 and 2024, Fox News Digital previously reported. Eckard and Anderson were praised for not standing on the podium on social media, and were even shouted out by prominent conservative activist Riley Gaines. Girls and women making symbolic gestures to protest trans inclusion in sports has become a growing trend in 2025. On May 17 at a California track and field sectional final, Reese Hogan of Crean Lutheran High School stepped from the second-place spot onto the first-place medal podium after her trans opponent, AB Hernandez stepped down from it. Hogan's stunt was lauded on social media by Gaines and others. On April 2, footage of women's fencer Stephanie Turner kneeling to protest a trans opponent at a competition in Maryland, and subsequently getting punished for it, went viral and ignited global awareness and scrutiny against USA Fencing. Oregon is one of many Democratic-controlled states that saw transgender athletes compete in girls' track and field championships this weekend, with other highly-publicized incidents taking place in California, Washington, Maine and Minnesota. The America First Policy Institute (AFPI), a nonpartisan research institute, filed a Title IX discrimination complaint against Oregon for its laws that allow biological males to compete in girls' sports on May 27. The complaint was filed to the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights, which has already launched Title IX investigations against the high school sports leagues in California, Minnesota, Maine and Massachusetts. "Every girl deserves a fair shot – on the field, on the podium, and in life," said Jessica Hart Steinmann, AFPI's executive general counsel and vice chair of the Center for Litigation, in a statement. "When state institutions knowingly force young women to compete against biological males, they're violating federal law and sending a devastating message to female athletes across the country." President Donald Trump signed the "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports" executive order on Feb. 5 and his administration has made combating the continued enabling of trans athletes in girls' sports by Democratic states a priority. The U.S. Department of Justice has already launched a lawsuit against Maine for its defiance of Trump's executive order, and the president suggested on Tuesday that federal funding pauses could be coming against California amid the situation involving Hernandez. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
YAHOO POLL: Do you agree with US defence chief's comparison of Donald Trump and Lee Kuan Yew?
In his address at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a leading security and defence forum focused on the Asia-Pacific, in Singapore on Saturday (31 May), US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth invoked comparisons between President Donald Trump's approach towards the Indo-Pacific and Singapore's founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew's well-known pragmatism, "shaped by a preference for engaging on the basis of commerce and sovereignty – not war". "These two historic men share a willingness to challenge old ways of doing things that no longer make sense. Under President Trump's leadership, we are applying this common sense approach here in the Indo-Pacific and throughout the world," he said. Other polls: YAHOO POLL: Do you support harsher punishments for animal abusers? YAHOO POLL: When in the day is best to take a shower? YAHOO POLL: Have you used an automated bot before? Hegseth was underlining the US' new approach in dealing with the rest of the world, where "America does not have or seek permanent enemies". "The United States is not interested in the moralistic and preachy approach to foreign policy of the past. We are not here to pressure other countries to embrace and adopt policies or ideologies. We are not here to preach to you about climate change or cultural issues. We are not here to impose our will on you," he said. Still, Hegseth called on Asian countries to increase their defence spending to match levels that the US expects of European allies, saying that they bear the brunt of the 'threat' of China and North Korea in their backyards. Do you agree with Hegseth's comparison of US President Donald Trump and Singapore's founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew's "common sense" approach? Related China says Hegseth is touting a Cold War mentality in calling the country a threat Top defense officials say Ukraine war has blurred lines, exposing global threats Did China take a back seat by not having its defence minister attend this year's Shangri-La Dialogue?