Australia condemns Iranian strike on US base, urges diplomacy
The Albanese government has condemned an Iranian strike on a major US base in the Middle East.
Iran overnight fired missiles at the Al Udeid Air base in Qatar in response to US strikes on its nuclear facilities at the weekend.
The Trump administration has said it was informed of the attack beforehand and Qatar was able to shoot down the Iranian missiles without any casualties.
Mark Butler was the first senior Albanese government minister to front media on Tuesday.
He condemned the Iranian attack and urged Tehran to return to the negotiating table.
'The Australian government does condemn this latest attack,' the Health Minister told Nine.
'We're pleased at reports there are no casualties from the attack, but again urged the Iranians to return to the table.
'It's important for them, but also for the region and the broader international community that we see a de-escalation in this conflict.
'Iran cannot be in a position where there's the threat of a full-blown war or further escalation. Here it is now behoves them to return to the table.'
Donald Trump has dismissed the Iranian strike as a 'very weak response' to the shock US operation over the weekend, which involved American bombers flying a 36-hour mission to pound three uranium enrichment sites with so-called bunker buster bombs.
'Iran has officially responded to our Obliteration of their Nuclear Facilities with a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered,' the US President posted on social media.
'There have been 14 missiles fired — 13 were knocked down, and 1 was 'set free,' because it was headed in a nonthreatening direction.
'I am pleased to report that NO Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done.
'Most importantly, they've gotten it all out of their 'system,' and there will, hopefully, be no further HATE.
'I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured.
'Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same.'
A little later, Mr Trump posted: 'CONGRATULATIONS WORLD, IT'S TIME FOR PEACE!'
It remains unclear if Iran still holds substantial amounts of enriched uranium.
The regime has said it moved much of its stockpiles out of the facilities the US struck before the attack.
Meanwhile, Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has vowed not to 'submit to anyone's harassment'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Support for military action should depend on rule of law
To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. WAR The recent US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities raise serious questions, not just about Iran's objectives, but about how military force is authorised in a democracy. President Donald Trump's decision to bypass Congress wasn't only constitutionally shaky, but it also set a dangerous precedent for unchecked executive power. Some have been quick to call any hesitation or push for diplomacy a sign of weakness. However, that's a simplistic view of a complex issue. Australia's decision to advocate for talks shows that we're thinking things through and sticking to what is right while keeping our long-term interests in mind. Backing our allies doesn't mean nodding along with every move they make. Our support should reflect our democratic values and respect for the rule of law. Bombs don't build peace; working together through proper channels has a much better chance of achieving it. Alistair McLellan, Yarrawonga Rethink alliance If only there were more Geoffrey Robertsons around to dispense incisive comment moulded by critical thinking (' Trump's rap sheet is long, but this may be his worst crime ', 23/6). The crux of the issue, with regards to the US' unprovoked bombing of another country, is entwined in the past efforts of United Nations members who, with honest intentions, strived to make the planet a safer, more secure place after the horrors of World War II. The UN has become hobbled by its own members. The fact that the Security Council has five permanent members of which two are actively engaged in 'aggressor actions' against fellow UN members speaks for itself. That these five countries have veto powers is beyond comprehension, and makes a mockery of the United Nations concept. President Trump, egged on by Benjamin Netanyahu, obviously never thought it through when he mulled over the idea of bombing Iran's alleged nuclear facilities. Australia has to tread carefully here and rethink its alliance with a potentially dangerous ally. David Legat, South Morang Iranian risks downplayed In downplaying Iran's threat to Israel, Geoffrey Robertson neither mentions the Iranian regime's 46-year-long commitment to destroy the Jewish state, nor that due to Iran, for over 20 months Israel has been fighting a war on as many as seven fronts. (And it's Israel who Iran primarily refers to as Little Satan, not the UK). Robertson is just another Israel critic who not only attempts to criminalise Israel's right to self defence, but who also condemns any other nation that assists Israel to this end. His likening of Saddam Hussein's 'mythical weapons of mass destruction' to Iran's nuclear program is absurd, given the atomic watchdog's explicit concerns about Iran's large stockpile of near weapons-grade uranium. Geoff Feren, St Kilda East Not all citizens In an effort to reduce conflating toxic governments with innocent people can we all make a concerted effort to add 'government' after talking about countries involved in current conflicts – Iran, Israel, Palestine, Russia, US – the list goes on. From talking to people from many of these countries in recent days, it strikes me that this distinction would make a difference to the racism experienced by citizens who did not ask to be led by dictators and zealots. Sara McMillan, Frankston South Slavish support As more reports surface that the US bombing of Iran was against international law, our relationship with the US seems to be undergoing change, (' PM stance marks shift from past ', 24/6). Our PM has now endorsed the attack, saying nothing about the legality of the action Australia must consider. Do we uphold international law or are we slavishly committed to support the US, the AUKUS deal and the erratic actions of Donald Trump? We can't have it both ways. For me, the law wins. Lorel Thomas, Blackburn South Nuclear powers Your correspondent seemingly sees no difference between the governments of Iran and Russia, and Israel and the US (Letters, 23/6), or why some can have nuclear weapons but Iran can't. Israel's Netanyahu is a democratically elected leader, like Trump, and has been fighting wars started and forced on his country by Iran and its proxies. They are determined to destroy the Jewish state, just as Russia is to destroy Ukraine. Neither the US nor Israel intend to destroy any state. Iran's regime, like Russia's, is autocratic, oppresses its own people, and strives for regional hegemony. Iran does so by having its proxies destabilise and cause violence throughout the region. A nuclear-armed Iran would be a total disaster for any prospect of Middle East peace. Unlike Israel, Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Agreement, which entitled it to international assistance in accessing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes in exchange for refraining from developing nuclear weapons. It is clearly in breach of this agreement. Mark Kessel, Caulfield North History repeats Talk of regime change has reminded Age correspondents of disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan. Surviving CIA patriots who pursued US strategic and business interests in places like Central America, Vietnam, the Congo, Brazil and Chile – and many more – should probably be confined to their retirement communities. Norman Huon, Port Melbourne
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Sharp deterioration': Queensland budget sparks S&P Global credit warning
Queensland's finances are on shaky ground after a reduced slice of the GST, credit ratings agency S&P Global Ratings says. The updated rating comes as the state government released its budget Tuesday, showing next year's deficit will rise by $1.7bn to $8.6bn. 'Today's Queensland budget highlights a sharp deterioration in the state's finances,' S&P's government ratings director Anthony Walker said in a note. 'The negative outlook on the credit rating highlights the size and pace of the state's fiscal decline, rising debt levels and potentially weaker liquidity coverage. 'The new government has refreshed, rather than redesigned, the state's fiscal strategy, with a greater emphasis on stabilising its ratio of non-financial public sector debt to revenue. Debt continues to rise to fund operating deficits and a growing infrastructure budget.' S&P points to falling coal royalties, the reduced GST allocation and the previous Labor government's decisions for the state's fiscal deterioration. On Tuesday, Treasurer David Janetzki delivered the first Liberal National budget in more than a decade. The LNP administration has trimmed net debt to $205.7bn by 2028-29. Mr Janetzki promised the electorate Queensland was 'on a path to surplus', with the budget papers showing a healthier deficit of $1.1bn by 2029. 'We are front-loading investment into jobs and services that will bring long-term benefits to the Queensland people,' he said. But S&P points to elevated risks for the state's credit rating 'if fiscal and debt ratios are structurally weaker than in the past with little prospect of improvement within the next two years'. 'It shows debt is increasing to cover the state's weak operating position and fund its large infrastructure pipeline,' Mr Walker said. 'We don't believe Queensland is overly exposed to ongoing global uncertainties compared with other Australian states.'
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australia needs to find its courage because no matter what Trump says, this is not over
On Tuesday morning Australian time, President Donald Trump posted a message to Truth Social, declaring that a temporary 'CEASEFIRE!' had been agreed to by the United States, Israel and Iran, and that it would come into effect within hours. But what the president says or posts to his social media platform is rarely reliable or consistent. Though a ceasefire has since been agreed to, neither Iran nor Israel had confirmed their agreement at the time of Trump's post. Not that Trump has any real interest in what other leaders think, know or do. Not long before this so-called 'PEACEFUL and RESPECTFUL' ceasefire agreement was reached, Trump speculated (on social media, of course) about a 'regime change' in Iran. It was 'not politically correct' to say it, he wrote, but 'why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' It's never about regime change. Until it is. Trump has long framed himself as the anti-war president. Both his Make America Great Again supporter base (some of whom are genuinely anti-war), and many in the media lapped up his messaging. But this has never been true. He is not anti-war. He's not even an isolationist. Trump relishes violence and assertions of power. Already since returning to the White House in late January, his administration has bombed Yemen, and now Iran. Loading Trump is undeniably anti certain types of war, and anti certain types of people dying in them. He is also anti losing wars. He is the worst instincts of American power personified, violently asserting might over right. For Australians, this week has been a reminder for us all of the significant risks and potential consequences of being aligned to a nation led by someone like this. Australia – still, we are told, an important ally of the US – was not informed in advance of the strikes, even though Australian systems and bases, including the joint facilities at Pine Gap, may very well have been used to execute them.
