
Can France and Algeria patch things up?
The diplomatic relationship between France and Algeria entered a critical phase this month, amid escalating bilateral tensions.
Relations between France and Algeria, deeply rooted in a colonial history that continues to shape their interactions, have long been fractious. The current crisis, which kicked off over the arrest of an Algerian consular official in France, comes in the context of a broader struggle over identity, influence and historical narratives.
The consular official was among three Algerian nationals indicted by French prosecutors over the 2024 abduction of Amir Boukhors, a Paris-based critic of the Algerian government.
In retaliation, Algeria expelled 12 French diplomatic staff this month, prompting France to expel 12 Algerian officials in a tit-for-tat move, while also recalling its ambassador in Algiers.
This is just the latest downturn in a relationship that has been marked by repeated diplomatic crises over the years.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Despite the formal end of colonialism, France remains a key political, economic and cultural player in Algeria. France's continued involvement in North African politics and its large Algerian diaspora have kept the former colony within the sphere of French strategic interests.
In 2021, tensions boiled over when French President Emmanuel Macron questioned the existence of an Algerian nation prior to French colonisation, and accused the Algerian regime of exploiting historical memory for political gain. Algeria responded by recalling its ambassador and temporarily banning French military aircraft from its airspace.
Point of contention
The geopolitical landscape has further strained relations. France's endorsement of Morocco's autonomy plan for the Western Sahara last year was perceived by Algeria as a betrayal, given its support for the Polisario Front.
This shift in French policy has been a point of contention, leading to a decline in trade and cooperation between the two nations. In addition, planned joint military exercises between France and Morocco near the Algerian border were condemned by Algeria as a 'provocation'.
Domestic political considerations in both countries often shape foreign policy postures. In France, politicians across the spectrum use the Algeria issue and migration to appeal to nationalist sentiments. In Algeria, criticising France also serves to reinforce nationalist credentials, and to distract from internal challenges, such as political and economic stagnation.
For any form of lasting reconciliation, there must be a candid reckoning with the past, a redefinition of mutual interests, and a de-politicisation of historical memory
Further complicating matters, France has threatened to review its 1968 migration agreement with Algeria, which has facilitated the settlement of Algerians in France, amid a dispute over Algeria's refusal to take back deported nationals.
The two countries also have divergent visions for regional security. France has historically positioned itself as a key actor in the Sahel through military operations, while Algeria, guided by its principle of non-interventionism, has opposed foreign armies in the region.
Algeria's growing relations with powers such as Russia, China and Turkey have also alarmed Paris, while Algeria's rivalry with Morocco - a close French ally - creates additional tensions.
In the energy sector, Algeria is a significant supplier of gas to Europe and has sought to capitalise on the continent's energy diversification efforts amid the Ukraine crisis. France's ambition to act as a Mediterranean energy hub might conflict with Algeria's own energy diplomacy.
In the defence sector, Algeria has diversified its arms procurement away from France, favouring Russian and Chinese suppliers. Economic frictions are also visible in trade agreements and investment policies, with Algeria adopting a more protectionist stance in recent years.
Long shadow
Despite recurring tensions, both sides have periodically attempted rapprochement. Macron's 2022 visit to Algeria was seen as a step towards resetting relations, resulting in the establishment of a joint commission of historians to examine colonial history. However, the effectiveness of such initiatives remains limited without genuine political will.
France remains a major investor in Algeria, and cooperation in the education, energy and counterterrorism sectors continues. But can such functional cooperation be insulated from the deeper structural and historical sources of tension?
The colonial past casts a long shadow over France-Algeria relations. Efforts at reconciliation have been hindered by differing narratives concerning the Algerian War. While Macron has expressed hope for a 'reconciliation of memories', Algeria has criticised France's reluctance to return key historical documents, viewing the issue as a significant obstacle to genuine healing.
The memory conflict also plays out domestically within France. The Pieds-Noirs (European settlers in Algeria), Harkis (Algerians who fought for France), and descendants of Algerian immigrants all have conflicting narratives about colonialism and the war. French leaders must attempt to balance their interests, often resulting in symbolic gestures rather than substantive reconciliation.
Diplomatic spat escalates as Algeria orders French embassy officials to leave Read More »
In Algeria, meanwhile, state narratives glorify the anti-colonial struggle as a foundational myth of national identity. This serves to legitimise the ruling elite, but it also hampers efforts to move towards a future-oriented partnership.
Indeed, memory politics are central to Franco-Algerian tensions. France's reluctance to fully acknowledge the crimes of colonialism, including systemic torture and massacres during the war, has long been a source of discord. While Macron has taken steps to recognise specific atrocities, such as the 1961 Paris massacre of Algerian protesters, his approach is seen by many in Algeria as insufficient and ambiguous.
Migration is another central point of friction. France hosts a large Algerian diaspora, and issues related to integration, identity and Islam in France are often linked - sometimes problematically - to Algeria. Policies on visa issuance, deportations and accusations of religious extremism often fuel diplomatic rows.
Macron's 2021 decision to sharply reduce the number of visas granted to Algerian nationals, citing non-cooperation on deportations, led to a wave of tensions, reflecting the interconnected nature of migration, security and identity politics.
France and Algeria are locked in a cycle where history continues to cast a long shadow over the present. For any form of lasting reconciliation, there must be a candid reckoning with the past, a redefinition of mutual interests and a de-politicisation of historical memory. Only then can the two nations forge a relationship based on equality, respect and shared destiny.
Despite recent diplomatic efforts, the path to reconciliation remains fraught with challenges, as has been underscored this month. Without substantive progress on key issues, including migration cooperation and historical reconciliation, a lasting rapprochement may be elusive.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
44 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel opens fire on Palestinians seeking aid, as UN warns of relief obstruction
Israeli attacks have killed at least 15 Palestinians and wounded many others waiting to receive aid in central Gaza in the latest assault on aid seekers in recent weeks. According to local sources, Israeli forces opened fire on Palestinians as they gathered around relief distribution points operated and organised by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The GHF was launched at the end of May after Israel imposed a total blockade on all supplies to Gaza for nearly three months, which the United Nations says pushed the enclave's 2.3 million people to the verge of famine. Since its operations began, more than 274 Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded while seeking food at distribution sites, which are guarded by US private military contractors and overseen by Israeli forces. The UN and aid organisations have accused the US and Israel-backed GHF, which employs private American security and logistics workers, of militarising humanitarian aid. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Jens Laerke, spokesperson for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha), told reporters on Friday that aid distribution and delivery have been stalled as a result of the organisation. 'GHF, I think it's fair to say, has been, from a principled humanitarian standpoint, a failure. "They are not doing what a humanitarian operation should do, which is providing aid to people where they are, in a safe and secure manner.' Meanwhile, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (Unrwa) described the US-Israeli distribution model as a "recipe for chaos", noting that it is "also a distraction from the ongoing atrocities and a waste of resources". "It is weaponising aid and resulting in fear, discrimination, and growing desperation," it added in a post on X. Unrwa urged for the blockade on the Gaza Strip to be lifted and for the UN to resume operations, stressing that "aid must be delivered safely and at scale". Gaza foundation is a humanitarian face to mask Israel's genocide Read More » In another post, the agency warned that restrictions and hostilities continue to "obstruct humanitarian aid deliveries in #Gaza". Israeli forces have killed more than 55,297 Palestinians in Israel's ongoing war on Gaza, which several countries, as well as many international rights groups and experts, now qualify as a genocide. Since the early hours of Saturday, Israeli shelling has killed more than 23 Palestinians across the Gaza Strip, with the Wafa news agency reporting the heaviest bombardment in the central region. In Gaza City, several were killed and wounded after a strike hit a tent sheltering displaced Palestinians near al-Khaldi Mosque. Meanwhile, artillery shelling was reported in al-Tuffah neighbourhood, in Gaza's Old City. Reports from the south of the enclave noted that at least three Palestinians were killed in a drone strike near the Islamic University in Khan Younis. In the same governorate, Israeli troops launched attacks targeting the Hamad City residential towers and the Asdaa area, with tanks opening fire on displaced Palestinians.


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israeli defence minister warns ‘Tehran will burn' if missile attacks continue
Tehran launched retaliatory strikes on Israel into Saturday morning, as the Israeli army declared Iran its primary war front a day after launching its biggest-ever air offensive against the Islamic Republic. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz warned Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei that "Tehran will burn" if it keeps firing missiles at Israeli civilians. Air raid sirens sounded across Israel, sending residents rushing into shelters as Iran launched five successive waves of missiles into the centre and north of the country. Israel said it had intercepted most of the missiles; however, the attacks caused extensive damage and killed at least three people. "The Iranian dictator is taking the citizens of Iran hostage, bringing about a reality in which they, and especially Tehran's residents, will pay a heavy price for the flagrant harm inflicted upon Israel's citizens. If Khamenei continues to fire missiles at the Israeli home front, Tehran will burn," Katz said in a statement. One woman was killed in the city of Ramat Gan, where nine buildings were also destroyed and hundreds of apartments in the area were damaged, according to Israeli media. Two other people were killed when an Iranian missile also struck near a home in the central Israeli city of Rishon Lezion. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In Tel Aviv, a 32-storey building was hit and caught fire, according to the Haaretz newspaper, while other areas suffered extensive damage. Israel's paramedic services said more than 70 people in total were wounded in the Iranian attack on central Israel, including 34 in the Tel Aviv area. Meanwhile, Israel targeted Iran's air defences and missile launchers on Saturday as it pressed ahead with its assault on Iran's military and nuclear capabilities. Iranian state TV reported that two senior Iranian generals - Gholamreza Mehrabi, deputy head of intelligence of the armed forces general staff, and Mehdi Rabbani, deputy head of operations - were killed in Israeli strikes. On Friday, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations said that 78 people had been killed and 320 wounded in the first wave of Israeli strikes. Iranian state TV reported on Saturday that an Israeli strike on a residential complex in Tehran killed at least 60 people, including 20 children. Exclusive: US quietly sent hundreds of Hellfire missiles to Israel before Iran attack Read More » Citing senior Iranian military officials, Iran's Fars News Agency reported that strikes against Israel will continue, with targets expected to expand to include US bases in the region in the coming days. "This confrontation will not end with last night's limited actions and Iran's strikes will continue, and this action will be very painful and regrettable for the aggressors," Fars reported. The Israeli army said on Saturday that Gaza has become a secondary front in the war and that the army's primary focus has now shifted to Iran. Israeli military sources, quoted by Haaretz, said that the Israeli air force has struck around 150 targets inside Iran. The military has admitted for the first time that it attacked, but did not destroy, the nuclear site in Fordow, south of Tehran, in Qom province. The Israeli army's chief of staff, Eyal Zamir, said Israel's overnight strikes took out Iran's air defence system, allowing its forces to now operate freely over Iranian airspace.


The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Iran signals it is still open to nuclear talks with the US despite Israel's assault
Iran said on Saturday it has not yet decided whether to take part in Sunday's latest round of talks with the US, leaving the door open to participation despite the recent Israeli military escalation. 'It is still unclear what decision we will make,' Esmaeil Baghaei, the representative for Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs told state-run media. The US hopes that talks with Tehran about its nuclear programme will continue, despite Israel's attacks on Iran that have called the merit of negotiations into question. Following Friday's strikes, Iran said it was withdrawing from the sixth round of nuclear negotiations that were to take place in Oman on Sunday with US special envoy to the Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. But Mr Baghaei suggested that his government is still open to participating, despite saying that Israel's actions 'effectively rendered talks meaningless'. The talks were supposed to forestall military action against Iran by forcing it to give up all uranium enrichment capabilities and abandon its drive to develop a nuclear weapon. For weeks, US President Donald Trump sounded optimistic that a deal could be achieved, while also threatening dire consequences for Iran if it did not reach an agreement. Ultimately, Israel rendered those talks moot by launching a 'pre-emptive' strike against Iran's military leaders and its nuclear sites. Despite those actions, Mr Trump insisted Iran possibly has a 'second chance' to come to the negotiating table. Difficult position Mr Baghaei accused the US of being somewhat responsible for the attacks that killed several high-ranking Iranian military officials and dozens of civilians. 'It is inconceivable for Iran – and indeed for anyone in the world – that the Zionist regime could have carried out such a reckless and aggressive act of war in the region without the co-operation, co-ordination, or at the very least the conscious green light of the US. 'We hold the US government responsible for the consequences of this reckless and unlawful act by the Zionist regime,' he added. Iran finds itself in a difficult position: walking away from the talks would suggest Israel has proven Tehran is not serious about a nuclear deal, while attending could make it appear weak after the Israeli assault. The UN nuclear watchdog's 35-nation board of governors passed a resolution on June 12 formally declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in almost 20 years, a move Tehran claimed was 'clearly designed to produce a crisis'. Tehran also said it would open a new uranium enrichment site. Hours later, Israel launched strikes on Iran, prompting Tehran to retaliate by firing dozens of missiles towards Israel, killing at least three people and injuring more than 150.