logo
Africa needs to lead the charge for an international anti-corruption court

Africa needs to lead the charge for an international anti-corruption court

Mail & Guardian06-05-2025

Among the participants at the launch of a policy brief, International Anti-Corruption Court: How Will It Serve Africa?, were Justice Richard Goldstone, Chief Justice Martha Koome of Kenya, Justice Key Dingake. Photo: Supplied
If corruption is a disease to our society and body politic, impunity is what stops us from healing. For far too long, Africa has been left gasping, looking for a cure to overcome the devastation wrought by corruption.
At the recent launch of a new policy brief titled International Anti-Corruption Court: How Will It Serve Africa?, a panel of judges, scholars and policymakers sent a clear message: African leaders must take ownership of the movement to establish a new international anti-corruption Court (IAC court) — or risk allowing the same old cycles of injustice and theft to continue unchallenged. Support for this initiative, the establishment of an IAC court is an endeavour African states can direct and help realise.
The launch opened with remarks from Justice Richard Goldstone, followed by a message of support from Chief Justice Martha Koome of Kenya, and a keynote by Justice Key Dingake. Backed by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, Integrity Initiatives International, Transparency International Kenya and Good Governance Africa, the gathering drew together some of the continent's most critical voices against corruption.
Speaker after speaker hammered home a grim but familiar reality: Africa remains one of the regions most battered by corruption's effects. From crippled development projects to weakened governance, the costs have been enormous. Worse still, grand corruption — the kind committed by those at the highest levels of power — continues to flourish, often protected by a stubborn culture of impunity.
In the face of this entrenched problem, the idea of an IAC court has gained significant traction. Proponents envision a tribunal that would treat high-level corruption as a crime of international concern — similar to war crimes or crimes against humanity. This court would not replace national justice systems, but complement them, stepping in where domestic courts are unable or unwilling to hold the powerful to account.
The IAC court proposal is gaining momentum. In 2021, a global Declaration calling for its creation was signed by more than 300 leaders from 80 countries, including dozens of former presidents and Nobel laureates. By 2024, a draft treaty and commentary were well under way, prepared by a task force of judges, prosecutors and legal scholars. The vision is clear: a court capable of pursuing the kleptocrats and corporate enablers who now operate with near-total impunity.
Africa's own experience is central to this conversation. The Malabo Protocol, designed to create an African criminal court with jurisdiction over crimes such as corruption, shows that African states have already contemplated regional accountability mechanisms. With only one ratification (Angola), however, the Protocol has remained little more than a good idea on paper.
Meanwhile, the scale of theft remains staggering. The High-Level Panel on Illicit Financial Flows chaired by former president Thabo Mbeki estimated that Africa has lost more than $1 trillion to illicit outflows over the past 50 years — roughly equivalent to all foreign aid received over the same period. The IAC court could play a transformative role here, helping to recover and repurpose stolen assets, returning funds to the communities they were stolen from through orders of restitution and civil suits.
Yet Africa's relationship with international justice is fraught. Understandably so. Many African leaders and citizens remember how international legal mechanisms have often marginalised African voices or served Western interests under the guise of 'universal values'. Scepticism is healthy; but disengagement would be a mistake.
African lawyers, scholars and policymakers have long been at the forefront of reimagining corruption as a human rights violation and a threat to democratic governance. It is African states that pushed for stronger commitments under the African Union Convention Against Corruption, going beyond even the UN Convention Against Corruption in some areas.
The choice ahead is stark. Africa can either sit back and let others design yet another international institution with little regard for African priorities or it can seize this moment to demand a court that truly serves African interests: one that respects sovereignty, enforces accountability and helps return stolen wealth to the people to whom it belongs.
Corruption thrives when accountability is absent. The IAC court is not a magic bullet, but it could be an essential tool in breaking the cycle of impunity that continues to rob Africa of its future.
Prosper S Maguchu is an assistant professor of law specialising in financial crimes and international asset recovery from a human rights-based approach. Karam Singh is the deputy director of the Integrity International Initiatives.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump orders names restored to military bases honoring Confederates
Trump orders names restored to military bases honoring Confederates

Eyewitness News

time5 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Trump orders names restored to military bases honoring Confederates

WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump said Tuesday he has ordered the restoration of the names of several US military bases that honored officers who fought for the Confederacy in the American Civil War. While the redesignations will return the facilities to their original names, they come with a twist, as the bases will ostensibly honor other military personnel who have the same names, and not those who fought to maintain slavery in the South. The Republican president made the announcement in a speech at the country's largest military base, which he had renamed to Fort Bragg in February after predecessor Joe Biden changed it to Fort Liberty in 2023. "We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill and Fort Robert E. Lee," Trump told soldiers. "We won a lot of battles out of those forts. It's no time to change." The move reverses a renaming process begun in the wake of the death of George Floyd, whose murder by police in 2020 focused a spotlight on systemic racism. A naming commission ultimately recommended hundreds of locations be redesignated, among them nine US Army bases named after Confederate officers who had fought for the South in defense of slavery during the country's 1861-1865 Civil War. The Pentagon said Tuesday that the new base names, while consistent with the last names of the Confederate officers, actually honor different military veterans. For example, while the original Fort Bragg honors Confederate general Braxton Bragg, the new name commemorates Roland L. Bragg, a little-known World War II hero, officials said. Fort Robert E Lee in Virginia, which was redesignated Fort Gregg-Adams in honor of two African-American servicemembers, was changed back to Fort Lee. But the new name honors Medal of Honor recipient Private Fitz Lee who fought in the Spanish-American War, said the Pentagon, and not the Robert E Lee who was overall commander of the Confederate army.

Operation New Broom is echo of apartheid past
Operation New Broom is echo of apartheid past

The Citizen

time5 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Operation New Broom is echo of apartheid past

If Operation New Broom is the new face of immigration enforcement in South Africa, then shame on all of us. In a move that belongs more in the archives of apartheid than in a democratic constitutional state, the department of home affairs has launched 'Operation New Broom', a campaign whose stated aim is to 'combat illegal immigration' through biometric verification and mass raids. Sweeping with a 'broom' is no innocent metaphor, it's drawing a very intentional parallel between illegal migrants and rubbish, a dehumanising tell-tale signal of stripped rights, dignity and humanity. An affront to every value enshrined in our Bill of Rights. If this is the new face of immigration enforcement in South Africa, then shame on all of us. Barely two days after the campaign was launched on 21 May, more than 50 individuals, including children, pregnant women and asylum seekers, were rounded up during an early morning raid at the Plastic View informal settlement in Tshwane. Minister Leon Schreiber called it 'a new era of digital border enforcement'. What followed was hardly innovation; it was humiliation, institutional cruelty dressed up in the vocabulary of tech-enabled governance. Lawyers for Human Rights and 20 other organisations said the operation 'marks a troubling descent into repressive state practices reminiscent of the apartheid past'. That is no exaggeration. Operation New Broom is not a policy, it is abuse of power, a show of force for the sake of political optics, where the primary victims are those least able to defend themselves. Children were taken from schools and homes without due process. Babies were detained at the Lindela Repatriation Centre, a facility unfit to care for them. ALSO READ: Home Affairs launches Operation New Broom to tackle illegal immigration The constitution is clear: the detention of children must be a last resort and for the shortest appropriate period. These events lay bare a troubling trend: the creeping securitisation of SA's borders and the scapegoating of migrants to mask governance failures. This cannot be claimed to be part of an effort to address unlawful entry, it is a campaign showcase masquerading as immigration enforcement, a political theatre dressed as policy. A familiar playbook keeps unfolding: blame the foreigner, distract the public and dress up persecution as patriotism. Ahead of the 2026 municipal elections, politicians like Gayton McKenzie (Patriotic Alliance) have already begun calling 'Abahambe' (let them go) for the removal of migrants along ethnic and racial lines, embracing his xenophobic labelling. Taking centre stage globally and in SA at the same time was the media frenzy surrounding the 59 Afrikaners granted refugee status by the US on the basis of alleged racial and economic persecution. A sad irony that is difficult to ignore, particularly from within the African continent and SA itself, where the principles of Ubuntu, as enshrined in the constitution, call for compassion, shared humanity and the protection of the vulnerable. The Constitutional Court has repeatedly affirmed Ubuntu as a guiding principle not only in private law, but in matters of state conduct. ALSO READ: Big changes coming for ID, passport applications and birth registrations – Home Affairs It is meant to embody dignity, empathy and social solidarity – all of which are absent from Operation New Broom. Though the department has framed its action as lawful and measured and Cabinet has publicly praised it, nothing about the manner in which these raids were conducted passes constitutional muster. This is not a crisis that ends at the border. Migrants may be the primary targets today, but the machinery of arbitrary enforcement rarely limits itself to one category of individuals. Even SA citizens without access to proper documentation already encounter a contrarian bureaucracy on many levels. In August last year, 700 000 IDs were automatically unilaterally blocked by the department, some merely on the suspicion of fraud or due to duplicate IDs reflecting in the systems, with no prior warning or due diligence. The courts confirmed this to be unconstitutional because it lacked fair procedures, such as notice, investigation and an opportunity for appeal. The dysfunction is systemic and it does not discriminate as neatly as the policies claim to. Without constitutional watchdogs and public scrutiny, no-one is immune. Today's raid is tomorrow's precedent. Some have pointed to the use of biometric verification as a sign of progress and, indeed, it can significantly streamline processes and increase efficiencies on multiple levels. ALSO READ: EFF calls for treason charges against corrupt Home Affairs officials But in the hands of untrained officials and opaque institutions, such tools carry significant risk. Mismanagement is not a technical glitch, it is a gateway. Without safeguards, digital enforcement quickly slides into digital authoritarianism. Deploying facial scans and fingerprint readers without legal safeguards or oversight is not governance, it is surveillance. When the state uses such tools in vulnerable communities already suffering from economic exclusion and neglect, it amounts to profiling at scale. This is not a moment for silence or bureaucratic indifference. It is a moment to remember that democracy is measured not by how we treat the powerful, but by how we treat the most vulnerable. State-led roundups, data-driven profiling and the slow bleed of constitutional values is a recipe for instability. Amnesty is not capitulation; it is legal realism. It is an invitation to build a functioning migration system that does not rely on repression to operate. It is time for a new broom, yes, but one that sweeps away injustice, not people. One that restores rights, not just order. NOW READ: Trump-Musk breakup: Will 49 'refugees' return to South Africa?

MK Party says it is ready to fix Joburg
MK Party says it is ready to fix Joburg

TimesLIVE

timea day ago

  • TimesLIVE

MK Party says it is ready to fix Joburg

The MK Party (MKP) has expressed its capability to rescue the city of Joburg and bring it to its former glory, citing its performance in recent by-elections. This comes after DA federal chair Helen Zille expressed interest in running for mayorship in the city in the 2026 local government elections. MKP spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela said the party is ready and capable of transforming the city. 'It goes without saying that given the chance, the MK Party can fix the city of Johannesburg and transform it into the world-class African city it once was,' Ndhlela said. 'One of our most important values of the MK Party's people's mandate is to reclaim the dignity of black people. We are informed by this mandate and urge the people of the city of Johannesburg to know the MK Party is more than capable of leading the city and ensuring reliable representatives who are familiar with the lived realities of those residing in the city are elected.' Ndhlela said the party would present a plan on how to rebuild the city in the build-up to the 2026 local government elections. Zille, a former Cape Town mayor and Western Cape premier, has reportedly been approached to become the DA's candidate for Joburg and is considering it. The MKP has rejected this, saying it's 'nonsensical' to consider someone who doesn't live in Joburg to run the city. 'Given the vast availability of qualified men and women who reside in the city of Johannesburg, it is nonsensical to consider the possibility of a Capetonian resident holding mayoral capacity in a city she is alien to,' Ndhlela said. The party believes there are capable black candidates in Joburg who could do the job. Ndhlela criticised Zille and the ANC, saying the dire state of Joburg is a result of the ANC's leadership. 'It is vital for us to remind Zille and her cronies that the state of disarray found in Johannesburg is courtesy of their absent mayor Dada Morero, and has resulted in the city being brought to its knees. 'Morero and the ANC should hang their heads in shame for emboldening a white supremacist and giving her the confidence to believe she can adequately run the city.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store