
Judge rules Mahmoud Khalil can remain in custody amid green card dispute
A United States federal judge has allowed the administration of President Donald Trump to keep student protester Mahmoud Khalil in custody based on allegations of immigration fraud.
On Friday, Judge Michael Farbiarz of Newark, New Jersey, ruled that Khalil's legal team had not adequately shown why his detention on the charge would be unlawful.
It was a major setback for Khalil, who had been a negotiator for the student protesters at Columbia University demonstrating against Israel's war on Gaza. He was the first high-profile protester to be arrested under Trump's campaign to expel foreign students who participated in pro-Palestinian advocacy.
Just this week, Farbiarz appeared poised to order Khalil's release, on the basis that his detention under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 was unconstitutional.
That law stipulates that the secretary of state – in this case, Marco Rubio – has the power to remove foreign nationals who have 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States'. But Farbiarz ruled that Rubio's use of the law violated Khalil's freedom of speech.
Still, the Trump administration filed additional court papers saying it had another reason for wanting to deport Khalil.
It alleged that Khalil, a permanent US resident, had omitted information from his green-card application that would have otherwise disqualified him from gaining residency.
The Trump administration has long accused Khalil of supporting terrorism through his protest-related activities, something the former graduate student has vehemently denied.
In the case of his green-card application, it argues that Khalil failed to disclose his work with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), a humanitarian organisation. Politicians in Israel and the US have accused UNRWA of ties to the armed group Hamas, an allegation reportedly made without evidence.
Khalil, however, has denied he was ever an 'officer' in UNRWA, as alleged. Instead, his legal team points out that he completed a United Nations internship through Columbia University.
The Trump administration also argues that Khalil did not accurately identify the length of his employment with the Syria Office of the British Embassy in Beirut. Khalil and his legal team, meanwhile, say he accurately identified his departure date from the job as December 2022.
Judge Farbiarz had set Friday morning as a deadline for the Trump administration to appeal Khalil's release on bail. But that deadline was extended to give the government more time to challenge Khalil's release.
Ultimately, Farbiarz allowed the Trump administration to continue its detention of Khalil. He advised Khalil's lawyers to seek release on bail from the immigration court where his deportation trial is being held in Louisiana.
Farbiarz had been weighing a separate habeas corpus petition from the Khalil team that called into question the constitutionality of his continued detention.
Marc Van Der Hout, a lawyer for Khalil, told the Reuters news agency that immigration fraud charges are exceedingly rare, and the Trump administration's use of such charges was simply a political manoeuvre to keep Khalil in lock-up.
'Detaining someone on a charge like this is highly unusual and frankly outrageous,' said Van Der Hout. 'There continues to be no constitutional basis for his detention.'
Another lawyer representing Khalil, Amy Greer, described the new allegations against his green-card application as part of the government's 'cruel, transparent delay tactics'. She noted that Khalil, a new father whose child was born in April, would miss his first Father's Day, which falls this Sunday in the US.
'Instead of celebrating together, he is languishing in ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] detention as punishment for his advocacy on behalf of his fellow Palestinians,' Greer said in a statement.
'It is unjust, it is shocking, and it is disgraceful.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
What are the anti-Trump, ‘No Kings' protests planned across the US?
Americans are taking to the streets on Saturday to protest United States President Donald Trump's policies in thousands of locations across the country. The 'No Kings' protests will coincide with a military parade in Washington, DC, marking the US Army's 250th anniversary, and with Trump's 79th birthday. The demonstrations are planned after days of protests against immigration arrests in multiple US cities. Protesters planning to take part in the No Kings demonstrations said they oppose the Trump administration. The organisers' website said the administration has 'defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services'. Since Trump's inauguration, the administration has sent immigrants to foreign prisons, set immigration arrest quotas, clashed with courts, slashed government jobs and proposed reductions to social services. The website describes the protests as a 'national day of defiance'. The name of the protests is derived from opposition to one-person rule. 'The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings,' the website said. The protests are planned in more than 2,000 cities and towns in all 50 US states as well as in Mexico, Australia, Malawi and some European countries, the organisers' map shows. The protesters plan to gather at a range of meeting spots, such as parks, community centres and public landmarks. Major rallies are planned in Philadelphia, Charlotte, Atlanta, Houston, Chicago and New York. However, the organisers have deliberately left Washington, DC, off the map and protests will not be held there. The reason they provide on their website is: 'Instead of allowing this birthday parade to be the center of gravity, we will make action everywhere else the story of America that day: people coming together in communities across the country to reject strongman politics and corruption.' The protests are organised by a social media movement called 50501, which stands for '50 states, 50 protests, one movement'. Times vary according to location and can be found on the organisers' map. Some locations will begin protesting early, such as Norman, Oklahoma, where the protest is to begin at 9am (14:00 GMT). Others will start demonstrations in the evening. In Big Sur, a rugged region on California's central coast, protests are to begin at 4:30pm (23:30 GMT). On Saturday, the military parade and celebration in Washington, DC, are to begin about 6:30pm (22:30 GMT). Tanks will roll through the streets of the US capital in the first military parade to be staged in the US since 1991 when a parade marked the end of the Gulf War under President George HW Bush. Thousands of soldiers will take part in the parade along with hundreds of military aircraft and vehicles. Army officials have estimated the cost of the parade to be $25m to $45m. The No Kings website said the protests are intended to be peaceful. 'Weapons of any kind, including those legally permitted, should not be brought to events,' it said. However, the No Kings demonstrations are planned after days of protests in multiple US cities against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids and Trump's use of the military to quell protests. The anti-immigration protests began on June 6 in Los Angeles after military-style ICE raids on several locations across the city, resulting in the detention of 44 people. While the protests in all cities have reportedly been largely peaceful, occasional clashes have led to injuries and further arrests. The immigration raids continue, and National Guard soldiers have been deployed in multiple cities. Trump has also sent Marines to Los Angeles. Ahead of the No Kings protests, some Republican leaders have threatened demonstrators with prosecution if protests become violent, some even going as far as to mobilise National Guard forces in advance of the protests. This approach has attracted a large amount of criticism. 'Protests are tumultuous, and military forces are trained to kill,' Gregory Magarian, professor of law at Washington University's School of Law in St Louis, Missouri, told Al Jazeera. When asked about the protests, Trump said at a White House news briefing on Thursday: 'I don't feel like a king, I have to go through hell to get stuff approved.' The president's allies and Republican lawmakers responded with laughter to his response. 'We're not a king at all, thank you very much,' he said. However, Trump has made use of this terminology himself in the past. In February, he posted on his Truth Social platform: 'CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING!' Congestion pricing refers to fees levied on motorists entering cities. It is aimed at reducing road traffic and increasing the use of public transport. Trump wrote the post after Sean Duffy, his transportation secretary, wrote a letter to New York Governor Kathy Hochul ending the US Department of Transportation's agreement with the state for congestion charging in Manhattan. Shortly after, the White House shared a computer-generated photo of Trump wearing a crown on a fake Time magazine cover. Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced on Thursday that he ordered the deployment of more than 5,000 National Guard soldiers and 2,000 state police officers to help manage the anti-ICE protests in the state on the border with Mexico. Abbott also deployed National Guard soldiers in San Antonio during protests against immigration enforcement actions there. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said during a news conference on Tuesday: 'The minute you cross into attacking law enforcement, any type of rioting, any type of vandalism, looting, just be prepared to have the law come down on you.' Republican South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson released a video on his X account warning 'extremist left-leaning groups' against causing disruptions in South Carolina. 'If you attack our officers, destroy property, or threaten innocent lives in South Carolina – you will be arrested, charged, and prosecuted. No excuses. No second chances.' Radical leftist groups and outside agitators are threatening to bring violence and chaos to our communities on June 14 — Flag Day and President Trump's birthday. Let me make this crystal clear:If you attack our officers, destroy property, or threaten innocent lives in South… — Alan Wilson (@AGAlanWilson) June 11, 2025Anti-ICE protests are continuing in Los Angeles and other cities. Civil and human rights attorney Robert Patillo told Al Jazeera that the protests could be expected in 'more than 30 cities, met with a familiar response: more riot gear, more barricades'. 'The protests are spreading because what's happening in Los Angeles isn't unique – it's a mirror,' Patillo said. 'Communities across the country see themselves in the images coming out of LA: the same painful encounters with police, the same racial disparities, the same struggle to make ends meet in a system that feels stacked against them. These aren't isolated incidents. They're part of a deeper, shared experience of injustice that stretches from coast to coast.'


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran says nuclear talks with US ‘meaningless' as Trump pushes for a deal
Iran says dialogue over its nuclear programme with the United States is 'meaningless' after Israel launched its biggest-ever military strike against Iran, which Tehran accuses Washington, DC, of supporting. 'The other side [the US] acted in a way that makes dialogue meaningless. You cannot claim to negotiate and at the same time divide work by allowing the Zionist regime [Israel] to target Iran's territory,' Iran's semiofficial Tasnim news agency quoted its foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei as saying on Saturday. The US has denied the Iranian allegation of being complicit in Israel's attacks and told Tehran at the United Nations Security Council that it would be 'wise' to negotiate over its nuclear programme. US President Donald Trump has called the Israeli attacks on Iran 'excellent' after initially warning Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against action that could jeopardise nuclear talks. Trump on Friday framed the volatile conflict with Israel as a possible 'second chance' for Iran's leadership to avoid further destruction 'before there is nothing left and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire'. The sixth round of US-Iran nuclear talks was set to be held on Sunday in Oman, but it was unclear whether it would go ahead after the Israeli strikes. 'It is still unclear what decision we will make for Sunday,' Iran's IRNA news agency quoted Baghaei as saying on Saturday. Iran denies that its uranium enrichment programme is for anything other than civilian purposes, rejecting Israeli allegations that it is secretly developing nuclear weapons. Netanyahu has pledged to continue the attacks for 'as many days as it takes' to stop Iran from developing a 'nuclear threat'. Trump said on his Truth Social platform that he had warned Iran's leaders that 'it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told, that the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come'. 'And they [Israelis] know how to use it,' he added. Trump has blamed Iran for rejecting US proposals on uranium enrichment and has warned of more brutal Israeli strikes to come. But Hamed Mousavi, professor of political science at Tehran University, told Al Jazeera that many Iranians think it is indeed meaningless to continue nuclear talks with the US when they are being bombed. 'The Israelis essentially killed the diplomatic solution and what was surprising was the Americans were fully coordinating with the Israelis in that regard. So I think it's unlikely the negotiations will continue,' he said. Mousavi said the mood in Iran is 'pretty defiant' and does not seem to support Israeli goals of a regime change in Tehran. 'The Israelis were really expecting some sort of protest or riots in the Iranian capital by the Iranian people. That hasn't happened so far. We don't know if it's going to happen in the future, but the mood right now is actually pretty defiant. I don't really see that many Iranians sympathising with the Israelis.'


Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
‘Drop Israel': How military escalation with Iran divides Trump's base
Washington, DC – After taking the oath of office for his second term in January, United States President Donald Trump said he would push to 'stop all wars' and leave a legacy of a 'peacemaker and unifier'. But six months in, missiles are flying across the Middle East after Israel attacked Iran, risking an all-out regional war that could drag US troops into the conflict. The Israeli strikes on Iran, which Trump has all but explicitly endorsed, are now testing the president's promise to be a harbinger of peace. They are also dividing his base, with many right-wing politicians and commentators stressing that unconditional support for Israel is at odds with the 'America First' platform on which Trump was elected. 'There is a very strong sense of betrayal and anger in many parts of the 'America First' base because they have truly turned against the idea of the US being involved in or supporting any such wars,' said Trita Parsi, executive vice president at the Quincy Institute, a US think tank that promotes diplomacy. 'They have largely turned sceptical of Israel, and they strongly believe that these types of wars are what cause Republican presidencies to become failures — and what causes their broader domestic agenda to be compromised.' Several conservatives questioned the Israeli strikes on Friday, warning that the US must not be dragged into a war that does not serve its interests. Influential conservative commentator Tucker Carlson — seen as a major figure in Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement — said the US should not support the 'war-hungry government' of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases. But not with America's backing,' the Tucker Carlson Network morning newsletter read on Friday. It added that a war with Iran could 'fuel the next generation of terrorism' or lead to the killing of thousands of Americans in the name of a foreign agenda. 'It goes without saying that neither of those possibilities would be beneficial for the United States,' the newsletter said. 'But there is another option: drop Israel. Let them fight their own wars.' Republican Senator Rand Paul also cautioned against war with Iran and slammed hawkish neoconservatives in Washington. 'The American people overwhelming[ly] oppose our endless wars, and they voted that way when they voted for Donald Trump in 2024,' Paul wrote in a social media post. 'I urge President Trump to stay the course, keep putting America first, and to not join in any war between other countries.' Right-wing Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene also sent a message suggesting that she opposes the strikes. She has previously cautioned Trump against attacking Iran based on Israeli assertions that Tehran is about to acquire a nuclear weapon. 'I'm praying for peace. Peace,' she wrote on X. 'That's my official position.' While many of Israel's supporters have cited the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran, the government in Tehran has long denied pursuing a nuclear weapon. Trump's own intelligence chief, Tulsi Gabbard, testified in March that the US 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon'. Charlie Kirk, a key Republican activist and commentator who is a staunch Israel supporter, also voiced scepticism about engaging in a war with Iran. 'I can tell you right now, our MAGA base does not want a war at all whatsoever,' Kirk said on his podcast. 'They do not want US involvement. They do not want the United States to be engaged in this.' Hours before Israel started bombing Iran on Friday — targeting its military bases, nuclear facilities and residential buildings — Trump said that his administration was committed to diplomacy with Tehran. ' Look, it's very simple. Not complicated. Iran can not have a nuclear weapon. Other than that, I want them to be successful. We'll help them be successful,' Trump said at a news conference on Thursday. A sixth round of denuclearisation talks between US and Iranian officials was set to be held in Oman on Sunday. Nevertheless, on Friday, Trump told reporters he had known about Israel's attacks in advance. He did not indicate he had vetoed the bombing campaign, though Secretary of State Marco Rubio did describe Israel's actions as 'unilateral'. Instead, Trump put the onus for the attacks on Iran, saying its officials should have heeded his calls to reach a deal to dismantle the country's nuclear programme. 'I told them it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told, that the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come,' Trump wrote in a social media post. Parsi said that, at the outset, Trump wanted to reach a deal with Iran, but his demands for Tehran to end uranium enrichment led to a deadlock in the talks. 'Instead of pursuing the negotiations in a reasonable way, he adopted the zero enrichment goal, which predictably would lead to an impasse, which predictably the Israelis used to push him towards military strikes and escalation,' he told Al Jazeera. Parsi added that he believed Trump engaged in deception over the past week by pushing diplomacy while knowing that the Israeli strikes were coming. 'Trump deliberately made statements in favour of diplomacy, in favour of not having Israel attack, leading everyone to think that, if there is an attack, it would happen after the six rounds of talks on Sunday,' he said. 'Instead, it happened sooner.' While the Israeli strikes garnered some criticism in Congress, many Republicans and Democrats cheered them on. But a key part of Trump's base has been a segment of the right wing that questions the US's unconditional support for Israel. 'They really are representative of a solid constituency within the Republican Party, especially if you look at younger individuals,' said Jon Hoffman, research fellow in defence and foreign policy at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. Hoffman pointed to a recent Pew Research Center survey that suggested 50 percent of Republicans under the age of 50 have an unfavourable view of Israel. 'Among the electorate itself, the American people are sick and tired of these endless wars,' he told Al Jazeera. Foreign policy hawks who favour military interventions dominated the Republican Party during the presidency of George W Bush, who launched the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan in the aftermath of the attacks on September 11, 2001. But those two conflicts proved to be disastrous. Thousands of US soldiers were killed, and many more were left with lasting physical and psychological scars. Critics also questioned whether the wars advanced US interests in the region — or set them back. The nation-building project in Iraq, for instance, saw the rise of a government friendly to Iran and the emergence of groups deemed to be a threat to global security, including ISIL (ISIS). In Afghanistan, meanwhile, the Taliban returned to power in 2021, almost exactly two decades after the group was ousted by US forces. The US-backed Afghan government quickly crumbled as American troops withdrew from the country. During his campaign for re-election in 2024, Trump tapped into the anger that the two conflicts generated. On multiple occasions, he sketched an alternative timeline where, if he had been president, the collapse of the Afghan government would have never occurred. 'We wouldn't have had that horrible situation in Afghanistan, the most embarrassing moment in the history of our country,' Trump said at one October 2024 rally in Detroit. The US president also slammed his Democratic opponent Kamala Harris for her alliance with Dick Cheney, who served as Bush's vice president, and his daughter Liz Cheney, criticising them as 'war hawks'. 'Kamala is campaigning with Muslim-hating warmonger, Liz Cheney, who wants to invade practically every Muslim country on the planet,' Trump told another crowd in Novi, Michigan. He added that Dick Cheney 'was responsible for invading the Middle East' and 'killing millions'. But critics say Trump's posture towards the Israeli strikes in Iran risks embroiling him in his own Middle East conflict. Hoffman, for instance, pointed to the closeness of the US-Israel relationship and the persistence of officials within the Republican Party who have been pushing for conflict with Iran for decades, like Senator Lindsey Graham. 'There is a tremendous risk of the United States being dragged into this war,' Hoffman said.