No, South Africa's HIV care is not ‘under control'. To pretend so recalls the dark days of Aids denialism
No one should be surprised that the health system in South Africa is straining in the aftermath of Donald Trump's cruel gutting of HIV funding. What is shocking is the political will to pretend otherwise.
As public health workers, researchers, academics, people living with HIV and civil society organisations, we reject the narrative put forward by the government that things are 'under control'. Testing has dropped. Frontline workers are being dismissed. Clinics that served our most marginalised communities have closed or are struggling to keep their doors open. And those most affected, such as transgender people, sex workers and drug users, have not been meaningfully included in any transition planning. The National Treasury and the Department of Health are at odds with each other. Officials within the health department are at odds with each other.
Aaron Motsoaledi, South Africa's minister of health, is in denial, refusing to confront the uncomfortable truth that South Africa is facing the aftermath of the US funding withdrawal and the failure of its own government to plan adequately and act when the writing was on the wall. And that writing has been there for months.
Last month, he told parliament that those 'propagating wrong information about the status of the HIV/Aids campaign in South Africa, in the manner that is being done, is no different from the approach adopted by AfriForum and its ilk, which led Trump to thrash the whole country'.
While the minister may try to blur the lines between critique and sabotage, we will continue to meet his narrative with data, lived experience and facts. What we won't do is sit quietly while being shamefully compared to AfriForum, a group whose entire existence is rooted in protecting apartheid's afterlife.
And it's not just the minister. The president and the so-called government of national unity have, through inaction and silence, allowed this moment to deepen into crisis. Nor has parliament exercised adequate oversight.
The idea that we can fix things through optimism and press briefings rather than coordination, resourcing and urgent national mobilisation is as dangerous as it is disingenuous.
For many of us, this moment drags us back to the darkest days of the Aids-denialism era, when the ANC's administration under Thabo Mbeki refused science, silenced dissent and abandoned hundreds of thousands of people, leaving them to die while insisting that things were 'under control'.
We remember being called enemies. We remember the state gaslighting grieving families. We remember the press conferences filled with half-truths and the rejection of life-saving treatment while garlic and beetroot were hailed as solutions. And we remember that it was civil society, not the state, that finally broke that deadly silence.
To now see activists and researchers once again dismissed, vilified and compared to racist rightwing agitators for daring to question the state's readiness and priorities is retraumatising. And it is an indication that perhaps denialism in South Africa never truly died. It simply evolved.
Advocacy is not the enemy; denial is. Dissent is not the problem; deflection is.
Sign up to Global Dispatch
Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team
after newsletter promotion
Which is why the president must act urgently. It is not enough to acknowledge the loss of funding from the US president's emergency plan for Aids relief (Pepfar); he must also convene a national task team on health, one that includes all of civil society, the communities most affected, researchers and frontline workers.
If he continues to delay, then he must also admit that the collapse of essential services for HIV and beyond is not an accident but a political choice. We have seen what political silence did during the early years of the HIV epidemic. We are seeing it again now. And parliament must refuse to enable it.
This is not just a funding crisis. It is a governance and leadership crisis. And if we are to preserve even a fragment of what the HIV movement has built, the time for measured concern is over. What we need now is urgency, truth, and power that listens.
Because the real collapse is not in our health system. It is in the political courage to face the truth about it.
Yvette Raphael is executive director of Advocates for the Prevention of HIV and Aids (APHA). Sibongile Tshabalala is national chairperson of the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC). Both are openly living with HIV
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The countries where you're most at risk from rabies
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has offered vaccinations to the 'close contacts' of a British tourist, who has died from rabies after being scratched by a puppy while on holiday in Morocco. While the agency has said there is no risk to the wider public, it has warned that holidaymakers should exercise caution around animals in countries where the disease is present. Egypt, Turkey and Albania are among the destinations that the Government has ascribed as 'high risk'. It advises that all visitors to rabies-affected countries 'should avoid contact with dogs, cats and other animals wherever possible, and seek advice about the need for rabies vaccine prior to travel'. Costa Rica, Bali, Mexico and South Africa are also rated 'high risk'. Dr Katherine Russell, head of emerging infections and zoonoses at the UKHSA, said: 'If you are bitten, scratched or licked by an animal in a country where rabies is found then you should wash the wound or site of exposure with plenty of soap and water and seek medical advice without delay in order to get post-exposure treatment to prevent rabies.' 'Human cases of rabies are extremely rare in the UK, and worldwide there are no documented instances of direct human-to-human transmission,' she added. What is rabies? Rabies is 'a rare but very serious infection of the brain and nerves', according to the NHS, that 'is almost always fatal once symptoms appear'. How is rabies transmitted? The disease is transferred from animals to humans through bites, licks and scratches, usually via saliva. Dogs are the primary cause of most rabies infections in people, but all animals can catch rabies and pass it on, including cats, monkeys and bats. Symptoms of rabies usually take three to 12 weeks to appear, but they can appear after a few days or not for several months or even years. Initial symptoms include feeling anxious or energetic, and numbness where contact with the animal took place. Later, patients may experience hallucinations, respiratory failure and paralysis. More than 59,000 people die from the disease every year, according to the World Health Organisation (WHO). Due to under-reporting, however, it notes that 'this number is likely a gross underestimate'. It is thought that more than 15 million people a year receive a post-bite vaccination that prevents hundreds of thousands of deaths. Where is rabies found? Rabies is most common in Asia and Africa but there are a number of European nations said to be 'high risk', such as Poland and Lithuania. The WHO says that the disease is present on all continents except Antarctica, but that 95 per cent of human deaths take place in Asia or Africa. The UK has been rabies-free since the beginning of the 20th century, though a rabies-like virus still resides in some wild bats. According to the Government, the last recorded case of rabies in the UK was in 2018, when a a 58-year-old man was bitten by a cat while visiting family in Mehdya, Morocco. The UKHSA ascribes three different levels of risk to the world's territories – no risk, low risk and high risk. Some eastern European countries such as Slovenia, Croatia and Bulgaria are given a 'low risk' rating but the advice adds that 'foxes are high risk'. The same is true of the US and Canada, where the warning is 'low risk but foxes, skunks and racoons are high risk'. The UK's entry reads: 'No risk in animals. Low risk in bats.' What should I do if travelling to an area with rabies? Dr Richard Dawood, Telegraph Travel's health expert, says it is not always possible to eliminate the chance of an unwanted encounter with a street dog. 'Having been attacked by a dog on my own travels, I have been a lifelong fan of pre-travel rabies vaccination: it is safe, effective, greatly simplifies treatment following a bite, and can be done cheaply,' he said. 'Vaccination requires three injections, ideally with a seven-day gap between the first two, and 14 to 21 days between the next. Protection is usually long-lasting. Most people have a full dose of vaccine, injected deep into a muscle. However, a reduced dose is also highly effective, given intradermally into the top layer of the skin, enabling more than one person to be vaccinated from a single vial. 'The Department of Health's official Green Book says that suitably qualified and experienced health care professionals may use this method, but does not recommend it, mainly because it requires skill to administer it correctly. However, it is approved by the World Health Organisation, used in other countries, supported by key British experts and should be used more widely.' What should I do if bitten or exposed? Scrub and rinse the wound thoroughly, and disinfect with alcohol or strong antiseptic. Get prompt local advice. Back this up with a call to your travel insurance company, your GP or a specialist travel clinic. Without previous vaccination, you need a rapid vaccine course, plus an injection of rabies immune globulin (RIG) – a product containing antibodies that neutralises rabies virus and which is often unavailable in countries with the highest risk – to give protection until the vaccine takes effect. RIG is scarce and very expensive, and reliable treatment can be hard to find. If you have previously been vaccinated against rabies, simple booster doses after a bite give full protection. How much is a rabies vaccine? The price of the rabies vaccine varies dependent on the vendor and the type of vaccination. The NHS charges £82 for a rabies vaccine. The London Travel Clinic charges £72 per dose of the intradermal rabies vaccine, which is given under the skin, while the intramuscular vaccine is £79 per dose. In each case, three doses are required. Superdrug's Travel Clinic charges £74 or £110 per dose, or £222 or £330 per course (which comprises three doses). Without prior vaccination, treatment is more complicated and urgent: an injection of RIG into the area of the bite. This treatment is followed by an accelerated course of vaccine, which can throw your travel itinerary into chaos revolving around medical appointments. The price (and availability) of this varies wildly between countries. For more information about travel vaccinations, read our guide here.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Americans told not to drink coffee in three states: 'Lethal in a matter of minutes'
Health officials have warned people living in the southwest to avoid drinking coffee due to 'dangerously hot conditions.' The National Weather Service (NWS) issued a statement this week about severe heatwaves in Nevada, California and Arizona, where temperatures are expected to hit up to 120 degrees Fahrenheit (49 C) in the coming days. The agency said due to its caffeine, even iced coffee is a diuretic, meaning it tells the body to produce and pass more urine. Energy drinks and soda are also a risk. Increased urination causes the body to lose fluids, and if those fluids can't be replaced, the body becomes dehydrated. Without enough fluids, blood volume in the body diminishes, damaging the kidneys, heart, brain and other vital organs. The agency also cautioned against eating meals high in protein, as they naturally raise body temperature because the body needs to expend more energy to digest them. The warning comes as heat-related deaths in the US have doubled in the past 25 years and couple even triple in the next 50 due to gradually increasing temperatures. Even Alaska has issued its first-ever heat advisory, though temperatures are only expected to hit 85 degrees Fahrenheit (29 C). Around 1,200 Americans die from heat-related causes every year, though officials note the actual number could be 10-fold higher due to underreporting. NWS said parts of Arizona in the coming days could see 115-degree temperatures, while Death Valley National Park may see 120. In a post on X, NWS Las Vegas said today and tomorrow will be the area's hottest days of the week. In a list of 'don'ts' on a graphic, it warned: 'alcohol and caffeine can speed up dehydration.' Diuretic drinks like these tell the kidneys to release more water and produce more urine, which helps the body get rid of excess fluid. But in hot temperatures, the body is already losing fluid due to sweating, so diuretics could drain the body of fluids faster than they can be replaced. In response, blood volume decreases, which means not enough of it can flow to vital organs. This makes sweating, which cools the body down, less effective and makes the body's internal temperature increase. This leads to heat stroke, which causes nausea, vomiting, a rapid pulse, loss of consciousness and organ failure. The NWS also warned against meals high in protein. Compared to carbohydrates and fats, protein takes more energy to digest into amino acid, meaning the body burns more calories. This generates heat. Body temperature increases as a result, a process called diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT). This could explain why eating protein-rich foods might cause 'meat sweats.' Instead, NWS encouraged people in hot areas to 'drink plenty of water or sports drinks. Health authorities also suggest skipping steak and chicken and instead opting for foods with high water content like watermelon, berries, melons and cucumbers.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Government to give £48m to Peterborough's new station quarter
The government has announced it will put almost £48m of funding towards helping regenerate an area around a city's railway station. On 13 May the government approved plans that would see a station quarter with a new railway station entrance, pedestrianised square and multi-storey car park built in Peterborough. Andrew Pakes, the Labour MP for Peterborough, asked Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner if places such as the city, which he believed were "forgotten", would be at the top of the government's agenda. Rayner confirmed the government would provide "nearly £48m" of funding for the new city centre quarter. A full business case for the project was submitted to the Labour government in March. When speaking in Parliament on Wednesday, Pakes said the government had already backed the city by supporting other projects in the Spending Review, such as a new swimming pool and sports quarter. He said: "That commitment has the power to turn years of campaigning into a reality. "That is not all: the government have also recently approved the business case for our new station and have given us new police. Does the deputy prime minister agree that this is just the start and that places like Peterborough that were forgotten for too long by the Conservatives are now at the top of this Labour government's agenda" In response, Rayner said funding from Chancellor Rachel Reeves would "accelerate" projects in the city. After the funding confirmation, Pakes said: "Today's announcement is a milestone in the city's regeneration and makes real the ambition of so many people to see investment and change come to station area. "After years of talking about this major project, we will soon be able to get going." During the chancellor's Spending Review, it was announced that funding would be given to Peterborough City Council to develop plans for a sports quarter and pool. The sports quarter would form part of the Anglian Ruskin University campus in the city. The city has been left without a swimming pool since the regional pool was forced to shut after reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete was discovered in September 2023. The rest of the funding for the station quarter will come from Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority, Peterborough City Council, LNER, Network Rail and other partners. The first phase of the works would see the creation of a new pedestrian and cycling route between the station and city centre and would replace the Cowgate underpass. The wider project would see a new western entrance to the station and multi-storey car park with refurbished station buildings to the east and places spaces for people to socialise. Previously it was estimated construction could start within the next year with further developments expected to continue up to 2028. Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
