US judge rejects call to withdraw from real estate antitrust lawsuit
April 11 (Reuters) - A federal judge in Missouri declined a request that he withdraw from hearing a major antitrust lawsuit after disclosures showed lawyers in the case previously donated to political campaigns involving the judge's wife.
In an order, opens new tab on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Stephen Bough said Howard Hanna Real Estate Services had not met the 'heavy burden of proof' to justify his recusal in the litigation in Kansas City.
Howard Hanna is among several defendants in the antitrust lawsuit, which was filed by home sellers in 2023 accusing brokerages of conspiring to inflate the commission that sellers pay in residential real estate sales.
A spokesperson for Howard Hanna said the company was evaluating the judge's order.
Michael Ketchmark, a lead attorney for the plaintiffs, on Friday welcomed the order and said they looked forward to presenting the case to a jury.
Bough did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Pittsburgh-founded Howard Hanna markets itself as the country's largest family-owned real estate brokerage.
The lawsuit was filed by plaintiffs' lawyers who had won a landmark class action jury verdict in Bough's courtroom in a related antitrust lawsuit.
Home sellers since that October 2023 verdict have secured more than a billion dollars in settlements with major brokerages and the real estate industry's chief trade group. The verdict spurred a wave of similar lawsuits against brokerages around the country.
Bough's wife is an attorney and at-large councilmember for Kansas City, Missouri. Bough had disclosed the donations from members of the plaintiffs' team in an earlier, related class action.
Donations from plaintiffs' lawyers to the judge's wife 'create an appearance of impropriety' for the court, Howard Hanna had argued to the court.
A lawyer for the plaintiffs countered that the donations were not improper and that Howard Hanna delayed raising its disqualification bid "until after it lost all its motions trying to escape accountability in Missouri."
In his ruling, Bough said his wife's campaign committee had received 'contributions from a huge cross section of the community, including lawyers representing both plaintiffs and defendants in this case.'
The judge questioned the timing of the recusal bid by Howard Hanna, saying it had come after the court declined the company's effort to dismiss the lawsuit.
Bough, in his decision, said he 'has taken significant time and effort to comply with the ethical rules.'
The case is Don Gibson et al v. National Association of Realtors et al, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, No. 4:23-cv-00788-SRB.
Lawyers cry foul over $34 million eXp settlement with US home sellers
Home listing service ends antitrust lawsuit against US realtors' group
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
TRADING DAY Good vibrations turn sour
ORLANDO, Florida, June 11 (Reuters) - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist I'm excited to announce that I'm now part of Reuters Open Interest (ROI), an essential new source for data-driven, expert commentary on market and economic trends. You can find ROI on the Reuters website, and you can follow us on LinkedIn and X. The US and China have reached a trade deal, or at least agreed on the framework of a deal, which together with surprisingly soft U.S. inflation data, gave markets a lift on Wednesday. But Wall Street's gains were mild, and they were later wiped out by rising tensions in the Middle East. In my column today I look at the 'equity risk premium' and other metrics that suggest relative U.S. equity and bond valuations are getting very stretched. More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. Today's Key Market Moves Good vibrations turn sour It's a "done" deal, according to U.S. President Donald Trump, although the he and Chinese leader Xi Jinping still have to finalize the wording of the trade agreement between the two superpowers and sign off on it. The main points of the deal appear to be: China will remove export restrictions on rare earth minerals and other key industrial components; U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods will total 55%; Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods will total 10%. Trump could not have been more enthusiastic in his praise for the agreement on Wednesday, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said 'deal after deal' with other countries will follow in the weeks ahead. Yet, judging by the relatively muted market reaction, investors are less enthused. And given the chaotic and unpredictable nature of the Trump administration's tariff announcements thus far, the irony of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent calling on China to be a "reliable partner" in trade negotiations will not be lost on some observers. Especially, one suspects, in Beijing. Based on these proposed China levies, and with the US expected to conclude more trade deals in the coming weeks, the overall U.S. effective tariff rate will be lower than feared a couple of months ago. That's a relief. But the effective tariff rate of around 15% that many economists expect will still be significantly higher than the 2.5% rate at the end of last year, and would be the highest since the 1930s. Also, as the May inflation figures showed, tariffs have yet to be felt on prices. Investors - and Fed policymakers, who meet next week - are in a state of limbo. How will corporate profits and consumer spending be affected? What proportion of the tariffs will companies "swallow", and how much will they pass on to their customers? Zooming out, inflation appears to be cooling around the world, although this trend is expected to reverse once tariffs start to fuel higher goods price inflation. Figures on Wednesday showed that U.S. consumer inflation and Japanese wholesale inflation were lower than expected in May. These reports follow similar numbers from Europe recently, and China remains stuck in its battle against deflation. Next up is India, which releases consumer inflation figures on Thursday, which are expected to show annual inflation slowed to 3.0% in May, the lowest in more than six years. Another focus for investors on Thursday will be the auction of 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds. US stocks-bonds warnings flash amber again Calm has descended on U.S. markets following the 'Liberation Day' tariff turmoil of early April. But Wall Street's rally has revived questions about U.S. equity valuations, as stocks once again look super pricey compared to bonds. Since the chaotic days of early April, U.S. equities have rebounded fiercely, with the S&P 500 up 25%, putting the Shiller cyclically adjusted price-earnings (CAPE) ratio for the index in the 94th percentile going back to the 1950s, according to bond giant PIMCO. Stocks are looking expensive in absolute terms, and in relation to bonds. The equity risk premium (ERP), the difference between equity yields and bond yields, is near historically low levels. According to analysts at PIMCO, the ERP is now zero. The previous two times it fell to zero or below were in 1987 and 1996–2001. In both instances, the ultra-low ERP precipitated a steep equity drawdown and sharp fall in long-dated bond yields. "The U.S. equity risk premium ... is exceptionally low by historical standards," they wrote in their five-year outlook on Tuesday. "A mean reversion to a higher equity risk premium typically involves a bond rally, an equity sell-off, or both." But reversion to the mean doesn't just happen by magic. A catalyst is needed. Equities have recovered largely because they were oversold in April, trade tensions have been dialed down, and investors remain confident that Big Tech will drive solid AI-led earnings growth. So even though huge economic, trade, and policy risks continue to hang over markets, there is no sign of an imminent catalyst that would cause an equity market selloff. The flip side of equities looking expensive is that bonds look like a bargain. Indeed, the relative divergence between stocks and bonds is such that, by one measure, U.S. fixed income assets are the cheapest relative to equities in over half a century. Using national flow of funds data from the Federal Reserve, retired strategist Jim Paulsen calculates that the total market value of U.S. bonds as a percentage share of the total market value of U.S. equities is the lowest since the early 1970s. "Since the aggregate U.S. portfolio is currently aggressively positioned, investors may have far more capacity and desire to boost bond holdings in the coming years than most appreciate," Paulsen wrote last week. But bonds are 'cheap' for a reason. Washington's profligacy – the reason ratings agency Moody's recently stripped the U.S. of its triple-A credit rating – and inflation worries have kept yields stubbornly high. The term premium - the risk premium investors demand for holding long-term debt rather than rolling over short-dated loans - is the highest in over a decade, reflecting concerns about Uncle Sam's long-term fiscal health. And the diagnosis here shows no signs of improving. Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' is expected to add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, likely putting more upward pressure on yields. Of course, equity investors do seem to be pricing in a very rosy scenario, and the past few months have shown how quickly the market landscape can change. The U.S. economy could weaken more than expected, the trade war could escalate, or there could be a geopolitical surprise that causes bond yields and equity prices to fall. Investors should therefore be mindful of the warnings being sent by ERPs and other absolute and relative valuation metrics. However, they should also remember that stretched valuations can get even more stretched. As the famous saying goes, markets can stay irrational longer than investors can remain solvent. What could move markets tomorrow? Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Grandmother left to die after getting trapped under a car in a hospital parking garage, family alleges
A family is demanding answers after a 79-year-old grandmother died when she became trapped under her car in a hospital parking garage in April. Theresa M Phillips, 79, was driving her husband, Walter, to a doctor's appointment in a Pittsburgh hospital when the tragic accident occurred. Upon entering the parking lot, Phillips turned into the wrong entrance, forcing her to exit her car to retrieve a ticket. Her family's attorney said that the Phillips did not put the car into park, causing it to roll towards her, eventually trapping her underneath. The family's defense attorney, Matthew Scanlon, said her husband attempted 'to lift the car off his wife' but had to watch her be 'crushed to death.' 'Poor Mr. Phillips was trying, I can't imagine having to watch [...] This was absolutely a preventable tragedy,' he said. According to her daughter, Marie Lawton, emergency services took 30 minutes to arrive at the scene. A University of Pittsburgh Medical Center spokesperson said the hospital was 'deeply saddened by the tragic accident.' 'While emergency crews quickly responded, the victim did not survive. Our deepest sympathies are with the family,' the spokesperson added. Philips is survived by her daughter, Marie Lawton; her grandchildren; numerous nieces and nephews; and her sister. According to her obituary, Phillips was a U.S. Army Veteran who 'enjoyed playing video games, her pets, card club, bingo, and shopping.' 'She was very, very active; no grass grew under her feet. She always had something to do. But in the past two months, I've wanted to call my mom 20 times a day about the dumbest things, like 'mom did you hear,' not being able to call her that's the hardest,' Marie Lawton told local station WPXI. Scanlon said the family intends to file a lawsuit to determine what took so long and why no one from the hospital, just a few steps away, stepped in to help Philips. 'The public deserves answers on this, this is a public safety issue, UPMC being the largest provider in the area, we all deserve answers to this,' Scanlon said. 'It's not on the world, it's the impact on me, on my husband, on my grandchildren, on my dad. That's where she left the impact, and we take it out into the world,' Lawton added. The family hopes to file the lawsuit in Allegheny County court within the next month.
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
China puts six-month limit on its ease of rare-earth export licenses, WSJ reports
June 11 (Reuters) - China is putting a six-month limit on rare-earth export licenses for U.S. automakers and manufacturers, The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday citing people familiar with the matter.
