Minister hails record growth in UK's public electric vehicle charger network
Future of roads minister Lilian Greenwood claimed the figures show people can always access a charger 'no matter where they live'.
Some 79,326 public charging devices were available on May 1, Department for Transport (DfT) statistics seen by the PA news agency show.
That is an increase of 2,819 compared from the total of 76,507 on April 1.
Since May 1 last year, the amount has soared by 30%.
The rollout of public EV charging is seen as vital to persuade more drivers – particularly those without off-road parking – to switch to electric motoring.
Ms Greenwood said: 'We're ensuring drivers are always close to an electric vehicle chargepoint, no matter where they live.
'Our new stats this week show strong growth in our public chargepoint network, with almost 80,000 public chargepoints now installed and a record of nearly 3,000 made available this April alone.'
She said the UK is 'seeing a chargepoint boost across all regions'.
Compared with April 1 2024, the number available on the same date this year increased by 30% in the North, 44% in the West Midlands, 29% in the South East, 28% in Wales, 32% in Scotland and 23% in Northern Ireland.
Changes in the total number of available devices are caused by chargers being installed, decommissioned or switching from private use only.
The DfT figures are based on data from charger map service Zapmap.
A report published by public spending watchdog the National Audit Office in December last year found the rollout of public EV chargers was 'on track' to meet the 300,000 the DfT estimates will be the minimum needed by 2030.
The Government has pledged to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars and vans from 2030.
Industry body the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders said on Thursday that pure electric versions are available for a record two out of five new car models on sale in the UK.
Car buyers can choose from more than 130 battery electric new car models, up from 102 a year ago.
There are also more than 100 plug-in hybrid models on sale.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Reporter
an hour ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
East Lothian Council set to review parking in new developments
Housebuilders in East Lothian may have to provide far fewer parking spaces in the future as the council considers changes aimed at reducing car use in towns. Midlothian Council is set to give the go ahead to changes this week which will drastically reduce the number of spaces required at new developments and East Lothian Council has said it will also be reviewing its current guidelines. The changes follow new Scottish Government policies which give priority to developers who propose ambitious low or no car parking plans. A report due to go before Midlothian's elected councillors this week from officers outlines changes including reducing the number of car park spaces for visitors to housing estates from one for every two homes to one for every 20 on urban sites. They will also reduce the number of spaces for users of new sports facilities with any stadium built with over 1500 capacity allowed no more than one space for every 150 seats. A report due to go before Midlothian Council's planning committee next week for agreement says the new standards have been influenced by the Scottish Government's goal of reducing private car use. It says previous policy which advised developers the minimum number of spaces required for housing will be replaced with new rules setting out the maximum allowed. The new standards will also require that 10 per cent of visitor spaces provided have an electric charger in place alongside minimum cycle parking places and EV charger spaces being introduced across all new developments. A spokesperson for East Lothian Council said that while no changes have been made to its parking standards policy 'yet' it was about to be reviewed. They said: 'These standards will be reviewed as part of the preparation of our new Local Development Plan. 'This review will have regard to the Scottish Government's recent national planning policy stating that development proposals which are ambitious in terms of low/no car parking will be supported, particularly in urban locations well-served by sustainable transport modes and where they do not create barriers to access by disabled people.' By Marie Sharp Local Democracy Reporter Like this: Like Related
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Rachel Reeves must not fall short on giving Welsh rail a fair deal in this spending review
Rachel Reeves must not fall short on giving Welsh rail a fair deal in this spending review Business Editor Sion Barry makes the case for greater UK Government rail investment in Wales Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander . (Image: Andrew Matthews/PA Wire ) All eyes will be on Chancellor Rachel Reeves next week when she delivers the UK Government's departmental spending allocations for the next three years in the comprehensive spending review. Her fiscal headroom is tight, but for Wales it will require Secretary of State for Transport Heidi Alexander to commit funding to start addressing decades of under-investment in Wales' rail network by successive Westminster governments. Her settlement from the Treasury will mean she cannot please everyone, but having rightly recognised the pressing case to fund much-needed rail enhancement projects in Wales - as highlighted in a welcome joint letter with Welsh Secretary Jo Stevens back in January - she must now deliver, even if it means cutting back elsewhere within her department. The advisory Wales Rail Board, which includes various stakeholders such as the Department for Transport (DfT), the Wales Office, Transport for Wales, and the Welsh Government, has already drawn up a detailed list of priority rail enhancement projects for Wales. These come with a price tag of several billion pounds, including the five Burns stations between Cardiff and Magor, improvements to the North Wales Main Line and connectivity with the north west of England, and the required investment - such as a Coryton loop and a Cardiff west junction - to allow for four trains per hour on the most densely populated part of the South Wales Metro: the Coryton and City Lines running through Cardiff. Once the DfT commits to major projects, like the £16bn rail and bus investment in the Midlands and North of England announced earlier this week, as they take more than three years to complete they will have to be funded for the long-term. Article continues below I would expect the UK Government to announce on Wednesday that it will, as a starting point, deliver the five Burns stations: Cardiff East (off Newport Road), Newport West, Maindy, Llanwern, and Magor on the South Wales Main Line. In a phased investment programme, they will take around five years to complete. The stations were recommended by the Burns Commission, chaired by Lord Burns and commissioned by the Welsh Government to explore ways to boost public transport investment in south-east Wales. This followed former First Minister Mark Drakeford's 2017 decision not to proceed with a Labour Senedd manifesto pledge to deliver a £1bn M4 relief road south of Newport. The stations, with a combined construction cost of £320m, first require £15m for detailed design work and £50m to upgrade the relief lines from Bristol Temple Meads to South Wales to allow for passenger services. The business case for the Burns stations is strong. They would serve a population of around 1.2 million, 20% of whom don't have access to a car. Transport for Wales could bid to run a new service from Bristol Temple Meads, calling at the new stations and potentially running as far west as Carmarthen. For Newport and its growing compound semiconductor sector, the stations and increased services to Bristol Temple Meads would enhance its appeal as an investment location - a city which already benefits from being closer to London than Cardiff. Transport for Wales could reassign its new rolling stock, deploying its tri-mode trains from the Rhymney Line, onto a new Temple Meads to South Wales service. Transport Wales, under the terms of its on order 35 tram-trains, could commission more to back fill the moving of tri-modes from the Rhymney Line and Penarth to Coryton services. Ahead of next spring's Senedd Election, the Burns stations are something the Welsh Government needs to see delivered by the UK Government, having cancelled the M4 relief road. Although little has been said recently about a promised £400m investment for roads and improved integrated public transport around Newport. Meanwhile, the backers of Cardiff Parkway and its integrated business park project at St Mellons are revising costings for what was a projected £120m four-platform station pre-Covid. It would be a welcome addition alongside the Burns stations. Despite accounting for around 10% of the rail network (England and Wales) and making up over 5% of the population, Wales has received less than 2% of rail enhancement investment over the last few decades. Over a 15-year period, Wales should be seeking a rail enhancement commitment from the UK Government of £200m to £300m per annum - equating to £3bn-£4bn in total investment. By contrast, up to 2040 the DfT has committed around £80bn for rail enhancement projects in England, including HS2 from London to Birmingham, a high-speed station at Euston, and the upgrade of the TransPennine Route. Through the Barnett Formula, the Welsh Government used to receive a transfer from changes to the DfT budget based on a comparability factor of around 80% - set against a UK population share of 5%. The transfer was based on any change to the DfT's overall budget. So it's not accurate to say, as many have this week when the UK Government announced the £6.6bn Oxford to Cambridge line, that Wales would have received a £360m consequential if the project was fully barnetised. If the overall DfT budget rose by £6.6bn, then yes - but savings will be made elsewhere. In the round, however, Wales has been hugely short-changed. The high previous comparability factor was due to non-devolved items being a small part of the DfT's budget, and because Network Rail spending was not included. However, with HS2 and Network Rail spending now included - and comprising a much larger share of the DfT's budget - the comparability factor for Wales has fallen to just 33.5%. The figures for Scotland and Northern Ireland remain at 95.6%. Of the DfT's current £37bn annual budget, around £20bn relates to high-speed rail and Network Rail. The 'England and Wales' classification for rail projects has significantly eroded Wales' share. I'm not expecting a significant uplift to the DfT budget. The Treasury's view is effectively: if you want to do more in Wales (via DfT), you have to do so from within existing - or only slightly increased - resources. However, the Treasury should also recognise that part of the rail network in Wales - the Core Valley Lines (CVL) - is devolved. When the £1bn South Wales Metro electrification project is completed and the new turn-up-and-go timetable is bedded in, passenger numbers could climb to around 12 million per year. With further investment in services on the Coryton and City Lines, the aim should be to increase that figure towards 20 million. If the CVL devolved asset were recognised fiscally by the Treasury - based on passenger numbers or track mileage - it would improve the comparability factor for Wales. The Welsh Government could then decide how to invest the resulting Barnett consequentials, potentially ring fencing them to support further CVL investment or future phases of Cardiff Crossrail. Whether this will be addressed by the Chancellor remains to be seen. Devolution would come with a Welsh Government block grant adjustment to reflect new responsibilities and functions – and then Barnett adjustments when DfT budgets change. Article continues below The then Welsh Government's 2004 decision to reject rail devolution - an offer extended by the then-Tony Blair government - must now rank among the worst decisions since devolution. Scotland accepted rail devolution, which has allowed projects like HS2 to be properly classified as England-only, unlocking full Barnett consequentials for the Scottish administration. If England and Wales classified rail projects provided for fair investment in Wales then many could live with that arrangement - though I would still argue for full devolution. The Welsh Secretary has made a strong case for Welsh investment and has the backing of Ms Alexander. Having raised expectations, they cannot afford to fall short.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
China's EV makers turn on BYD as price war escalates
BEIJING/SHANGHAI, June 9 (Reuters) - Fierce competition among China's leading EV makers has intensified, with a long-running dispute between BYD and Great Wall Motor over emissions compliance escalating after Geely joined in to criticise BYD's aggressive price cuts. The row dates back to 2023, when Great Wall Motor ( opens new tab reported BYD ( opens new tab to Chinese regulators, alleging that its two best-selling hybrid models failed to meet emissions standards. The issue re-emerged last month when Great Wall's chairman, Wei Jianjun, expressed concerns about the ongoing price war and confirmed that the regulatory probe was still active. BYD dismissed his remarks on the industry's health as "alarmist" but did not comment on the emissions issue. At the time, BYD rejected the claim and said its vehicles met China's emission standards. On Saturday, Geely's vice president, Victor Yang, publicly backed Great Wall's claims at an auto conference in Chongqing, stating that Geely had conducted its own emissions tests and reached the same conclusions. "Wei Jianjun is a genuine, honest person and is our industry's whistleblower," Yang said in videos of his speech posted online by The Paper and other local media outlets. Great Wall Motor's claims concern BYD's use of non-pressurised fuel tanks in its Qin Plus and Song Plus plug-in hybrids, which let the liquid inside evaporate more rapidly than in pressurised ones. BYD's general manager of branding and public relations, Li Yunfei, responded to Geely's comments on Sunday on his Weibo account, saying that the non-pressurised tanks used in its cars between 2021 and 2023 were compliant with the regulatory requirements at the time but added that BYD had since changed them due to customer complaints. Li's Weibo post was no longer there on Monday, although Reuters could not verify the reason for this and the company did not immediately reply to a request for comment. Great Wall Motor did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday, while Geely referred Reuters to the videos posted online of Yang's speech and declined to provide additional comment. China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, one of the regulators involved in the emissions probe, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The escalating feud comes as China's EV market faces intense competition as BYD's recent price incentives, which reduced the starting price of its cheapest model to 55,800 yuan ($7,771.05), triggered a broader sell-off in auto stocks. Following this, MIIT called for the sector to halt its price wars and summoned automakers to a meeting last week, two sources familiar with the matter said. The meeting was first reported by Bloomberg. Dealers have also urged automakers to stop dumping inventory on them. ($1 = 7.1805 Chinese yuan renminbi)
