Dictator's daughter learns fate for Jetstar act
The Australian daughter of late Philippines dictator Ferdinand Marcos, who admitted to drinking from a bottle of alcohol smuggled on-board and disrupting a Jetstar flight to Sydney, has escaped with a $800 fine.
Analisa Josefa Corr, 53, and partner James Alexander Corr, 45, were sentenced in the Downing Centre Local Court in Sydney on Monday for their actions on-board a Hobart-to-Sydney flight that prompted airline staff to ask the Australian Federal Police for assistance.
The couple on Monday admitted to drinking alcohol they brought aboard flight JQ720 on December 28 last year and Ms Corr also pleaded guilty to acting in a disorderly manner.
The court was told that she only had one sip from a bottle she and her husband had brought on the flight, and at the time she had also consumed painkillers – Panadeine Forte – for broken ribs. James and Analisa Corr were fined for behaving badly on a Jetstar flight. NewsWire/Simon Bullard. Credit: News Corp Australia
The court was told that Ms Corr was taken into custody on the tarmac after the couple were met by AFP officers.
In January, they pleaded not guilty to all charges.
But in court on Monday, Ms Corr pleaded guilty to one count of consuming alcohol not provided by cabin crew and behaving in an offensive or disorderly manner affecting safety.
Prosecutors withdrew one count of assault and one count of not complying with the cabin crew's safety instructions. They both consumed alcohol not provided by cabin crew. YouTube Credit: NewsWire
Mr Corr pleaded guilty to consuming alcohol not provided by crew, while another charge of not complying with the cabin crew's safety instructions was withdrawn.
Their lawyers asked magistrate Rosheehan O'Meagher not to record a conviction because it would affect their ability to travel internationally for work. Their actions were described in court as out of character. NewsWire / Max Mason-Hubers Credit: News Corp Australia
The couple had been in Indonesia, developing an app to assist sailors, the court was told.
Ms O'Meagher described their actions as out of character and noted they were remorseful.
'On the flip side to that, this is a serious matter, it is a fairly prevalent offence. Because people become intoxicated on planes, it causes problems, it causes havoc,' she said.
Ms O'Meagher also told the couple that she had to 'send a message to the community.'
Both were convicted and Ms Corr was fined $800 and Mr Corr was fined $400.
Outside court on Monday, Ms Corr's solicitor Jasmina Ceic said both would be lodging an appeal.
More to come
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
7 hours ago
- The Age
‘Losses will continue to mount': Bank staff's security warnings before massive scam cost customers millions
Similar warnings were made repeatedly in the years to come, according to the ASIC statement of claim filed to the federal court. '[C]urrently, HSBC do not have the capability to stop an online transfer of funds from one bank account to another,' said another presentation given in October 2022 to HSBC's Australian wealth and personal banking fraud steering committee. By July 2023, the court documents show that Matthew Hannan, HSBC Australia's head of fraud management, was making a 'special' presentation about an 'HSBC impersonation scam' in which he had said that 50 customers had lost money in the emerging scam, sometimes after receiving text messages that tricked them into sharing personal information. In September the same year, a slide pack for an HSBC Australia committee meeting discussing impersonation scams said that 'current limitations on desktop banking monitoring and real-time interception are impacting our ability to disrupt and prevent these attacks'. ASIC alleges that HSBC Australia didn't implement adequate real-time fraud payment monitoring, including capabilities to detect and block suspicious activity, across both mobile and online banking until about May 2024, at the tail end of the swindle. The corporate regulator also highlighted other alleged security deficiencies, claiming HSBC did not implement a digital fraud behavioral biometric system called BioCatch, and digital fraud device identification capabilities, via ThreatMetrix, for online banking until June 2024. In January 2022, the minutes of one of the bank's fraud steering committee meetings noted that 'losses resulting from these scam cases and determinations would likely have been avoided with BioCatch/ThreatMetrix implementation for transactional monitoring'. In December 2023, as the reports from the impersonation scam mounted, another internal presentation warned that until these systems were implemented for online banking, the fraud team 'cannot disrupt scams, and losses will continue to mount'. HSBC Australia customers lost $18 million via impersonation scams in the 2023 financial year, and $24 million in the first nine months of 2024, according to court documents. About 950 reports of unauthorised transactions were made to HSBC Australia between January 2020 to August last year. HSBC was due to file its defence in the case early last month, but failed to do so. At a hearing in May, Justice Elizabeth Bennett ordered the bank to provide a written explanation of their non-compliance. A solicitor acting for HSBC Australia earlier submitted that the bank had identified inaccuracies in data presented to the court that it needed to correct before it would be appropriate to file its defence. Asked about the repeated internal warnings of the bank's inability to halt suspicious transactions highlighted in ASIC's statement of claim, an HSBC spokesperson replied, 'as the matter is before the court, we are unable to comment'.
Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Losses will continue to mount': Bank staff's security warnings before massive scam cost customers millions
Similar warnings were made repeatedly in the years to come, according to the ASIC statement of claim filed to the federal court. '[C]urrently, HSBC do not have the capability to stop an online transfer of funds from one bank account to another,' said another presentation given in October 2022 to HSBC's Australian wealth and personal banking fraud steering committee. By July 2023, the court documents show that Matthew Hannan, HSBC Australia's head of fraud management, was making a 'special' presentation about an 'HSBC impersonation scam' in which he had said that 50 customers had lost money in the emerging scam, sometimes after receiving text messages that tricked them into sharing personal information. In September the same year, a slide pack for an HSBC Australia committee meeting discussing impersonation scams said that 'current limitations on desktop banking monitoring and real-time interception are impacting our ability to disrupt and prevent these attacks'. ASIC alleges that HSBC Australia didn't implement adequate real-time fraud payment monitoring, including capabilities to detect and block suspicious activity, across both mobile and online banking until about May 2024, at the tail end of the swindle. The corporate regulator also highlighted other alleged security deficiencies, claiming HSBC did not implement a digital fraud behavioral biometric system called BioCatch, and digital fraud device identification capabilities, via ThreatMetrix, for online banking until June 2024. In January 2022, the minutes of one of the bank's fraud steering committee meetings noted that 'losses resulting from these scam cases and determinations would likely have been avoided with BioCatch/ThreatMetrix implementation for transactional monitoring'. In December 2023, as the reports from the impersonation scam mounted, another internal presentation warned that until these systems were implemented for online banking, the fraud team 'cannot disrupt scams, and losses will continue to mount'. HSBC Australia customers lost $18 million via impersonation scams in the 2023 financial year, and $24 million in the first nine months of 2024, according to court documents. About 950 reports of unauthorised transactions were made to HSBC Australia between January 2020 to August last year. HSBC was due to file its defence in the case early last month, but failed to do so. At a hearing in May, Justice Elizabeth Bennett ordered the bank to provide a written explanation of their non-compliance. A solicitor acting for HSBC Australia earlier submitted that the bank had identified inaccuracies in data presented to the court that it needed to correct before it would be appropriate to file its defence. Asked about the repeated internal warnings of the bank's inability to halt suspicious transactions highlighted in ASIC's statement of claim, an HSBC spokesperson replied, 'as the matter is before the court, we are unable to comment'.
West Australian
15 hours ago
- West Australian
‘Weekly basis': Lawyer reveals why young people are still carrying knives, despite harsher laws
Harsher penalties will do little to curb the spike in youth knife crime unless the underlying reasons why they are being carried are addressed, a leading criminal lawyer has declared. Astor Legal principal lawyer Avinash Singh said he deals with people charged with knife offences on a weekly basis, with many also involved in the illegal drug trade. 'We have represented a number of minors accused of carrying knives – generally from lower socio-economic areas carrying knives for self-defence,' Mr Singh told NewsWire. 'Unfortunately, a lot of these young people have been assaulted and/or threatened themselves. 'They feel that reporting the matter to police after the fact will do them little good, particularly if they are seriously injured or even killed,' he said. 'As such, they often feel that they have to carry a knife to protect themselves.' The hard truth then, is that harsher crimes may not reduce offending, or make the community any safer, Mr Singh said. 'While it is understandable that governments and the community demand tougher laws to combat knife crime, this is unlikely to do much to reduce it in my opinion,' he said. 'People who carry knives are unlikely to stop just because of increased penalties. 'Research has found that they stop when they are no longer exposed to an environment where carrying a knife is seen as a necessity,' he said. 'This means addressing these communities by providing resources, programs and funding to prevent the issue – something governments have continuously failed to do.' The Victorian Allan Government announced in May it will be introducing laws to ban the sale and possession of machetes following an alleged spate of machete assaults. From September 1, those carrying a 'controlled weapon' or knife in Victoria will face up to two years imprisonment or a fine of $30,700. 'In Victoria, community safety comes first. We must never let places we meet become places we fear,' Premier Jacinta Allan said. 'I hate these knives, and I will keep introducing as many laws as it takes to get them off our streets, out of our shops and out of our lives.' Those found guilty in NSW face four years imprisonment fines up to $4,400. Mr Singh said he feared 'the expanded search powers will disproportionately be used against young people from lower socio-economic areas'. 'This leads to distrust of police and can in fact have the opposite effect – that is, young people keep knives but simply avoid police and are less likely to report crimes'. He said this is already seen in the rising amount of NSW youth caught up in the criminal system following legislation changes and bail reform. 'The strictest knife crime laws at present are in NSW. While the laws have only recently been introduced, there has been a noticeable increase in the courts seeing knife offences,' Mr Singh said. 'This, along with recent Bail Act reforms in NSW, has led to a marked increase in children being refused bail and held in custody, which does nothing to address their behaviour or promote rehabilitation of offenders.'
