Thames Water drops bonuses due for bosses after Government criticism
Thames Water has 'withdrawn' plans to pay senior bosses large bonuses linked to the water company securing a £3 billion emergency loan, Environment Secretary Steve Reed has said.
Mr Reed confirmed the proposals had been dropped during an Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Efra) committee session with MPs on Tuesday.
Earlier in the day, Thames Water's chairman admitted to incorrectly stating that the so-called retention plan was 'insisted upon' by the company's lenders.
This was set to amount to 50% of senior bosses' salaries, leading to them getting £1 million on top of their annual salaries and regular bonuses.
The payments were linked to Thames Water securing a rescue loan earlier this year that could reach £3 billion to stave off collapse.
Mr Reed told MPs that Thames Water had been 'trying to circumvent' upcoming rules that can ban water companies from paying bonuses, by 'calling their bonuses something different so they continue to pay them'.
'I'm very happy indeed that Thames have now dropped those proposals,' he said.
'It was the wrong thing to do. It offends against their own customers' sense of fair play.
Asked if he was confirming Thames will not be making the retention payments, he said: 'They won't be doing that.
'The Government will take any action necessary to prevent them trying to circumvent the ban that we've now tried to put in law. They've now withdrawn their proposal to make those payments.'
Thames' chairman Sir Adrian Montague said he may have 'misspoken' when he said the group's creditors 'insisted' upon the retention incentives, when quizzed on the struggling water firm's turnaround at an Efra committee session last week.
In a letter to the committee, Sir Adrian wrote: 'I appreciate that in the heat of the moment I may have misspoken when I stated that the creditors insisted on the management retention plan.'
Thames Water is England's biggest water firm and supplies around 16 million households across London and the South East.
The company has been at the centre of growing public outrage over the extent of pollution, rising bills, high dividends, and executive pay and bonuses at the UK's privatised water firms.
Downing Street said on Tuesday that Thames Water bosses should not be receiving bonuses.
The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'Water bosses rewarding themselves for failure is clearly not acceptable and ministers are clear that, after presiding over years of mismanagement, Thames Water should not be handing itself bonuses.
'The new Ofwat powers that are set out in the Water Act and will be coming into effect shortly will be applied retrospectively, meaning that they apply to Thames Water, just as they will any other company.'
The regulator's new rules mean it can ban bonus payments to water bosses if they fail to meet standards to protect the environment, their consumers, and their company's finances.
It also means it could block payments funded not just by customer money, but also by lenders and shareholders.
Thames Water has said the retention incentives are different to performance-related bonuses, so are not covered by the rules, and will be funded by lenders.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
16 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. Promise made. Promise delivered. — Steve Reed MP (@SteveReedMP) June 6, 2025 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened.
South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. Promise made. Promise delivered. — Steve Reed MP (@SteveReedMP) June 6, 2025 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened.
Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Water firms would be foolish to increase salaries to get around bonus ban
Six firms have been banned from paying bonuses to senior bosses under new rules that came into force on Friday. Thames Water, Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water have been told that they cannot issue bonuses for the financial year 2024/25, which concluded in April. Mr Reed said that customers need to have 'confidence' in what water firms are doing, but also said it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be 'capping' salaries in private sector businesses. Businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing Steve Reed Asked if he was going to make sure that firms cannot raise base salaries to compensate for any bonus ban, Mr Reed told Times Radio: 'I think they would be extremely foolish to do anything of the sort that you're describing, because (…) these companies need to rebuild their broken relationship with their customers. 'Their customers need to have confidence in what they're doing, their customers are furious at the fact that they're seeing local waterways being polluted, but bosses taking multimillion-pound bonuses.' He later told the BBC that it would not be 'right' for the Government or regulator to be setting salaries. He told Radio 4's Today programme: ''I don't think it's right that government or regulators should be capping the salaries in private sector businesses. Promise made. Promise delivered. — Steve Reed MP (@SteveReedMP) June 6, 2025 'But those businesses need to have an eye on how their customers are feeling about what they are doing, and there are steps that you can take that are appropriate within regulation.' The firms have all been banned under new rules which prevent bonuses from being paid if a water company does not meet environmental or consumer standards, does not meet financial resilience requirements, or is convicted of a criminal offence. The six companies are not under an indefinite ban, and those firms may be able to offer rewards for the 2025/26 year, provided they stick within the Ofwat rules, under the Water (Special Measures) Act which comes into force on Friday. If a company pays a bonus while it is under a ban, the water regulator Ofwat has the power to get the money back. Under the new rules, Yorkshire Water, United Utilities, Thames Water, and Southern Water will all be unable to pay bonuses to the chief executive or chief financial officer, for the 24/25 financial year. Anglian Water will be banned from paying its chief executive a bonus, but the chief financial officer will not be banned. Wessex Water will be banned from paying its chief financial officer any extra, but the chief executive will be exempt. The exemptions are because people were not in post when the incident that broke Ofwat's rules happened.
