logo
Officials: Ottawa County harbor dredging delays over PFAS testing could drive up costs

Officials: Ottawa County harbor dredging delays over PFAS testing could drive up costs

Yahoo20-05-2025

King Co. Inc., based in Holland, will dredge about 12,400 cubic yards of sediment in Holland Harbor this year. [Photo/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers]
This story was originally published by Ottawa News Network.
OTTAWA COUNTY — Local, state and national officials are warning that unless Michigan environmental officials can fast-track PFAS regulations to allow for harbor dredging this year, it could end up costing Ottawa County residents millions.
The problem arose when the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (EGLE) implemented a new policy that requires testing for PFAS chemicals in sediment prior to being removed from federal harbors and channels.
The new requirement has caused confusion for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which said it cannot proceed with dredging Ottawa County's Grand Haven inner harbor until EGLE determines how PFAS will impact the silt and sediment to be dredged.
'EGLE has not been clear regarding the terms of this policy, the extent to which this policy change could disrupt harbors and shipping throughout our state and the Great Lakes system, the relevant PFAS thresholds and disposal requirements, and the timing of implementation,' said U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga, who represents Michigan's Fourth Congressional District, which includes the southern half of Ottawa County. 'If these matters are not properly addressed, the communities I represent could face serious economic harm.'
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are a group of manmade chemicals used in various products and industries, including firefighting foams, stain repellents, and non-stick cookware.
Other sources can come from industrial sites, such as power plants, as in Grand Haven. The coal-fired J.B. Sims Plant, which closed in 2020 and was demolished in 2021, left coal ash on the site, which contains contaminants like mercury, cadmium, arsenic and PFAS.
Exposure in humans can lead to a range of health problems, including increased cholesterol, changes in the immune system, potential developmental delays and increased risk of certain cancers. There's also evidence suggesting a link between PFAS and thyroid disease, liver damage and reproductive issues such as decreased fertility.
As the chemicals became known to state environmental regulators — there are seven known PFAS sites in Ottawa County — policies were developed to help identify and monitor new contamination sites.
That led to a new policy from EGLE's Water Resources Division in 2018 to require harbor sediment be tested for PFAS prior to dredging.
Dredging is the process of removing sediments and debris from the bottom of water bodies to maintain navigable waterways, deepen channels for larger vessels, and support various infrastructure projects.
The U.S. Corps of Engineers' Detroit District maintains a navigation system of 81 harbors and channels on the Great Lakes. Some harbors, such as Muskegon, require annual dredging, while others, such as Grand Haven's inner harbor, might be dredged every two to four years, depending on factors such as river sediment accumulation, coastal erosion and water levels.
'We have to keep the channel dredged,' Grand Haven Mayor Bob Monetza told WGHN in April. 'It gets full of sediment and gets shallow in places where boats can get hung up, or they might have to come in with lighter loads.'
The Grand River is typically kept at a depth of about 23 feet.
Every five years, harbors must apply for their Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Grand Haven was due to apply for its re-certification in November, but when the location was one of 17 harbors in Michigan identified with nearby PFAS-contributing sites — the former Sims site is about 2.5 miles from the outer harbor — EGLE implemented the new PFAS testing standard for the site.
'It kind of came out of nowhere, but they want us to start sampling the river bottom for PFAs, because there's PFAs in the river in the sediment that washes downstream from farther upstream,' Monetza told WGHN.
The 'inner harbor' generally refers to the area closer to land, while the 'outer harbor' is further from shore, where breakwaters or other structures are found to protect the harbor from strong waves and currents.
Meanwhile, the state has yet to establish PFAS standards for the sediment testing, causing confusion between the agencies about which levels are acceptable to allow dredging to proceed as well as who pays for the process.
Huizenga, in a letter to Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, said the Corps said at the Great Lakes Navigation meeting in November that the new testing requirements will reduce the number of harbors that are dredged annually and could drive up costs by up to 70%.
Standards for PFAS levels and disposal are still being circulated for review and have yet to be made available by the state. Even if the testing process is sorted out and performed, Monetza said it could take six months to a year to confirm the plan for Grand Haven.
'They'll take a long period of time to analyze and decide what they're going to do, what kind of permits they'll issue,' he said.
The Corps also announced it was pushing back the Grand Haven project until 2026, prompting deep concerns from local, state and federal officeholders.
'This is the equivalent of writing a speeding a ticket when there is no posted speed limit,' Huizenga, a Republican, said on his website.
Liz Wilkinson, operations manager at the Corps' Grand Haven office, described the delay as 'unlucky timing.'
'It was just kind of unfortunate, unlucky timing that Grand Haven needed to be coordinated right at about the time that EGLE felt like they were ready to start doing this testing with PFAS. We had it planned for this year. We had it budgeted for this year because we knew it was needed,' Wilkinson told The Grand Haven Tribune last month.
U.S. Rep. Hillary Scholten wrote a letter in April urging Whitmer of the economic impacts of not dredging Grand Haven's harbor. The congresswoman, a Democrat, represents Michigan's Third Congressional District, which includes the northern half of Ottawa County.
She said Grand Haven's harbor is 'an economic powerhouse' that supports over 450 jobs totaling $29.5 million in wages annually, as well as producing a regional impact of $88.8 million per year.
'A missed dredging cycle will come at a high price. Delays will directly affect our partners across the state who rely on materials to complete transportation projects and agriculture operations, with road-building materials, concrete, asphalt, and fertilizer expected to increase in cost by more than $1 million annually,' Scholten said in the letter.
She said lighter loads and more freighter trips will result in price hikes for consumers that could reach $3 to $5 million a year.
'If we see delayed dredging, goods being shipped through Grand Haven may increase in cost by roughly $3 to $5 million annually — costs that will likely be passed through to consumers,' Scholten wrote. 'In the instance that Grand Haven becomes unnavigable for commercial vessels, it is understood that neighboring harbors do not have the capacity to accept those supplies.'
The Corps announced in April it was actually moving up the dredging schedule for Holland Harbor after a shoal — a submerged ridge or bank of sand or gravel that lies close to the water's surface — developed over the winter across the entrance to the harbor, which could have caused the shipping industry to lose $1.4 million to $1.9 million per year due to ships having to carry lighter loads, according to WGVU Public Media.
King Co. Inc., based in Holland, will dredge about 12,400 cubic yards of sediment hydraulically. The project will cost $344,480 out of a three-project contract that also includes Grand Haven and St. Joseph harbors.
Ottawa County Commissioner Josh Brugger, who represents Grand Haven, Spring Lake and Ferrysburg, also wrote to Whitmer urging the state to find a solution.
Monetza, Spring Lake Mayor Richard Carlson, Spring Lake Township Supervisor Jerry Rabideau and Spring Lake Village President Mark Powers also signed onto Brugger's message.
'We wish to underscore the message that, without a timely resolution, this major port cannot be maintained, and our local economy may be significantly harmed,' Brugger wrote. 'We are appealing for your assistance to expedite the process.'
Scholten said time is of the essence.
'At a time of grave economic uncertainty and rising prices due to tariffs for the industries, we do not need to add to the increased production costs. This problem is still solvable,' she said. 'When it comes to the shipping, construction, and agricultural industries, time is not a luxury we have.'
— Sarah Leach is the executive editor of the Ottawa News Network. Contact her at sleach@ottawanewsnetwork.org. Follow her on Twitter @ONNLeach.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legislative recap for Wednesday, June 4
Legislative recap for Wednesday, June 4

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Legislative recap for Wednesday, June 4

Members of the Maine House of Representatives during the first session of 2024 in the State House in Augusta. Jan. 3, 2024. (Photo: Jim Neuger/ Maine Morning Star) Lawmakers are divided on what to do with a proposal to modify the law born out of a 2021 referendum question requiring the Maine Legislature to approve any new high-impact transmission lines. Although legislators who worked on the campaign saw it as an effort to clarify the law, LD 810 fell shy of passage in the House of Representatives on Tuesday with lawmakers voting 72-75 before ultimately killing the bill under the hammer. However, the Senate passed the bill 18-16 on Wednesday. It is now up to the House to determine if it will hold its ground or join the Senate in supporting the bill. With papers shuffling between chambers this week, Maine Morning Star has compiled a slightly more pared down roundup for Wednesday, forgoing the list of all bills voted on and focusing on the biggest items of debates as well as legislation and issues that we've followed all session. Here's an overview of what happened Wednesday. Both chambers The Maine House of Representatives and Senate have now backed LD 1668, which would change the voting requirements to extend the data of adjournment for the Legislature. Currently, a two-thirds vote in each chamber is needed to do so. The bill would change it to only an affirmative vote of a simple majority in both chambers. After the Senate voted 20-14 in favor of the bill on Monday, the House narrowly voted 72-71 in favor on Wednesday. Both chambers also passed a bill that would expand summer school programming, LD 1624, with the Senate approving it without a roll call after it passed the House with a 75-71 vote on Tuesday. The Senate also followed the action taken by the House earlier this week to reject LD 1982, a late-session bill that wanted to change how perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as PFAS, are defined in state law. (Read more on that proposal here.) After the House backed it, the Senate approved LD 1248, a bill proposing to loosen the restrictions on restraint and seclusion in schools. (Read more about restraint and seclusion here.) Both chambers have also now passed LD 437, which would develop a pilot program to place child care facilities in a few school districts statewide. Legislation (LD 10) that would add political affiliation as a protected class to the Maine Human Rights Act. The House voted against it on Wednesday, after the Senate did on Tuesday. (Read more about this bill here.) The chambers can't agree on LD 1960, which would exempt electronic smoking devices or other tobacco products containing ingestible hemp from the tax imposed on tobacco products. The House voted against the bill on Wednesday after the Senate voted for it on Tuesday. The chambers also still can't agree on a bill submitted by the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (LD 402), which would move the Natural Areas Program from the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry to the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, among other technical tweaks. Earlier this week, the House passed the bill with one amendment, while the Senate passed it with another. On Wednesday, the House and Senate insisted on their positions, essentially killing the bill. On Wednesday, the House also insisted, 81-61, on its vote against LD 544, aimed to create parity in the taxation of medicine by exempting sales of cannabis for medical use. This position is counter to the committee recommendation and Senate vote in favor of passage. With the Senate insisting on its position Wednesday, this bill is also essentially dead. With a narrow 72-71 vote, the House did change its position on LD 588. The bill seeks to grant agricultural workers the right to engage in concerted activity. After initially voting against its passage, the House on Wednesday receded and concurred with the Senate, which passed it. The bill now heads back to the Senate. Though the Housing and Economic Development Committee was evenly split, the Senate passed a proposed pilot project that would allow 30 small businesses from the farming, fishing and logging industries to set aside up to $250,000 of revenue, sheltered from income tax, to use for capital expenses in the future. Senate Minority Leader Trey Stewart (R-Aroostook) said he introduced this bill again this session because it could provide flexibility for the most critical components of Maine's economy: its heritage industries. LD 195 includes a sunset date of 2029. Sen. Jeff Timberlake (R-Androscoggin),whose family has been farming in Maine since 1803, encouraged his colleagues to let the state try this out because it could help counter the year-to-year financial swings farms experience. The Senate voted 17-16 to reject a bill (LD 1535) that would require the Public Utilities Commission to gather a group of municipal, police and fire officials to discuss the high electricity usage related to illegal cannabis grows in the state. While Sen. Craig Hickman (D-Kennebec) agreed the state should look into that issue, he said the Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee is carrying over legislation into the next session that could provide a more comprehensive approach, including this sort of study. The House passed a bill, LD 957, that would require Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander history to be included in the next review of content standards and performance indicators. (Read more about this bill here.) The House passed and enacted LD 1664, a proposal to amend the Dirigo Business Incentives program, which offers eligible businesses the opportunity to greatly reduce state taxes for up to five years. While the bill initially sought to repeal the program, the amended version passed would only change some program criteria. LD 613, a bill supported by the Maine Medical Association that allows terminally ill patients to waive the current 17-day waiting period for access to life-ending medication, also the House 74-64 Wednesday. Several members shared stories about their loved ones' end-of-life care. However, Rep. Kathy Irene Javner (R- Chester) argued the bill 'removes the very pause that gives patients, families and physicians, the opportunity to reflect, to seek counsel to consider alternative palliative options.' After a lot of discussion, lawmakers voted 72-70 to pass LD 1036, which would prohibit landlords from refusing to rent to tenants solely because they rely on programs such as General Assistance or housing vouchers. Some lawmakers objected to the restrictions the bill would put on landlords, but others, including bill co-sponsor Rep. Cheryl Golek (D-Harpswell) said many residents relying on General Assistance are rejected from renting because of stigma, which the bill aims to address. (Read more about the proposal here). 'We as a state can only create fair housing once we take the steps to remove the discrimination within the housing opportunities,' Golek said. 'Protection from source-of-income discrimination, protection is one significant way we can apply and protect this to people.' The House also passed an amended version of LD 396 that would establish a grant program to encourage schools to adopt start times at 8:30 a.m. or later. A heavily amended version of LD 1787, passed the House. The bill initially sought to allow candidates for district attorney, sheriff and county commissioner to participate in the Maine Clean Election Act, but the version now being considered was amended to increase the contribution limits for gubernatorial seed money donations. (Read more about other proposals related to changing Maine's clean elections here.) The House also passed an amended version of LD 1726, which seeks to improve planning for the future of the energy grid, with a 75-69 vote. Legislation (LD 1900) to grant authority to certain Wabanaki Nations to develop tribal power districts and recognizes the authority for child support enforcement passed the HOuse fter heated discussions about the effectiveness of masks in schools during which Rep. John Eder (R-Waterboro) asked Speaker Ryan Fecteau if he would like to apologize for mandating masks, the House voted 73-69 to reject a proposal (LD 1461) to prohibit school boards from instituting future mask mandates. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

EPA seeks more time on PFAS water rule
EPA seeks more time on PFAS water rule

E&E News

time5 days ago

  • E&E News

EPA seeks more time on PFAS water rule

EPA is still evaluating how it plans to regulate 'forever chemicals' in drinking water, a process that has taken 'longer than anticipated,' the Trump administration said in a court filing Wednesday. The agency is asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for another 45-day pause in litigation challenging last year's first-ever national drinking water rule for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS. EPA has said it will maintain stringent limits in tap water for two substances, PFOA and PFOS, while giving water utilities an additional two years to meet those limits. But it is still considering to what extent it will regulate other PFAS included in the Biden-era rule. EPA says it will propose a new rule in the fall. Advertisement 'EPA is still evaluating the impact of its planned reconsideration and compliance extension proceedings on the issues presented in this case,' attorneys for EPA said in the new court filing. 'This evaluation has taken longer than anticipated at the time EPA filed its last motion to govern.'

Bill would cover ‘Forever Chemical' exposure at bases under VA benefits
Bill would cover ‘Forever Chemical' exposure at bases under VA benefits

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

Bill would cover ‘Forever Chemical' exposure at bases under VA benefits

A bipartisan bill would allow veterans with health issues caused by exposure to 'forever chemicals' at U.S. military bases to be treated as service-connected disabilities, which would further open the door to health care and benefits compensation for those impacted. Forever chemicals, more technically known as polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, are long-lasting chemicals that break down slowly. They are found in many everyday objects, food, and in air, water, and soil around the world, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The bill, titled 'Veterans Exposed to Toxic PFAS Act,'' or the ''VET PFAS Act,' would designate exposure to PFAS as a service-connected condition for veterans, making them eligible for disability compensation through the Department of Veterans Affairs. It would also allow military dependents, including those 'in utero while the mother' resided at a base with PFAS exposures, to be eligible for hospital care and medical services for certain diseases and conditions, according to the text of the bill. If passed, the legislation would be a major expansion of health conditions and illnesses for which veterans could receive VA care and disability benefits. The bill was introduced in the House on May 29 by New York Rep. Josh Riley, a Democrat, and Rep. Mike Lawler, a Republican, and builds upon measures from the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act. The PACT Act, passed in 2022, was the largest expansion of service-connected health conditions eligible for VA care, including service members exposed to burn pits during Iraq and Afghanistan deployments, for Vietnam War veterans exposed to Agent Orange-related chemicals, and very specific instances of base exposures. The Department of Defense has identified 718 bases with known or suspected PFAS release. The military estimates that PFAS investigation and cleanup costs could come to more than $9.3 billion in fiscal year 2025, which was more than triple the estimate in 2022. Since 2017, the Defense Department has spent around $2.6 billion to address PFAS, according to a Government Accountability report from February. The bill states that covered health conditions would be identified by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the agency administrator of the Department of Health and Human Services' registry for toxic substances and diseases. Their suggestions would come from studies directed by Congress in the annual defense bill for fiscal year 2018, which are ongoing from the Centers for Disease Control. The CDC's website on health investigations states that existing research suggests that high levels of PFAS could lead to increased cholesterol, changes in liver enzymes, pre-eclampsia in pregnant women, decreases in birth weight, and increased risks of kidney and testicular cancers. The bill specifically calls for health care coverage of perfluorooctanoic acid exposures for veterans diagnosed with high cholesterol, ulcerative colitis, thyroid disease, testicular cancer, kidney cancer, and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Other iterations of the legislation have been previously introduced. Some Democratic senators have expressed interest in crafting their own PFAS bill, but nothing formal has been introduced yet, a spokesperson for the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee told Task & Purpose. The issue of forever chemicals on military bases and their health impacts on military families has been gaining support in Congress. In April, Senate Democrats held an event on the Hill with former service members and their families who called for a broadening of the PACT Act. At the April event, military families described cancers and other illnesses they believe are the result of PFAS exposures, including former bases like George Air Force Base, California, which later became superfund sites, a designation by the EPA as one of the most polluted sites in the U.S. Despite the designation, the families based there were never notified of their potential exposure. The PACT Act also established a framework for the VA to establish presumptive conditions without an act of Congress through the federal rule-making process. The VA began the process for defining PFAS exposure as a presumptive health condition for VA care with a federal register notice in September. However, an executive order issued by President Donald Trump in January paused all federal rule-making. Navy SEAL Team 6 operator will be the military's new top enlisted leader Veterans receiving disability payments might have been underpaid, IG finds Guam barracks conditions are 'baffling,' Navy admiral says in email Navy fires admiral in charge of unmanned systems office after investigation The Pentagon wants troops to change duty stations less often

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store