logo
RFK Jr. fired all 17 members of key vaccine committee ACIP. What exactly does that mean?

RFK Jr. fired all 17 members of key vaccine committee ACIP. What exactly does that mean?

USA Today4 days ago

RFK Jr. fired all 17 members of key vaccine committee ACIP. What exactly does that mean?
Show Caption
Hide Caption
RFK Jr. expels entire CDC vaccine advisory committee
Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. removed a 17-member panel at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that issues recommendations on vaccines.
unbranded - Newsworthy
For more than 60 years, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has heavily relied on an independent expert panel to establish vaccine recommendations.
But for the first time in its history, no one is currently serving on that advisory committee after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all its 17 sitting members on June 9.
Noel Brewer, a professor at the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, had been on the panel, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), since July 2024 before the firings blindsided him.
'It's surprising… shocking,' he said. 'None of us had any idea that this was coming, so it came out of the blue and it was not something that's ever been done before with ACIP.'
Kennedy plans to replace the fired members with new people 'currently under consideration,' according to a statement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Kennedy's decision marks a reversal from what a key Republican senator said the Trump Cabinet member had promised during his confirmation hearings earlier this year. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-Louisiana, chair of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, said Kennedy had promised to maintain the advisory committee's current composition.
"If confirmed, he will maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices without changes," Cassidy said.
In a June 9 post on X, Cassidy said he's in contact with Kennedy to ensure that ACIP won't "be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines."
Kennedy says "a clean sweep" will "reestablish public confidence in vaccine science," and some who follow the Make America Healthy Again movement praise his decision, but former health officials and medical experts worry the firings will sow more distrust in the public health system and impede access to vaccines.
'An important part of our social contract is trust and introducing unnecessary chaos and disruption violates that trust,' said Cathy Bradley, dean of the Colorado School of Public Health.
Vaccine guidance: RFK Jr. fires entire 17-member CDC vaccine board. Here are the vaccines they recommended
What does ACIP do?
After the Food and Drug Administration approves a vaccine, ACIP reviews the scientific evidence to create guidance on who should receive it based on age, preexisting medical conditions and other factors.
The CDC director approves these recommendations, which shape guidance from other medical organizations and insurance coverage.
In an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal, Kennedy said the committee has been 'plagued with persistent conflicts of interest,' citing evidence from 25 years ago. Brewer said the committee has since strengthened its vetting process, which typically takes a year from nomination to member status.
'All ACIP members go through a vetting for conflicts of interest,' he said. 'We're not allowed to have them during our time, we're not allowed to accept money from drug companies for consulting or grants, we're not allowed to sue them.'
Members are required to disclose any conflicts of interest, which are published on the CDC website. Meetings are also open to the public, typically livestreamed on the CDC website, and are open for public comment.
'It's a very open and transparent process which leads to a body of individuals with different types of expertise,' said Dr. Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting director of the CDC. 'Pulling information from decades ago to disparage the ACIP was ludicrous.'
Can Americans still get vaccinated?
Vaccine guidance regarding all the shots recommended for adults and children remains in place, for now, which means eligible patients should have access to these vaccines.
But Dr. Tina Tan, a pediatric infectious disease physician and president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, said that may change as Kennedy appoints new members to the advisory committee.
She fears the administration could walk back certain vaccine recommendations, similar to how Kennedy dropped COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women on May 27.
Changing vaccine recommendations could impact how private insurance companies cover certain vaccines, Tan said, which could deter Americans from getting vaccinated and fuel outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases.
ACIP also determines which vaccines are included in the Vaccines for Children program, which provides vaccines to children whose parents or guardians may not be able to afford them.
Changes made to the program would be a 'great concern for public health,' Brewer said.
It's also unclear if COVID-19 vaccines will be available in the fall, he said. The committee met in April to discuss the COVID-19 shot, among other vaccines, but Kennedy canceled the vote that would have made recommendations for the fall.
ACIP is scheduled to meet again between June 25 and June 27 with its new committee members, according to the HHS statement.
More details: RFK Jr. fires entire CDC vaccine advisory panel
What parents should know
Doctors and public health experts urge parents to continue discussing vaccine options with their pediatricians and primary care providers.
Tan also said professional organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Medical Association are working together to ensure that children have access to vaccines despite possible changes to the recommendations.
She encourages parents to look to these national organizations for guidance and support, and to vaccinate their children if they're not up to date with their shots.
'They need to get up to date now, given the fact that access to vaccines at this moment shouldn't be an issue,' she said. 'The American public needs to understand that the federal agencies that were in place before… they're not going to be the same now."
Adrianna Rodriguez can be reached at adrodriguez@usatoday.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats squaring off in Virginia primaries say one name a lot: Trump
Democrats squaring off in Virginia primaries say one name a lot: Trump

Hamilton Spectator

time22 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Democrats squaring off in Virginia primaries say one name a lot: Trump

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Two Virginia Democrats are battling Tuesday to be their party's nominee for attorney general. Yet, the name mentioned most in their campaigns is not that of their opponent, but rather a man who lives just over the Arlington Memorial Bridge: President Donald Trump. The barrage of changes Trump has wrought to American culture in the first few months of his second White House residency has ignited the campaigns of Virginia Democrats Jay Jones and Shannon Taylor as they appeal unrelentingly to the most devout swaths of their base ahead of down-ballot primary elections. The primary will also determine the party's nominations this year for lieutenant governor and some contested seats in the House of Delegates. In one of only two states electing governors in November — the other is New Jersey — the caustic anti-Trump rhetoric could be a hint of what voters nationwide will hear from Democrats in next year's midterm elections, when the stakes will be higher. Virginia's nominees for governor have been settled by default. Democrat Abigail Spanberger became her party's nominee after running unopposed, and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears was the only contender who gathered enough signatures to be on the ballot. The other statewide races are for attorney general and lieutenant governor, and Democrats in both contests seem to be vying to top each other with anti-Trump rhetoric and caustic ads. Republicans are not hosting statewide primaries this year, so only Democrats will pick a nominee for lieutenant governor. It's a part-time position that pays about $36,000 a year but is often a stepping stone to higher office. Six Democrats want the job , and most of them have pushed ad after ad on the airwaves and online about their commitment to taking on Trump if elected to the mostly ceremonial role. In the contest for attorney general, Jones and Taylor are competing in much the same way. Turnout is likely to be sluggish, which means firing up base voters is widely seen as the way to go. The last time a left-wing candidate for governor ran unopposed, roughly 142,000 Democrats voted for an attorney general nominee compared with more than 485,000 this past election cycle. Still, the AG's race has been spicy, more so when the candidates' criticism isn't directed at each other. Jones and Taylor have lambasted the White House and argued that the administration's actions should be litigated in court. When they are not lamenting Trump, their attacks are directed toward incumbent Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares, who is seeking reelection. In their respective campaigns, the Democrats argue that Miyares submits to the president by not suing him. They say that sets him apart from more progressive attorneys general across the United States, who are going to court over such things as birthright citizenship and elections . Their main message: A Democrat will take the White House to trial when Miyares won't — and saving democracy starts there. 'The job is to protect Virginians, to fight for them, to work for them, to keep us safe,' Jones said while campaigning in June in Falls Church, Virginia, adding, 'I don't understand why he is not going after them.' Last month, Taylor told a room full of Democratic voters that Miyares would enable Trump's overreaches in Virginia, and potentially double down on institutions that don't comply with the president. Either way, 'the result is the same for Virginians: getting hurt,' she said. In a wide-ranging interview in May, Miyares said he identifies as a balls-and-strikes Republican. The former Virginia Beach state delegate, elected top prosecutor in 2021, worked to reduce violent crime. He sought settlements from Big Pharma. When he felt President Joe Biden's administration overstepped, he went to court . But as Trump was ushered into office for a second term, Miyares entered new political terrain. Unlike most other states, Virginians will elect their attorney general this November, nearly a year after the country voted for the president and his consequential agenda. Miyares has waded into the political arena. He often spars on social media with progressive prosecutors throughout Virginia for being too lenient in prosecuting criminal cases. Still, Miyares rebuffed the notion that suing Trump is his top concern. He said the Democrats looking to replace him fail to understand the nature of his position. The attorney general touted meaningful work his office has shouldered: holding listening sessions for crime victims, designating resources to support law enforcement and beefing up his office's prosecutions of child support cases. He flashed his law enforcement badge, tucked within a leather wallet, and described the emblem as a guidepost for being an effective people's prosecutor. 'They seem very obsessed with Donald Trump, whereas I'm obsessed with how am I going to keep Virginians safe?' Miyares said. ___ Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Cities brace for large crowds at anti-Trump ‘No Kings' demonstrations across the US
Cities brace for large crowds at anti-Trump ‘No Kings' demonstrations across the US

Boston Globe

time23 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Cities brace for large crowds at anti-Trump ‘No Kings' demonstrations across the US

Police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades while officials enforced curfews in Los Angeles and Democratic governors called Trump's Guard deployment 'an alarming abuse of power' that 'shows the Trump administration does not trust local law enforcement.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Governors and city officials vowed to protect the right to protest and to show no tolerance for violence. Advertisement Republican governors in Virginia, Texas, Nebraska and Missouri are mobilizing National Guard troops to help law enforcement manage demonstrations. There will be 'zero tolerance' for violence, destruction or disrupting traffic, and 'if you violate the law, you're going to be arrested,' Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin told reporters Friday. In Missouri, Gov. Mike Kehoe issued a similar message, vowing to take a proactive approach and not to 'wait for chaos to ensue.' Nebraska's governor on Friday also signed an emergency proclamation for activating his state's National Guard, a step his office called 'a precautionary measure in reaction to recent instances of civil unrest across the country.' Advertisement Organizers say that one march will go to the gates of Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, where Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis warned demonstrators that the 'line is very clear' and not to cross it. Governors also urged calm. On social media, Washington state Gov. Bob Ferguson, a Democrat, called for peaceful protests over the weekend, to ensure Trump doesn't send military to the state. 'Donald Trump wants to be able to say that we cannot handle our own public safety in Washington state,' Ferguson said. In a statement Friday, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, urged 'protestors to remain peaceful and calm as they exercise their First Amendment right to make their voices heard.' Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, said his administration and state police are working with police in Philadelphia ahead of what organizers estimate could be a crowd approaching 100,000 people. Philadelphia's top prosecutor, District Attorney Larry Krasner, warned that anyone coming to Philadelphia to break the law or immigration agents exceeding their authority will face arrest. He invoked civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. as a guide for demonstrators. 'If you are doing what Martin Luther King would have done, you're going to be fine,' Krasner told a news conference. Some law enforcement agencies announced they were ramping up efforts for the weekend. In California, state troopers will be on 'tactical alert,' which means all days off are canceled for all officers. Why is it called 'No Kings'? The 'No Kings' theme was orchestrated by the 50501 Movement, to support democracy and against what they call the authoritarian actions of the Trump administration. The name 50501 stands for 50 states, 50 protests, one movement. Advertisement Protests earlier this year have denounced Trump and billionaire adviser Elon Musk. Protesters have called for Trump to be 'dethroned' as they compare his actions to that of a king and not a democratically elected president. Why are they protesting on Saturday? The No Kings Day of Defiance has been organized to reject authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics and the militarization of the country's democracy, according to a statement by organizers. Organizers intend for the protests to counter the Army's 250th anniversary celebration — which Trump has ratcheted up to include a military parade, which is estimated to cost $25 million to $45 million that the Army expects to attract as many as 200,000 people. The event will feature hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers. It also happens to be Trump's 79th birthday and Flag Day. 'The flag doesn't belong to President Trump. It belongs to us,' the 'No Kings' website says. 'On June 14th, we're showing up everywhere he isn't — to say no thrones, no crowns, no kings.' What is planned at the 'No Kings' protests? Protests in nearly 2,000 locations are scheduled around the country, from city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, organizers said. Demonstrations are expected to include speeches and marches, organizers said in a call Wednesday. The group says a core principle behind all 'No Kings' events is a commitment to nonviolent action, and participants are expected to seek to de-escalate any confrontation. No weapons of any kind should be taken to 'No Kings' events, according to the website. How many people are expected to participate? The No Kings Day of Defiance is expected to be the largest single-day mobilization since Trump returned to office, organizers said. Organizers said they are preparing for millions of people to take to the streets across all 50 states and commonwealths. Advertisement

Two in three Americans oppose using tax money for military parade: poll
Two in three Americans oppose using tax money for military parade: poll

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Two in three Americans oppose using tax money for military parade: poll

A new survey from the NBC Decision Desk Poll, powered by Survey Monkey, showed that 64 percent of Americans disapprove of the use of state funds for this weekend's military parade. On Saturday starting at 6:30 p.m., 150 vehicles, 50 aircraft and 6,600 soldiers will parade the street of Washington, D.C., to mark the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, which also coincides with President Trump's 79th birthday. Depending on the weather, there could also be an air show. The celebration is estimated to cost between $25 million and $45 million taxpayer dollars, according to the Army. The price also includes potential damage to public spaces caused by tanks driving on the streets. Overall, 88 percent of Democrats and 72 percent of Independents disapprove of the use of government funds, while 68 percent of Republicans support it. Within the Republican party, the MAGA faction approves up to 75 percent while more moderate Republicans approve at 56 percent. The question the poll asked respondents was: 'As you may know, President Trump has ordered a military parade in Washington D.C. on June 14th to commemorate the U.S. Army's 250th Birthday. Defense officials estimate the cost for this parade could be as much as 45 million dollars. Do you support or oppose the use of government funds for the parade?' Respondents were asked whether they supported or opposed, moderately or strongly. Fourteen percent of adults say they strongly support federal funding for the parade. In contrast, 44 percent say they strongly oppose it. Twenty-two percent say they somewhat support it compared to 20 percent who say they are somewhat opposed. The poll was conducted from May 30 to June 10 among 19,4100 adults nationwide. The margin of error stands at plus or minus 2.1 percent. An Associated Press-NORC Center of Public Affairs Research survey also confirmed that 60 percent of Americans said the parade was 'not a good use of government funds.' Democrats have had strong reactions to the parade. 'If it was really about celebrating military families, we could put $30 million toward helping them offset the cost of their child care, food assistance and tuition,' said Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) on X on June 5. 'We all like to enjoy a nice birthday party. But most of us don't celebrate with a $45 million taxpayer-funded military parade,' Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said on X. This demonstration of force also contrasts with Trump's deployment of 4,000 members of the National Guard and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to squall protests over immigration raids. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store