
Keeping countries company: Deglobalisation does not alter the need for corporate nationality— it actually reinforces it
Do
corporate citizenship
and matters like 'nationality' matter for companies, especially those aspiring for '
MNC-hood
', in circa 2025? GoI's revocation of security clearance to Istanbul-based Celebi Aviation Holding for providing airport ground handling services in India certainly reinforces the argument that it does. In fact, ironically, they seem to matter more in a globalised economy.
By pledging to stand by Islamabad in 'good times and bad' - including during the aftermath of the latest Pakistan-backed terrorist attack in Pahalgam that saw an escalation in India-Pakistan conflict - Turkiye is helping Pakistan extend the life cycle of arms bought from Nato members that have since switched off the supply pipeline. This places Turkiye in the same corner as China from India's national security perspective. Turkish companies operating in India must, therefore, adjust to the evolving geopolitics.
Chinese companies face a raft of security obstacles in doing business in India, running the gamut of capital monitoring to outright bans. The Indian response is shaped by strategic relations with China that have deteriorated over border disputes. Some of India's concerns around the links Chinese companies have to the country's military complex are shared by the US.
Play Video
Pause
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded
:
0%
0:00
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
default
, selected
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You
Villas In Dubai | Search Ads
Get Rates
Undo
Such developments debunk the notion that companies tend to outgrow their home markets to become stateless economic agents. While governments facilitate cross-border investment, they are unwilling to lose agency over the source of capital, or identity of the vehicle it is transported in. Corporate passports, thus, matter, and investment treaties are structured to improve identification.
Corporate structures have become increasingly complex, in part driven by the opportunity to treaty-shop for favourable tax treatment. Yet, broadly, nationality can still be established through management control and beneficial ownership. The idea is to plug tax evasion, and legal interpretations have gone beyond a narrow reading of incorporation.
Live Events
A large majority of foreign affiliates are easy to identify with both the direct and ultimate owner from the same country. Conduit structures emerge when direct and ultimate owners are in different foreign countries. Round-tripping occurs when the ultimate owner is from the host country and the direct owner is from a foreign country. Domestic hubs arise when the direct owner is from the host country, but the ultimate owner is foreign.
In the list above, conduit structures and round-tripping present policy challenges to countries by widening investment coverage to unintended foreign and domestic economic agents. Complex ownership structures, by and large, facilitate tax entities to shift incidence from high-tax to low-tax jurisdictions. Tax avoidance and treaty abuse can be curbed through improved identification of
corporate nationality
. It also serves national security interests.
From a corporate standpoint, presenting nationality is a powerful calling card. It reinforces branding and can be used to gain market access. This matters when supply chains have become globalised where the culture of management and shareholders acts as a differentiator. Since most global investment decisions are designed to optimise taxes, emphasising or de-emphasising national identity can be used as a business strategy.
Countries can push their agenda for environment, labour and consumer protection through corporate nationality. Multinationals operating across jurisdictions can act as a harmonising force over standards by their needs to abide by the highest levels available. Governments have cause beyond tax and security to uphold corporate nationality, and this contributes to its abiding importance. It helps direct investment to countries a government is comfortable doing business with.
Deglobalisation does not alter the need for corporate nationality. It actually reinforces it. Markets vacated by foreign companies are filled up by local firms, and this process becomes accretive. This is the premise of governments offering protection to domestic industry through tariffs. Donald Trump is asking Apple to make more iPhones at home. The offer is most certainly available to
Samsung
as well. But the preference is clearly for the domestic company.
MNCs will try to keep deglobalisation in check, because it doesn't make sense to build everything at home. Their advantage lies, apart from innovation, in scale, and they must be free to seek either where it is available.
TikTok
has offered to rearrange its corporate structure to satisfy US lawmakers. Yet, investors in the US would prefer that it is bought over by an American company.
Companies and countries have a delicate interplay of interests that serve to define corporate nationality. Nations are limited by their borders, but can extend their economic influence through the culture of their companies. This holds true across periods of integration as well as retraction in the world economy. Corporates benefit through their culture that influences organisational behaviour. They shape national engagement with the rest of the world, but are also subject to political changes.
As the global order changes,
cross-border acquisitions
will change corporate nationality at an accelerated pace. Technology supports this trend. But caution needs to be exercised over determining corporate identity in an era of rising conflict and economic warfare. Global resources are becoming the choice of tool for countries to impose their will on others. Since companies manage most of the world's resources, they will come into the frontline of global conflict.
Possessing corporate nationality under these circumstances is better than having none. It is an agent for economic progress, as well as a defence against political turmoil. Globalisation has not obscured the nationality of individuals and economic agents. A pushback will sharpen focus on identity.
dipankar.bhattacharyya@timesofindia.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
36 minutes ago
- India Today
Bangladesh election: Is Yunus just buying time amid political pressure?
Muhammad Yunus, the chief adviser to the interim government in Bangladesh, on Friday addressed the nation and declared that elections would be held in the first half of April 2026. The announcement runs counter to the demands of polls in December by a host of parties, including the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), which is the frontrunner to win the election. The situation of uncertainty in Bangladesh improves just marginally with Yunus' the Communist Party of Bangladesh insisted on polls in December, the student-led National Citizens Party (NCP) said it was fine with polls in April if effective steps were taken to implement the July Charter, July Declaration and reforms by then, according to reports by Dhaka-based Prothom declaring that the election would be held in April, Yunus didn't provide any specific dates. Revealing that he wasn't really prepared, no details or schedule were provided as to how the administration plans to utilise the months in the run-up to the election in April. "There is a possibility that Yunus might not be able to conduct the election in a very free and fair way due to the given political circumstances. In that case, the country will be in a big dark circle," Dhaka-based activist academic Rezaur Rahman Lenin told India Today he took over as the Chief Adviser to the interim government in Bangladesh in August 2024 after protesters forced PM Sheikh Hasina into exile, Yunus has ruled in confusion, chaos and announcement reveals that he plans to continue in that same Yunus and advisers on his council had earlier said that elections would be held between December 2025 and June the announcement, Yunus and his team, including the student advisers, have around nine months to prepare for the election. While governments have conducted elections in such a timeframe, this might be a difficult task because the entire machinery has been shaken up and those in power are talking about student-founded NCP is also demanding a revamp of the election commission to purge it of "BNP loyalists".While Yunus and the NCP have been prioritising reforms, the BNP wants elections held first. It knows that with Hasina's Awami League becoming infamous and banned, it has the momentum with it now, which might fizzle out for some there is a genuine fear of the NCP becoming the "king's party" with student advisers still part of the Yunus government. The lines between the NCP and the interim government have leader Ruhul Kabir Rizvi had just on June 5 accused the interim government of "resorting to tactics" to delay the election. Not just the BNP, around 50 other parties have been demanding that the polls be held in December, according to a report in the Dhaka-based Army Chief General Waker-Uz-Zaman also called for elections by December, saying that an elected government should take policy decisions for the pressure, Yunus told the advisory council and NCP leader Nahid Islam that he planned to resign as the Chief Advisor. This saw a flurry of activity, and leaders said they had persuaded Yunus to stay the road ahead isn't going to be smooth and without major arguments was hinted by the NCP on Friday, right after Yunus announced that the election would be held in April."If effective steps are taken to implement the July Charter, July Declaration and reforms within this period, then we have no objection to holding the elections on the announced date," NCP member secretary Akhtar Hossain told Prothom NCP is trying to project itself as a rising force to take on the established BNP, which has seen frequent number of political killings have taken place against members of both the BNP and the NCP. Around 70–80 people have been killed in political clashes," said Rezaur APRIL ISN'T THE BEST TIME FOR ELECTIONThe Communist Party of Bangladesh (CPB) on Friday expressed disappointment over the election timing."We do not understand why he [Yunus] wanted to hold the elections in April," the CPB's general secretary Ruhin Hossain Prince said, according to Prothom Alo."...We have clearly said, an elected government is definitely needed by 2025," he is the best period for elections in country sees pre-monsoon Kalbaishakhi storms between March and during the public exam period (typically February to April), most school and college teachers are tied up with invigilation and evaluation duties, and result processing for several months, making them largely unavailable for crucial election Yunus has declared that an election will be held by April, this doesn't end the uncertainty, and improves the situation, even if so, just marginally. What seems to be Yunus' attempt here is to buy time even as parties clamour for an election in InMust Watch


Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
What is Canada's Bill C-3? How will it help Indian-origin residents, 'lost canadians'?
Canada amends its Citizenship Act to making Canadian citizenship easier to obtain. Canada decided to amend its Citizenship Act, widening the scope of who can become a Canadian citizen in a relief to many Indian-origin residents at a time when Indians are facing hard times in the US owing to the crackdown of the Donald Trump administration. Bill C-3 would allow a Canadian parent who was not born in Canada to pass on citizenship to children born abroad beyond the first generation. This would be applicable to even child adopted abroad and beyond the first generation. But the parent must have a substantial connection to Canada which means he or she must have stayed in Canada for cumulative 1095 days, three years, before the birth or the adoption of the child. The bill would also benefit 'lost Canadians', a term that refers to those who lost Canadian citizenship or were denied a Canadian citizenship before due to certain provisions of the former citizenship law. "Most cases were remedied by changes to the law in 2009 and 2015. These changes allowed people to gain Canadian citizenship or get back the citizenship they lost. Despite this, additional amendments are needed to include other categories of 'Lost Canadians' and their descendants who did not benefit from the 2009 and 2015 changes," the government said. "Bill C-3 will restore citizenship to remaining 'Lost Canadians,' their descendants and anyone who was born abroad to a Canadian parent in the second or subsequent generations before the legislation comes into force. This includes people who lost their citizenship as a result of requirements under the former section 8 of the Citizenship Act," it said. The present citizenship law has a first-generation limit which means a Canadian parent can only pass on Canadian citizenship to a child born outside Canada if the parent was either born or naturalized in Canada before the birth of the child. Because of this limitation, Canadian citizens who were born outside Canada and obtained their citizenship through descent cannot pass on citizenship to their child born outside Canada, and cannot apply for a direct grant of citizenship for a child adopted outside Canada.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
44 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Indian ambassador, Chinese official discuss ties, Kailash Mansarovar Yatra
Top diplomats from India and China met recently to review bilateral relations and work towards implementing the understanding reached by their leaders last year, the Ministry of External Affairs said on Friday. The meeting, held on Thursday, was between Indian Ambassador to China Pradeep Kumar Rawat and China's Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong, according to a report by the Press Trust of India. It marked the first diplomatic engagement between the two countries since Operation Sindoor. According to a statement from the Chinese Foreign Ministry, 'Both sides expressed their willingness to work together to earnestly implement the important consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries.' Plans for cultural and strategic cooperation The two sides also discussed ways to enhance cultural exchanges and mutually beneficial cooperation. The statement said both nations would 'properly manage differences, and promote the development of China-India relations along a healthy and stable track.' In addition, the diplomats 'exchanged views on the issues of common concern,' the Chinese statement added. Sun, who is currently in charge of South Asia affairs at the Chinese Foreign Ministry, previously served as China's Ambassador to India. Thursday's meeting also comes as preparations are being made to resume the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra in Tibet for Indian pilgrims. If resumed, this would be the first such step following a prolonged military standoff in eastern Ladakh that had stalled bilateral ties for over four years. Earlier on April 26, India's Ministry of External Affairs had announced that the Yatra would be held from June to August via two routes — the Lipulekh Pass in Uttarakhand and Nathu La in Sikkim. The pilgrimage was first suspended in 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic and later due to the border tensions. It is worth mentioning that after the complete disengagement of troops at Demchok and Depsang, based on an agreement reached in October last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping met in Russia's Kazan. There, they agreed to revive multiple bilateral dialogue mechanisms. Since then, several meetings have taken place to help restore normal diplomatic relations. Rawat and Sun had earlier met on April 9 to discuss ties and cooperation in different sectors. Impossible to ignore China: Shashi Tharoor The recent meeting came against the backdrop of Operation Sindoor, launched by India after the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam that claimed 26 lives. After the Pahalgam attack, India carried out precision strikes targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. Four days of military action followed from both sides, ending after military officials from both nations held talks on May 10 and agreed to cease further operations. On Thursday (June 5), Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said it was 'absolutely impossible' to ignore China during India's confrontation with Pakistan. 'China is an absolutely impossible factor to ignore in what has been our confrontation with Pakistan,' Tharoor said. He noted that before tensions escalated with Pakistan, India was making 'good progress' in its ties with China. Speaking from the US, where he is heading an all-party delegation for Operation Sindoor outreach, Tharoor added, 'I'm not going to mince my words, but we are aware that China has immense stakes in Pakistan.' The timing of the Rawat-Sun meeting also aligns with rising concerns in India over China's export restrictions on rare earth metals. China currently produces 61 per cent of the world's mined rare earths and controls 92 per cent of the global output, according to the International Energy Agency.