
Russia might use Belarus to attack the Baltics, Tsikhanouskaya says
'Ask your intelligence, what is Russia planning this summer in Belarus?' Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in Lithuania on 2 June.
Addressing a group of nine NATO member countries in eastern and central Europe, Ukraine's president urged them to "bring more strength together" for the possible Russian threat coming from the territory of Belarus.
Belarus opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya told Euronews the large-scale joint military exercises between Russia and Belarus taking place in the autumn might indeed pose a threat to NATO's Eastern flank.
'Don't forget the last military drills in Belarus ended with the attack on Ukraine', she said, referring to the upcoming Zapad 2021 manoeuvres.
In autumn 2021, just months before Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Moscow and Minsk held military exercises in Belarus, training, among other things, for assault operations in densely populated areas with the use of Russian equipment.
Back in 2022 Russia used Belarus as a launching pad for its attacks and full-scale invasion of Ukraine. But Moscow didn't get the people of Belarus to participate in the assault, says Tsikhanouskaya, adding that Belarusians will not go against the Baltic states.
'They might be forced, but it doesn't mean that they will fight there. I hope that people will prefer to escape or change sides, but not fight with the Lithuanians or Poles, especially knowing how much these countries are supporting us'.
The Belarus opposition leader believes that this support is also for her. Since fleeing Belarus in 2020, she has been living in Lithuania, where she is now hearing the concerns and worries about whether her native country can stage an attack on the country which welcomed her when she had to leave home.
'It is a rather dire atmosphere with all the discussions over possible attacks on Lithuania, because Lithuania will be the first country on the way to the European Union', she admits, saying there are also concerns over whether NATO will stand up for Lithuania.
'There are discussions of whether NATO will come to rescue Lithuanias, will there be enough time,' Tsikhanouskaya explains.
Tsikhanouskaya remains optimistic that NATO will step in despite the recent reports of European officials being concerned that Washington might even withdraw US troops from the Baltic states.
'I really do believe in NATO alliance, that with their unity and their power they will send a very clear signal to Putin 'Don't dare'.'
She hopes a similar strong signal will be sent to Aliaksandr Lukashenka of Belarus as well, as the further militarisation of the country is getting worse, Tsikhanouskaya says.
'People notice how regime is militarising our society. There are many enterprises and factories now are working for Russian military. We have all the proofs how enterprises participate in this war against Ukraine.'
Tsikhanouskaya told Euronews that Aliaksandr Lukashenka is also forcing the militarisation of Belarusian society.
'We see how young people are very much involved into this militarisation in schools, in universities, where the militarisation subjects are being taught," she explained.
She said that this way, Lukashenka's regime was trying to show the population that there is an external enemy to unite against — a strategy also used by Moscow.
'They want to show we have external enemies, somebody wants to invade us, so they are saying they try to prepare the nation for some for some possible danger in the future," Tsikhanouskaya pointed out.
But compared to the similar militarisation strategy in Russia, this won't work on the people of Belarus, Tsikhanouskaya said.
And although there is a complete understanding that Belarus might be used by Russia "with the help of Lukashenka for possible future attacks on Ukraine or on the European Union," people will resist the direct involvement.
'I don't think that the same method will work with the Belarusian nation, because Belarusians really don't understand how it is to fight against our neighbor and how to kill our neighbours," Tsikhanouskaya concluded.
Israel has carried out an attack on the Iranian capital of Tehran, in strikes aimed at the country's nuclear programme which also killed several top military officials as well as nuclear scientists. Iran has responded by launching at least 100 drones towards Israel.
IDF spokesperson Brig. General Effie Defrin said Israel is working to intercept the drones. A state of emergency has been declared.
Israel's strikes on Iran, which took place late Thursday into Friday, reportedly killed Hossein Salami, chief of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, as well as the chief of staff of the Iranian armed forced. Two top nuclear scientists were also killed, according to Iranian state media.
Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu said the strikes were a "targeted military operation to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival", claiming that "if not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in a very short time."
The Iranian government said Israel's attacks had "proven that it does not abide by any rule of international law. We affirm our right to retaliate, and we will respond to this terrorist entity firmly and decisively."
Earlier, explosions were heard in the Iranian capital, Tehran, as Israel claimed it was attacking the country. Iranian state media reported explosions in the northeastern parts of the city.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed early Friday that an Israeli strike hit Iran's uranium enrichment facility at Natanz.
In a statement on X, the IAEA's Director General, Rafael Mariano Grossi, said: 'The IAEA is closely monitoring the deeply concerning situation in Iran... The Agency is in contact with Iranian authorities regarding radiation levels. We are also in contact with our inspectors in the country.'
Israeli leaders cast the "preemptive assault" as a fight for the nation's survival, adding that it was necessary to head off what they described as an imminent threat that Iran would pose if it developed nuclear weapons.
It remains unclear how close the country is to achieving that or whether it had actually had been planning a strike. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel targeted both nuclear and military sites.
'It could be a year. It could be within a few months," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said as he vowed to pursue the attack for as long as necessary to 'remove this threat.'
"This is a clear and present danger to Israel's very survival,' he said.
The strike on Iran pushed the Israeli military to its limits, requiring the use of aging air-to-air refuelers to get its fighter jets close enough to attack. It wasn't immediately clear if Israeli jets entered Iranian airspace or just fired so-called 'standoff missiles' over another country.
Fighter jets were reportedly heard flying overhead in Iraq at the time of the attack.
The attack comes as tensions have reached new heights over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme. The Board of Governors at the IAEA for the first time in 20 years on Thursday censured Iran over it not working with its inspectors.
Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more-advanced ones.
Israel for years has warned it will not allow Iran to build a nuclear weapon, something Tehran insists it doesn't want — though official there have repeatedly warned it could.
Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz announced a 'emergency situation' in the country following the attacks. He said schools would be closed nationwide on Friday, adding that an Iranian retaliation of missiles and drones are to be expected in the 'immediate future'.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took 'unilateral action against Iran' and that Israel advised Washington that it believed the strikes were necessary for its self-defence.
'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,' Rubio said in a statement released by the White House.
Rubio said the Trump administration took steps to protects its forces and remained in contact with its partners in the region. He also issued a warning to Iran that it should not target US interests or personnel.
A US media outlet says President Donald Trump has reportedly convened his cabinet for an emergency meeting following the Israeli attack.
In the days leading up to the attacks, Washington has made clear that it will not participate in any Israeli attacks on Iran. Trump had urged Israel to refrain from striking Tehran, and to seek diplomatic solutions, but acknowledged that an Israeli strike could very well happen.
Trump earlier said he urged Netanyahu to hold off on any action while the administration negotiated with Iran.
'As long as I think there is a (chance for an) agreement, I don't want them going in because I think it would blow it,' Trump told reporters.
The US has been preparing for something to happen, already pulling some diplomats from Iraq's capital, Baghdad, and offering voluntary evacuations for the families of US troops in the wider Middle East region.
Iran halted flights Friday at Imam Khomeini International Airport outside of Tehran, the country's main airport, according to state-run media. Iran has closed its airspace in the past when launching retaliatory attacks against Israel.
Our journalists are working on this story and will update it as soon as more information becomes available.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
What to expect at the G7 Summit attended by Trump and Zelenskyy
World leaders are arriving in Canada on Sunday for a Group of Seven summit in the resort town of Kananaskis, Alberta in the Canadian Rockies. The Group of Seven comprises Canada, the United States, France, Italy, Japan, Germany and Britain. The European Union is also attending as well as other heads of state who are not part of the G7 but have been invited by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will attend and is expected to meet with his American counterpart Donald Trump, a reunion coming just months after their contentious Oval Office encounter, which laid bare the risks of having a meeting with the US president. Other world leaders will be meeting with Trump both in a group setting and for bilateral talks, which are often precarious as foreign leaders must navigate between placating and confronting him. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum will attend and said she expects to have her first in-person meeting with Trump. Among the other newcomers are German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Ahead of the G7 summit, there are already signs of subtle pushback against Trump from fellow leaders in the group. French President Emanuel Macron planned to visit Greenland over the weekend in a show of European solidarity. Carney has said the US is no longer the 'predominant' force in the world after Trump's tariffs created fissures in a decades-long partnership between the US and its northern neighbour. 'We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a predominant role on the world stage," Carney said this past week in French. "Today, that predominance is a thing of the past.' The new prime minister added that with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the US became the global hegemon, a position of authority undermined by Trump's transactional nature that puts little emphasis on defending democratic values or the rule of law. 'Now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security,' Carney said. Israel's attacks on Iran has added a new wrinkle to the global picture and will likely dominate discussions during the summit. Other topics will likely include Trump's looming tariffs and the war in Ukraine. Italy's Meloni has positioned herself as a 'bridge' between the Trump administration and the rest of Europe. But Italy's strong support of Ukraine and Trump's threatened tariffs on European goods have put Meloni, the only European leader to attend Trump's inauguration, in a difficult position. But even as other G7 leaders defuse any public disputes with Trump, the US president's vision for the world remains largely incompatible with what they want. The grand military parade that US President Donald Trump had been wanting for years barrelled down Constitution Avenue in Washington, DC on Saturday with tanks, troops and a 21-gun salute. It played out against the counterpoint of protests around the country by those who decried the US leader as a dictator and would-be king. During the parade, which coincided with Trump's 79th birthday, he sat on a special viewing stand south of the White House to watch the display of American military might, which began early and moved swiftly as light rain fell and dark clouds shrouded the Washington Monument. The procession, with more than 6,000 soldiers and 128 Army tanks, was one Trump tried to make happen in his first term after seeing such an event in Paris in 2017, but the plans never came together until this year, when the parade was added to an event recognising the Army's 250th anniversary. Hours before the parade started, demonstrators turned out in streets and parks around the nation to sound off against the Republican president. They criticized Trump for using the military to respond to people protesting his deportation efforts and for the muscular military show in the US capital. In Washington, anti-war protesters unfurled signs that said 'Homes not drones' not far from a display of armoured vehicles, helicopters and military-grade equipment on the National Mall set up to commemorate the Army's birthday. Vendors outside the festival sold gear marking the military milestone. Others hawked Trump-themed merchandise. Doug Haynes, a Navy veteran who voted for Trump, attended the daylong festival to celebrate the Army's 250th birthday, but said that the parade 'was a little over the top.' Pointing at a nearby tank, Haynes said that having them roll down the street is a 'very bold statement to the world, perhaps.' 'No Kings' rallies unfolded in hundreds of cities, designed to counter what organisers said were Trump's plans to feed his ego on his 79th birthday and flag day. Organisers said they picked the name to support democracy and speak out against what they call the authoritarian actions of the Trump administration. The parade was added just a few weeks ago to the planned celebration of the Army's birthday and has drawn criticism for its price tag of up to $45 million and the possibility that the lumbering tanks could tear up city streets. The Army has taken a variety of steps to protect the streets, including laying metal plates along the route. The daylong display of America's Army comes as Trump has shown his willingness to use the nation's military might in ways other US presidents have typically avoided. In the last week, he has activated the California National Guard without the governor's permission and dispatched the US Marines to provide security during Los Angeles protests related to immigration raids, prompting a state lawsuit to stop the deployments. A previously calm demonstration in downtown LA quickly turned chaotic as police on horseback charged at the crowd, striking some with wood rods and batons as they cleared the street in front of the federal building. Officers then fired tear gas and crowd control projectiles at the large group, sending demonstrators, hot dog vendors and passing pedestrians fleeing through the street. Some have since regrouped, ignoring an LAPD dispersal order. 'Less lethal has been approved. Less lethal may cause discomfort and pain. It is advised that all persons leave the area,' police said in a post on X. 'It was a total 100% over-reaction. We weren't doing anything but standing around chanting peaceful protest,' said Samantha Edgerton, a 37-year-old bartender. Marines appeared for the first time at a demonstration since they were deployed to city on Friday with the stated mission of defending federal property. Dozens of Marines stood shoulder to shoulder in full combat gear, hands on their rifles, beside other law enforcement, including Department of Homeland Security officers at the National Guard. Directly in front of them, hundreds of protesters jeered in English and Spanish, telling the federal troops to go home.
LeMonde
10 hours ago
- LeMonde
France says it supports Harvard, welcomes foreign students
France's foreign minister on Saturday, June 14 said his country supported students and staff at Harvard, after President Donald Trump tried to ban foreign students from the prestigious US university. "We stand with universities facing the threat of government control, restriction to their funding, constraints on their curricula or research projects," Jean-Noel Barrot said during a commencement address at the high-profile HEC business school in Paris. "We stand with Harvard faculty, with Harvard students, facing unjustified stress and anxiety right now," he added in English. "Should US courts uphold decisions to ban international students, France will offer (them) a safe place to complete their degrees," he said. Universities and research facilities in the United States have come under increasing political and financial pressure under Trump, including with threats of massive federal funding cuts. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top American universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and "viewpoint diversity." A US court last week put a temporary stay on Trump's latest effort to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard. A White House proclamation a day earlier had sought to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country, and said existing foreign enrollees risked having their visas terminated. The US government has already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the institution from any future federal funding. France and the European Union are seeking to encourage disgruntled researchers to relocate from the United States to Europe. European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen said last month that the EU would launch a new incentives package worth 500 million euros ($580 million) to make the 27-nation bloc "a magnet for researchers." French President Emmanuel Macron in April unveiled plans for a funding program to help national universities and other research bodies cover the cost of bringing foreign scientists to the country.


France 24
16 hours ago
- France 24
France says supports Harvard, welcomes foreign students
"We stand with universities facing the threat of government control, restriction to their funding, constraints on their curricula or research projects," Jean-Noel Barrot said during a commencement address at the high-profile HEC business school in Paris. "We stand with Harvard faculty, with Harvard students, facing unjustified stress and anxiety right now," he added in English. "Should US courts uphold decisions to ban international students, France will offer (them) a safe place to complete their degrees," he said. Universities and research facilities in the United States have come under increasing political and financial pressure under Trump, including with threats of massive federal funding cuts. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top American universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and "viewpoint diversity". A US court last week put a temporary stay on Trump's latest effort to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard. A White House proclamation a day earlier had sought to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country, and said existing foreign enrollees risked having their visas terminated. The US government has already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the institution from any future federal funding. France and the European Union are seeking to encourage disgruntled researchers to relocate from the United States to Europe. European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen said last month that the EU would launch a new incentives package worth 500 million euros ($580 million) to make the 27-nation bloc "a magnet for researchers". French President Emmanuel Macron in April unveiled plans for a funding programme to help national universities and other research bodies cover the cost of bringing foreign scientists to the country. © 2025 AFP