
What does the UK-EU deal mean for holidays and jobs? Your questions answered
Many of you have been submitting questions to Your Voice, Your BBC News about the deal signed this week between the UK and European Union.Your questions have touched on a range of issues, including jobs, food and travel.Our experts have been digging into the detail to figure out what the deal means for you and your family.
Will professional qualifications be recognised across the UK-EU border?
Anna Maria, a dental student studying in Bulgaria, asked about mutual recognition of professional qualifications, which was a Labour Party manifesto pledge. Our political reporter Becky Morton has looked into the details of the deal.In its manifesto last year, Labour said it would seek to "secure a mutual recognition agreement for professional qualifications, external to help open up markets for UK service exporters".That would mean professionals such as doctors, lawyers and accountants who qualified in one country could practice in another with minimal extra bureaucracy - a system already in place across the EU.Monday's deal promises to set up "dedicated dialogues" on the recognition of professional qualifications, but a full agreement could take much longer to negotiate.Such an agreement would make it easier for British companies to move staff between the UK and EU and undertake short-term work in Europe.However, there may be less incentive for the EU to agree a deal, given the current situation makes it harder for UK firms to compete for business in Europe.
Will Brits be able go skip long queues for non-EU passport holders?
Malcolm in Bristol wanted more clarity on what the agreement will mean for passport queues for UK citizens visiting the EU. Our transport correspondent Simon Browning explains.While some EU ports and airports already allow UK citizens to use modern e-gates, many do not and queues have become familiar to holidaymakers.The new agreement provides more clarity on e-gates and sets out that in the future, UK citizens will be able to use them - but the EU Commission says that will not come into force in time for this summer.However, the UK government has indicated it is hopeful there could be changes in time for the summer, so the timeline still appears to be up for debate.The EU says there will be no change before a new EU border security scheme comes into force in October, which will see biometric data including fingerprints collected from passengers coming from non-EU countries such as the UK. It will mean manned desks where people will have to queue in order to enter some EU countries could still be a feature of travel beyond this year, even if e-gate usage becomes more widely available.In short, that will mean long queues at some destinations could continue during this holiday season and perhaps beyond.Any decision about UK citizens using e-gates will not be a blanket one across the bloc. Instead, it will be up to individual countries to decide how they manage queues at their borders.
Will pet passports resume in time for the summer?
We have received a lot of questions about pet passports. Our political correspondent Jack Fenwick has looked into when the scheme will be up and running.In short, we just do not know yet whether there will be any change in time for this summer.The agreement between the UK and EU commits to introducing a new passport system which would make it easier for people to travel with their pets and end the need to acquire repeat vet certificates.Many British holidaymakers will be keen for these rules to be introduced in time for their trip this year.However, so-called pet passports come under a part of the deal known as the sanitary and phytosanitary agreement - and while the UK and EU have agreed to work together in this area, the full scope of it has not been fully fleshed out yet.
What does the deal mean for British farmers?
Chris in Bristol asked whether UK farmers would have to accept EU regulations on food standards. Our business correspondent Simon Jack has assessed the impact.The new agreement removes the need for time consuming and costly veterinary checks and forms - but in return, the UK will have to align with EU food standards. As those regulations change, the UK will have to change too. The government insists it will have a say in how those rules develop and it may be able to negotiate exceptions - but they will not have a vote. The National Farmers Union has broadly welcomed the new deal because it provides easier and quicker access to a big market for perishable products, in which the speed that goods can be moved is important.
Will it be easier for British bands to tour in Europe?
Andy in Eastbourne asked whether this deal would allow for the free and unrestricted movement of musicians and bands on tour in Europe. Our political reporter Becky Morton answered.Since Brexit, British musicians have faced extra costs and red tape when touring Europe.The industry has been urging the government to find a solution and Labour's general election manifesto pledged to "help our touring artists" as part of negotiations with the EU.But the deal agreed on Monday only recognises the "value" of touring artists and promises to continue efforts "to support travel and cultural exchange".The UK says it will explore "how best to improve arrangements for touring across the European continent".Tom Kiehl, chief executive of UK Music, which represents the industry, welcomed this as "an important first step" but said the sector was seeking "more concrete commitments".
Will this agreement impact the UK's ability to boost trade around the world?
Brian in Nottingham asked about any knock-on effect the agreement may have on the UK's ability to negotiate trade deals with other nations. Political correspondent Jack Fenwick looked into it for him.If the UK was to re-join the customs union or single market, there would be knock-on effects for other trade agreements, like the Trans-Pacific Partnership - but this relatively limited agreement does not go nearly that far.However, the UK will now effectively be a rule-taker when it comes to EU standards on food and farming exports - but the government is fairly comfortable with that for two reasons.Firstly, ministers do not want to lower food standards anyway, which we saw during recent trade negotiations with the US.Secondly, the level of trade the UK has with the EU massively outstrips other agreements signed in recent years.This UK-EU deal is expected to eventually boost the economy by around £9bn a year, largely from food, farming and energy trading. Compare that with the much broader agreement signed with India this year, which will bring economic benefits of around £5bn a year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
ECB's Schnabel sees no lasting decoupling from Fed
DUBROVNIK, Croatia, June 7 (Reuters) - Ongoing trade tensions between the United States and the rest of the world are a shock to the entire global economy, meaning the Federal Reserve's and the European Central Bank's monetary policies are unlikely to diverge for long, ECB board member Isabel Schnabel said on Saturday. "I expect this trade conflict to play out as a global shock that's working through both lower demand and supply," she told a conference in Croatia. "We can discuss which of the two effects on inflation is larger because that determines the net effect. But in any case, I would not expect a sustained decoupling (between the ECB and the Fed)," she said.


Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Banking group urges customers with £10,000 in savings to move their money NOW
Customers with £10,000 in savings are being urged to move their money or risk missing out on earning hundreds of pounds a year. In the UK 8.3 million current accounts hold £10,000 or more but 80 per cent of these accounts pay no interest - meaning their money sits passively. However, Spring, a savings app, has encouraged those looking to earn money through interest to move it into a savings account instead. The company warned millions of people in the UK are 'current account coasters' - leaving their money in a main account after paying for essentials, rather than placing it in savings. Derek Sprawling, Spring's Managing Director of Savings, told The Express: 'Cumulatively, nearly £400 billion is held in current account balances in the UK. 'You would imagine that these would mainly consist of small balances, but our analysis shows that there are a significant number of accounts that contain sizeable funds, accounting for over half of the overall balance. 'Most people sensibly maintain a small current account balance to cover emergency costs and everyday expenses, but leaving thousands of pounds in your current account means you will be missing out on hundreds of pounds in interest each year. 'With nearly eight million current accounts containing significant balances, that money could work harder in a higher-paying savings account.' File image: In the UK 8.3 million current accounts hold £10,000 or more but 80 per cent of these accounts pay no interest - meaning their money sits passively He explained that many people are wary about using savings accounts because they can loose immediate access to their money. But there are alternatives, which connect savings and current accounts together. These allow money to be transferred between accounts immediately. As well as unlimited withdrawals.


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Russia is already at war with Britain and we can no longer rely on Trump, defence adviser warns
Britain is at war with Russia already, one of the authors of the government's strategic defence review has warned, while arguing that we can no longer depend on the US as a reliable ally. Dr Fiona Hill, who served as the White House's chief Russia adviser during Donald Trump 's first term in office, said the UK is in 'pretty big trouble', warning that the country is stuck between 'the rock' of Russia and the 'hard place' of an increasingly unreliable US under Mr Trump. 'Russia has hardened as an adversary in ways that we probably hadn't fully anticipated,' Dr Hill told the Guardian, concluding that 'Russia is at war with us'. Arguing that the Kremlin has been 'menacing the UK in various different ways' for years, she pointed to 'the poisonings, assassinations, sabotage operations, all kinds of cyber-attacks and influence operations. The sensors that we see that they're putting down around critical pipelines, efforts to butcher undersea cables.' Unveiling the SDR last week - authored by Dr Hill, Lord Robertson and General Sir Richard Barrons - defence secretary John Healey said Britain's army needed to become '10 times more lethal' in the face of the 'immediate and pressing threat" from Russia and the rise of China. 'We are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK defence,' he told MPs. The review found that the armed forces are not ready to fight its opponents as a result of inadequate stockpiles of weapons, medical services that cannot cope with a mass-casualty conflict and a personnel 'crisis' that means only a small number of troops are ready to be deployed. Meanwhile, General Sir Richard Barrons, warned that a cruise missile was 'only 90 minutes away from the UK'. But Sir Keir Starmer vowed to make Britain "a battle-ready, armour-clad nation' as he unveiled the SDR at the Govan shipbuilding yard in Scotland, which included an army boosted to 100,000 personnel, 12 new submarines, drones and a rollout of Artificial Intelligence. But questions were raised over the government's big ambitions to make Britain 'safer and stronger' after Sir Keir refused to commit to spending 3 per cent of Britain's gross domestic product on defence by 2034 — which the review warned was essential to ensure the plans were affordable. Dr Hill, who was highly critical of the Trump administration, said Britain could no longer rely on the US's military umbrella as it did during the cold war, at least 'not in the way that we did before'. It comes after the SDR contained a similar warning, saying: 'The UK's longstanding assumptions about global power balances and structures are no longer certain.' The defence adviser argued that the US president 'really wants to have a separate relationship with Putin to do arms control agreements and also business that will probably enrich their entourages further, though Putin doesn't need any more enrichment'. Speaking about Mr Trump's White House, Dr Hill warned it is 'not an administration, it is a court', arguing that the president is driven primarily by his 'own desires and interests, and who listens often to the last person he talks to'. Speaking about the rise of the populist right in the US, she expressed concerns it could do well in British electoral politics if 'the same culture wars' are allowed to grow in influence. Warning of the impact of Reform UK, she said: 'When Nigel Farage says he wants to do a Doge against the local county council, he should come over here [to the US] and see what kind of impact that has. 'This is going to be the largest layoffs in US history happening all at once, much bigger than hits to steelworks and coalmines.' Doge (the Department of Government Efficiency) is an initiative by the second Trump administration, which aims to cut wasteful spending.