A gun & a life changed: Car salesman speaks out after being shot by former customer
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A Liberty car salesman is fighting for justice – and accountability – after he was shot by a man he sold a car to.
Jody Hendrick was working at an Independence car lot when a former customer walked in and shot him repeatedly.
'He shot me here in the chest; I remember that part,' Hendrick said. 'After that, I don't remember anything until my femur shattered and I went down by the front door.'
Hendrick had to undergo multiple life-saving surgeries, which impacted his mobility.
'The last shot was when he stood over me and shot me in the forehead with a gun, and that caused a brain bleed.'
KC firefighter's death highlights rise in violence against health care workers nationwide
As for the shooter, and former customer, he was killed by deputies in the subsequent gun fight.
Now, five years later, Hendricks says his injuries have left him unable to work.
So he filed a lawsuit in a Missouri court.
It turns out, the shooter stole the gun from a local sporting goods store, Academy Sports and Outdoors, in Liberty.
So Hendrick sued the retail chain – only to find his chances of winning in court blocked, again and again, by a federal law.
'They're hiding behind a law,' Hendrick said. 'And that leaves me, who's permanently disabled for the rest of my life, out in the cold.'
The store where the gun was stolen from caught the whole thing on camera.
You can see the suspect talking with a store clerk who hands him the gun to look at. The clerk then goes in the back to run his information, and it comes back 'denied.' That's when the suspect pulls out a knife, leaps over the counter, and steals the gun and some ammo.
Hendrick said the store needs to be held accountable.
His lawsuit claims the store was negligent for handing over the gun before the customer's background check was completed.
He also claims the gun didn't have a trigger lock and says the ammo for it was easily accessible.
But his case was dismissed in the lower court then upheld in favor of Academy Sports again and again – until reaching the Missouri Supreme court, which declined to hear it.
The problem, according to Hendrick, is a federal law: the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA).
Timothy Lytton, a law professor at Georgia State University, says the act was a statement by Congress.
'PLCAA essentially says that no person can bring a lawsuit for civil liability against a firearms manufacturer or seller for any injury that results from criminal misuse of a weapon,' Lytton said.
Congress passed the act in 2005 – after several lawsuits were filed against firearms sellers and manufacturers, holding them liable for injuries caused by criminals who got ahold of their weapons.
Lytton says it's a type of immunity specifically for the gun industry.
'In no other system or no other instance do we have a case where an industry enjoys immunity without any alternative source of compensation for civil liability for its negligence in the sale or marketing its products,' Lytton said.
Attorney Kevin Jamison says the act was intended to protect businesses within the gun industry.
'Otherwise everyone who is shot by a criminal could sue the manufacturer, and that would drive the manufacturers out of business,' he said. 'And that's what the Protection Act was designed to prevent.'
There are a few exceptions to the protections provided by the PLCAA – one being if the sale of the weapon violated on of the other federal or state laws about the marketing or sale of guns.
However, Jamison says it's his opinion that the fact the gun was stolen breaks the chain of responsibility.
'There were intervening criminal acts that preceded the gentleman's injury,' he said. 'It's a terrible thing, but there are terrible people in the world.'
To this day, Hendrick says his court battle was less about justice and more about accountability.
'We need to start looking at the process of how these weapons are stored at these facilities and how they're handled,' Hendrick told FOX4. 'If somebody is a convicted felon, they shouldn't be handed a firearm.'
As a gun owner himself, his goal now is encouraging others to be more cautious.
See the latest headlines in Kansas City and across Kansas, Missouri
Since Hendrick won't get his day in court, he said he's now focusing on being grateful that he's still alive.
FOX4 reached out to the sporting goods store, but we have not received a response from either its national headquarters or the local store where the theft took place.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Daily Briefing: The Musk-Trump break-up
Good morning!🙋🏼♀️ I'm . I saw Queen Bey last night and am still country singin'. 🤠 Some Republicans recoiled at the Trump-Musk feud. A Massachusetts teen detained by ICE was held in "deplorable" conditions. Package delayed for tariffs? It may be a scam. America's eyes were glued to X yesterday as President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk engaged in a social media tit-for-tat, hurling deep personal attacks at one another. : Trump said Thursday he was "very disappointed" with Musk and suggested his close relationship with the former top White House adviser was over. . Musk said Trump wouldn't have won a second term and Republicans would be in the minority in both chambers of the U.S. Congress without him. Then, Trump threatened Musk's government contracts as "the easiest way to save money." . Musk countered it was "time to drop the really big bomb" and said Trump's name was in the Justice Department's files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. . Other Republicans welcomed Musk's criticism of GOP spending. Democrats watched the feud unfold with glee. ~ Robin Nice, lawyer for Marcelo Gomes da Silva,18, a Massachusetts high school junior who she says endured "deplorable" conditions while being held by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. Gomes da Silva was arrested by ICE agents on May 31 when he was stopped on his way to volleyball practice with friends in his hometown of Milford. A humble veteran, 100, recalls D-Day 81 years later. Trump's actions on LGBTQ+ issues in Pride Month were criticized as "bullying" by advocates A Holocaust survivor burned in the Boulder attack spoke out. An anti-crime program was gutted as summer violence looms. The Pentagon is set to change to military oversight of Greenland. What's the weather today? . The Supreme Court this week made it easier for members of so-called 'majority groups' to sue for discrimination by siding with an Ohio woman, Marlean Ames, who claimed she twice lost jobs to lesser-qualified gay candidates because she is straight. Federal civil rights law does not distinguish between members of majority and minority groups, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in the unanimous decision striking down the standard used in nearly half of federal circuit courts. You see an ad online for something you want, and you proceed to the seller's website. The site looks professional, the price seems reasonable, and checkout is quick and easy. But then, your order never arrives. When you follow up with the seller, you might get vague, automated emails urging you to 'be patient.' Then comes the explanation: Your package is stuck due to tariffs. But that could be a sign of a scam, warns the Better Business Bureau. U.S. consumers are not typically required to pay tariffs after placing an order. If a company says your package is stuck in customs or asks for additional payment due to tariffs, that's a major red flag. Who are the winners and losers of Aaron Rodgers' deal with the Steelers? USA TODAY asked Livvy Dunne about her splits at the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Runway Show. This Emmy Award-winning actress wants to show family caregivers they aren't alone. Yes, your vacation behavior can get you arrested. The Women's College World Series national championship series is headed for a winner-take-all Game 3. Gauff, the No. 2 seed, dismantled the previously unknown Frenchwoman Lois Boisson 6-1, 6-2 on Thursday to reach the French Open final for a second time. Gauff will face No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka, the player she defeated in 2023 to win the US Open, on Saturday. Tribeca Film Festival is a celebrity draw through June 15 in New York City. Nicole Fallert is a newsletter writer at USA TODAY, sign up for the email here. Want to send Nicole a note? Shoot her an email at NFallert@ This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Elon Musk, Trump, ICE, LGBTQ+, tariff, French Open, NBA, Aaron Rodgers: Daily Briefing

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
The Musk-Trump break-up
The Musk-Trump break-up Good morning!🙋🏼♀️ I'm Nicole Fallert. I saw Queen Bey last night and am still country singin'. 🤠 It's Friday. Here's the news: The dramatic, very public Trump-Musk break-up America's eyes were glued to X yesterday as President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk engaged in a social media tit-for-tat, hurling deep personal attacks at one another. An all-out war erupted: Trump said Thursday he was "very disappointed" with Musk and suggested his close relationship with the former top White House adviser was over. It escalated . Musk said Trump wouldn't have won a second term and Republicans would be in the minority in both chambers of the U.S. Congress without him. Then, Trump threatened Musk's government contracts as "the easiest way to save money." . Musk said Trump wouldn't have won a second term and Republicans would be in the minority in both chambers of the U.S. Congress without him. Then, Trump threatened Musk's government contracts as "the easiest way to save money." The intensity of the exchange then only increased . Musk countered it was "time to drop the really big bomb." He then added that Trump's name was in the Justice Department's files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. . Musk countered it was "time to drop the really big bomb." He then added that Trump's name was in the Justice Department's files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Some Republicans are cringing. Other Republicans welcomed Musk's criticism of GOP spending. Democrats watched the feud unfold with glee. Lawyer details 'horrendous conditions' faced by 11th grader detained by ICE "If you are detained in the Burlington ICE facility, you do not see the light of day. You don't know what time it is." ~ Robin Nice, lawyer for Marcelo Gomes da Silva,18, a Massachusetts high school junior who she says endured "deplorable" conditions while being held by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. Gomes da Silva was arrested by ICE agents on May 31 when he was stopped on his way to volleyball practice with friends in his hometown of Milford. More news to know now What's the weather today? Check your local forecast here. The Supreme Court just made it easier for White workers to sue for bias The Supreme Court this week made it easier for members of so-called 'majority groups' to sue for discrimination by siding with an Ohio woman, Marlean Ames, who claimed she twice lost jobs to lesser-qualified gay candidates because she is straight. Federal civil rights law does not distinguish between members of majority and minority groups, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in the unanimous decision striking down the standard used in nearly half of federal circuit courts. Legal experts say the closely watched ruling could spur more reverse discrimination complaints. Scammers are leaning into tariff confusion You see an ad online for something you want, and you proceed to the seller's website. The site looks professional, the price seems reasonable, and checkout is quick and easy. But then, your order never arrives. When you follow up with the seller, you might get vague, automated emails urging you to 'be patient.' Then comes the explanation: Your package is stuck due to tariffs. But that could be a sign of a scam, warns the Better Business Bureau. U.S. consumers are not typically required to pay tariffs after placing an order. If a company says your package is stuck in customs or asks for additional payment due to tariffs, that's a major red flag. Here are more tips to avoid tariff tricks. Today's talkers Coco Gauff rolls into French Open final Gauff, the No. 2 seed, dismantled the previously unknown Frenchwoman Lois Boisson 6-1, 6-2 on Thursday to reach the French Open final for a second time. Gauff will face No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka, the player she defeated in 2023 to win the US Open, on Saturday. Though her level of play has vacillated between sharp and sloppy throughout the tournament, Gauff was mostly dialed in against Boisson, who captivated the Parisian crowds in recent days. Photo of the day: A Hollywood hug Tribeca Film Festival is a celebrity draw through June 15 in New York City. Tom Hanks and Robert De Niro had a tender moment on the red carpet.

4 hours ago
What Trump ordering an investigation into Biden's actions might mean legally and politically
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into pardons and other executive actions issued by his predecessor, Joe Biden — launching an extraordinary effort to show that the Democrat hid his cognitive decline and was otherwise too mentally impaired to do the job. Trump, who turns 79 this month, has long questioned the mental acuity and physical stamina of Biden, and is now directing his administration to use governmental investigative powers to try and back up those assertions. Biden, 82, and now undergoing treatment for prostate cancer, dismissed Trump's actions as 'ridiculous.' Here's a look at what Trump is alleging, what impact it could have, and why the country may never have seen anything like this before. Trump directed his White House counsel and attorney general to begin an investigation into his own allegations that Biden aides hid from the public declining mental acuity in their boss. Trump is also casting doubts on the legitimacy of the Biden White House's use of the autopen to sign pardons and other documents. It marks a significant escalation in Trump's targeting of political adversaries, and could lay the groundwork for arguments by leading Republicans in Congress and around the country that a range of Biden's actions as president were invalid. 'Essentially, whoever used the autopen was the president,' Trump said Thursday. He then went further, suggesting that rogue elements within the Biden administration might have effectively faked the president's signature and governed without his knowledge — especially when it came to pushing policies that appeased the Democratic Party's far-left wing. 'He didn't have much of an idea what was going on,' Trump said, though he also acknowledged that he had no evidence to back up those assertions. A Trump fundraising email released a short time later carried the heading, 'A robot ran the country?' Legal experts are skeptical about that the investigation will do much more than fire up Trump's core supporters. 'I think it's more of a political act than one that will have any legal effect,' said Richard Pildes, a constitutional law scholar at New York University School of Law. He added: 'I think it's designed to continue to fuel a narrative that the administration wants to elevate, but courts are not going to second-guess these sorts of executive actions' undertaken by Biden. Trump has long questioned the legitimacy of pardons his predecessor issued for his family members and other administration officials just before leaving office on Jan. 20, people whom Biden was worried could be targeted by a Trump-led Justice Department. But Trump has more recently suggested Biden was unaware of immigration policies during his own administration, and said Thursday that aides to his predecessor pushed social issues like transgender rights in ways Biden might not have agreed with. It is well-established that a president's executive orders can easily be repealed by a successor issuing new executive actions — something Trump has done repeatedly since retaking the White House. That lets Trump wipe out Biden administration policies without having to prove any were undertaken without Biden's knowledge — though his predecessor's pardons and judicial appointments can't be so easily erased. 'When it comes to completed legal acts like pardons or appointing judges,' Pildes said, a later president 'has no power to overturn those actions.' Autopens are writing tools that allow a person's signature to be affixed automatically to documents. The Justice Department, under Democratic and Republican administrations, has recognized the use of an autopen by presidents to sign legislation and issue pardons for decades — and even Trump himself acknowledges using it. 'Autopens to me are used when thousands of letters come in from young people all over the country and you want to get them back,' Trump said Thursday. Michigan State University law professor Brian Kalt said the 'consensus view is that, as long as the president has directed the use of the autopen in that particular instance, it is valid.' 'The only issue would be if someone else directed the use of the autopen without the President's approval,' Kalt, an expert on pardons, wrote in an email. Yes. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution bestows the president with the power 'to grant Reprieves and Pardons.' 'A president's pardons cannot be revoked. If they could, no pardon would ever be final,' American University politics professor Jeffrey Crouch, author of a book on presidential pardons, said in an email. 'There is no legal obstacle I am aware of to a president using an autopen on a pardon.' Kent Greenfield, a Boston College law professor, said, 'Once you pardon somebody, you can't go back and un-pardon them.' 'If it's done with a president's authority, I don't think it matters whether it's done with an autopen or not,' Greenfield added. 'The president's authority is the president's authority.' Trump's suggestions that Biden's administration effectively functioned without his knowledge on key policy matters go beyond questions about pardons and the president using the autopen. Even there, though, the Supreme Court ruled in 2024 that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution. At the time, Trump celebrated the ruling as a 'BIG WIN' because it extended the delay in the Washington criminal case against him on charges he plotted to overturn his 2020 election loss. Such immunity would likely cover Biden as a former president. It might not extend to Biden administration officials allegedly acting without his knowledge — though Trump himself acknowledged he's not seen evidence of that occurring. Biden has dismissed Trump's investigation as 'nothing more than a mere distraction.' 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' he said in a statement. In a word, no. There have been allegations of presidents being impaired and having their administrations controlled by intermediaries more than the public knew — including Edith Wilson, who effectively managed access to her husband, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson, after his serious stroke in 1919. Wilson's critics grumbled about a shadow presidency controlled by his wife, but the matter was never formally investigated by Congress, nor was it a major source of criticism for Wilson's Republican successor, Warren G. Harding. More recently, some questioned whether President John F. Kennedy struggled more than was publicly known at the time with Addison's Disease and debilitating back pains while in office. And there were questions about whether dementia might have affected Ronald Reagan during his second term, before he was diagnosed with Alzheimer's in 1994, five years after he left office.