UK retail sales slow after January bounce, BRC data shows
By David Milliken
LONDON (Reuters) - British consumer spending lost momentum last month after a bounce at the start of the year, despite households' rising confidence in their personal finances and the broader economy, surveys of retailers and consumers showed on Tuesday.
The British Retail Consortium said sales at its member stores - mostly large retail chains - rose by 1.1% year-on-year in February, slowing from January's robust 2.6% growth which had been helped by post-Christmas discounts.
BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said the weaker growth reflected low demand for spring fashions as February's weather remained wintry and repeated complaints about higher employer social security and packaging taxes that take effect next month.
"The industry is already doing all it can to absorb existing costs, but they will be left with little choice but to increase prices or reduce investment in jobs and shops, or both," she said.
Upcoming government plans to make it harder to dismiss new employees risked discouraging typical retailers from taking on entry-level staff and should focus instead on existing bad practice by unscrupulous employers, she added.
Separate data from Barclays showed that consumer spending - which covers a wider range of goods and services than retail sales - rose by 1.0% in February, slowing from January's 1.9%.
However, Barclays' survey measure of households' confidence in their own finances rose to its highest since records began in 2015 at 75% - though this partly reflected efforts to save.
Confidence in the wider economy also rose but remained much lower at 25%.
Barclays spending data was based on debit and credit card spending between January 25 and February 21, while the consumer sentiment data was based on a survey of 2,000 people conducted from February 21-26.
The BRC data covered sales made between February 2 and March 1.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US to partially evacuate embassy in Iraq over security threats
Non-essential US embassy staff and their dependants in Baghdad are evacuating from Iraq due to heightened security risks, US government sources said on Wednesday. Officials did not say exactly what prompted the removal, however in recent days talks over Iran's nuclear programme appear to have stalled. A US state department official told the BBC: "We are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies. "Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq." US President Donald Trump told a podcast on Wednesday that he was growing less confident that a deal could be reached over Iran's nuclear programme. The US wants Iran to stop enriching uranium, which can be used to create a nuclear bomb, in exchange for easing economic sanctions. Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said his country would retaliate against US bases in the region if talks fail and Trump orders military strikes against Iran. Reuters reports that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also approved the voluntary departure of families of US military personnel from countries across the Middle East, including Kuwait and Bahrain. Also on Wednesday, the UK's Maritime Trade Operations organisation - part of the Royal Navy - issued a warning saying that increased military tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping. The price of oil initially increased more than 4% when news of the US evacuation broke, in anticipation of regional insecurity potentially leading to supply problems. Around 2,500 US troops are based in Iraq, according to the defence department. Additional reporting by Tom Bateman in Washington What is Iran's nuclear programme and what does the US want? US sends nuclear deal proposal to Iran

Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Nuclear Plant to Power Six Million British Homes
Weeks after Germany decided to reverse course and 're-embrace' nuclear power following their supreme idiocy on the matter, the UK government announced on Tuesday that it would invest 14.2 billion pounds (US$19.3 billion) to build a new nuclear plant in the southeast of England. The move was revealed by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero as part of its broader spending review, which will lay out priorities for the next four years. The new plant, named Sizewell C, will be located in Suffolk county, and is predicted to create around 10,000 jobs during construction, according to a government statement. Once operational, it will create enough electricity power roughly 6 million homes. "We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis," said Energy Minister Ed Miliband. "This is the government's clean energy mission in action, investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security." As the Epoch Times notes further, the UK has also been tapping up new investors to fund the construction of Sizewell C, but no new partners were mentioned in the announcement. Neither the total cost of construction nor a date for expected completion has been announced. Sizewell C was originally an EDF Energy project but is now majority-owned by the British government, with EDF Energy a minority shareholder. EDF Energy is the British arm of Électricité de France (EDF), which is wholly owned by the French state. The UK government's stake was 83.8 percent and EDF's stake was 16.2 percent at the end of December, EDF's financial results showed in February. Sizewell C would be just the second new nuclear plant built in Britain in more than 20 years, after another EDF project, Hinkley Point C, which was first announced in 2010. Hinkley Point C, based in Somerset, southwest England, has been beleaguered by delays and budget overruns and is currently expected to come online in 2029. Sizewell C would be the third power station built on the site after Sizewell A and Sizewell B, both of which are currently in the process of being decommissioned. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero also announced that it had picked Rolls-Royce SMR to build Britain's first small modular reactors (SMRs). About 2.5 billion pounds ($3.4 billion) of government funds will be dedicated to the SMR program over the next four years, in a bid to get one of Europe's first small-scale nuclear industries going. SMRs are usually around the size of two football fields and composed of parts that can be assembled in a factory, making them quicker and cheaper to build than conventional plants. The moves by Britain come amid a renewed interest in nuclear power across Europe, sparked by spiraling energy costs due to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, which is hampering the continent's supply of natural gas. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a keynote speech in August 2024 that the European Union needed more nuclear power. By More Top Reads From this article on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US preparing to partially evacuate Iraq embassy over security risks: Sources
WASHINGTON/BAGHDAD (Reuters) – The United States is preparing a partial evacuation of its Iraqi embassy and will allow military dependents to leave locations around the Middle East due to heightened security risks in the region, U.S. and Iraqi sources said on Wednesday. The four U.S. and two Iraqi sources did not specify which security risks had prompted the decision and reports of the potential evacuation pushed up oil prices by more than 4%. 'The State Department regularly reviews American personnel abroad and this decision was made as a result of a recent review,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly told Reuters when asked about reports of the partial evacuations, without giving further details. Can you still visit the countries listed under Trump's travel ban? A White House official said U.S. President Donald Trump was aware of the move. The partial evacuations come at a moment of heightened tensions in a region already aflame after 18 months of war in Gaza that has raised fears of a wider conflagration pitting the U.S. and Israel against Iran and its allies. Trump has repeatedly threatened to strike Iran if stuttering talks over its nuclear programme fail and on Wednesday he said he was growing less confident that Tehran would agree to stop enriching uranium, a key American demand. Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh also said on Wednesday that Iran would retaliate against U.S. bases in the region if the nuclear talks failed and it was subjected to strikes. The United States has a military presence in Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has authorized the voluntary departure of military dependents from locations across the Middle East, a U.S. official said. Another U.S. official said that was mostly relevant to family members located in Bahrain — where the bulk of them are based. 'The State Department is set to have an ordered departure for (the) U.S. embassy in Baghdad. The intent is to do it through commercial means, but the U.S. military is standing by if help is requested,' a third U.S. official said. Where the 'No Kings' anti-Trump military parade protests are planned An Iraqi foreign ministry official said a 'partial evacuation' of U.S. embassy staff had been confirmed due to what the official termed 'potential security concerns related to possible regional tensions.' Another U.S. official said that there was no change in operations at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East and that no evacuation order had been issued for employees or families linked to the U.S. embassy in Qatar, which was operating as usual. Oil futures climbed $3 on reports of the Baghdad evacuation with Brent crude futures at $69.18 a barrel. Earlier on Wednesday Britain's maritime agency warned that increased tensions in the Middle East may lead to an escalation in military activity that could impact shipping in critical waterways. It advised vessels to use caution while travelling through the Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Straits of Hormuz, which all border Iran. Iraq, a rare regional partner of both the United States and its arch regional foe Iran, hosts 2,500 U.S. troops and has Tehran-backed armed factions linked to its security forces. Trump says Egypt excluded from travel ban because 'they have things under control' Tensions inside Iraq have heightened since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023, with Iran-aligned armed groups in the country repeatedly attacking U.S. troops. Top U.S. regional ally Israel has also struck Iran-linked targets across the region, including Iraqi armed groups operating both inside Iraq and in neighbouring Syria. Can the US protect itself from a Ukraine-style drone attack? Iran's U.N. mission on Wednesday posted on X: 'Threats of 'overwhelming force' won't change facts: Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon and U.S. militarism only fuels instability.' The statement appeared to be a response to an earlier comment by U.S. Central Command chief U.S. Army General Michael Kurilla that he had provided the president with 'a wide range of options' to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.