China accuses US' Hegseth of ‘vilifying' remarks at Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore
BEIJING, June 1 — China has protested to the United States over 'vilifying' remarks made by Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, the foreign ministry said today, while accusing it of deliberately ignoring calls for peace from regional nations.
China has objected to Hegseth calling it a threat in the Indo-Pacific, the ministry added, describing his comments at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore yesterday as 'deplorable' and 'intended to sow division'.
'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the Cold War mentality for bloc confrontation, vilified China with defamatory allegations, and falsely called China a 'threat',' the ministry said on its website.
'The United States has deployed offensive weaponry in the South China Sea and kept stoking flames and creating tensions in the Asia-Pacific, which are turning the region into a powder keg,' the ministry added in the statement.
Hegseth had called on allies in the Indo-Pacific region, including key security ally Australia, to spend more on defence after warning of the 'real and potentially imminent' threat from China.
Asked about the call to boost defence spending, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his government had pledged an extra A$10 billion (RM27.4 billion) to defence.
'What we'll do is we'll determine our defence policy,' he told reporters today, a transcript of his remarks showed.
As part of Washington's longstanding defence ties with the Philippines, the US military this year deployed Typhon launchers that can fire missiles to hit targets in both China and Russia from the island of Luzon.
China and the Philippines contest sovereignty over some islands and atolls in the South China Sea, with growing maritime run-ins between their coast guards as both vie to patrol the waters.
The ministry also warned the United States not to 'play with fire' on the Taiwan question.
In his speech at Asia's premier forum for defence leaders, military officials and diplomats, Hegseth said any attempt by China to conquer Taiwan 'would result in devastating consequences'.
China has vowed to 'reunify' with the separately governed island, by force if necessary. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
18 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump and China's Xi will likely speak this week, White House says
Donald Trump said he expects to speak with Xi Jinping, though China noted no recent talks had occurred between them. (AFP pic) WASHINGTON : President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping will likely speak this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday, days after Trump accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. Leavitt is the third top Trump aide to forecast an imminent call between the two leaders to iron out differences on last month's tariff agreement in Geneva, among larger trade issues. It was not immediately clear when the two leaders will speak. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent told CBS' 'Face the Nation' on Sunday that Trump and Xi would speak 'very soon' to iron out trade issues including a dispute over critical minerals and China's restrictions of exports of certain minerals. Trump said on Friday he was sure that he would speak to Xi. China said in April that the two leaders had not had a conversation recently. Bessent led negotiations with China in Geneva last month that resulted in a temporary truce in the trade war between the world's two biggest economies, but progress since then has been slow, the US treasury chief told Fox News last week. The US-China agreement to dial back triple-digit tariffs for 90 days prompted a massive relief rally in global stocks. But it did nothing to address the underlying reasons for Trump's tariffs on Chinese goods, mainly longstanding US complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model, leaving those issues for future talks. A US trade court on Wednesday ruled that Trump overstepped his authority in imposing the bulk of his tariffs on imports from China and other countries under an emergency powers act. But less than 24 hours later, a federal appeals court reinstated the tariffs, saying it was pausing the trade court ruling to consider the government's appeal. The appeals court ordered the plaintiffs to respond by June 5 and the administration to respond by June 9.
Free Malaysia Today
21 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump wants Big Tech to own the dollar
The Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are usually placid, forgettable affairs. Not this year. Several central bankers returned home with a visceral sense of dread. The reason? The specter of the GENIUS Act – the stablecoin bill barreling towards passage by the US Congress hot on the heels of President Donald Trump's March 6 executive order establishing a strategic cryptocurrency reserve. Central bankers have hitherto seen cryptocurrencies as a nuisance that, thankfully, lacked the capacity to cause serious ruptures in the monetary systems under their care. But now they think that Trump's team is counting on cryptocurrencies pegged to the dollar as part of its strategy to rejig the global monetary system (and make the boss and his family a fortune in the process). What unsettled central bankers this spring was the policy's implications: a deliberate, chaotic unraveling of the twentieth century's monetary order, under which central banks reigned as the sole architects of money. While the GENIUS Act allows private stablecoins, another bill would bar the US Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC), thereby anointing corporate-issued tokens as the new guardians of dollar hegemony. This isn't innovation; it's a hostile takeover of the money supply. Lacking anything resembling serious regulation, stablecoins are neither stable nor merely an alternative dollar payment option. They are a Trojan horse for the privatisation of money. The European Central Bank (ECB) sees the danger. If securities migrate to the blockchain, with bonds, stocks, and derivatives becoming tokenised, then settlement must follow. The ECB's solution is a tokenised euro, ensuring public money remains the bedrock of finance. So far, the ECB has faced resistance to this plan from German and French private banks. Now, the ECB has another, bigger headache: the US is racing in the opposite direction. By banning CBDCs and green-lighting stablecoins, Trump's team is not just rejecting public digital money; it is outsourcing dollar supremacy to the darkest forces within Big Tech. The irony is grotesque. The same libertarians who railed against the government are now begging the state to anoint their stablecoins as de facto official currency. Worse, they demand access to the Federal Reserve's balance sheet, allowing private issuers to back their tokens with central bank reserves. Imagine a world where Tether, Circle, or some non-scam 'X Token' backed by Elon Musk enjoys the implicit backing of the US Treasury while operating outside banking regulations. This isn't just regulatory arbitrage; it's monetary feudalism. Lest we forget, nineteenth-century America was a monetary dystopia. With thousands of wildcat banks issuing private notes, frequent financial panics left the public, the working class in particular, holding worthless paper. Even JP Morgan was so appalled and felt so threatened that he decided to strong-arm the federal government and other bankers to establish the Federal Reserve as a public institution with a remit to stabilise money. Now, the US is hurtling backward – and dragging the rest of the world along. In a stunning reversal of reality, Trump's Jan 23 executive order on Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology defines dollar-backed stablecoins as instruments that will 'promote and protect the sovereignty of the US dollar'. But the GENIUS Act (whose final draft is not yet public) is a formula for unleashing a digital wildcat era, where stablecoins – pegged to the dollar but controlled by private actors – flood the global economy with digital pseudo dollars. Private stablecoins stand no chance of maintaining their tokens' dollar peg after they receive the official imprimatur of the federal authorities and their volume balloons. Even if countries ditch the greenback, they will remain trapped in its digital shadow. Europe is scrambling. The ECB, recognising the existential threat, is fast-tracking a 'wholesale CBDC': a digital euro for institutional use that acts as a stopgap – a quick and dirty hybrid system that syncs traditional payments with blockchain infrastructure and buys time until true atomic settlement can be pushed past the resistance of private bankers who profit from the status quo. But it may be too late. While Europe dithers with committees, the US is acting. The Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation has already driven Tether out of Europe – not because MiCA is too strict, but because the EU's political leadership still does not grasp the stakes. If stablecoins become the default money of crypto markets, decentralised finance, and emerging economies, the ECB's half-baked digital euro will arrive to a battlefield where the war is already lost. Meanwhile developing countries face a brutal choice. Already struggling under the dollar's dominance, they must now either ban stablecoins (thus forfeiting access to crypto capital flows) or create their own to compete with the dollar's network effects. A third, unappetising alternative, is to surrender to a new – even more perilous – form of de facto dollarisation. The only central bank that has planned ahead is the People's Bank of China (PBOC). Having the luxury of its own, already functioning digital renminbi, the PBOC can afford to refuse lending legitimacy to stablecoins by banning them. But this sensible defiance leaves one gigantic dilemma unaddressed: China's public and private institutions hold accumulated savings of approximately US$4.5 trillion. Should they dump their dollars, thus giving a boost to the Trump team's plan to devalue the greenback, or hold them and remain exposed to the turbulence that Trump is so adept at stirring up? In the longer term, the danger is that monetary bifurcation exacerbates geopolitical and geo-economic uncertainty. Two parallel monetary systems – one based on public monies issued in China, India, and maybe the eurozone, and the other comprising private money, increasingly dominated by dollar-pegged stablecoins – would inevitably clash. Central bankers are not the only ones who should feel anxious. Yanis Varoufakis, a former finance minister of Greece, is leader of the MeRA25 party and professor of economics at the University of Athens. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
Malay Mail
41 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Top countries where the US gets its steel and aluminium from, and how much
WASHINGTON, June 3 — US President Donald Trump said on Friday he planned to double tariffs on steel and aluminium imports to 50 per cent from 25 per cent, starting from Wednesday, ratcheting up pressure on global producers and deepening his trade war. Here's a summary of the major trade partners it will affect. Steel: Roughly a quarter of all steel used in the US is imported, the bulk of it from neighbours Mexico and Canada or close allies in Asia and Europe such as Japan, South Korea and Germany. While China is the world's largest steel producer and exporter, it sends very little to the United States. Tariffs of 25 per cent imposed in 2018 shut most Chinese steel out of the market. China exported 508,000 net tons of steel to the US last year or 1.8 per cent of total American steel imports. Aluminium: For aluminium, the US is more heavily reliant on imports. Roughly half of all aluminium used in the US is imported, with the vast majority coming from Canada. At 3.2 million tons last year, Canadian imports were twice those of the next nine countries combined. The next largest sources of imports are the United Arab Emirates and China, at 347,034 and 222,872 metric tons, respectively. The US aluminium smelting industry is small by global standards. Total smelter capacity in the country was just 1.73 per cent of the global total according to the US Geological Survey. — Reuters
