Southwick Select Board appoints full-time town planner and economic development director
SOUTHWICK — Six months after the town's chief executive officer implored the Select Board to hire a town planner and economic development director, on Monday the board appointed Alvin Allen, who has been serving as a planner in the Springfield Office of Planning and Economic Development for the last 17 years.
'I was looking for some upward mobility in my profession,' Allen said during his interview with the board.
A graduate of Westfield State University with a bachelor's degree in geography and regional planning, Allen has held a variety of positions since being hired by Springfield in 2008, including senior and principal planner.
During the interview, talked about his responsibilities while in Springfield, which were extensive.
'I've worked as a planner dealing with zoning. I dealt with site plan reviews in regard to special permits. I've dealt with subdivision plan reviews … design guidelines for new housing on city-owned lots, historic preservation, [and] GIS computer mapping,' he said.
'I've had to deal with other city departments like the building department, DPW engineering and the Conservation Commission when it comes to wetland matters,' he added.
According to his cover letter, Allen has worked with the Springfield City Council, the Planning Board, Historical Commission, the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission, the Food Policy Council, and Urban Agriculture.
He also administers Springfield's portion of the ValleyBike program, which is a regional bike sharing program.
And while he didn't mention it during his interview, according to his resume, he has worked with the Gandara Mental Health Center as a staff member teaching clients between the ages of 12 and 21 discipline, respect, and taking responsibility for their actions.
Planning Board Chair Jessica Ann Thornton was at the meeting to offer her thoughts on Allen's appointment.
'I appreciate you taking a look at a completely different community from the one you're used to dealing with. The challenges here are many,' she said, including the effort currently underway by the Planning Board and PVPC to update the town's zoning bylaws.
'I'm very much looking forward to your expertise,' she said.
Thornton also said he comes to the town 'with the knowledge we're looking for.'
Allen will also serve as the town economic development director.
Greg Deily, the chair of the town Economic Development Commission also weighed in on Allen's appointment.
'I'm excited that someone with your resources to help us with our goals,' he said, adding that he was impressed with Allen's background.
As the interview wrapped up, Select Board Chair Jason Perron said he was ready to appoint Allen.
Select Board member Diane Gale asked Perron if he wanted to hold off on making the final decision until the board got to old business on its agenda.
He said he was ready, and Gale made the motion to appoint Allen. She and Perron voted yes and Select Board member Douglas Moglin abstained.
Later in the meeting, Moglin explained why he abstained.
He explained his vote to abstain was because of his 'longstanding opposition' that the town didn't need an economic development director.
However, he did endorse Allen's appointment.
'I think the candidate that we met tonight is imminently qualified and will do a good job as a town planner,'
Parker began advocating for hiring a town planner/economic development director late last year.
The town's current planner, Jon Goddard, has been working part-time since 2021.
However, last year he was named the town's stormwater management coordinator and assistant DPW director, which prompted Parker to begin pushing the board for the new hybrid position.
Allen's salary, which has yet to be negotiated, will be between $70,000 and $80,000.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Where does Bills QB Josh Allen rank in average salary in the NFL?
The Buffalo Bills are in the midst of the offseason but there is still reason to celebrate since quarterback Josh Allen did sign a contract extension in March. Allen was the NFL's MVP in 2024. He threw 28 touchdown passes and only six interceptions and rushed for 12 touchdowns while leading the Bills to a 13-4 record. Advertisement The extension was a move made in good faith by the Bills and general manager Brandon Beane. Instead of making $14.5M in 2025, Allen will make $58M. A nice pay day that was well deserved. Allen's extension will keep him in Buffalo through the 2030 season and is worth a record-breaking $330 million with $250M guaranteed. Overall, where does that place Allen in terms of average annual value/ salary on his contract? Here's where Allen ranks in terms of AAV among NFL QBs currently according to OverTheCap: Cowboys QB Dak Prescott Nov 3, 2024; Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott (4) on the bench against the Atlanta Falcons in the fourth quarter at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Brett Davis-Imagn Images AAV: $60 million. Total value: $240 million. Jaguars QB Trevor Lawrence Apr 12, 2025; Augusta, Georgia, USA; Jacksonville Jaguars quarterback Trevor Lawrence walks past no. 10 during the third round of the Masters Tournament at Augusta National Golf Club. Mandatory Credit: Kyle Terada-Imagn Images AAV: $55 million. Advertisement Total value: $275 million. Packers QB Jordan Love Nov 3, 2024; Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA; Green Bay Packers quarterback Jordan Love (10) hangs his head after throwing an interception during the second quarter against the Detroit Lions at Lambeau Field. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Hanisch-Imagn Images AAV: $55 million. Total value: $220 million. Bills QB Josh Allen Bills quarterback Josh Allen looks at the first-down marker after his sneak got the first down in a season-ending win over the Dolphins on Dec. 30, 2018. Jg 123018 Bills 31 AAV: $55 million. Total value: $330 million. This article originally appeared on Bills Wire: Where does Bills QB Josh Allen rank in average salary in the NFL?
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: Brandon Johnson turns to taxing groceries
Mayor Brandon Johnson has positioned himself as a champion of working families and the poor. But his messaging is getting complicated as it collides with the city's difficult fiscal reality. 'You all know my position. The ultra-rich continue to get away with not having to put more skin in the game,' he said at a Tuesday news conference. But at the same time, Johnson is pushing for a grocery tax that will disproportionately hurt families at the checkout line as they try to put food on the table. His administration is taking an obfuscational messaging approach to explain its position. Johnson insists this isn't a new tax — it's merely a local continuation of a state tax being phased out. But for struggling families, the semantics won't matter. Higher grocery prices are higher grocery prices. '(The grocery tax) was a function that the state of Illinois decided to relinquish, and leave it to the cities to collect the tax,' Johnson said earlier this week. 'So we're not creating a grocery tax, we're just creating a process by which we can collect it.' That's some twisty logic, to say the least. A tax is a tax even when a mayor calls it a 'function.' It's true that when Gov. JB Pritzker ended the state's 1% grocery tax, he left the door open for cities to collect their own — being as state grocery tax revenues flow to municipalities, not state coffers. Chicago stands to lose $80 million in revenue from the change — at a time when it's already facing a $1 billion budget shortfall. But the budget problem is not just Springfield's doing. It's a reflection of City Hall's unwillingness to rein in spending and make hard choices. And now, instead of leading with reforms, the mayor is reaching for the easiest — and most regressive — option on the shelf. The mayor has put himself in a corner on this one. If his goal is tax fairness, it's hard to see how making food more expensive for struggling Chicagoans fits the bill. In a better world, Chicagoans would be getting a small break at the grocery store. Pritzker has acknowledged the regressive nature of the grocery tax and its impact on families. 'Even with inflation cooling off every dollar counts, so I'm proud we're doing what we can to make trips to the grocery store a little easier,' he said in 2024 after eliminating the statewide grocery tax. We have said much the same, noting that the grocery tax does not need to be there, especially since its absence might contribute in some small way to motivating people to cook healthy meals at home rather than stopping at the local fast-food outlet. In a few months, the working group Johnson convened to explore budget cuts and revenue options for addressing the city's structural budget challenges is expected to share its preliminary recommendations, ahead of the mayor's budget proposal later this year. We're interested to see what the group comes back with — hopefully sooner rather than later. We're aware that the city's finances are so grim there may be no choice but to add back the grocery 'function,' or tax. We'll leave our final view on that until we see a fuller picture of ideas. Until now, the mayor's efforts to introduce widespread new revenue sources have been met with stiff opposition and a lack of public support. First, his flagship fiscal proposal, a real estate transfer tax hike dubbed 'Bring Chicago Home,' failed, a rude awakening that Johnson's election was not a mandate for sweeping new tax hikes. Next, an attempt to build support for a $300 million property tax hike fizzled out amid understandable public resistance and pushback from aldermen. We opposed both ideas. We say these outcomes are a reflection of the general sentiment among Chicagoans, most of whom are sick to death of being asked for more as the city gives them more of the same, often worse, public services. The mayor's grocery tax push will certainly be met with resentment. If he wants to make it happen, the grocery tax will need to be adopted as an ordinance by City Council and submitted to the state by Oct. 1 in order for the tax to be imposed beginning Jan. 1, according to the Illinois Municipal League. Even Johnson's supporters may struggle to square this proposal with his progressive ideals. It's hard to claim you're standing with working families while taxing their daily bread. Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@
Chicago Tribune
a day ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: Brandon Johnson turns to taxing groceries
Mayor Brandon Johnson has positioned himself as a champion of working families and the poor. But his messaging is getting complicated as it collides with the city's difficult fiscal reality. 'You all know my position. The ultra-rich continue to get away with not having to put more skin in the game,' he said at a Tuesday news conference. But at the same time, Johnson is pushing for a grocery tax that will disproportionately hurt families at the checkout line as they try to put food on the table. His administration is taking an obfuscational messaging approach to explain its position. Johnson insists this isn't a new tax — it's merely a local of a state tax being phased out. But for struggling families, the semantics won't matter. Higher grocery prices are higher grocery prices. '(The grocery tax) was a function that the state of Illinois decided to relinquish, and leave it to the cities to collect the tax,' Johnson said earlier this week. 'So we're not creating a grocery tax, we're just creating a process by which we can collect it.' That's some twisty logic, to say the least. A tax is a tax even when a mayor calls it a 'function.' It's true that when Gov. JB Pritzker ended the state's 1% grocery tax, he left the door open for cities to collect their own — being as state grocery tax revenues flow to municipalities, not state coffers. Chicago stands to lose $80 million in revenue from the change — at a time when it's already facing a $1 billion budget shortfall. But the budget problem is not just Springfield's doing. It's a reflection of City Hall's unwillingness to rein in spending and make hard choices. And now, instead of leading with reforms, the mayor is reaching for the easiest — and most regressive — option on the shelf. The mayor has put himself in a corner on this one. If his goal is tax fairness, it's hard to see how making food more expensive for struggling Chicagoans fits the bill. In a better world, Chicagoans would be getting a small break at the grocery store. Pritzker has acknowledged the regressive nature of the grocery tax and its impact on families. 'Even with inflation cooling off every dollar counts, so I'm proud we're doing what we can to make trips to the grocery store a little easier,' he said in 2024 after eliminating the statewide grocery tax. We have said much the same, noting that the grocery tax does not need to be there, especially since its absence might contribute in some small way to motivating people to cook healthy meals at home rather than stopping at the local fast-food outlet. In a few months, the working group Johnson convened to explore budget cuts and revenue options for addressing the city's structural budget challenges is expected to share its preliminary recommendations, ahead of the mayor's budget proposal later this year. We're interested to see what the group comes back with — hopefully sooner rather than later. We're aware that the city's finances are so grim there may be no choice but to add back the grocery 'function,' or tax. We'll leave our final view on that until we see a fuller picture of ideas. Until now, the mayor's efforts to introduce widespread new revenue sources have been met with stiff opposition and a lack of public support. First, his flagship fiscal proposal, a real estate transfer tax hike dubbed 'Bring Chicago Home,' failed, a rude awakening that Johnson's election was not a mandate for sweeping new tax hikes. Next, an attempt to build support for a $300 million property tax hike fizzled out amid understandable public resistance and pushback from aldermen. We opposed both ideas. We say these outcomes are a reflection of the general sentiment among Chicagoans, most of whom are sick to death of being asked for more as the city gives them more of the same, often worse, public services. The mayor's grocery tax push will certainly be met with resentment. If he wants to make it happen, the grocery tax will need to be adopted as an ordinance by City Council and submitted to the state by Oct. 1 in order for the tax to be imposed beginning Jan. 1, according to the Illinois Municipal League. Even Johnson's supporters may struggle to square this proposal with his progressive ideals. It's hard to claim you're standing with working families while taxing their daily bread.
