logo
French Minister Valls Wants All Parties To Own Their Responsibilities Ahead Of Third Trip To New Caledonia

French Minister Valls Wants All Parties To Own Their Responsibilities Ahead Of Third Trip To New Caledonia

Scoop29-04-2025

Manuel Valls, who is visiting New Caledonia for the third time in two months, has again called all sides to live up to their responsibilities.
, Correspondent French Pacific Desk
French Minister for Overseas Manuel Valls, who is visiting New Caledonia this week for the third time in two months, has once again called all parties to live up to their responsibilities in order to make a new political agreement possible.
Failing that, he said a potential civil war was looming.
'We'll take our responsibilities, on our part, and we will put on the table a project that touches New Caledonia's society, economic recovery, including nickel, and the future of the younger generation', he told a panel of French journalists on Sunday.
He said that he hoped a revised version on a draft document – resulting from his previous visits in the French Pacific territory and new proposals from the French government – there existed a 'difficult path' to possibly reconcile radically opposing views expressed so far from the pro-independence parties in New Caledonia and those who want New Caledonia to remain part of France.
The target remains an agreement that would accommodate both 'the right and aspiration to self-determination' and 'the link with France'.
'If there is no agreement, then economic and political uncertainty can lead to a new disaster, to confrontation and to civil war', he told reporters.
'That is why I have appealed several times to all political stakeholders, those for and those against independence,' he warned.
'Everyone must take a step towards each other. An agreement is indispensable.'
Valls said this week he hoped everyone would 'enter a real negotiations phase'.
He said one of the ways to achieve this will be to find 'innovative' solutions and 'a new way of looking at the future'.
This also included relevant amendments to the French Constitution.
Local parties will not sign any agreement 'at all costs'
Local parties are not so enthusiastic.
In fact, each camp remains on their guard, in an atmosphere of defiance.
And on both sides, they agree at least on one thing: they will not sign any agreement 'at all costs'.
Just like has been the case since talks between Valls and local parties began earlier this year, the two main opposing camps remain adamant on their respective pre-conditions and sometimes demands.
The pro-independence liberation front, the FLNKS, largely dominated by the Union Calédonienne, held at the weekend a 'convention' to decide on whether they would be attending this week's new round of talks with Valls.
They eventually resolved that they would attend the new roundtables, but have not yet decided to call this 'negotiations', only 'discussions'.
They said another decision would be made on Thursday 1 May, 2025, after they have examined Valls's new proposals and documents which the French minister is expected to circulate as soon as he hosts the first meeting, on Wednesday 30 April.
During their weekend 'convention', the FLNKS reaffirmed their demands for a 'Kanaky Agreement' to be signed not later than 24 September 2025, to be followed by a five-year transition period.
The official line was to 'maintain the trajectory' to full sovereignty, including in terms of schedule.
On the pro-France side, the main pillar of their stance is the fact that three self-determination referendums have been held between 2018 and 2021, even though the third and last consultation was largely boycotted by the pro-independence camp.
And that all three referendums have resulted in a vote rejecting full sovereignty.
One of their most outspoken leader, Les Loyalistes party and Southern Province President Sonia Backès, told a public rally last week they refuse another date for yet another referendum.
'A new referendum would mean civil war. And we don't want to fix the date for civil war. So we don't want to fix the date for a new referendum', she said.
Backès, however, said they 'still want to believe in an agreement'.
'We're part of all discussions on seeking solutions. In a constructive and creative spirit'.
One of their other proposals was to grant more powers to each of the three provinces of New Caledonia, including on tax collection matters.
'We don't want differences along ethnic lines. We want the provinces to have more powers so that each of them is responsible for their respective society models'.
Under a draft text leaked last week, any new referendum could only be called by at least three-fifths of the Congress and would no longer pose a 'binary' question on yes or no to independence, but would consist in endorsing a 'project' for New Caledonia's future society.
Another prominent pro-France leader, MP Nicolas Metzdorf, repeated this weekend he and his supporters 'remain mobilised to defend New Caledonia within France'.
'We will not budge,' Metzdorf said.
Despite Valls's warnings and urges, another scenario could also be that New Caledonia's political stakeholders could find it more appealing or convenient to agree on no agreement at all, especially as New Caledonia's crucial provincial elections are in the pipeline and scheduled for no later than 30 November this year.
Concerns about security
But during that same interview, Valls repeated that he remained concerned that the situation on the ground remained 'serious'.
'We are walking on a tightrope above embers'.
He said top of his concerns were New Caledonia's economic and financial situation, the tense atmosphere, a resurgence in 'racism, hatred' as well as a fast-deteriorating public health services situation or the rise in poverty caused by an increasing number of jobless.
'So yes, all these risks are there, and that is why it is everyone's responsibility to find an agreement. And I will stay as long as needed and I will put all my energy so that an agreement takes place. Not for me, for them'.
Valls also recalled that since insurrectional riots broke out in May 2024, almost one year ago, French security and law enforcement agencies are still maintaining about twenty squads of French gendarmes (1500 personnel) deployed there.
This is on top of the normally-stationed 550 other gendarmes and another 680 police officers.
Valls said this was necessary because 'any time, it could flare up again'.
Outgoing French High Commissioner Louis Le Franc said in an interview recently that in case of a 'new 13 May' situation, the pre-positioned forces could ensure law enforcement 'for three or four days' 'until reinforcements arrive'.
If fresh violence were to erupt again, reinforcements could be sent again from mainland France and bring the total number to up to six thousand law enforcement personnel, a number similar to the level deployed in 2024 in the weeks following the riots that killed 14 and caused some €2.2 billion in material damage.
Carefully chosen words
Valls said earlier in April the main pillars of future negotiations are articulated around the themes of 'democracy and the rule of law', a 'decolonisation process', the right to self-determination, a future 'fundamental law' that would seal New Caledonia's future status, the powers of New Caledonia's three provinces, and a future New Caledonia citizenship with the associated definition of who meets the requirements to vote at local elections.
Valls already travelled to Nouméa twice this year, in February and March 2025.
He left Paris on Monday afternoon (local time) and is scheduled to touch down in New Caledonia on Tuesday, 29 April in the evening.
Since his last visit that ended on 1 April, discussions have been maintained in visio conference mode between local political stakeholders and Valls, his cabinet, as well as French Prime Minister François Bayrou's special advisor on New Caledonia, constitutionalist Eric Thiers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

First Māori Voice Opens UN Oceans Conference, Pushing For Marine Legal Rights
First Māori Voice Opens UN Oceans Conference, Pushing For Marine Legal Rights

Scoop

time6 hours ago

  • Scoop

First Māori Voice Opens UN Oceans Conference, Pushing For Marine Legal Rights

NICE, FRANCE, 8 June 2025 The United Nations Oceans Conference commenced today with a significant opening address that championed the Rights of Nature for all marine life, including the groundbreaking concept of legal personhood for whales. This pivotal message was delivered by Dr. Mere Takoko, CEO of the Pacific Whale Fund, alongside Jean-Pierre Gattuso, Director of Research at CNRS and co-chair of the One Ocean Science Congress. French President Emmanuel Macron was in attendance, highlighting the global significance of these discussions for the future of our oceans. The opening presentation underscored the critical role of science and Indigenous knowledge to foster effective, culturally appropriate marine conservation and unlock vital nature finance. "Indigenous knowledge is not just a cultural heritage; it is a profound scientific methodology, honed over millennia of intimate coexistence with the ocean," stated Dr. Takoko. "Our traditional ecological insights are crucial for understanding marine ecosystems, their delicate balances, and the sustainable practices essential for their long-term health. This presentation marks a pivotal honour for the Pacific Whale Fund, demonstrating how Indigenous-led Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are a proven model for both ecological and financial success." The Pacific Whale Fund and Moananui Sanctuary Trust emphasise that integrating Indigenous knowledge and holistic frameworks, deeply rooted in interconnectedness, is essential for integrated marine restoration. These initiatives exemplify the power of blending traditional wisdom with modern science, not only delivering effective conservation outcomes but also ensuring cultural appropriateness and community well-being. The presentation served as a powerful call to action for global decision-makers to actively seek out and respectfully integrate Indigenous knowledge into all facets of marine conservation, recognising it as a powerful, proven pathway to a thriving ocean. The advocacy for the legal personhood of whales, a key initiative of the Pacific Whale Fund, represents a groundbreaking approach to marine protection, offering a new paradigm for our relationship with the ocean's most magnificent creatures. The Pacific Whale Fund is an Indigenous-led organization dedicated to ocean conservation through innovative legal, financial, and cultural frameworks, championing the recognition of whales as legal persons and the establishment of protected marine sanctuaries guided by ancestral wisdom.

French court postpones release of Kanak leader following appeal
French court postpones release of Kanak leader following appeal

RNZ News

time11 hours ago

  • RNZ News

French court postpones release of Kanak leader following appeal

Christian Téin Photo: LNC A Parisian appellate court has delayed the release of New Caledonia's Kanak pro-independence leader, Christian Téin, from custody following an appeal by prosecutors. Téin, 57, is the head of a Field Action Coordinating Cell (CCAT), a group created late 2023 by New Caledonia's largest and oldest pro-independence party Union Calédonienne. From October 2023 onward, the CCAT organised a series of marches and demonstrations that later degenerated (starting 13 May 2024) into months of civil unrest, arson and looting, causing 14 dead and an estimated €2.2 billion in material damage, mainly in the Greater Nouméa area. Since his arrest in June 2024 and his transfer (with others) by plane from New Caledonia to mainland France, Téin has been jailed in Mulhouse (north-eastern France). Late August 2024, Téin, from his Mulhouse jail, was also nominated, in absentia, president of the pro-independence Kanak and Socialist National Liberation Front (FLNKS), of which the Union Calédonienne party is a dominant member. In January 2025, the case, initially investigated out of Nouméa, was removed from the former investigating judges in Nouméa and transferred to a panel of three Paris judges. Téin's lawyers said they welcomed the "new approach" by the Paris judges. In a ruling last week, three magistrates found that following Téin's latest hearing, on 27 May 2025, found no sufficient grounds to keep him in custody. They decided that the Kanak leader should be released from jail, but that he should be kept under judicial supervision and prevented from returning to New Caledonia or interfering with persons related to the case. In response, the prosecution immediately appealed the ruling. The Parisian Appellate Court will now hear the case on 12 June. Nicolas Metzdorf Photo: LNC Reacting to the latest ruling to postpone hearings until 12 June, one prominent and anti-independence leader in New Caledonia, Nicolas Metzdorf (who is also an MP for New Caledonia at the French National Assembly), said he was concerned that Téin's "untimely" release could "upset the balances" of political talks currently underway to find a consensus between all political parties regarding New Caledonia's future. "I think what we need above all is serenity, calm and people who are willing to build," Metzdorf told public broadcaster Nouvelle-Calédonie La Première on Friday. French President Emmanuel Macron Photo: AFP / POOL / JEANNE ACCORSINI The talks between all New Caledonia's political groupings, both pro-France and pro-independence, resumed early 2025, fostered by French minister for overseas Emmanuel Valls. Even though Valls managed to bring back all sides to the same political table, the talks once again stalled on 8 May, after an attempted "conclave" in New Caledonia. This was mainly because prominent anti-independence parties strongly objected to Valls' proposal to introduce a "sovereignty with France", including the transfer of key powers from Paris to Nouméa, a dual Kanak/French citizenship and an international standing. Since then, French President Emmanuel Macron has announced his intention to convene all parties once again, this time in Paris in early July, for fresh talks. On 30 May, one of the pro-independence leaders who was also transferred to France last year, could return home to New Caledonia. Frédérique Muliava , a former Congress staffer, was part of a group of six who were charged in relation to the May 2024 riots. Under her new judicial requirements, set out by the judge in charge of the case, Muliava, once she returns to New Caledonia, is allowed to return to work, but is not to make any contact with other individuals related to her case and not to take part in any public demonstration.

‘Just let them do it' an ideological attack on regulations
‘Just let them do it' an ideological attack on regulations

Otago Daily Times

time4 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

‘Just let them do it' an ideological attack on regulations

For a Bill set to transform New Zealand into a libertarian nightmare, it has an extremely boring name. The Regulatory Standards Bill (RSB) sounds like one of those pieces of legislation debated on a dreary Thursday afternoon in an almost empty House of Representatives. Not because anyone in particular wants it, but because those whose job it is to monitor the efficacy or otherwise of government regulations declares it to be necessary. MPs protesting to their respective party whips that they know absolutely nothing about this sort of Bill's content are told that participation in such debates is good for them. Speaking for 10 minutes about something one knows absolutely nothing about is key political skill. Without it, no politician should expect to do more than shepherd boring Bills through a nearly empty House for the rest of their (short) political career. The RSB may sound like one of those Bills, but it is anything but. According to one critic, the Bill will "neuter the ability of lawmakers to consider anything outside of individual liberty and property rights". That this proposed piece of legislative dynamite is the product of the Act New Zealand party is entirely unsurprising. David Seymour and his caucus are the most disciplined band of ideologically driven politicians in our Parliament. Liberty and property are their twin lodestars, and by them they navigate the choppy seas of New Zealand's resolutely non-ideological politics. Knowing exactly where they want to go has made it much easier for Act to determine, often with alarming and near-revolutionary clarity, what they ought to do. Boiled down to its essence, Act's political mission is captured in the French expression laissez-faire — loosely translated as "let them do it". If the actions of individuals cause no harm to others — let them do it. If those actions involve only their own property — let them do it. Contrariwise, if some individuals seek to compel other individuals for any reason other than preventing them from causing harm to others, then don't let them do it. And if that compulsion involves regulating the use of other individuals' private property, then definitely don't let them do it. Understandably, socialists are not (and never have been) great fans of laissez-faire. The collective welfare is (or used to be) their lodestar. Individuals determined to put themselves, and their property, ahead of measures designed to serve the common good should not be allowed to do it. Obviously, a great deal rests on how "harm" is defined. If your dairy farm is polluting the streams and rivers that others are accustomed to fishing and swimming in, does that constitute harm? If it does, then, surely, the state is entitled to regulate your farming practices? To restrict the ways in which you can legally use your private property. Alternatively, if a friend undertakes to sell you a few grams of cannabis, what business is it of the state's? Why should smoking weed, which most medical scientists have determined to be essentially harmless, be punishable by law? Why aren't individuals, if they're old enough to assess and accept the consequences of using cannabis, and it causes others no harm, allowed to do it? If pressed, Act will always put the rights of individual New Zealanders, and the sanctity of their private property, well ahead of the nation's collective welfare. These twin principles are what, with National's and New Zealand First's backing, Act intends to enshrine in the RSB. If it becomes law, then all regulatory legislation will be weighed carefully by an appointed board against the rights of liberty and property. If Parliament, in its wisdom, elects to override those rights, then the citizens required to surrender them must be fairly compensated. Naturally, environmental groups, iwi, trade unionists and the overwhelming majority of the inhabitants of NGO-land regard the RSB with horror and dismay. They no doubt believed that, having been soundly defeated several times already, such libertarian legislative forays were things of the past. The Left, generally, is flabbergasted and outraged that the coalition remains committed to the RSB's passage. Boy, are they making a fuss. To hear them talk, the Bill might have been co-sponsored by Sauron and Voldemort. But, don't be alarmed. One parliament cannot bind another. If the RSB looks like transforming Aotearoa-New Zealand into Mordor, then the next government can simply repeal it. ■Chris Trotter is an Auckland writer and commentator.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store