EXCLUSIVE My terminally ill brother was forced to eat Wendy's off a STOOL because the fast food spot didn't have available seating... it's his favourite but we can't go back
A terminally ill boy in a wheelchair was forced to eat off a stool at a fast food restaurant in London after staff did not offer disabled seating.
Stage 4 cancer patient Bailey Merritt, 13, was taken to Wendy's in Camden by his brother Carl, 29, after finishing radiotherapy at a London hospital.
Bailey also suffers from ADHD, autism, as well as being partially sighted and prone to seizures.
His family chose the restaurant as the chain is a favourite of Bailey's and the window displayed a disabled access sign.
However the teenager was forced to sit with his wheelchair pushed up to a stool due to a lack of available disabled access seating.
His family said the experience ruined Bailey's view of Wendy's and made him uncomfortable about eating there ever again.
Carl has called for more establishments to be aware of accessibility issues.
He said: 'He has stage 4 terminal cancer, so at this moment in time we are just trying to make memories with him.
'He had just come out of the hospital and when he is hungry he needs to eat pretty quickly.
'We went in and ordered food, when you are in a bit of a rush you don't always realise if there aren't any seats. We also did not think it would be an issue so we just ordered our food.
'When we got the food, we asked where the disabled seating was and staff just told us they only had a disabled toilet and not disabled seating.'
Under the Equality Act, restaurants should make reasonable adjustments to allow disabled people to have the same access as any other customers.
Carl claimed staff at Wendy's did not make any accommodations for his brother and just told the family that 'no seats were available'.
A small number of more practical seats were available, but staff refused to ask other customers to move their seats to accommodate for Bailey.
In an astonishing excuse, staff told the family that the building 'was a bank' before it was a restaurant, which explained why they did not have disabled seating
Carl is a restaurant manager himself and was appalled by the lack of sympathy which he said he received from staff members.
He added: 'If you have a disabled toilet then you need to have disabled seating. If they are all full then you tell customers to move and tell them that other people need it.
Bailey had been returning from a chemotherapy appointment at hospital when he went to Wendy's
'They sent someone with terminal cancer to eat his dinner off a chair.
'We would have left but we couldn't because of Bailey's situation, he needed to eat something then.
'I am angry, not just for Bailey, there are a lot of people that have physical disabilities but also invisible ones. They have a disabled toilet and a sign on their window about accessibility so it doesn't make sense.
'They could have put disabled seating downstairs, it didn't make sense to me.'
Bailey lives with his mother and father in Romford, while Carl has moved out of the family home he said he still tries to visit and spend time with his brother as much as possible.
He was diagnosed with cancer in 2024 and the family are now spending as much time as they can with Bailey to look after him.
However the experience at Wendy's has now put Bailey off the restaurant for good.
'He was very upset about it,' said Carl, 'Wendy's was his favourite place to eat.
'We have one where he lives in Romford and it was his favourite food.
'But the way he put it in Camden was that he was eating food off a seat someone had just sat on. It made him feel dirty eating his food.
'We struggle enough to find places he likes to eat and now we have to find a new place for him.'
Carl has called on other businesses to be more aware of catering for customers with disabilities.
He said: 'I just think places like this need to be looking into not just physical, but hidden disabilities, they need to follow the Equality Act.
'Especially with children, they are the worst ones to do it to.
'I don't think a lot of people realise how much of an impact it can have on people, it is disrespectful and it is discrimination.'
A Wendy's source said the Camden restaurant did have three low-level seats on the downstairs floor of the building.
They confirmed they had been in touch with the family.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Simple blood test could provide first reliable diagnosis for ME
Scientists have found biological signatures in the blood of people with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), a breakthrough that could lead to the first reliable test for the debilitating condition. ME, also known as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), affects an estimated 400,000 people in the UK. Symptoms can include pain, brain fog and extremely low energy levels that do not improve with rest. These often become dramatically worse after even minor physical effort, a phenomenon known as post-exertional malaise. There is no cure and the cause is unknown. A diagnosis is typically made by ruling out other illnesses, a process that can take years. The new study, led by researchers from Edinburgh University, may mark a turning point. Using data from the UK Biobank, they compared blood samples from 1,455 ME patients with those of more than 131,000 healthy people and identified dozens of molecules that differed in concentrations between the two, as well as different cell counts. The changes in the ME patients, who all had mild to moderate forms of the disease, were largely related to chronic inflammation, insulin resistance and liver dysfunction. The findings were replicated in a group of American patients and healthy controls. Professor Chris Ponting, of the university's Institute of Genetics and Cancer, said: 'For so long people with ME/CFS have been told it's all in their head. It's not. We see [it] in their blood. 'Evidence of a large number of replicated and diverse blood biomarkers that differentiate between ME/CFS cases and controls should dispel any lingering perception it is caused by deconditioning and exercise intolerance.' The study found 116 'biomarkers' for ME in the blood of men and women with the condition — a key finding, because ME can affect the sexes differently. These markers did not change according to how active the patients were, consistent with the view that graded exercise therapy, which aims to gradually increase activity levels, is unlikely to be helpful. The strongest differences were found in people who reported post-exertional malaise, which may underscore its central role in the illness. Dr Sjoerd Beentjes, of the university's School of Mathematics, said: 'Blood differences are sometimes attributed to reduced activity levels rather than ME/CFS directly. Our study provides strong evidence ME/CFS affects blood traits through paths other than activity.' The authors stressed that the research was at an early stage with no guarantees a test would be possible. The government pledged last year to improve ME research and the NHS agreed to assess services for patients across England after an inquest into the death at 27 of Maeve Boothby O'Neill in 2021. She had suffered from ME since she was a teenager. The daughter of Sarah Boothby and Sean O'Neill, a senior journalist at The Times, she was left bedbound, unable to speak and malnourished. The coroner issued a prevention of future deaths report in October, the first of its kind for ME, and urged Wes Streeting, the health secretary, NHS officials and health bodies to take action to address the 'non-existent' care and lack of funding for research.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Last chance for MPs to think again on assisted dying
The assisted dying bill has split voters and MPs TOLGA AKMEN/EPA I n November, when the assisted dying bill had its second reading in the House of Commons, its sponsor Kim Leadbeater reassured fellow MPs that a vote in favour was only 'to continue the debate' and ' to subject the bill to line-by-line scrutiny'. That conversation — which permitted wavering MPs to interrogate their decision further — is drawing to a close. Today, MPs will vote on the third and final reading of the bill, after which it could go to the House of Lords. What has emerged from that 'line-by-line scrutiny', however, has chilled many legislators and observers to the core. Firstly, there is the nature of the scrutiny itself. Because this was not a government bill, but a private member's one, Ms Leadbeater was able to handpick the committee and exercise control over the witnesses called. It did not boost confidence in an impartial process. Indeed, four Labour MPs raised concerns that the committee's evidence was 'weighted towards those who were known to be supportive of the bill'. Of eight witnesses called from foreign jurisdictions with an assisted dying law, for example, not one was critical of how the legislation had played out — despite there being numerous experts with misgivings, such as Theo Boer of the Dutch Health Council. Formerly pro-euthanasia, he became horrified by the steady expansion of the system and its eligibility from what was first intended. Although the UK bill is being sold on the basis that it is strictly limited to those with a terminal diagnosis of less than six months, Mr Boer has warned that 'our safeguards were presented that way too.' In the Netherlands, assisted dying provision now includes children over 12 years old and those with psychiatric disorders. If the passage of this bill has been distinguished by procedural ruthlessness, that has been matched only by its intellectual woolliness. The absence of tight, ethical safeguards to protect the vulnerable — in particular those with mental health problems — has caused deep anxiety in organisations at the sharp end of patient care: the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Association for Palliative Medicine, and the Royal College of Physicians have all raised serious concerns. Tellingly, the two ministers whose departments would be most involved in the bill's implementation, the health secretary Wes Streeting and the justice secretary Shabana Mahmood, are both opposed. Many safeguarding amendments have been shrugged aside. MPs who vote yes on Friday will be voting to permit doctors to raise the subject of ending a patient's life, including with people who have learning disabilities. The door is open for private contractors to get involved in running the service with no transparency obligations or cap on profits. And as the former prime minister Gordon Brown argues, the legal right to assisted dying would not be matched by any equivalent right to high-quality palliative care, making a cruel nonsense of real choice for many of those in extremis. Sir Keir Starmer has repeated his support for the principle of the bill, while distancing himself from the legislation. But should its proposals take full effect in 2029 as stipulated, close to the next general election, troubled voters who consider it a deal-breaker will inevitably connect it to the prime minister. There are many others, too, who back assisted dying in good faith, but this flawed bill delivers a far greater number of dangers than it does solutions. Before it is too late, its parliamentary supporters can, and must, think again.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Leeds maternity services now 'inadequate' after inspectors act on parents' concerns
Maternity services at two Leeds hospitals have been downgraded from "good" to "inadequate" by the healthcare regulator, because their failings posed "a significant risk" to women and from staff and patients around quality of care and staffing levels were substantiated by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) during unannounced inspections at Leeds Teaching Hospitals (LTH) NHS regulator has now issued a warning notice which requires the trust to take immediate action to improve. Neonatal services have also been downgraded from "good" to "requires improvement".Over the past six months, the BBC has spoken to 67 families who say they experienced inadequate care at the trust, including parents who say their babies suffered avoidable injury or death. We also talked to five whistleblowers who said the previous CQC "good" rating did not reflect response to the CQC downgrade, LTH said it had committed to improving its maternity and neonatal services at Leeds General Infirmary (LGI) and St James' University Hospital. 'At risk of avoidable harm' During its December 2024 and January 2025 inspections, the CQC found official regulation breaches relating to risk management, safe environment, learning following incidents, infection prevention and control, medicines management and of concern highlighted in the maternity units at both hospitals included: People being "not safe" and "at risk of avoidable harm" - while investigations into incidents, and points raised from these to enable learning, were not always evidentBabies and families not always being supported and treated with dignity and respectLeadership being "below acceptable standard" and not supporting the delivery of high-quality careStaff being reluctant to raise concerns and incidents - because "the trust had a blame culture"Staff, despite being passionate about their work, struggling to provide their desired standard of care because of staffing issues LTH provided evidence to the CQC showing it had reported 170 maternity "red flag incidents", indicating there had been staffing issues, between May and September CQC's findings also highlighted staffing concerns in neonatal services at both hospitals, with a shortage of qualified staff to care for babies with complex coming autumn, the trust says 35 newly qualified midwives are due to start work and it has also appointed additional midwifery leadership regulator will be monitoring the trust's services closely, including through further inspections - says the CQC's director in the north of England, Ann Ford - to make sure patients receive safe care while improvements are implemented."We would like to thank all those people who bravely shared their concerns," she said. "This helps us to have a better picture of the care being provided to people and to focus our inspection in the relevant areas." One family who told the BBC they believe their child would have survived had they received better treatment is Amarjit Kaur and Mandip Singh Matharoo, whose baby was stillborn in January CQC report highlights "how inadequate the service is, which leads to patient harm", they told us."Unfortunately, it's too little too late for our daughter Asees and us, but we hope that this will trigger serious change within the system and take the concerns of patients using the service more seriously."Fiona-Winser Ramm, whose daughter Aliona died in 2020 after what an inquest found to be a number of "gross failures", described the CQC's findings as "horrific"."The concerns we have been raising for five years have been proved true," she says. But she believes the CQC has been slow to act."The CQC inspected Leeds in 2023 and somehow rated them as being good. Let's be clear these problems haven't just appeared in the last two years, they are systemic."In response, the CQC said the 2023 inspection had been part of a national maternity inspection programme focussing specifically on safety and leadership, which found some areas for improvement, but also identified some good practice."As the independent regulator we are committed to ensuring our assessments of the quality and safety of all services are accurate and reflect the experiences of the people that use them," added Ann Ford. If you have been affected by the issues in this story, you can contact the BBC Action Line here All 67 families who have spoken to the BBC want an independent review into the trust's maternity services - and a group of them have asked Health Secretary Wes Streeting for it to be led by senior midwife Donna Leeds families also joined other bereaved parents from across England this week to urge Mr Streeting to hold a national inquiry into maternity safety - he is yet to make a executive of LTH, Prof Phil Wood, said in a statement: "My priority is to make sure we urgently take action to deliver these improvements."The trust is committed to providing "safe, compassionate care", he added, and has already started making improvements, including recruitment, and addressing concerns around culture."We deliver more than 8,500 babies each year and the vast majority of those are safe and positive experiences," he said. "But we recognise that's not the experience of all families." Do you have more information about this story?You can reach Divya directly and securely through encrypted messaging app Signal on: +44 7961 390 325, by email at or her Instagram account.
