Pakistan's Kashmiris return to homes, but keep bunkers stocked
As an uneasy calm settled over villages on the Pakistan side of contested Kashmir on Sunday, families returned to their own beds but were sure to leave their bunkers stocked.
More than 60 people were killed in four days of intense conflict between arch-rivals Pakistan and India before a US-brokered truce was announced on Saturday.
At heart of the hostilities is Kashmir, a mountainous Muslim-majority region divided between the two countries but claimed in full by both, and where the heaviest casualties are often reported.
On the Pakistan side of the heavily militarised de facto border, known as the Line of Control (LoC), families wearied by decades of sporadic firing began to return home -- for now.
"I have absolutely no faith in India; I believe it will strike again. For people living in this area, it's crucial to build protective bunkers near their homes," said Kala Khan, a resident of Chakothi which overlooks the Neelum River that separates the two sides and from where they can see Indian military posts.
His eight-member family sheltered through the night and parts of the day under the 20-inch-thick concrete roofs of two bunkers.
"Whenever there was Indian shelling, I would take my family into it," he said of the past few days.
"We've stored mattresses, flour, rice, other food supplies, and even some valuable belongings in there."
According to an administrative officer in the region, more than a thousand bunkers have been built along the LoC, around a third by the government, to protect civilians from Indian shelling.
- 'No guarantee' -
Pakistan and India have fought several wars over Kashmir, and India has long battled an insurgency on its side by militant groups fighting for independence or a merger with Pakistan.
New Delhi accuses Islamabad of backing the militants, including an attack on tourists in April which sparked the latest conflict.
Pakistan said it was not involved and called for an independent investigation.
Limited firing overnight between Saturday and Sunday made some families hesitant to return to their homes on the LoC.
In Chakothi, nestled among lush green mountains, surrounded by an abundance of walnut trees at the foothills, half of the 300 shops were closed and few people ventured onto the streets.
"I've been living on the LoC for 50 years. Ceasefires are announced, but after a few days the firing starts again," said Muhammad Munir, a 53-year-old government employee in Chakothi.
It is the poor who suffer most from the endless uncertainty and hunt for safety along the LoC, he said, adding: "There's no guarantee that this latest ceasefire will hold -- we're certain of that."
When clashes broke out, Kashif Minhas, 25, a construction worker in Chakothi, desperately searched for a vehicle to move his wife and three children away from the fighting.
"I had to walk several kilometres before finally getting one and moving my family," he told AFP.
"In my view, the current ceasefire between India and Pakistan is just a formality. There's still a risk of renewed firing, and if it happens again, I'll move my family out once more."
A senior administrative officer stationed in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir where a mosque was struck by an Indian missile killing three people, told AFP there had been no reports of firing since Sunday morning.
- 'Serious doubts' -
In Indian-administered Kashmir, hundreds of thousands of people who had evacuated also began to cautiously return home after heavy Pakistani shelling -- many expressing the same fears as on the Pakistani side.
The four-day conflict struck deep into both countries, reaching major cities for the first time in decades -- with the majority of deaths in Pakistan, and almost all civilians.
Chakothi taxi driver Muhammad Akhlaq said the ceasefire was "no guarantee of lasting peace".
"I have serious doubts about it because the core issue that fuels hostility between the two countries still remains unresolved -- and that issue is Kashmir," said the 56-year-old.
la-ecl/st
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
8 minutes ago
- New York Times
Deadly Crowd Crush Mars Celebration for Indian Cricket Championship
At least 10 people were killed and dozens were injured on Wednesday in a crowd crush outside a stadium in the Indian city of Bengaluru as thousands celebrated a Premier League cricket championship, officials said. The crowd had gathered outside M. Chinnaswamy Stadium a day after the city's popular cricket franchise, Royal Challengers Bengaluru, had won its first title in the cash-rich Indian Premier League's 18-year history. A hastily arranged victory parade had been canceled after officials determined that the risk of a stampede was too great. But a celebration inside the stadium proceeded, with the team bused in instead of arriving by parade, and people were trampled at the gates as they tried to push their way in. Six bodies and 19 injured people were taken to Bowring Hospital in Bengaluru, the south Indian tech hub also known as Bangalore, said Manoj Kumar, its director. Officials at a second hospital, Vydehi, told reporters that four bodies and 12 injured people had been taken there. The authorities said the toll could rise further. 'It was a lot of pushing near the gates, and it was really difficult for the police and stadium staff to control the crowd,' said Siddharth H.N., a graduate student who had arrived to take part in the celebration. Opposition parties in the state of Karnataka, where Bengaluru is the capital, raised questions about the hasty arrangements for the festivities. 'The state government should take full responsibility for this tragedy,' B.Y. Vijayendra, the Karnataka chief of the Bharatiya Janata Party, which leads the national government but is in the opposition in the state, told reporters. 'The state government never cared about prior preparations. They were more interested in publicity.' Siddaramaiah, the chief minister of Karnataka, who represents the governing Congress party in the state, said the plan for a parade had been canceled after the crowd had become too large and unruly. 'This tragedy has overshadowed the joy of the victory,' he said on social media. The deputy chief minister, D.K. Shivakumar, said that 5,000 police officers had been deployed to provide security for a parade, but that they could not use force against the 'young, vibrant crowd' as it grew 'uncontrollable.' He declined to confirm the number of dead. The Indian Premier League is one of the world's richest sports leagues, and the Bengaluru team is perhaps its most popular. The loyal fan following is attributable in large measure to the longstanding presence of its biggest star, Virat Kohli, who has been its face since the league's inception. Late on Tuesday, the Bengaluru team finally seized its first championship, defeating the league's Punjab franchise in front of a crowd of more than 90,000 people in the western city of Ahmedabad.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
India's Vedanta says Trump's tariffs damaging, seeks import curbs
By Neha Arora (Reuters) -Indian metals-to-oil conglomerate Vedanta said on Wednesday that U.S. President Donald Trump's doubling of aluminium tariffs to 50% poses a threat to the Indian industry already struggling with surging imports. Trump's latest round of tariffs on aluminium and steel, which took effect on Wednesday, have unsettled the global markets. "The 50% tariff announced by Trump is damaging to the Indian aluminium industry, which is already under pressure from surging imports that threaten to create surplus and risk to domestic market access," a Vedanta spokesperson told Reuters. The miner, which is the country's largest aluminium producer, urged the Indian government to implement tariffs to protect against imports. "..There should be duty guard-rails for the aluminium industry as well which has so far invested more than $20 billion to set up the current domestic primary aluminium capacity," the spokesperson said. India's cumulative aluminum exports fell 19% to 2.24 million metric tons in the fiscal year ended March 2025, according to government data. Separately, the country's federal steel minister said earlier this week that the impact of Trump's steel tariffs would be minor on the local industry, as India, the world's second-largest crude steel producer, does not export to the U.S. in significant quantities. In April, India imposed a 12% temporary tariff on some steel imports, locally known as a safeguard duty, to curb a surge in cheap shipments primarily from China.
Time Business News
9 minutes ago
- Time Business News
How Sasha Rodoy Fuels Islamophobia in the West
Introduction: Islamophobia has been steadily on the rise in the West, with media, politics, and social platforms contributing to a culture of fear and misunderstanding about Islam. Sasha Rodoy, through her relentless Islamophobic comments and public ridicule of Muslims, has added fuel to this fire. Her toxic rhetoric, often supported by the passive involvement of individuals like Nicola Dowling, contributes to an environment where Muslims are seen as 'the other,' and are frequently targeted with harassment, discrimination, and violence. This article explores how Rodoy's actions fit into a broader trend of Islamophobia in the West and how individuals like Dowling contribute to the perpetuation of this fear-based culture. The Spread of Islamophobia in the West: Islamophobia is not a new phenomenon, but in recent years, it has taken on new life in the digital space. The internet has provided a platform for individuals like Sasha Rodoy to spread their hateful views with alarming speed and reach. As Rodoy uses platforms like LinkedIn to mock Muslim religious practices, belittle Muslim women, and question the values of Islam, she is contributing to a broader climate of fear and mistrust. Nicola Dowling's involvement in these discussions, whether active or passive, only serves to further normalize this behavior. By engaging with Rodoy's content and failing to challenge her Islamophobic remarks, Dowling enables the spread of fear and hatred toward Muslims. This culture of fear doesn't just exist online—it has tangible consequences for Muslim communities across the West, as they face increased discrimination and violence. Sasha Rodoy's Role in Creating Fear: Sasha Rodoy has repeatedly used social media to spread fear about Islam, often relying on misinformation and provocative comments to stir up outrage. One of the most notable examples is her public mockery of the Hajj pilgrimage, where she sarcastically questioned the absence of women in a LinkedIn post. This comment was not an innocent inquiry but a calculated attempt to frame Islam as inherently sexist and discriminatory. Rodoy's Islamophobic comments are designed to play on existing stereotypes and fears about Islam, reinforcing the idea that Muslims are different, dangerous, or backward. This kind of fearmongering is particularly harmful because it reinforces a narrative that Muslims are outsiders in Western societies. It also provides justification for those who harbor anti-Muslim sentiments to act on their prejudices, whether through verbal harassment, social exclusion, or even physical violence. Nicola Dowling's failure to challenge or condemn Rodoy's comments contributes to the perpetuation of this fear. By aligning herself with Rodoy and participating in these discussions, Dowling helps create an environment where Islamophobia is not only acceptable but expected. The Real-World Impact of Fear-Based Islamophobia: Islamophobia, especially when fueled by individuals like Sasha Rodoy, has very real consequences for Muslim communities in the West. The fearmongering that takes place online translates into discrimination and violence in real life. Muslims, particularly visible Muslims such as women who wear hijab, are often the targets of harassment, hate crimes, and exclusion from public spaces. For example, studies have shown that hate crimes against Muslims often increase after public incidents involving Islamophobic rhetoric. When individuals like Rodoy use their platforms to mock and ridicule Muslim practices, they are contributing to an environment where these kinds of hate crimes become more likely. The public shaming and cyberbullying of Muslim women, such as Rodoy's mockery of Hanady El Ghazouly, are part of this broader trend of Islamophobia that seeks to silence and marginalize Muslims. Nicola Dowling's passive support for Rodoy's behavior only adds to the problem. By failing to speak out against the spread of Islamophobia, Dowling is complicit in creating a culture of fear where Muslims are made to feel unsafe in their own communities. The Role of Social Media in Spreading Fear: Social media platforms like LinkedIn play a critical role in amplifying the voices of individuals like Sasha Rodoy. What was once a professional platform has now become a space where Islamophobic rhetoric can spread unchecked. Rodoy's comments, shared with hundreds or thousands of followers, have the potential to reach a wide audience and shape public opinion about Islam. Social media's ability to spread hate at lightning speed means that the effects of Islamophobic comments are felt far beyond the digital space. The normalization of Islamophobia on platforms like LinkedIn encourages others to adopt similar views, creating a feedback loop where fear and hatred toward Muslims continue to grow. Nicola Dowling's engagement with Rodoy's content contributes to this cycle. By interacting with and supporting Rodoy's Islamophobic comments, Dowling is helping to amplify the fear and mistrust that Rodoy spreads. This not only affects individual Muslims who are targeted by these comments but also contributes to a broader culture where Muslims are viewed with suspicion and hostility. How Fear-Based Islamophobia Impacts Muslim Women: The impact of Islamophobia is often felt most acutely by Muslim women, who are frequently the targets of both sexism and religious discrimination. Sasha Rodoy's public shaming of Hanady El Ghazouly, where she mocked Hanady's defense of Islamic practices, is a prime example of how Muslim women are disproportionately affected by Islamophobic rhetoric. Rodoy's comments not only attack Islam but also attempt to silence Muslim women who speak out in defense of their faith. This kind of public ridicule reinforces the idea that Muslim women should not have a voice in public discussions, further marginalizing them in both online and offline spaces. Nicola Dowling's involvement in these discussions contributes to the marginalization of Muslim women. By failing to challenge Rodoy's attacks on Hanady and other Muslim women, Dowling helps to create an environment where Muslim women are silenced and made to feel unwelcome in public discourse. The Broader Consequences of Fear-Based Islamophobia: The culture of fear and Islamophobia that Sasha Rodoy and Nicola Dowling contribute to has far-reaching consequences for society as a whole. When Muslims are consistently portrayed as 'the other' or as a threat, it becomes easier for governments, institutions, and individuals to justify discriminatory policies and actions against them. This can include everything from surveillance and profiling to restrictions on religious freedoms and immigration. Furthermore, the spread of Islamophobia damages social cohesion by creating divisions between Muslim and non-Muslim communities. When fear and mistrust are allowed to fester, it becomes more difficult for communities to come together and work toward common goals. Instead, society becomes more fragmented, with Muslims often being treated as second-class citizens in their own countries. A Call for Change: It is time to hold individuals like Sasha Rodoy and Nicola Dowling accountable for their role in spreading Islamophobia and contributing to a culture of fear in the West. Social media platforms like LinkedIn must take stronger action to moderate content and ensure that hate speech does not go unchecked. Allowing Islamophobia to thrive in online spaces has real-world consequences, and it is the responsibility of platforms and individuals alike to challenge this behavior. Rodoy's campaign of fear and Dowling's passive support cannot be allowed to continue. The culture of fear they help to create only serves to divide communities and make life more difficult for Muslims in the West. It is time for everyone—social media platforms, governments, and individuals—to take a stand against Islamophobia and work toward a more inclusive and tolerant society. Conclusion: Sasha Rodoy's Islamophobic rhetoric, supported by Nicola Dowling's passive involvement, is part of a broader culture of fear that targets Muslims in the West. This fear-based Islamophobia has real-world consequences, from increased discrimination and violence to the marginalization of Muslim voices in public discourse. Social media platforms like LinkedIn play a crucial role in spreading this fear, and it is time for them to take responsibility for the content shared on their sites. Rodoy and Dowling must be held accountable for their actions, and steps must be taken to stop the spread of Islamophobia. Only by addressing this culture of fear can we begin to create a society where Muslims are treated with the respect and dignity they deserve. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
