logo
Diversity, equity and inclusion are values worth saving. Let's raise our voices.

Diversity, equity and inclusion are values worth saving. Let's raise our voices.

Yahoo19-02-2025

As faith and community leaders, we come together in this moment to remember history and challenge the present and fight for the future.
During Black History Month, we reflect on the enduring struggle for freedom, justice and dignity – and we know that we cannot separate our past from our present reality.
The attack on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) by the current administration is not just political; it is a moral failing. It is an attempt to erase hard-fought progress, to silence truth-telling and to reassert a system that has for too long privileged a few at the expense of the many.
We have seen this playbook before.
More: Sociology's 'woke ideology' no longer a general education course at Florida universities
The same forces that once justified segregation, voter suppression and economic disparity are now repackaging those injustices under the guise of 'merit' – as if America has ever functioned on an unbiased, level playing field.
But let us be clear: the dismantling of DEI is nothing more than a deliberate attempt to entrench inequity and white supremacy.
Just as the words 'End Racism' were quietly removed from the end zone during the recent Super Bowl game, this administration seeks to strip away efforts that foster belonging, justice and repair.
They call for unity, yet their actions divide.
They speak of fairness, yet their policies exclude.
The message is clear:
Diversity is a threat.
Equity must be undone.
Inclusion is expendable.
But we refuse to be silent.
The legendary Black author James Baldwin once wrote, 'Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.'
This moment demands that we face the truth: racism and exclusion are not relics of the past – they are realities shaping our present. To dismantle DEI is to deny the truth of this nation's history and to betray its future.
Indeed, this is the work that the Association for the Study of African American Life and History (ASALH) and the subsequent Manasota Branch strives to do as they promote the teaching of accurate Black history and to confront legislation ostensibly passed to protect children from feeling guilty for slavery and its attendant horrors.
We believe the truthful, age-appropriate teaching of our history is essential for all children.
DEI is not a threat to this nation; it is its redemption.
Our strength has never been found in uniformity but in the boldness of our diversity. A nation that acknowledges past harms and builds policies that uplift historically marginalized communities is a nation that thrives.
When Black voices, immigrant voices, Indigenous voices, queer voices and all voices from the margins are heard, we are all stronger.
As faith and community leaders, we declare unequivocally that DEI is not just a political strategy – it is a moral imperative. It is a reflection of our deepest values: that all people are created with inherent dignity, that justice requires action and that our faith envisions the world as one of equity, not exclusion.
So today, in the face of these attacks, we lift our voices not in despair but in defiant hope.
We call on our communities to speak out, to resist and to defend the sacred work of inclusion. We urge businesses, schools, places of worship and civic institutions to refuse to cave to the pressures of whitewashing history and restricting diversity initiatives.
We will not allow the progress of the past to be erased. We will sing a song full of the faith that the dark past has taught us. And together, we will march on till victory is won.
This guest column was jointly authored by the following Sarasota-area faith and community leaders:
David G. Wilkins, Manasota ASALH
Rev. Alex G. Evangelista, pastor, Pine Shores Presbyterian Church
Rev. Dr. Wes Bixby, pastor, First Congregational UCC
Rev. Ashley Nicolls, pastor, St. Paul Lutheran Church
Rev. Dr. Laurie Etter, SURE, co-chair
Rev. Eric Olaf Olsen, pastor, Faith Lutheran Church
Mel Gosselin, executive director, ALSO Youth
Rev. Ryan McBride, pastor, 12 Springs Church
Karlenna (KK) Burchell, Harvest Sarasota Church
Rev Stephen Hoffman, United Methodist Clergy
Rev. Dr. Paul T. Reiter, Presbyterian Church U.S.A. Clergy
The Rev. Carla McCook, St. Margaret of Scotland Episcopal Church
The Rev. Wayne F. Farrell, St. Boniface Episcopal Church
Rev. Dr. Mary Alice Mulligan, minister, St. Andrew United Church of Christ
JT Priar, young adult minister, Church of the Trinity MCC
Dr. John W. Walker, Jr., retired pastor, Christian Methodist Episcopal Church
Rev. Jay Wolin, Minister, Unitarian Universalists of Sarasota
Rev. Elder Lillie Brock, senior pastor, Church of the Trinity MCC
Rabbi Jennifer Singer, Liberal Yeshiva
Kristopher Wise, United Methodist Church
Rev. Sarah Robles Wise, United Methodist Clergy
Rev. Dr. Jeff Jones, retired seminary professor, Andover Newton
Rev. Dr. Tim Boggess, pastor, First Presbyterian Church of Sarasota
This article originally appeared on Sarasota Herald-Tribune: Destroying DEI is about restoring white supremacy | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's latest manufactured crisis has Los Angeles in its grip
Trump's latest manufactured crisis has Los Angeles in its grip

Boston Globe

time31 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump's latest manufactured crisis has Los Angeles in its grip

Advertisement And it's hard to imagine them voting to trample local local enforcement. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But then this administration has been just spoiling for a confrontation — especially in Los Angeles, with presidential advisers like And the president threw gasoline on the fire. Even as more demonstrators took to the streets, Advertisement Now there is no excuse for violence on the streets of any American city — and burning Waymo robot-driven cabs is hardly a good image for those with legitimate concerns about tactics used by immigration forces. The initial demonstrations were touched off by immigration raids at a garment factory and But throughout the weekend there was also no evidence that state and local police were incapable of dealing with the situation without the unasked-for federal intervention. In fact, some These are not the LA riots of 1992 in the wake of the verdict acquitting police officers of beating a Black man, Rodney King. Some Trump has long been the master of the manufactured crisis — the kind he has repeatedly used to justify broad use of executive powers. The president had barely finished taking the oath of office, when he declared a crisis at the border, requiring an Then there was the declaration of an equally nonexistent In April, with the Advertisement But by calling out the National Guard in California, on his own initiative and under false pretenses, Trump has entered new and more dangerous territory. 'The people who are causing the problems are bad people, they are insurrectionists,' Trump The president has not yet invoked the Insurrection Act but instead is using a section of the US Code on Armed Services ( That certainly explains Trump's escalating rhetoric and that of his administration, but it is an allegation that at the end of the day would have to be proven in court. 'Federal law enforcement officers were attacked by violent radicals and illegal criminals waving foreign flags because Governor Newsom was too weak to protect the city,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt Those 'foreign flags' were evidence not of an 'invasion' but for many Mexican-Americans in LA, But for this administration there is no detail that can't be used to distort the truth. 'Let me be clear: There is no invasion. There is no rebellion,' Advertisement Sure, Trump has long had it in for California, threatening to But the truly horrifying thing about Trump's current move is that it could happen to each and every state in the nation — or, more likely, to each and every Democratic state, especially when truth is so irrelevant to the Trump administration and facts are so fungible. The other danger is that having normalized the deployment of troops during manufactured crises, Trump will feel empowered to use them in even more forceful or aggressive ways if and when the nation faces actual crises. California's political leaders will not be fighting this battle on behalf of the rule of law alone. It's our fight too, and it won't be the last. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us

Launch of mandatory Ontario Greenbelt review months overdue: internal docs
Launch of mandatory Ontario Greenbelt review months overdue: internal docs

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Launch of mandatory Ontario Greenbelt review months overdue: internal docs

Ontario appears to be months behind launching a mandatory review of the Greenbelt, and opposition politicians and environmentalists are asking for a wide-ranging and transparent study of the protected lands to preserve their future. A mandatory 10-year-review of the Greenbelt Plan, which created the protected zone from development, was to have started earlier this year. As of late March that review had not formally begun, according to documents obtained by CBC News through a freedom of information request. Civil servants warned new Municipal Affairs Minister Rob Flack that the process should have started on Feb. 28, the day after Ontario elected the Ford government to a third term. "To date, (the Ministry) has initiated internal policy research and analysis, including developing possible approaches to consultation and Indigenous engagement," civil servants told the new minister in a March briefing note. The Greenbelt was created in 2005 to protect farm land and some of the most ecologically sensitive areas of the Golden Horseshoe region. The law provides environmental protection and specifies where development should not occur. The Greenbelt has been the subject of scandal for the Ford government since 2022, when it announced it would swap 15 pieces of land from the protected area and open them up for development. Reports from the auditor general and integrity commissioner found that the process to select lands was rushed and favoured certain developers. The property owners with land removed from the Greenbelt stood to see their land value rise by $8.3 billion, the auditor general found in her own Greenbelt investigation. Ford reversed course after heated public outcry and the RCMP continues to investigate the matter. WATCH | Ontario's 4 major parties say they would not build housing on the Greenbelt: The legislation that created the Greenbelt requires a review every decade. That involves consultations with municipalities within the protected area and members of the public. It also requires the government hear from its own Greenbelt Council, a body of 10 representatives it appoints to meet regularly and provide advice to the minister on land use planning related to the protected area. But the civil servants say that as of March, the council only had one member and no chairperson. According to the Greenbelt council's website Monday, the sole remaining appointee's term expires on June 24. Seven members of that body, including former Toronto mayor and PC cabinet minister David Crombie, resigned in 2020 in protest over changes the Ford government made to the powers of conservation authorities. But the civil servants are also clear about the parameters of the review — it's not meant to shrink the protected zone. "Amendments shall not have the effect of reducing the total land area of the Greenbelt Plan," the briefing note says. Minister Flack's office did not respond to questions from CBC News on the status of the review or the Greenbelt Council. The briefing note puts the Greenbelt review at the top of a list of early priority decisions for the minister, labelling it a "medium" operational and reputational risk for the government. Given the political trouble the government has had with the Greenbelt, NDP environment critic Peter Tabuns said he's not surprised work on the review has been slow to progress. "The fewer times the word Greenbelt is uttered in public the better for them," he said. "Having a really minimal review push through quickly would probably be politically the easiest thing for them." While the review may seem like a simple formality, it's needed to help strengthen the protected zone, Tabuns said. He urged the government to consult widely on how to strengthen the law. "Every 10 years you've got to look at it to make sure it's in good shape," he said. "To make sure it's protected in the hope that any future attack will be blunted." Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner said he's concerned the province has nearly reached the halfway point of the year and hasn't made any meaningful progress on the review. "I think it is critically important for public confidence that this review take place, that it be rigorous, and it be designed in a way to ask questions about what we can do to strengthen the Greenbelt," he said. In light of the scandal, the government should use the review as a way to bolster public confidence in its management of the Greenbelt, Schreiner said. "I would say to the government, this is an opportunity to help you move forward in terms of the Greenbelt scandal and the public opposition that flowed from that, to say, 'We learned a lesson, and we're going to conduct a Greenbelt review, and we're going to do it in a way that talks about how to strengthen the Greenbelt,'" he said. The review must be expansive and the government must consult widely, said Tim Gray, the executive director of Environmental Defence. The last study, done a decade ago, took years and was substantive, he said."It is important that we do a check in and upgrade it where necessary, expand it where necessary, and address threats to it where it's necessary," Gray said. Tony Morris, conservation policy and campaigns director at Ontario Nature, said he's concerned the government will want to perform a quick review that "tinkers at the edges." "It's critical that the process be transparent and it be science-based," he said. "It must be open to Indigenous communities and all stakeholders to actually be involved and feel like they're being heard, which means that it has to be a well thought out process with appropriate timelines."

World Cup host city organizers acknowledge immigration crackdown may impact next year's tournament

time2 hours ago

World Cup host city organizers acknowledge immigration crackdown may impact next year's tournament

NEW YORK -- Philadelphia's host city executive for the 2026 World Cup says organizers accept that an immigration crackdown by President Donald Trump's administration may be among the outside events that impact next year's tournament. "There are certainly things that are happening at the national level, the international level, there are going to be geopolitical issues that we don't even know right now that are going affect the tournament next year, so we recognize that we're planning within uncertainty,' Meg Kane said Monday at a gathering of the 11 U.S. host city leaders, one year and two days ahead of the tournament opener. The World Cup will be played at 16 stadiums in the U.S., Mexico and Canada from June 11 to July 19 next year, a tournament expanded to 48 nations and 104 games. All matches from the quarterfinals on will be in the U.S., with the final at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. 'Whether it's the Olympics, whether it's a World Cup, whether it's a Super Bowl, you name it, anytime you've got a major international sporting event, geopolitics is going to have a role,' said Alex Vasry, CEO of the New York/New Jersey host committee. Kane said the host committees must adapt to decisions made by others. 'One of the things that I think we all recognize is that we have to be really good at operating within that uncertainty,' Kane said. 'I think for each of our cities, we want to be prepared to make any person that is coming and makes the decision to come to the United States or come to this World Cup feel that they are welcome. We do not play a role necessarily in what is happening in terms of the decisions that are made.' Trump's travel ban on citizens from 12 countries exempted athletes, coaches, staff and relatives while not mentioning fans. 'We allow for FIFA to continue having constructive conversations with the administrations around visas, around workforce, around tourism,' Kane said. FIFA is running the World Cup for the first time without a local organizing committee in the host nation. Asked in late April whether FIFA president Gianni Infantino was available to discuss the tournament, FIFA director of media relations Bryan Swanson forwarded the request to a member of the media relations staff, who did not make Infantino available. Legislation approved by the House of Representatives and awaiting action in the Senate would appropriate $625 million to the Federal Emergency Management Agency 'for security, planning, and other costs related to the 2026 FIFA World Cup.' The 11 U.S. host committees have been consulting with each other on issues such as transportation for teams and VIPs, and for arranging fan fests. At the last major soccer tournament in the U.S., the 2024 Copa America final at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida, started 82 minutes late after fans breached security gates. 'Certainly we were not involved in the planning or the logistics for that particular match,' said Alina Hudak, CEO of the Miami World Cup host committee. She said local police 'have done an extensive review of the after-action reports related to that in collaboration with the stadium and so all of the things that happened are in fact being reviewed and addressed and I can assure you that everything is being done within our power to make sure that the appropriate measures are being placed, the appropriate perimeters.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store