Federal trade court blocks Trump's emergency tariffs
A federal court struck down on May 28 many of the tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump, describing them as 'illegal'.
A three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade in Manhattan issued its ruling early Wednesday morning, marking a victory for Democratic-led states and a group of small businesses.
In their lawsuit, these companies and states claimed that Trump misused the emergency law to justify the tariffs. However, the Republican President's administration can still appeal the decision before the federal court.
This ruling is considered one of the biggest legal and political defeats Trump has faced so far, amid a wave of lawsuits challenging the executive orders he has issued since taking office in January.
Global markets witnessed prolonged volatility when Trump announced the blanket tariffs on April 2, wiping out trillions of dollars in market value before recovering weeks later following the suspension of the higher tariffs and the beginning of trade negotiations.
The court ruled that President Trump did not have the authority to impose blanket tariffs on most countries around the world — a decision that nullifies the tariffs that sparked a global trade war and threatened to destabilize the global economy.
In its decision, the court noted that it does not find that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) confers such absolute authority and nullifies the challenged tariffs imposed thereunder.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
The US-China trade war's consequences for agriculture
The trade war initiated by the Trump administration, particularly focused on China, has sparked widespread debate about its implications for various sectors, especially agriculture. As tariffs have been imposed on numerous goods, the US agricultural sector faces significant challenges, particularly concerning essential exports like soybeans and corn. This article examines the consequences of the trade conflict, especially regarding food security and weaponry, while also assessing the position of developing countries, with a specific focus on Saudi Arabia. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for formulating strategies that mitigate negative impacts and foster collaboration in an increasingly interdependent global economy. The US-China trade war was started with the intent to rectify perceived trade imbalances and protect American industries. The administration's tariffs aimed to shield domestic producers from foreign competition and address issues related to intellectual property theft. However, the immediate fallout of these tariffs has been a disruption in agricultural exports, particularly to China, which has historically been one of the largest markets for US agricultural products. American farmers, particularly those in Republican strongholds, have reported significant declines in sales, leading to financial distress. The repercussions extend beyond individual farms, threatening the broader agricultural sector's viability and influencing global food security. This conflict has highlighted the fragility of agricultural markets, which are intricately linked to international trade dynamics. The imposition of tariffs has led to a significant decrease in US agricultural exports to China, particularly in commodities like soybeans, which have seen a dramatic fall in demand. As Brazil and Argentina have ramped up their production and captured market shares, US farmers are finding it increasingly difficult to regain access to these crucial markets. The historical example of the 1980s grain embargo against the Soviet Union serves as a cautionary tale, illustrating how protectionist measures can backfire, hurting domestic producers while leaving foreign competitors relatively unscathed. Additionally, the psychological burden on American farmers cannot be overlooked. The uncertainty surrounding trade relations has led to fears of economic instability, with farmers expressing concerns over unsold crops and the long-term viability of their operations. Kenneth Hartman of the National Corn Growers Association encapsulated this anxiety by emphasizing the dire consequences of prolonged disconnection from the Chinese market. Food security has historically been a pivotal aspect of international relations. The US has often leveraged its agricultural prowess to exert influence over other nations, particularly in developing countries. Following its sanctions on Russia, the US sought to intertwine agricultural economies with its own, thereby fostering dependency through strategic practices. This raises questions about the ethical implications of using food security as a tool of power. In contrast, Saudi Arabia's approach to agricultural self-sufficiency offers a compelling counternarrative. By investing significantly in domestic agriculture, the Kingdom aims to reduce reliance on external sources, thereby enhancing national food security. This strategic pivot underscores the importance of sovereignty in food production and highlights the potential of developing nations to chart their own paths in the face of global trade pressures. Historically, John R. Block, who was secretary of agriculture in the Reagan administration, advocated for self-sufficiency in developing nations, promoting the idea that countries should cultivate their agricultural capabilities to reduce reliance on imports. However, this notion becomes paradoxical when considering that many developing countries could achieve food security more efficiently through American agricultural products. This dynamic illustrates a broader strategy of domination: controlling food equates to wielding power. By fostering dependency on US agricultural exports, America not only secures its own economic interests but also reinforces its geopolitical influence. A compelling counterexample to this paradigm is Saudi Arabia, where King Fahd's administration made a strategic pivot toward agricultural self-sufficiency, directly challenging US recommendations that favored external dependence. Recognizing the vulnerabilities associated with food imports, the Saudi government invested heavily in domestic agriculture, focusing on initiatives that would enhance local production capabilities. These investments led to significant advancements in technology, irrigation systems and agricultural practices, resulting in increased yields and a reduced reliance on imported food. This pursuit of self-sufficiency not only enhanced food security for Saudi Arabia but also economically empowered its citizens by creating jobs, fostering local industries and integrating them into the agricultural mainstream. Farmers received training and resources that allowed them to contribute to a more robust domestic agricultural sector, ultimately leading to greater national pride and resilience against global market fluctuations. Saudi Arabia's approach underscores the importance of national sovereignty in food security, highlighting that self-sufficiency can be achieved through strategic planning and investment rather than reliance on external sources. This successful policy serves as a valuable lesson for other nations, particularly those in similar geopolitical situations, emphasizing that prioritizing local agricultural development can lead to sustainable food security and economic empowerment. Saudi Arabia's pursuit of agricultural self-sufficiency serves as a valuable lesson for other nations. Dr. Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed Furthermore, as global food systems continue to evolve, the Saudi model demonstrates that countries can effectively balance self-sufficiency with international trade. By developing a robust domestic agricultural sector while maintaining trade relationships, Saudi Arabia has positioned itself to navigate the complexities of global food markets more effectively. This dual approach not only secures its food supply but also enables the country to play a more influential role in regional and global food security discussions. In conclusion, while the US promotes self-sufficiency in developing nations as a means of encouraging independence, the Saudi experience illustrates that achieving food security can also involve strategic investments in local agriculture. By recognizing the interplay between self-sufficiency and international cooperation, countries can develop more resilient food systems that protect their interests while contributing to global food security efforts. Developing countries, often caught in the crossfire of US-China trade tensions, face unique challenges. Many of these nations rely on agricultural exports to sustain their economies, making them particularly vulnerable to market fluctuations triggered by trade wars. The trade conflict can exacerbate existing inequalities, as wealthier nations with greater resources can better absorb the shocks of tariffs and retaliatory measures. In the context of Saudi Arabia, while the nation has made strides toward agricultural self-sufficiency, it remains heavily dependent on imports for various food products. The trade war complicates these dynamics, as rising food prices and market instability can threaten food security for vulnerable populations. The interplay of global trade and domestic agricultural policies thus becomes crucial in ensuring that developing nations can navigate these challenges effectively. Given the complexities of the trade war and its implications for agriculture and food security, several strategies can help mitigate negative impacts on both the US and developing nations. Firstly, pursuing diplomatic resolutions to enhance trade access with key markets, particularly China, can create a more stable environment for agricultural exports. Constructive dialogue focused on fair trade practices can cultivate cooperation and trust. Secondly, innovating through sustainable farming practices can enhance productivity and food security. Investing in technology such as precision farming can position US farmers to compete effectively in both domestic and international markets. Thirdly, forming strategic partnerships with countries facing similar agricultural challenges can establish a united front in advocating fair trade practices. Collaborating with nations with aligned agricultural interests can bolster global food security. Fourthly, encouraging farmers to diversify their export markets can reduce dependence on any single nation. By exploring opportunities in emerging markets, US agriculture can build resilience against trade disruptions. Finally, providing support to developing nations through investment, technology transfer and capacity building can help them achieve greater self-sufficiency in food production. This, in turn, can enhance global food security by reducing reliance on a few dominant suppliers. In summary, the trade war's impacts reach far beyond the immediate economic consequences for US farmers. They challenge the very foundations of global food security and the strategies employed to navigate this conflict will determine the resilience of agricultural sectors worldwide. As nations strive to adapt to these changes, the lessons learned from both the US and Saudi Arabia will prove integral to developing sustainable pathways for food security and economic cooperation in the future. The ongoing trade war between the US and China has significant implications for agriculture and global food security. As American farmers grapple with the challenges posed by tariffs and market disruptions, it is essential to consider the broader consequences of these actions on developing nations. By adopting a balanced approach that emphasizes collaboration, innovation and strategic engagement, the US can navigate the complexities of the global trade landscape. The decisions made today will shape the future of agriculture and international relations for generations to come. Through resilience and strategic foresight, American agriculture can not only weather the storms of trade conflict but also reaffirm its role as a leader in global food production. In an interconnected world, fostering cooperation and embracing the realities of global trade will be crucial for ensuring a sustainable and secure future for all nations.
Asharq Al-Awsat
7 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
‘Lilo & Stitch' Passes ‘Sinners' to Become 2nd Highest Grossing Film of 2025
'Lilo & Stich' and 'Mission: Impossible—The Final Reckoning' dominated the box office charts again after fueling a record-breaking Memorial Day weekend. Theaters in the US and Canada had several new films to offer this weekend as well, including Sony's family friendly 'Karate Kid: Legends' and the A24 horror movie 'Bring Her Back.' According to studio estimates Sunday, it added up to a robust $145 million post-holiday weekend that's up over 115% from the same timeframe last year. Disney's live-action hybrid 'Lilo & Stitch' took first place again with $63 million from 4,410 locations in North America. It was enough to pass 'Sinners' to become the second-highest grossing movie of the year with $280.1 million in domestic ticket sales. Globally, it's running total is $610.8 million. 'Sinners,' meanwhile, is still going strong in its seventh weekend with another $5.2 million, bumping it to $267.1 million domestically and $350.1 million globally. The eighth 'Mission: Impossible' movie also repeated in second place, with $27.3 million from 3,861 locations. As with 'Lilo & Stitch,' that's down 57% from its opening. With $122.6 million in domestic tickets sold, it's performing in line with the two previous installments. But with a reported production budget of $400 million, profitability is a ways off. Internationally, it added $76.1 million (including $25.2 million from China where it just opened), bringing its global total to $353.8 million. Leading the newcomers was Sony's 'Karate Kid: Legends,' with an estimated $21 million from 3,809 locations. The movie brings Jackie Chan and Ralph Macchio together to train a new kid, the kung fu prodigy Li Fong (Ben Wang). Chan starred in a 2010 reboot of the 1984 original, while Macchio has found a new generation of fans in the series 'Cobra Kai,' which just concluded a six-season run. Reviews might have been mixed, but opening weekend audiences gave the PG-13 rated film a strong A- CinemaScore and 4.5 stars on PostTrak. It also only cost a reported $45 million to produce and has several weeks until a new family-friendly film arrives. Fourth place went 'Final Destination: Bloodlines,' which earned $10.8 million in its third weekend. The movie is the highest-grossing in the franchise, not accounting for inflation, with $229.3 million globally. The weekend's other big newcomer, 'Bring Her Back' rounded out the top five with $7.1 million from 2,449 screens. Starring Sally Hawkins as a foster mother with some disturbing plans, the film is the sophomore feature of twin filmmakers Danny and Michael Philippou, who made the 2023 horror breakout 'Talk to Me.' It earned a rare-for-horror B+ CinemaScore and is essentially the only new film in the genre until '28 Years Later' opens on June 20. A new Wes Anderson movie, 'The Phoenician Scheme,' also debuted in New York and Los Angeles this weekend, where it made $270,000. It expands nationwide next weekend. The summer box office forecast remains promising, though there's a long way to go to get to the $4 billion target (a pre-pandemic norm that only the 'Barbenheimer' summer has surpassed). The month of May is expected to close out with $973 million – up 75% from May 2024, according to data from Comscore.
Al Arabiya
7 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
US says trade row with China could ease after Trump-Xi talks
A logjam in the trade talks between the United States and China could be broken once Presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping speak, US officials said Sunday – a conversation they said could happen soon. Trump on Friday accused Beijing of violating a deal reached last month in Geneva to temporarily lower staggeringly high tariffs the world's two biggest economies had imposed on each other, in a pause to last 90 days. China's slow-walking on export license approvals for rare earths and other elements needed to make cars and chips have fueled US frustration, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday – a concern since confirmed by US officials. But US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent seemed to take the pressure down a notch on Sunday, telling CBS's 'Face the Nation' that the gaps could soon be bridged. 'I'm confident that when President Trump and Party Chairman Xi have a call that this will be ironed out,' Bessent said, however noting that China was 'withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement.' When asked if rare earths were one of those products, Bessent said, 'Yes.' 'Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system. Maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with' Xi, he said. On when a Trump-Xi call could take place, Bessent said: 'I believe we will see something very soon.' Kevin Hassett, director of the White House's National Economic Council told ABC that the call could happen 'this week' but that he had no confirmation of a scheduled time. Since Trump returned to the presidency, he has slapped sweeping tariffs on most US trading partners, with especially high rates on Chinese imports. New tit-for-tat levies on both sides reached three digits before the de-escalation this month, where Washington agreed to temporarily reduce additional tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent. China, meanwhile, lowered its added duties from 125 percent to 10 percent. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told 'Fox News Sunday' that China was 'slow-rolling the deal,' adding: 'We are taking certain actions to show them what it feels like on the other side of that equation.' 'Our president understands what to do. He's going to go work it out,' Lutnick said. Lutnick also said that a US court battle over Trump's tariff strategy – one court's ruling to block the tariffs has been stayed pending an appeal – would ultimately end with a win for the president. 'Tariffs are not going away,' Lutnick said. 'We've got to be ready' Separate from the China deal, Trump said Friday he would double sector-specific tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50 percent starting June 4 – sparking ire from the European Union, which said it would retaliate. Hassett said China's dumping of low-cost steel was hurting US industry –which in turn was hindering US military preparedness. 'The bottom line is that we've got to be ready in case things don't happen the way we want, because if we have cannons but not cannonballs, then we can't fight a war,' Hassett told 'This Week.' 'And if we don't have steel, then the US isn't ready, and we're not preparing ourselves for something,' he added. 'We have to have a steel industry that's ready for American defense.'
