logo
Are elephants housed in Punnathurkotta taken out for non-religious activities, Kerala HC asks Guruvayur devaswom

Are elephants housed in Punnathurkotta taken out for non-religious activities, Kerala HC asks Guruvayur devaswom

Time of India24-05-2025

Kochi: An HC bench of Justices Anil K Narendran and P V Balakrishnan on Friday directed the Guruvayur devaswom managing committee to clarify whether elephants housed at Punnathur Aanakotta are permitted to be taken for activities other than religious rituals in temples.
The bench is considering a petition by Voice for Asian Elephants Society president Sangita Iyer, seeking intervention to safeguard the welfare of captive elephants at Punnathurkotta, which is managed by the Guruvayur devaswom.
During the hearing, HC referred to a recent instance where the devaswom had invited applications from temples and other religious institutions seeking financial assistance. "If you have surplus money, why earn income by sending elephants in trucks to various places," the court asked.
The bench also referred to a submission made by the devaswom's veterinary surgeon regarding an incident at the Manakulangara Bhagavathy Temple in Koyilandy, where two elephants ran amok. The surgeon stated that unless 'koochu vilangu' (elephant hobbles) are used during processions, elephants may become uncontrollable upon hearing fireworks. The court further observed orally, "As far as the Guruvayur devaswom is concerned, there is absolutely no mechanism in place to monitor the care of elephants once they are taken outside Punnathurkotta.
"
The petition was adjourned to June 26.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Brother's Day wishes
,
messages
and quotes !

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Maharashtra has big dams, but we face water imbalance: CM
Maharashtra has big dams, but we face water imbalance: CM

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Maharashtra has big dams, but we face water imbalance: CM

Nagpur: Maharashtra's deep regional water disparities persist despite hosting some of India's largest irrigation projects, said chief minister Devendra Fadnavis at the Vidarbha Pani Parishad. "Big dams alone can't resolve the issue. The real solution lies in small, sustainable conservation structures," he stated, advocating for localised water planning. He highlighted the success of Jalyukt Shivar under the Baliraja Project, which ensured convergence of departments under district collectors, boosting participation and impact. Fadnavis also backed the Centre's move to suspend the Indus Water Treaty, calling it the "deadliest blow" to Pakistan and a precursor to "Operation Sindoor." He warned that water wars are no longer distant possibilities, urging wise use and conservation amid mounting national and global water stress. "Water has been at the heart of civilisations — from the Saraswati to Sindhu to African rivers," said Fadnavis, adding that in modern times, unchecked use, especially in agriculture, has become a major concern. "Whenever water availability rises, we shift to cash crops and overuse it. We must act wisely in usage and conservation." Speakaing about Jalyukt Shivar, he said, "Unlike earlier fragmented schemes split across 14 departments, this one was coordinated under district collectors. All officials, irrespective of departments, reported directly to the collector. This streamlined planning, execution, and participation." With Rs700 crore raised through public contribution, the scheme benefited over 20,000 villages, notably in Marathwada, improving groundwater levels. A 2018 HC petition led to an expert panel, which verified the scheme's success. In 2020, the Centre's Groundwater Report confirmed Maharashtra as the only state with consecutive annual water level rises. "Even with just 75% rainfall, we faced no scarcity," he said. Among key projects, Fadnavis cited the Wainganga-Nalganga river-linking initiative — a 500km project spanning seven districts in Vidarbha — aimed at redirecting surplus water toward the Godavari basin. Similar efforts include five other river-linking schemes and the Tapi Water Recharge Project, set to shift 35 TMC water to saline-affected areas. Since 2014, the state has completed 90 irrigation projects, including the near-completion Gosikhurd Dam. Post-2017, it has shifted to piped distribution systems, saving 8 TMC of water and boosting efficiency. Fadnavis also praised Israel's water practices, such as micronutrient delivery and precision irrigation, as models being adopted in Maharashtra. He flagged river and nullah pollution, attributing 90% of it to untreated domestic waste. "Industries get blamed, but citizens are major contributors," he said, urging better sewage systems in cities like Nagpur, Pune, and Mumbai. Warning of rising inter-district water conflicts like Nashik vs Marathwada, Fadnavis stressed that solutions, not demands, are the way forward. Earlier, Nagpur University's acting vice-chancellor Madhavi Khode Chaware inaugurated the Wainganga Water Exhibition at Vanamati. Over 150 students, scholars, and activists participated, showcasing posters, research papers, and models focused on water conservation and sustainability. (Inputs by Krisha Panchmatia) * * * * **************** THE WATER STORY * Rs 700 crore raised by villagers under Jalyukt Shivar Yojana 20,000 villages benefited under Jalyukt Shivar 90 irrigation projects completed since 2014 8 TMC water saved through efficient usage methods 3%: Water absorption rate in Maharashtra, (compared to 22% in Uttar Pradesh) 56 TMC water from Konkan redirected to Godavari 35 TMC water under Tapi Water recharge Project 500 km new river being created under Wainganga–Nalganga river linking

Water sharing row: HC dismisses Punjab's May 14 plea over release of more water to Haryana
Water sharing row: HC dismisses Punjab's May 14 plea over release of more water to Haryana

Hindustan Times

time5 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Water sharing row: HC dismisses Punjab's May 14 plea over release of more water to Haryana

The court had disposed of the petition on May 26 and the detailed order was released on June 7 The Punjab and Haryana high court has dismissed a petition from the Punjab government seeking modification of the May 6 order that allowed the release of an additional 4,500 cusecs of water to Haryana by Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB). The Punjab government had filed the petition on May 14 arguing that direction was an outcome of concealment of material facts by the BBMB, Haryana and the Centre. 'This court disposed of the matter (on May 6) in the backdrop of emergent situation, which had arisen and any delay in resolving the dispute would have caused irreparable damage to millions of residents of different states, including Haryana, Rajasthan and Delhi. With this urgency in mind, this court finally disposed of the matter... (on May 6),' the bench of chief justice Sheel Nagu and justice Sumeet Goel said, dismissing the plea from Punjab. The petition was disposed of on May 26, and the order was released on June 7 evening. The controversy erupted on April 28 when the Haryana government's demand for additional water from the Bhakra Dam was approved by the BBMB despite opposition from Punjab. The Punjab government refused to accept the decision and deployed police at Nangal dam, 13km downstream from Bhakra, to stop the additional water release. The BBMB was established by the Union power ministry in 1966 under Section 79 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act and regulates water distribution from Bhakra, Nangal, Pong, and Ranjit Sagar dams between Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Delhi and Rajasthan. The Union home ministry stepped in on May 2 and directed that additional water be released to Haryana. However, the BBMB said that the order could not be complied with as Punjab Police prevented board officials from discharging their duties. The BBMB approached the high court on May 5, seeking the court's intervention and demanding that Punjab Police be withdrawn from BBMB. It was during these proceedings, on May 6, the high court ordered that the May 2 decision of the Union home secretary be implemented, whereby Haryana was to get additional water. However, Punjab did not allow implementation of the May 6 order claiming that 'not a drop could be spared'. HC reiterated its order on May 9 and also sought names of Punjab officials who did not allow the implementation of the HC order. However, it was also not implemented. Finally, on May 14, Punjab filed a plea seeking recall of the May 6 order, which has been dismissed by the HC now. Lawyers said, practically, this decision has 'no impact on the ground' as a new water-sharing cycle has started from May 21. The high court said that on May 29, Haryana wrote a letter to the Centre seeking its intervention in the backdrop of Punjab's opposition. But the letter merely seeks implementation of the May 28 resolution of BBMB allowing more water to Haryana. The court said that this letter can't be treated as a reference, which, as per rule 7 of the BBMB Act, a dissenting state can raise in the event of a dispute. 'This letter does not fall within the realm of 'material fact' (which Punjab was claiming) non-disclosure of which is inconsequential,' the court said. The court also said that Punjab has argued that since the May 29 'reference' was pending with the Centre, BBMB was not competent to decide the issue of water sharing. However, this issue does not arise as the May 29 letter or 'reference' of the Haryana government to the Centre was not made under Rule 7 of the BBMB Act. 'More so, Punjab is not left remediless, since it can always make a reference to Central government in terms of Rule 7,' the court said adding that Punjab was given liberty to approach Centre as per rules. But has not been availed by the state. It further added that with regard to Punjab's argument that the Union home secretary was not competent to take the May 2 decision on the issue and since Haryana's request of May 29 has been held to be 'not in terms of Rule 7,' the very foundation of raising the said ground does not exist,' it added.

HC directs govt to revise ASO seniority list based on appointment date
HC directs govt to revise ASO seniority list based on appointment date

Time of India

time12 hours ago

  • Time of India

HC directs govt to revise ASO seniority list based on appointment date

1 2 Cuttack: Orissa high court has directed the state govt to revise the seniority list of assistant section officers (ASOs)in the Odisha Secretariat Service, impacting hundreds of employees. The vacation bench's verdict settles a long-standing dispute concerning seniority among two batches of ASOs — direct recruits appointed through two separate advertisements and between promotees and direct recruits. Further, the verdict brings clarity to service-related disputes that lingered for years while providing relief to employees who were appointed earlier but placed lower in the final gradation list of ASOs published on June 11, 2020. A total of 10 writ petitions were clubbed together for hearing, categorised into two groups. The first group, comprising seven petitions, involved a dispute between two sets of direct recruits: one recruited under Odisha Public Service Commission (OPSC)'s advertisement no. 06 dated May 14, 2015, for ST category candidates (140), and another (811) under advertisement no. 08 of Oct 6, 2012. The second group of three petitions involved disputes between promotees and direct recruits. The HC noted that although advertisement no. 6 was issued earlier, appointments from the list were delayed until Oct 2016 due to legal hurdles and administrative delays. In contrast, candidates under the 2015 advertisement were appointed earlier — on Jan 27 and May 18, 2016. In the judgment on June 3, the vacation bench of Justice B P Routray upheld the principle that seniority in govt service should be based on the actual date of appointment, not the date of the recruitment advertisement or recommendation — unless a rule explicitly states otherwise. Justice Routray ruled that ASOs appointed earlier in 2016 under advertisement no. 6 must be placed above those appointed later in the same year under advertisement no. 8 in the final gradation list published on June 11, 2020. Justice Routray further ruled that promotees must be treated as en-bloc seniors to the direct recruits of the same calendar year. Accordingly, Justice Routray ordered the home department to revise the ASO gradation list in line with the HC's directives, ensuring that seniority reflects the actual date of appointment. The judgment reinforced a key service jurisprudence, "He who is appointed earlier, ranks earlier. " Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store