Taiwan bolsters combat readiness, prepares for 'war of endurance' against China threat
Taiwan's military is prioritizing combat readiness and overhauling training programs in response to increasing threats from China. President Lai Ching-te emphasizes the need to stockpile supplies and prepare for a potential war of endurance. The annual Han Kuang exercises are extended to identify weaknesses, and a troop number review is scheduled to assess ongoing military enhancements.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Taiwan's military is prioritising combat readiness as a key aspect of deterrence due to escalating threats from China, as reported by Focus Taiwan , citing Minister of National Defence Wellington.President Lai Ching-te noted that the armed forces are undergoing a significant transformation to better handle the increasing hostility from Beijing. "As we are situated on an island, we need to stockpile military supplies in case China launches multiple assaults. We may even need to prepare for a war of endurance," he stated, according to the Focus Taiwan report.To prepare for these potential situations, the military has revamped its training programs. Koo mentioned that new training subjects have been introduced for both conscripts and senior officers, encompassing topics related to newly acquired military assets.He emphasized that the objective is to "prepare for war," insisting that readiness is crucial for maintaining a strong deterrent, as noted by Focus Taiwan.Koo also highlighted Taiwan's ongoing focus on asymmetric warfare, especially following the extension of compulsory military service to one year starting January 1, 2024. Elements like air defence units, drones, and mobile radar systems are integral to Taiwan's strategy to ensure precision and adaptability against a numerically superior opponent, as indicated by Focus Taiwan.He remarked that the military must evaluate whether troop planning and positioning are sufficient for scenarios in which the Chinese People's Liberation Army suddenly escalates exercises near Taiwan into real attacks.The annual Han Kuang exercises are set to take place from July 9-18 this year, significantly longer than last year's five-day war games, which were cut short by a typhoon. Koo stressed that the exercises intend to identify weaknesses in existing plans and address any issues, according to Focus Taiwan.Koo also mentioned that a review of troop numbers is scheduled for the second half of the year, considering ongoing military enhancements. This review will determine whether adjustments are required across various units, as reported by Focus Taiwan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
9 hours ago
- Business Standard
What are China's grey zone tactics, and why Taiwan is vary of them?
As regional security leaders gathered at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore from May 30 to June 1, the focus once again centred on Taiwan. Speaking to the South China Morning Post, former Taiwanese defence minister Andrew Yang Nien-dzu expressed concern over the increasing 'grey zone operations' by Beijing, including frequent Chinese coastguard activity near the island. 'Although there have not been accidental conflicts (between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait), this kind of activity has placed immense pressure on us,' he said. What are grey zone tactics? Grey zone tactics refers to the ambiguous space between peace and open conflict. It is characterised by the use of non-kinetic means, such as psychological, informational, and economic tactics, which is often employed in hybrid forms including cyber, military, and diplomatic operations. Unlike regular warfare, which involves open fighting between armies, grey zone tactics are unclear and often hidden. State or non-state actors use these methods to cause trouble or gain power without officially going to war. Because the actions are hard to trace or prove, the attackers can deny they were involved. In recent years, more countries have started using these sneaky strategies instead of direct military force. For example, when Russia took over Crimea in 2014, it used soldiers without uniforms (called 'little green men'), spread false information, hacked into computer systems, and influenced local politics. This strategy helped Russia succeed without starting a traditional war. Hacking and cyberattacks are also common in grey zone warfare. These can damage important systems, steal secrets, or create political confusion. In its 2021 report, the Office of the US' Director of National Intelligence accused China of hacking Western companies and governments to gain an edge in business and politics. Another tool is economic pressure. China has sometimes used trade bans or blocked investments to punish countries that oppose its policies. One example is when South Korea installed a missile defence system in 2017, and China responded by limiting trade. Military drills, economic tools, and coercion Since the election of President Lai Ching-te in May 2024, who asserted that 'Taiwan and mainland China are not subordinate to each other", China has ramped up its campaign of intimidation. Beijing's grey zone activities include deploying the China Coast Guard in disputed waters in March 2024, conducting large-scale military drills near Taiwan, and flying warplanes around the island on a near-daily basis. These actions aim to alter the status quo without crossing the threshold of war. Broader application across the region China's grey zone tactics extends beyond Taiwan. In the South China Sea, Beijing has built artificial islands and militarised them to strengthen its territorial claims, according to a report by US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is another form of grey zone engagement, using economic tools to establish geopolitical leverage. One example is Sri Lanka's Hambantota Port, which was leased to China for 99 years after Colombo defaulted on Chinese loans—an instance of so-called 'debt-trap diplomacy'. Salami slicing and the 'String of Pearls' China's incremental 'salami slicing' strategy enables it to make small territorial or strategic gains that would be harder to achieve through a single overt act. The expansion of artificial islands in the South China Sea and increased patrol activity exemplify this. Another manifestation is the 'String of Pearls' strategy—China's effort to build a network of ports and facilities across the Indian Ocean to secure maritime routes and project influence. Global implications and US response According to Yang, grey zone tactics are not actually military operations but "carry a military message", making them difficult to counter under traditional defence protocols. A Taiwan defence ministry report in March 2024 noted an escalation in grey zone actions, with China deploying balloons, drones, and civilian vessels to 'saturate' areas around the island. In response, the US has ramped up arms sales to Taiwan. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth warned that China's actions aim to fundamentally alter the regional security environment while avoiding open warfare. China, for its part, has cautioned the US against 'playing with fire' over Taiwan.
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Taiwan's Lai, Rubio vow to 'never forget' Tiananmen victims
AP image TAIPEI: Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te vowed Wednesday to preserve the memory of victims of China's Tiananmen Square crackdown on demonstrators 36 years ago, echoing rhetoric by US secretary of state Marco Rubio. Chinese troops and tanks forcibly cleared peaceful protesters from Beijing's Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989, after weeks-long demonstrations demanding greater political freedoms. The exact toll is unknown but hundreds died, with some estimates of more than 1,000. China's communist rulers have since sought to erase any public mention of the crackdown. "Authoritarian governments often choose to be silent and forget history; democratic societies choose to preserve the truth and refuse to forget those who have contributed to the ideal of human rights and their dreams," Lai said in a post on Facebook ahead of an annual vigil in Taipei's Liberty Square. "We remember the sacrifice of our predecessors, and we know the value of freedom, and we cannot ignore the erosion of global democracy and the rule of law by authoritarian expansion." China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and has threatened to seize the democratic island by force. In a rare return to human rights rhetoric, Rubio said Tuesday the "world will never forget" what happened on June 4 even as Beijing "actively tries to censor the facts". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo "Today we commemorate the bravery of the Chinese people who were killed as they tried to exercise their fundamental freedoms, as well as those who continue to suffer persecution as they seek accountability and justice for the events of June 4, 1989," Rubio said in a statement. Rubio during a long Senate career was an outspoken advocate for human rights, especially in China, and he spearheaded legislation imposing sanctions in response to the country's treatment of the mostly Muslim Uyghur minority. As President Donald Trump's top diplomat, Rubio has been more selective, focusing his rights criticism on US adversaries including China and Cuba. Rubio's predecessors have issued statements each year to mark the anniversary of the bloody crackdown. But Rubio's statement also had subtle differences, his Democratic predecessor Antony Blinken last year urged China to accept recommendations in a UN-backed rights review and to respect freedoms enshrined in the post-World War II Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Rubio did not reference the United Nations, a frequent target of criticism by the Trump administration.
The Hindu
19 hours ago
- The Hindu
The political deadlock in Taiwan
On May 20, Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te celebrated a year in office. And while Mr. Lai's celebratory speech presented a vision of cooperation with rival stakeholders, the second year of his presidency is off to a rocky start. If the recall campaign facing legislators of the two main parties — the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Kuomintang (KMT) — comes to fruition, it may be both a display of democratic vibrance, and indicative of volatility in the political corridors of Taipei. Yielding the Yuan Mr. Lai's biggest policymaking hurdle since the beginning of his tenure has been that his party, the DPP, had failed to achieve a majority in the Legislative Yuan. Of the 113 parliamentary seats, 52 were won by the main opposition party, the KMT, and 51 by the DPP. Eight seats were won by a third party closely aligned with the KMT — the Taiwan People's Party (TPP). The remaining two seats went to independent candidates who, again, are believed to be ideologically aligned with the KMT. Subsequently, the KMT has blocked vital steps to secure Taiwan's internal democratic and legal processes, as well as its defence preparedness. For example, in December 2024, the KMT pushed amendments to the 'Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures'. The Act was amended for the first time in 25 years, and its new text restricted the central government's budgetary decision-making powers, especially in the defence sector. Now, the central government is liable to disburse more funds to local governments, bringing the ratio of the central-to-local tax revenue share from 75:25 to 60:40, the pre-1999 amendment levels. KMT's controversial manoeuvres during Mr. Lai's tenure go back a year. In May 2024, one of the bills put forth jointly by the KMT and the TPP made the case that it should be compulsory for the president-elect to address the Yuan post-inauguration, and conduct an on-the-spot question-and-answer session with legislators. In the past, this had been optional for the President. Historically, no sitting Taiwanese president has been subject to it. Despite this, KMT and TPP lawmakers proposed that it be made mandatory for Mr. Lai which led to scuffles in the Yuan. DPP lawmakers have also alleged that the KMT introduced amendments to laws on the legislature's powers, without going through mandatory processes. These processes include first hashing out bills at a procedural committee meeting, and then forwarding them for a first and second reading to the legislative floor, before the eventual vote. However, KMT lawmakers have opposed the allegations. On the brink of dismantling? Today, the ideological and political rift is evident in something more serious — a series of recall campaigns (a mechanism through which voters can remove a sitting legislator and ask for re-election) targeting as many as 37 KMT legislators and 15 DPP ones. The initiators of the petitions for the KMT recall campaigns seem to all be citizen groups, including from constituencies through which KMT legislators won a seat in the Yuan. Many KMT lawmakers are in the second stage of the recall process, where 10% of the electorate in a constituency signs a petition to initiate a recall vote. In a face-saving move, KMT lawmakers, too, initiated a recall campaign against DPP parliamentarians, and have shot themselves in the foot by forging signatures on behalf of voters who were declared dead sometime in the past year. It now seems that by June, a huge batch of lawmakers (of which a greater majority belong to the KMT) may have to vacate their Yuan seats. It all depends on the validity of the signatures submitted to the Central Election Commission. Names of the first set of recalled legislators may even be available as early as late June-early July, when the third and final stage, the recall vote, comes to fruition. A rift beyond repair Under Mr. Lai, the rift between the KMT and the DPP is especially apparent, because the KMT previously never occupied a majority in the Yuan when a member of the DPP party (Tsai Ing-Wen or Chen Shui-Bian) was President. The transformation of this legislative deadlock into a mass recall campaign means that democracy is alive through the exercise of citizens' rights to re-election. But it also means that even KMT lawmakers who won a majority in the 2024 elections are losing hold of their electorate. Historically, the KMT has been a party that promotes dialogue over deterrence with China, while the DPP is relatively more vocal against reunification. With changing sentiments among the youth, the KMT's narrative and pitch were already unappealing, even though they won Yuan seats due to dissatisfaction with the DPP's economic and diplomatic performance during two tenures before Mr. Lai. As the ideological rift materialises into a deadlock, Mr. Lai has two options. He can either continue to emphasise deliberations with the KMT to avoid mass recall, including by inviting opposition parties to the table for a meeting on national security. His other option is to put the weight of the DPP behind KMT recall petitioners, and prepare a policy agenda so strong that by-elections yield majority seats for the DPP. Either way, this would be a historic moment in Taiwanese politics. Anushka Saxena is a staff research analyst at The Takshashila Institution.
