
What does it mean to live a good life?
This article is a reflection on an English movie I watched last night, 'When Nietzsche Wept'. When Nietzsche Wept is a psychological drama that explores the fictional encounter between the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and Dr Josef Breuer, set in 19th-century Vienna. The film intricately weaves themes of existentialism, unfulfilled love, and intellectual struggle, ultimately highlighting the transformative power of self-exploration and emotional catharsis.
Well, we all aspire to live a good life. Yet, the definition of a good life remains elusive. Who decides what a good life is? How do we measure it? Can we ever truly know if someone is leading one? And what of those who came before us, were their lives better or worse than ours? The question persists across generations and cultures, challenging philosophers, thinkers, and ordinary people alike.
Nietzsche rejected conventional morality and social expectations as determinants of a good life. Instead, he argued for 'Übermensch' (Overman or Superman), an individual who creates their own values and rises above societal norms. 'He who has a why to live can bear almost any how,' he wrote, emphasising that meaning, rather than comfort, defines a fulfilling life. In his view, a good life is not necessarily an easy one but one where an individual carves their own path with strength and determination.
On the other hand, Albert Camus, a leading existentialist thinker, viewed life through the lens of absurdity. He questioned whether life had any inherent meaning at all. His famous metaphor of Sisyphus, eternally rolling a boulder uphill only for it to roll back down, encapsulates the struggle of human existence.
Yet, Camus argued, one must imagine Sisyphus happy. To him, the good life is not about escaping suffering but embracing the absurd and living with passion despite it. It is about finding joy in defiance, in moments of beauty, and in our personal acts of rebellion against meaninglessness.
Osho, the controversial spiritual teacher, took a more fluid and individualistic approach. He dismissed rigid philosophical frameworks and religious doctrines, advocating instead for a life of spontaneity and deep awareness. 'Don't seek, don't search, don't ask, don't knock, don't demand, relax,' he advised. For Osho, the good life is one where one lives in the present, unburdened by the expectations of society or the past.
Russian philosophers, too, have grappled with this timeless question. Fyodor Dostoevsky explored the moral and spiritual dimensions of life, often portraying characters who suffer greatly yet find redemption through faith or moral awakening. In The Brothers Karamazov, he suggests that suffering and hardship might be essential components of a meaningful existence. Similarly, Leo Tolstoy, after years of searching, concluded that a good life must be rooted in simplicity, humility, and love. Nikolai Berdyaev, another Russian philosopher, took a different approach, arguing that true fulfilment lies in creativity and spiritual freedom. He saw human beings as creators, destined to shape their world and their destinies. 'The meaning of life is revealed only through creative acts,' he wrote. This perspective aligns, in some ways, with Nietzsche's call for self-overcoming but with a greater emphasis on the spiritual aspect of human existence.
So, what does it truly mean to live a good life? Is it wealth and material success? Is it peace of mind? Is it love and relationships? Is it the pursuit of knowledge? Or is it merely survival? The answer is as varied as the human experience itself. Some find it in ambition and achievement, others in simplicity and surrender.
The pursuit of a good life is deeply personal. It is shaped by culture, personal experiences, and individual aspirations. It is a question that each of us must answer for ourselves, not through blind adherence to societal norms but through introspection and conscious choice. In the end, perhaps a good life is not something to be defined but something to be lived, authentically, courageously, and with an open heart.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
25-05-2025
- Observer
The latest Booker award is a nod to marginal literature
The 2025 International Booker Prize has been awarded to writer Banu Mushtaq, for her collection of short stories 'Heart Lamp' which was translated from Kannada by Deepa Bhasthi. Being the most prestigious award for translated fiction, this is a recognition for literatures in languages which are not commonly known around the world. It is also the first time a collected anthology, and not a novel, has been awarded this prize. Deepa Bhasthi also became the first Indian to win this prize for her translation. The award committee recognised this collection for its use of English in creative ways. In its official commentary, it said that it was 'A radical translation which ruffles language, to create new textures in a plurality of Englishes. It challenges and expands our understanding of translation. These beautiful, busy, life-affirming stories rise from Kannada, intersperse with the extraordinary socio-political richness of other languages and dialects. It speaks of women's lives, reproductive rights, faith, cast, power and oppression'. This 'celebration of the multiplicity of language', according to The Guardian, is an inspiring new trend in English literature. Traditional ways of telling stories in 'correct' English is not an aspiration any more. But this collection uses a variety of English that reflects the rhythm and emotions of a lesser-known language. Kannada is spoken by around 60 million people in one state in India, Karnataka. As such, it is not the most widely spoken or understood language, even in India. To centre a literary work from this comparatively marginal community is to recognise the significance of the lives of the ordinary. We may question the importance placed on international awards, but there is no doubt that they help to bring focus on the world's lesser known languages and cultures. Data shows that a national prize increases visibility by 35 per cent and international prizes by more than 60 per cent. This, not only helps the writers and translators gain global recognition, but it also helps to bring the world's attention to parts of the world that would otherwise stay unexplored. It also brings attention to the joys and struggles of people as they negotiate through life. This year's award winning collection 'Heart Lamp' brings to life the lives of women whose stories may never make the headlines – women who face social ostracism, violence and marginalisation based on cultural and social factors. But they are also women who fight back with resilience and dignity. The book also centres on the author's own faith in the written word. As she said in her acceptance speech, 'In a world that often tries to divide us, literature remains one of the last sacred spaces where we can live inside each other's minds'. Literary prizes are not guarantees of future success, but they do bring attention to various corners of our world. By choosing to celebrate women's lives in a distant land, the latest Booker prize has sensitised us to the complex varieties of human experiences, as also to the multiple ways in with Englishes are being invented and used by people around the world. Sandhya Rao Mehta The writer is Associate Professor, Sultan Qaboos University


Observer
25-05-2025
- Observer
Russians pay last respects to ballet maestro Grigorovich
Russians paid their last respects to dance legend Yuri Grigorovich on Friday at the Bolshoi Theatre where he reigned for decades as artistic director of one of the world's most famous ballet companies. Grigorovich, considered one of the most influential choreographers of the 20th century, died on Monday at the age of 98. Leading figures from the Russian arts world gathered inside the gilded auditorium of the Bolshoi to pay tribute to him. Grigorovich's coffin was placed in front of the stage, where a giant photograph of the puckish, white-haired ballet master was displayed. Hundreds of Muscovites, many carrying flowers, were waiting outside the theatre in central Moscow. They applauded as his casket was carried down the steps, accompanied by a portrait of Grigorovich and three huge floral wreaths. Participants of a memorial ceremony carry a portrait of Russian ballet choreographer Yuri Grigorovich, who died at the age of 98, at the Bolshoi Theatre in Moscow, Russia, May 23, 2025. REUTERS/Evgenia Novozhenina "I really loved him. He was a genius... so I could not miss this farewell," said pensioner Alexandra Tretyakova. Grigorovich was famed for productions of Spartacus, Ivan the Terrible, Romeo and Juliet and many other ballets that were staged in Russia and around the world. He was especially noted for male roles requiring extraordinary strength and technique. Ballerina Lyubov Filippova told Reuters that the late choreographer was a "colossus" and an idol. "This person will always remain with us, in our hearts, in our lives. And we should continue to learn from his ballets," she said. —Reuters


Muscat Daily
22-05-2025
- Muscat Daily
Mission: Impossible
A daring finale that divides Tom Cruise's Ethan Hunt returns for one last mission in 'Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning,' delivering a spectacle brimming with adrenaline-pumping stunts and high-stakes action. Directed by Christopher McQuarrie, this installment aims to conclude the franchise with grandeur, featuring Cruise performing audacious feats like hanging from an airplane and leaping off an aircraft carrier. Early reactions highlight the film's exhilarating action sequences, with some scenes that are indeed exhilarating adrenaline rush. However, the film's sprawling narrative and extended runtime have drawn criticism for pacing issues and a convoluted plot. The editing is crisp though at times the action scenes look monotonous. 'The Final Reckoning' is one of the easiest 'Mission Impossible' films in terms of plot (and somewhat action). But sadly, little predictable, the eighth part sees Ethan Hunt on the chase for the drowned Russian submarine, Sevastopol, which contains the source code for a dangerous the Artificial Intelligence programme known as the Entity. If Hunt and his team do not get the source code and destroy it, Entity will cause a nuclear war and end mankind. Complicating matters is Gabriel (Esai Morales), a former acolyte of the Entity who wants the source code to control the programme. And thus, the dashing agent, as usual is out there alone, with his trusted team, saving the world yet again. While the MI films have never been ensembles and always had a Hunt-centric plot, this time, the script does rob some of the supporting players of a chance to shine. The ensemble cast, including Hayley Atwell, Ving Rhames, and Simon Pegg, adds depth and camaraderie, reflecting the franchise's emphasis on teamwork. Yet, some viewers feel the film's ambition overshadows character development, leaving emotional arcs underexplored. 'The Final Reckoning' offers a thrilling conclusion with its high-octane action and Cruise's unwavering commitment to performing his own stunts. While it may not satisfy all narrative expectations, it stands as a testament to the franchise's legacy of pushing cinematic boundaries. Rating – ***Genre- Triller Starring – Tom Cruise, Hayley Atwell, Simon Pegg, Ving Rhames