SNAP cost-sharing jeopardizes food assistance program
Indiana could be on the hook for as much as $360 million a year in SNAP costs. (Getty Images)
Most people are talking about work requirements for federal assistance like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). But it's another provision that could have a much bigger impact.
More than 600,000 Hoosiers received $1.44 billion in financial assistance to buy food in fiscal year 2024, mostly families with children who can't make ends meet. That cost-sharing language for the federal program threatens to break Indiana's budget or take out the program altogether.
A key provision in the federal reconciliation bill that passed the U.S. House and now is being vetted in the Senate would require states to have skin in the game for SNAP. Right now, the benefits are 100% covered by the federal government with the state picking up half of the administrative costs.
But the proposal would require some states to cover as much as 25% of the benefits cost starting in 2028, depending on each state's error rate. States with the highest error rates would pay more as a 'state quality control incentive' to crack down on fraud and abuse.
The seven states with error rates below 6% would only need to cover 5% of the tab under the current version of the bill. But Indiana's 10.5% error rate puts it into the highest tier for a match rate — even though it falls below the national average rate of 11.68%.
That means Indiana could be on the hook for as much as $360 million a year.
Coming off a budget session where state lawmakers had to cut higher education funding, child care aid and economic development programs, any new fiscal obligation will be a burden. But $360 million would be near impossible.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated the cost-sharing component will save the federal government a little under $100 billion.
'CBO expects that some states would maintain current benefits and eligibility and others would modify benefits or eligibility or possibly leave the program altogether because of the increased costs,' the analysis found.
Gov. Mike Braun's administration didn't provide a comment on the possible ramifications.
It's important to remember the hungry Hoosiers at the heart of this debate. Despite the error rate — which includes underpayments as well as overpayments — most are desperate families in need of additional assistance to put food on the table.
USDA research from fiscal year 2023 showed Indiana is among the lowest states in the percent of population receiving SNAP – between 8 and 10%. In comparison, six states and Washington D.C. were above 16% and all of Indiana's neighbors rank higher.
To be eligible, you must have a monthly net income of less than $1,255 for a family of one; $1,704 for a couple and $2,600 for a family of four. That means if you live alone and make over $300 a week you are ineligible for SNAP.
The amount you receive depends on your income but the average monthly payment per participant in April 2025 was $196. That is down slightly from April 2024.
Indiana's enrollment went up during the pandemic when additional emergency aid was available. But generally, it has been stable and ranks about mid-pack nationally. For instance, in April 2025 281,112 households or 588,184 individuals. Those numbers are a few percentage points lower than April 2024 and slightly down from Fiscal Year 2023.
Other changes being considered nationally include imposing work requirements on those receiving benefits. And some states, like Indiana, will ban using the benefits on candy and pop. I generally don't have a problem with those proposals.
But the cost-sharing provision will undoubtedly take food from hungry adults and children, and I hope the U.S. Senate re-evaluates the pain it could cause.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
31 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
For these Trump voters, a rubber-stamp Congress is a key demand
Advertisement And they reserved their purest aversion for Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the solidly conservative former longtime party leader, whom they described alternately as an 'obstructionist' to Trump's agenda, a 'snake in the grass,' and a 'bowl of Jell-O' with no spine. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Their perspectives offered a striking contrast to the reception that many Republican lawmakers have confronted at raucous town halls throughout the country in recent months. The lawmakers have been grilled and booed by constituents at these events for supporting Trump's policies on tariffs, immigration and, most recently, the domestic policy bill that the GOP pushed through the House in May. And they help explain why most Republican lawmakers have put aside any reservations they may have on key issues and backed the president -- because a critical portion of their party's base is still demanding that they do so. Advertisement 'For loyal Trump voters, they're loving what they see as him 'doing something' and don't want congressional Republicans getting in the way of his agenda,' said Sarah Longwell, the anti-Trump Republican strategist who conducted the focus groups. 'And members of Congress have gotten that message loud and clear.' These voters represent only a piece of the electorate that Republicans must court in the run-up to midterm congressional elections in which their governing trifecta is on the line. Since Trump took office, GOP lawmakers have struggled to defend his executive actions and his efforts to dismantle the federal bureaucracy and unilaterally defund government programs, and to explain to their constituents why they are not doing more to challenge him. In Nebraska this past week, Representative Mike Flood faced an angry crowd grilling him on the Medicaid and food assistance cuts included in the domestic policy bill. And he admitted he had been unaware that the measure included a provision to limit the power of federal judges to hold people, including Trump administration officials, in contempt for disobeying court orders. But Longwell's sessions, videos of which were shared with The New York Times, were a reminder that there is still a powerful pull for Republicans to swallow whatever disagreements they may have with Trump and bow to what he wants. Since the beginning of this Congress, Speaker Mike Johnson, whose too-slim majority in the House leaves him little latitude to maneuver, has positioned himself less as the leader of the legislative branch and more as a junior partner to Trump. That stance is exactly what these voters, whom Longwell identified only by their first names and last initials to protect their privacy, said they liked about him. Advertisement Arthur M., a voter from Arizona, described Johnson as 'loyal,' adding, 'I'm not saying they should never have any other ideas of their own, but they certainly shouldn't have someone dissenting if you're trying to put an agenda through -- and that's what the Congress is.' Jeff B., a voter from Georgia, said Johnson always appeared to be 'in over his head.' But he did not see that as a negative. 'He's not the kind of guy like Mitch McConnell, who was pulling all the strings,' he said. 'He's struggling, and I think that's the way it's supposed to be. He looks like he's in over his head, and I think that's the way it's supposed to be.' The voters who participated in the focus groups, which were conducted May 16 and 19, had uniformly negative views of those House Republicans they viewed as 'rabble-rousers,' which they defined as anyone expressing an opinion that was not in sync with the White House. Jane H., a voter from Indiana, criticized her Congress member, Representative Victoria Spartz, an unpredictable lawmaker who often sides with the hard right, for being 'out of line' when she makes noises about opposing Trump's agenda. Gilbert W. from North Carolina held a similar view of Murkowski, who has routinely broken with her party to criticize Trump. 'Murkowski -- this woman's never found anything on the Republican side she really goes for,' he said, calling her a 'troublemaker.' In contrast, Allen K. from Arizona praised his Congress member, Representative Juan Ciscomani, for never making any waves. Advertisement 'Whatever Trump does, he'll say,' he said of Ciscomani, describing that as a positive. As for Senator John Thune, the new majority leader from South Dakota, he earned kudos mostly for not being McConnell. 'He's pressing Trump's agenda, it seems like,' Gilbert W. said. 'What else can you ask for?' Jane H., a three-time Trump voter, said, 'What I want to see is someone who will work hard and effectively to advance a conservative agenda, and to work closely with the White House to advance at this time Donald Trump's agenda. It's what the American people want, so that's what John Thune should be doing.' Many of the participants in the focus groups had only vague impressions of their own representatives, a reminder that to many voters, Congress remains a faceless institution of 535 mostly anonymous lawmakers about whom they don't have particularly strong feelings. That could help explain why most appeared to judge their elected officials almost exclusively according to how deferential they were to Trump, about whom they expressed potent -- and extremely positive -- sentiments. Asked for his opinions on Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill, Steve C., a voter from Michigan, said, 'I don't have an opinion on anyone specifically.' This article originally appeared in


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Senate will move forward with Russia sanctions bill, Sen. Lindsey Graham says
WASHINGTON — The Senate will 'start moving' on a bill imposing more sanctions on the Kremlin following talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said. 'I would expect next week that the Senate will start moving the sanctions bill,' Graham, an ally of President Trump but also a firm backer of Ukraine's war efforts, said Friday, according to The Kyiv Independent. 'There are House members that are ready to move in the House, and you'll see congressional action,' he added. 'President Trump said that the next two-week period will be outcome-determined.' The bipartisan meeting with Ukraine's leader included Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), who like Graham supports the legislation applying a 500% tariff on Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products. Neither sits on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee where the bill, which has racked up at least 80 co-sponsors, is currently under consideration. 3 Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said Friday the upper chamber will 'start moving' on a bill imposing more sanctions on the Kremlin following talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv. UKRAINIAN PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE HANDOUT/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock At least 82 senators are prepared to vote for it if it heads to the Senate floor, Graham told the outlet. 'I've never been more optimistic than I am today,' he added, when asked whether Trump would sign it. 'Russia faces a stark choice: peace or crippling sanctions,' Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) said in a Senate floor speech on May 20. 'President Trump has spoken forcefully of swift, severe consequences if Russia fails to honor a ceasefire.' On June 2, delegations from Russia and Ukraine had been expected to meet for talks in Istanbul — but Graham said he doesn't have 'any hope at all that Russia is interested in peace' given drone strikes in Ukraine that killed more than a dozen civilians on May 25. 3 President Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky clashed in the Oval Office last month after Ukraine's leader protested that the US wasn't providing it with enough security guarantees to ward off Russia. AFP via Getty Images It was the largest aerial bombardment in the war to date, with 355 drones and nine cruise missiles being unleashed. Trump — who promised to end the war 'on day one' of his second presidential term — slammed Putin as 'absolutely crazy' following the strikes, but stopped short of announcing tougher sanctions on the regime despite having threatened them earlier this month. 'Russia is playing a game at the expense of the world, not just the United States,' Graham said, noting how oil from Moscow is prolonging the war by being sold to China and India. Russian President Vladimir Putin has indicated that curtailing NATO expansion from the West, relaxing sanctions and official recognition of Ukraine's neutral status are redlines for him in peace talks. 3 Russian President Vladimir Putin has indicated that curtailing NATO expansion from the West, relaxing sanctions and official recognition of Ukraine's neutral status are redlines for him in the discussions. AP The Kremlin was not targeted with 10% baseline global tariffs as part of Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement in April, though the White House indicated previous sanctions made it irrelevant. European leaders have already slapped sanctions on Russia over Putin's refusal to accept a US-backed cease-fire deal. 'It's clear to almost anyone — Putin is not remotely interested in anything that would lead to peace,' Graham added. 'So there's a card game going on this summer. The first cards are going to be played by the United States Senate and the House.' Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.) backs stricter sanctions, and Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) also suggested last week that the US should also send 'more lethal weapons' to Ukraine. 'If Ukraine falls, it will always be known in the history books that it happened with Trump doing little to help Ukraine defend themselves with the means we have available,' Bacon said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Yates snatches Giro title on stunning penultimate stage
Simon Yates' first Grand Tour win came seven years ago at the Vuelta a Espana [Getty Images] British rider Simon Yates produced a stunning performance on the penultimate stage of the Giro d'Italia to snatch the pink jersey from Isaac del Toro and effectively ensure his second Grand Tour title. Del Toro came into the 20th and final competitive stage of the race with a 43-second lead over Richard Carapaz, with Yates trailing by one minute and 21 seconds in third. Advertisement Mexico's Del Toro, 21, would have clinched victory in his maiden Giro by successfully negotiating the Colle delle Finestre, the highest point of this year's race and where Yates' hopes of winning evaporated in 2018. But Yates, 32, exorcised those ghosts as he attacked on the brutal ascent to leave Del Toro and Carapaz - the 2019 winner - in his wake. He not only wiped out Del Toro's advantage but was one minute 41 seconds clear of his general classification rivals when he crested. His Visma-Lease A Bike team had pulled off a masterstroke as team-mate Wout van Aert was in the breakaway group and allowed Yates to catch him on the descent, helping him build a comprehensive lead over the final 20km. Advertisement Jayco-Alula's Australian rider Chris Harper, who was the first over the Colle delle Finestre summit, claimed the second Grand Tour stage win of his career, with Yates crossing one minute 57 seconds later, third on the day. Yates was in tears as he hugged team staff at the finish, surrounded by media, with Del Toro of UAE Team Emirates crossing the line five minutes after him. It means the Briton leads Del Toro by three minutes 56 seconds, with Carapaz in third, heading in to Sunday's processional stage in Rome. "I'm not really an emotional person but I couldn't hold back the tears," said Yates. Advertisement "It's something I've worked towards year after year and I've had a lot of setbacks but I've finally managed to pull if off." Yates lost 30 seconds to Del Toro during Friday's stage but recovered to become just the third British rider to win the Giro, after Chris Froome (2018) and Tao Geoghegan Hart (2020). Yates 'always had' redemption in mind Froome memorably snatched the pink jersey on the penultimate mountain stage in 2018, as Yates cracked and ultimately lost more than 38 minutes. This year, the same climb was scheduled for late in the 205km stage from Verres to Sestriere and Yates, who bounced back from the 2018 Giro to win that year's Vuelta a Espana, said after today's stage he "always had it in the back of my mind" once the route was announced. Advertisement The 18.5km climb has an average gradient of 9.2% and started 43km from the finish. Within a kilometre of the climb, Carapaz's EF Education team attacked, but Del Toro was alert to the danger and soon closed the gap to Carapaz, with the rest of the peloton dropping back. Yet Yates then came from nowhere to join his general classification rivals and made a series of attacks before ultimately breaking clear. When Yates hit the gravel section, he extended his lead, while Del Toro and Carapaz continued to trade blows. But by the time they also reached the summit, some 2,178m above sea level - they knew the race was gone. Advertisement "It's incredible, said Van Aert. "It was such a brave effort from Simon to go all in from so far. I love it when people are not racing for a place of honour."