logo
Poverty levels in Scotland below UK for 20 years, graphs show

Poverty levels in Scotland below UK for 20 years, graphs show

The National8 hours ago

Accredited UK Government statistics show that across all age groups, Scotland has had lower levels of poverty than the UK as a whole since 2005.
For child poverty, Scotland has seen levels drop in the last three years, from 25% in 2021 to 23% last year. In England and Wales, rates in 2024 were at 31%, the same as in 2021. For the UK as a whole, child poverty rates have flatlined at 30% since 2018.
John Dickie, the director of the Child Poverty Action Group in Scotland, told The National that the poverty levels were directly impacted by interventions like the Scottish Child Payment.
'The biggest single factor is the level of social security available for families,' he said.
The rates The National has used for the analysis are all relative poverty – having an income below 60% of the current median income for that year – after housing costs are excluded (AHC).
READ MORE: Child poverty falling in Scotland but rising in rest of UK, study finds
This, Dickie said, is the best measure to get an understanding of the amount of disposable income a family has available.
He also said that historically higher levels of social housing in Scotland could help explain the lower levels of relative poverty north of the Border.
In London, child poverty AHC has tracked above the UK average for 20 years (at 35% in 2024), largely due to the high cost of housing in the city.
Further analysis of UK Government figures shows that children in families where a person has a disability are more likely to be living in poverty.
And children in households with three or more children are much more likely to be in poverty than those with two or one.
In 2024, an estimated 44% of children in a family with three or more kids were in relative poverty, compared to 21% of those in a single-child household.
The two-child cap, imposed by the Tories and kept in place by Labour, prevents families from claiming benefits for third or subsequent children unless certain conditions are met, such as proving that the child was a product of rape.
The cap is seen as a key driver of higher poverty levels among families with three or more children.
Dickie said that child poverty levels were also about the 'long-term consequences' on people's lives. Better off children are more likely to do well in school, and more likely to have good health in the long-term, he said, warning that the UK would eventually 'pay the price' for having high levels of child poverty.
READ MORE: 2 million families 'lifted out of poverty if UK followed Scotland'
The Child Poverty Action Group Scotland director pointed to a report from his charity which estimated that the cost of child poverty on the economy was around £40 billion per year.
'This figure is comprised of costs to the economy due to the greater risk of unemployment and lower earnings potential of adults who grew up in poverty, and of the additional amount spent on public services to help address the damage done to children growing up in poverty,' the report said.
For people of pension age, relative poverty levels AHC have also tracked lower than the UK average for two decades.
The UK hit a 20-year low at 13% of pensioners in relative poverty in 2014. Scotland tracked at 12% from 2011 to 2016, before seeing levels slowly climb up to 15% from 2022-2024. This was below the UK as a whole, which was at 18%, 17%, and 16% respectively through those most recent years.
And for individuals Scottish poverty rates have tracked below the UK as a whole since 2005, when they were both at 21%.
Last year, the UK saw relative poverty levels at 21%, while Scotland's was at 20%. Like for people of pension age, this was an increase on the lows seen in the early 2010s.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ballater residents 'dumbfounded' by slow response to fire
Ballater residents 'dumbfounded' by slow response to fire

The National

time42 minutes ago

  • The National

Ballater residents 'dumbfounded' by slow response to fire

Emergency services were called out to a blaze at a property in Swann Place on Saturday afternoon, where two homes were destroyed and a third was damaged. Terry Gauld, who was evacuated from his home in the area, told The National that 'everyone was dumbfounded' by how long it took fire crews to attend the scene. READ MORE: Firefighters tackling wildfires in Highlands for third day He said 'without a doubt, had there been a quicker response' only one of the properties would have been fully engulfed by flames. It took responders nearly six hours to extinguish the fire after they arrived. Ballater fire services were busy tackling a wildfire in the Highlands, meaning Swann Place residents had to rely on Aberdeen-based fire crews based over an hour away. 'The whole of Deeside was left without cover,' Gauld said, and explained that whilst there were a few community firefighters on the scene, there was 'nothing they could do' since their equipment was in use elsewhere. 'I could see the frustration on their faces,' he added. Four other homes were evacuated due to the thick plumes of smoke from the fire, and nearby residents were warned to keep their doors and windows closed. READ MORE: Wildfire blazes overnight at Moray wind farm Guald was one of the Swann Place occupants told to leave the area and he told The National that there was oil burning all down the road due to a tank in one of the destroyed properties exploding. He was able to return to his undamaged house around 8pm, though he was left without power until well after midnight. There were no injuries reported as a result of the fire. According to reports from The Press and Journal, a police inquiry into the cause of the blaze is currently ongoing.

Tom Devine speaks after Neil Oliver binned from Glasgow tour buses
Tom Devine speaks after Neil Oliver binned from Glasgow tour buses

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Tom Devine speaks after Neil Oliver binned from Glasgow tour buses

As The National reported on Friday, Oliver has been quietly axed from City Sightseeing Glasgow, where he previously provided English language commentary and had his portrait featured on the side of the service's buses. Now, leading historian Sir Tom Devine has responded to Oliver being dropped by the tour guiding business, saying the GB News host had taken a slot which could have been filled by a real historian. READ MORE: Theatrics of Unionist duo on Question Time were cringeworthy Devine told The National: 'It has taken some time for Oliver's name to be removed from the city's tourist buses. Now that it has finally happened, I am pleased. "He is not a historian. Scotland is currently awash with excellent historians, any one of whom could have been selected as the face of this tourist campaign. 'I suspect the decision to delete his image is partly to do with the fact that he has become a much more controversial figure in recent years because of his eccentric opinions on politics and other issues, which have undermined his former public standing.' READ MORE: Bob Vylan member responds to Glastonbury backlash with lengthy statement Oliver has descended into the realm of conspiracy theories in recent years, claiming Covid lockdowns are part of a new world order and that vaccinations can give people "turbo cancer". He called the prospect of a new independence vote 'cancerous' and most recently had one of his YouTube videos blocked by the platform for using antisemitic language. His involvement with the tourism service has long been questioned, given his fierce support of the union and Glasgow's majority-Yes vote in 2014. West Coast Motors, the firm who operate the City Sightseeing Glasgow tour bus service, did not respond to requests for comment.

Inside a pivotal week on Skye's energy future as 50 more turbines proposed
Inside a pivotal week on Skye's energy future as 50 more turbines proposed

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Inside a pivotal week on Skye's energy future as 50 more turbines proposed

Three new planning applications — totalling 50 turbines up to 200 metres high — were lodged this week for sites at Glen Ullinish, Ben Sca, and Balmeanach. The developments add to the growing number of wind energy proposals across the island, with more than 130 turbines now either operational, approved, or awaiting consent. The timing of the new applications has drawn sharp criticism from community members already engaged in the inquiry over the Ben Aketil Wind Farm repowering. That project, led by developer Nadara, would double the height of existing turbines and extend the operational lifespan of the site. At the public hearing earlier this week, Highland Tory councillor Ruraidh Stewart said the pace and scale of development was putting serious pressure on local authorities and communities. 'I was really speaking on behalf of the community, saying that a lot of people had contacted me about this development as it came through the process. Public speaking isn't a natural thing for many — they don't want to get involved in inquiries", he said in an interview with The National after the session. 'What they're proposing for Ben Aketil is 200-metre wind turbines. That's hard to visualise with no context — but for comparison, that's about the height of the observation deck of The Shard. 'Putting something like that in the middle of Skye is just, by and large, inappropriate. I made the comparison in the inquiry: Skye is the second most visited tourist destination in all of Scotland, only behind Edinburgh. 'If someone proposed putting wind turbines on top of Arthur's Seat, they'd be laughed out of a planning meeting.' READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Highlanders are rallying against Scotland's energy land grab Landowners and campaigners have also raised doubts over the promised benefits of repowering. Charles MacDonald, who owns land near the Ben Aketil site, told the inquiry that developers were overstating local gains, revealing that no jobs had been promised. He shared that he had turned down three separate wind farm offers. Each company had made it clear that the construction phase wouldn't involve any local labour — workers would be brought in, complete the job, and leave. Just 1.2 maintenance positions are expected to be delivered from the repowerment at Ben Aketil. Campaigner Thor Klein (below), who attended this week's hearings, echoed that frustration. 'You've got consultants giving expert testimony who haven't even visited Skye. One of the cultural heritage experts admitted her whole report was done from a desk.' He said the inquiry revealed a 'lack of preparedness' by developers, and called on Scottish ministers to pause new approvals until a full review of the Scotland's energy strategy can be completed. 'Even the applicant had to admit there's no comprehensive plan connecting these various wind farm projects,' Klein said. 'That lack of oversight is frankly shocking. We're facing a massive infrastructure transformation, but there's no roadmap. This leaves local councils like Highland Council completely overwhelmed, because corporations push multiple developments simultaneously, hoping something sticks. 'It's not a sustainable governance model, and I hope the reporter takes note of that.' He also said there was 'little to no community benefit'. Nadara, the developer behind Ben Aketil, has claimed that its existing wind farm has delivered £700,000 in community benefits. But critics argue that amounts to just £1685 per megawatt — far below the Scottish Government's non-binding benchmark of £5000 per MW set in 2014. READ MORE: 53 community councils unite to demand Highland energy projects pause Stewart, who is also a crofter, noted the community was disillusioned with the process, but said he was glad to see so many locals attending the sessions throughout the week. 'By and large, the majority of the community opposes it. But there's a real disillusionment with the process. 'From what I've heard, the council, who objected, and the Skye Wind Information Group, who instructed their own experts, made very compelling points for refusal. 'But there's still doubt whether those views will be meaningfully considered. 'Look at the Ackron Wind Farm decision in East Sutherland. The government reporter recommended refusal, but Scottish ministers approved it anyway. 'There's a disconnect — a lack of trust that even after participating in the process, communities will be heard.' Originally the council objected due to peatland impact, in line with another statutory body. The developers then reconfigured the turbine layout to avoid some peat areas, and those objections were withdrawn. Stewart believes that on paper, the peat restoration plans sound reasonable. But the best protection for peat 'is not damaging it in the first place,' he said. 'Especially when so much of this power might never reach the market, digging up thousands of tonnes of peatland in the name of green energy doesn't sit right with me. 'Peatland is vital for ecosystems, carbon storage, and climate resilience. 'The first Ben Aketil wind farm was supposed to operate for 33 years — now, 18 years in, they're digging it up and starting again. 'It happens time and again as turbines get bigger — they just dig up more.' Residents have also raised fears over infrastructure, emergency planning, and fire risk. Turbine components would arrive via the pier at Kyle of Lochalsh and travel by truck to remote sites on Skye. But Klein said there were no detailed transport plans provided yet — only verbal assurances. 'We're talking about massive vehicles on single-track roads,' he said. 'And no one has explained how they'll deal with emergencies—especially fires at battery storage sites, which local fire services are not equipped to handle.' Looking Ahead With more projects entering the planning system each week, residents fear a tipping point is approaching. 'Right now, there are three more applications on the table — this week alone,' said Klein. 'That's another 50 turbines. It's too much, too fast, with too little oversight.' As the volume of projects increases, pressure is growing on Scottish ministers to intervene. Both campaigners and councillors are calling for a coordinated national strategy that balances renewable energy goals with the protection of local communities and landscapes. 'I'm not against wind turbines or anything like that,' Klein said, 'it's just really crucial to ask for a pause — to evaluate, think it through, and then make decisions. 'Because you're overwhelming local democratically elected bodies. It's a big danger."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store