
Program gives students some hands-on experience with food systems
From student-run markets to a seed stewardship program, an environmental group is helping kids connect with their community via food.
Youth in Food Systems (YFS) started back in 2017 as Waterloo Region School Gardens with the initial focus of building gardens around the region. They have multiple gardens in and around the township, including at John Mahood and Riverside public schools in Elmira.
YFS is a program offered by Seeds of Diversity, a seed stewardship organization.
Following the success of the garden program, the organization realized there were other efforts they could also be supporting.
'What caused us to switch from building gardens to having several programs we run that are focused on getting youth into learning about and building skills in food systems and exploring careers related to food and food systems,' said YFS program manager Andrew Jackson.
In 2021, YFS ran some of its first programs, including its first youth-run market in July. Jackson told The Observer that these markets allow young participants to run all aspects of a farmers' market.
They are holding 21 market days across Waterloo Region this year, which sells fresh produce using a pay-what-you-choose model. The produce is grown by youth teams at six school garden spaces and farm partners.
'During the summer, we run three markets where the youth, again, do everything. They talk with the farmers. They think about how to display and price produce, and interact with the customers. We help guide them through that process,' said Jackson.
YFS not only expanded the programs it offered, but was also able to expand across Ontario through virtual activities, including their Food Leader Interview Series.
They are entering their fifth season of the program in which students across Ontario sit down and interview industry professionals.
'It challenges youth to work on and build their interview skills, think about what it takes to interview and ask good questions. Allowing them to build confidence, they get to interview a food leader somewhere in Canada.'
YFS hopes to expand past just Ontario this year by getting six of the 12 interviewers from different provinces and territories for this program season, added Jackson.
One program that Jackson is excited about is YFS's Seed Stewardship Program, which allows students to learn about seed stewardship and provide seeds for the following years. It currently provides seed for schools in the Waterloo Region, but they're looking to expand.
'One hope we have for the seed stewards program is that next year we're able to open it up so that schools and educators and youth outside of Waterloo Region can request seeds and get seeds from it, that we can just support a lot more schools in being able to access these resources,' he said.
They have created an inter-school seed library with seeds available to school communities and youth in Waterloo Region.
'We hope that next year we can hopefully double it again, or at least be able to continue to expand the number of schools that see this,' said Jackson.
'We want to give them as much support in making that accessible so they can have the biggest impact on their youth.'
All these programs have in common that they emphasize teaching youth hands-on skills and communication, added Jackson.
'Skill-building is 100 per cent a key focus in every program. Some of the programs require more of the staff, jumping in and making sure that they meet their goals if they need to. But the ultimate goal is to have youth take on and lead with them as much as we can.'
Jackson added that one of the major goals of the program is for the youth involved to take these skills into the future, no matter what they do.
'Our hope is really that youth build skills, build knowledge that then benefits them in the long run, past when they go to university or when they go into the trades or when they get a job after school.'
More information can be found online at
www.seeds.ca/schoolfoodgardens
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
Can Matheus Cunha and Liam Delap signings boost Chelsea, Manchester United's top four odds?
For more stories like this, click here to follow The Athletic's sports betting section and have them added to your feed. Legendary American basketball coach John Wooden once said, 'Never mistake activity for achievement.' Wooden spent his time coaching players who dribbled with their hands instead of their feet in the 1970s. That means it's unlikely his famous quote was directed at the transfer strategies of Manchester United and Chelsea. Advertisement In acquiring Matheus Cunha and Liam Delap, each club appears to be doing something. Whether early transfer window activity indicates edging closer to securing silverware or a place in the top four next year is another story. At the very least, it represents hope around the Blues' 2/1 and their Manchester counterparts' 5/1 top four odds. Delap and Cunha also share another similarity; their numbers don't tell the whole story of their value to each club. Let's dive deeper into the metrics. Let's not beat around the bush: Ipswich Town were objectively bad this past season. The Tractor Boys' minus-1.01 expected goal (xG) differential per 90 minutes ranked 17th in the league — nearly triple the difference of Wolves in 16th. When attackers like Delap play substantial minutes for a side this dreadful, it raises questions whether their statistics accurately reflect their abilities. At 22 years old, Delap is just about to enter his prime. Considering that context, however, his underlying numbers are, well, not great: Chelsea's incumbent striker, Nicolas Jackson, has his weaknesses, particularly around his finishing, but there's no denying his surface numbers supercede Delap. Jackson's 0.50 non-penalty xG per 90 mark is nearly double Delap's 0.27. While some forwards could make up for that gap with their contributions to build-up play or chance-creation in the final third, the former Tractor Boy doesn't do either of those things. The only thing Delap does better than Jackson is dribble past opposing defenders. For Delap's inclusion to make a significant shift in Chelsea's prospects, his underwhelming numbers have to be a by-product of Ipswich's shortcomings. The Tractor Boys only averaged 40 per cent possession during the 2024-25 season. Kieran McKenna's side also were last in touches and passes into the penalty area. Projecting what this signing means for the South Londoners means trying to determine whether Delap's numbers were underwhelming due to his own poor performance or because his team simply never had possession of the ball. Advertisement Even if the answer lies somewhere in the middle, it's hard to project Delap as the type of player that adds a ton of value to Chelsea's 22/1 title odds. The Blues' top four odds might be a different story. If Delap can prove to be an effective rotation player, then the 2/1 odds for the team to qualify for the Champions League next season seem like the better bet. Delap's numbers call into question his actual level of impact, but it's quite clear the kind of player Cunha is. The 26-year-old is a good, not great, winger whose market value rose thanks to a season buoyed by a fiery finishing streak. The Brazilian scored 15 goals off just 8.6 xG — a conversion rate that even Lionel Messi would be envious of. If the predictive strength of xG has taught us anything, it's that Cunha is headed toward a serious regression next season. Thankfully for United, he does bring a decent dose of playmaking. Cunha ranks in the 80th percentile of all attacking midfielders in expected assists and led Wolves in shot-creating actions last season. Yet even with that all-around production, there's no denying that his signing is simply a signing for the sake of change given the presence of Marcus Rashford and Alejandro Garnacho. Rashford almost exactly matches Cunha's production, while the 20-year-old Garnacho offers far more promise. Despite being six years his junior, the young Argentine matched Cunha's non-penalty xG of 0.30 this past season. The problem for United is that Garnacho and Rashford have had a series of run-ins with recent managers. Erik ten Hag and Ruben Amorim sought to find alternatives, and now the latter seems poised to push both players out of the club. At 8/15 odds to head to Barcelona, Rashford seems destined to leave Old Trafford. Garnacho's most likely destination is also outside of Manchester as Napoli (6/4) are currently the club favoured to secure his services. Advertisement As great as data is, it can't really measure the impact of someone like Cunha slotting into a starting XI match after match without high-profile spats with his manager. Professionalism and locker room cohesion may not matter as much as actually putting the ball in the back of the net, but those intangibles do matter. That said, United finished 12th in non-penalty xG differential last season. This was not an unlucky side needing some stability, it is a side in need of players who move the needle (Bruno Fernandes staying should also help). Cunha is a solid player and perhaps a better fit with Amorim, but those intangible factors aren't enough to make United's 5/1 top four odds any more enticing than they already are. Betting/Odds links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Matheus Cunha: David Rogers / Getty Images)


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
AI on verge of eight-hour job shift without burnout or break. Is 24-hour AI workday next?
Jan Williamson, retired, age 72, of Penn Argyle, Pennsylvania, often finds herself chatting up ChatGPT for answers to questions instead of what used to be the old searching standby: Google. "It will give you plenty of basic information, and expanded information if you ask for it, on any topic you can think of. I now use it regularly to give me information on anything I don't understand or am curious about," said Williamson. But if Williamson engages in conversations with it that are too long, she'd notice ChatGPT might start to run out of gas, despite the massive data farms that power the computing behind AI. That's why Anthropic's Amazon-backed Claude 4 AI model drew notice last week for its breakthrough ability to work seven straight hours. And Claude won't head to the coffee machine or gossip at the water cooler. Claude will work. For seven hours. But then, like an exhausted and grumpy cubicle worker at the end of a long shift, Claude too begins to peter out. The fact that Claude, or any other AI program, has a cap on its work hours is surprising to those who are used to being able to use AI at will whenever. But in the AI arms race, seven hours of work is a barrier broken. "What Anthropic has accomplished with Claude Opus 4 is an incredible, unmatched feat in AI. For a model to work on a task for seven straight hours is unheard of when current standards expect models to spend seconds to minutes working on a problem," said Brian Jackson, principal research director at Info-Tech Research Group. "AI can't work 24/7 because it's a bit like a goldfish with a very expensive aquarium. It's like a goldfish because it can only remember things for limited windows of time, and the aquarium is expensive because it requires high-end GPUS or TPUs working at max performance to create the environment," Jackson said. Increasing the number of what are called "tokens" is key to AI longevity on the job. A token in AI parlance isn't bus fare, it's words or word fragments that AI models intake through prompts. They are an important metric for the capacity of the LLM's memory. When "How many tokens does this sentence use in AI?" is entered into ChatGPT, it says that 10 tokens are used. The number of tokens in a context window is the metric that determines the memory, and Claude Opus 4 can hold 200,000 tokens, almost double Chat-GPT's 128,000 tokens. But once that limit is reached, "the context window is flushed and you have to start over," Jackson said. MJ Jiang, chief strategy and revenue officer at Credibly, a business financing firm that uses AI, said the reason AI tools like ChatGPT often experience performance degradation during long conversations is that the model may begin to "forget" earlier instructions and produce lower-quality responses. This is due to limitations including context window size, token limits, and the computational burden of managing large amounts of information. "As a result, older parts of a conversation may be discarded, leading to reduced accuracy, slower response times, and loss of coherence," Jiang said. Claude's seven-hour workday is notable because it implies continuous execution without performance degradation which is "an impressive feat, given the substantial compute power required to maintain stable output over time," Jiang said. It also raises the question of how far off the 24-hour workday is for AI. Ultimately, computing power is the key constraint. While Claude and ChatGPT are doing their thing, those GPUs and TPUs are working to deliver the results, and that is costly, requiring copious cooling and electricity. While compute efficiency will continue to improve, it comes with tradeoffs in cost, accessibility, and environmental impact. "Anthropic probably wants some sort of limit on how much cost will go into these super-sessions, or else it could break the bank," Jackson said. Jiang says the environmental impact from AI is growing quickly. "One can very well envision a future where the demand for water cooling is so great that water shortages become even more prevalent," she said. While a 24-hour AI workday may be technically possible in the future, the more important question, according to Jiang, is whether we should pursue it, and at what cost? "We might want to think about self-imposing [limits] smartly before some other force demands it and makes it truly suboptimal for all," Jiang said. Jeremy Rambarran, a professor at Touro University Graduate School of Technology, says 24-hour AI would be a game-changer, though the development of long-term memory over sessions, the processes of continuously storing and retrieving memories, can become technically intricate and expensive when done at a scale. "Transitioning from 7-hour sessions to enduring, memory-laden, constantly active AI agents would resemble the shift from calculators to full-time research assistants. It transforms AI from a mere instrument into a partner," Rambarran said. What would take a team of people weeks or months, an AI operating continuously could complete in days or hours, whether the focus is drug development, product design, or cybersecurity threat management. Anthropic leadership has spoken about the advance in similar terms, with its CEO Dario Amodei telling CNBC's "Squawk Box" that Claude's design speaks to a future where AI builds long-term working relationships across various domains. "You're going to have this model that talks to the biochemists for years, and that model becomes an expert in the law or national security. I think that force is going to lead to different model providers specializing in different things, even as the base model they made is the same." Amodei said. Not everyone is convinced that the burnout-free AI is almost here. Jon Brewton, founder and CEO of Data2, says AI agents still struggle with long-running tasks due to several hidden constraints that compound over time like memory overflow, cumulative reasoning errors, infrastructure costs, and fragile toolchains. He likens Claude's current seven-hour workday to seeing a photocopy degrade with each pass. "Claude 4's recent leap to a seven-hour run reflects breakthroughs in context retention, self-correction, and safety monitoring, but hitting a full 24-hour stretch will require cheaper, more efficient hardware, more reliable workflows, and smarter trust and governance systems," Brewton said. Amodei seems to have drawn some lines in his own thinking about Claude, at least at this point in the AI work cycle and concerns about wholesale human replacement. "I'd like us to get to the point where you can just give the AI system a task for a few hours — similar to a task you might give to a human intern or an employee," he said in an interview with the Financial Times. "Every once in a while, it comes back to you, it asks for clarification ... think of a management consultant."
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former Spurs Player Delivers Definitive Verdict on 2013 NBA Finals Loss
Former Spurs Player Delivers Definitive Verdict on 2013 NBA Finals Loss originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The San Antonio Spurs lost to the Miami Heat in the 2013 NBA Finals in one of the most heartbreaking moments in franchise history, highlighted by Ray Allen's legendary game-winning 3-pointer in Game 6. Advertisement The Spurs would go on to lose in Game 7, although it set the stage for their bounce-back year in 2014, where they beat Miami in devastating fashion. During Allen's final shot in Game 6, the Spurs opted to have an unusual lineup on the floor to defend the 3-ball, and it worked against the Heat's first attempt. Tony Parker, Manu Ginobili, Kawhi Leonard, Danny Green, and Boris Diaw were all on the floor, with rebounders Tim Duncan and Tiago Splitter sitting on the bench in order to make contesting a shot easier. James missed a 3-pointer over Diaw and Parker, although the Spurs were unable to secure the rebound. Advertisement Stephen Jackson thinks that if he had been on the court, things would have gone differently. "I would have got the f------ rebound," Jackson said to Green on his podcast. "Ray damn sure wouldn't have got it. I mean, he wouldn't have got the shot off or none of that. He wouldn't have been involved because, you know, I take that s--- personally." Jackson was waived by the Spurs before the postseason to make room to sign Tracy McGrady. While Jackson was not a star for the Spurs that season, averaging 6.2 points and 2.8 rebounds, McGrady failed to score a single point for the Spurs in 32 minutes of postseason play. Jackson, since retiring, has long been critical of the Spurs, Parker, and Gregg Popovich. However, he won his only NBA title with the Spurs. Advertisement While it's true that he would have been an upgrade over McGrady in the series, Popovich would have been more likely to play Splitter or Duncan in the final seconds than Jackson. At the time, Ginobili, Green, and Leonard were all better perimeter defenders than he was, and if the Spurs wanted size on the court, his name would not have been the one called. Check out the Inside the Spurs home page for more news, analysis, and must-read articles. Related: Michael Wilbon Offers Which San Antonio Spurs' Trade Asset is Untouchable Related: Victor Wembanyama Reacts to San Antonio Spurs Unique News This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.