logo
Trump wants 20,000 National Guardsmen to hunt, transport immigrants

Trump wants 20,000 National Guardsmen to hunt, transport immigrants

Keeping 20,000 National Guardsmen on duty for one year would cost $3.6 billion, according to a U.S. official briefed on the potential deployment. However, it's unclear how many Guardsmen are available to fill the request, according to a Defense official.
More: As ICE touts arrests, chaotic scenes emerge amid immigration crackdown
The moves would shift the military from its mission of defending the nation against foreign enemies toward policing its streets, according to critics such as Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee.
Trump has upped the ante in recent days, ordering the 4,000 California National Guardsmen to Los Angeles and deploying 700 active-duty Marines to the city over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom. That deployment is costing $134 million.
"Using the U.S. military to support immigration enforcement within our own borders would threaten the longstanding American principle of separating law enforcement from military power," Reed said in a statement to USA TODAY. "Such a move would erode civil liberties and set a dangerous precedent for the militarization of American communities. I've voted for billions in smart and focused immigration enforcement, but it is a duty for law enforcement, not the armed forces."
More: LA protests went from small to substantial over three days. Here's what unfolded
On June 10, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth indicated the National Guard would soon take on a larger role in domestic security. He told a House committee that the United States was entering a new "phase" in which the National Guard would "become a critical component of how we secure that homeland."
"The National Guard is a huge component of how we see the future," he said.
At Fort Bliss in Texas, the Army has a facility holding about 100 immigrants in a detention facility. A larger facility is being built there to house as many as 5,000 people, according to a U.S. official briefed on the operation but not authorized to speak publicly.
Other bases under consideration to detain immigrants include Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey, Dover Air Force Base in Delaware, Travis Air Force Base and Camp Parks in California, Fort Walker in Virginia and Camp Atterbury in Indiana.
Officials visited those bases months ago, but it's unclear if any have been selected to receive detainees, the Defense official said.
The location of some of the bases near major metropolitan areas like New York City and San Francisco indicates that immigration sweeps like the one in Los Angeles could take place there, too, the official said.
Separately, the request from Homeland Security calls for up to 21,000 National Guard troops whose "support will encompass both non-law enforcement support functions and sworn law enforcement activities."
There are thousands of National Guard and active-duty troops at the southern border. However, a memo reviewed by USA TODAY acknowledges that it is the first formal request by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to deploy national staff "in support of interior immigration enforcement operations."
ICE is carrying out a directive from Trump to find immigrants living in the United States without legal status. Protests have sprung up against the sweeps the agency is carrying out in various neighborhoods.
Active-duty troops are generally prohibited from domestic policing under the Posse Comitatus Act, a 19th-century law that "embodies an American tradition that sees military interference in civilian affairs as a threat to both democracy and personal liberty," according to the Brennan Center for Justice.
But National Guard troops are rarely subject to the law, and, under the direction of a state's governor, can participate in law enforcement activities. A governor of a state sympathetic to the request from Homeland Security could provide the troops for the request from Homeland Security, according to the U.S. official who is familiar with the request but not authorized to speak publicly about it.
The request states that the National Guard troops would be funded under Title 32, the law that leaves the Guardsmen under the control of their state's governor but uses federal taxpayer dollars to fund their activities.
The request seeks troops to aid immigration enforcement in five areas, including "Attempt to Locate" - Fugitives. Homeland Security is seeking as many as 3,500 Guardsmen for investigative units, surveillance and "Night operations and rural interdiction."
The largest ask for troops falls in the category of "Transportation Support," with as many as 10,000 troops needed. These personnel would help transport detainees and "unaccompanied alien children." The request also seeks buses, vans and aircraft.
As many 2,500 troops fall under the request for help in "Detention Support." These Guardsmen would support "overwhelmed detention facilities." Among their expected duties: "riot control."
Other troops are being sought for search and rescue, medical units and public affairs to manage "public information during high-visibility operations."
The deployment of thousands of additional National Guard troops in immigration enforcement could affect the public's perception of the military, said Lindsay Cohn, a political scientist and expert on the domestic use of the military. Cohn is also an associate professor at the U.S. Naval War College, but spoke about this issue in a personal capacity and not as a representative of the college or federal government.
Homeland Security can justify the request by arguing it lacks the manpower to conduct the sweeps, Cohn said. But raids on schools and businesses are unpopular with the American public. Also, how troops conduct themselves matters a great deal for public perception and confidence, she said.
If they behave with restraint, Cohn said, they may be able to maintain an appearance of not "taking sides." However, given that many in law enforcement personnel dress in military-like uniforms, the public may not differentiate between troops and law enforcement.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans fear the Mexican flag at the LA protests. But I see it as a symbol of our power
Republicans fear the Mexican flag at the LA protests. But I see it as a symbol of our power

The Guardian

time19 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Republicans fear the Mexican flag at the LA protests. But I see it as a symbol of our power

Republicans are using images of Ice protesters waving Mexican flags atop burning Waymo cars to foment fear among Americans. Like this photograph that Elon Musk tweeted on Sunday: a shirtless protester wielding the Tricolor atop a vandalized robotaxi as flames billow toward the weak sunlight backlighting the flag. His dark curls fall to his bare shoulders. He stares into the camera. Frankly, the image belongs in a museum. I understand my reaction is not the feeling Republicans hope to inspire in Americans broadly this week. Their messaging thus far about the protests against immigration raids in Latino communities has largely been alarmist – proof, they say, of an 'invasion' of 'illegal aliens'. 'Look at all the foreign flags. Los Angeles is occupied territory,' said Stephen Miller on X. According to Adam Kinzinger, a former congressman and more moderate voice, the Mexican flags carried by protesters are 'terrible… and feeding right into Donald Trump's narrative'. 'I just think that it would be much stronger if they were carrying American flags only,' he said on CNN this week. By this logic, Mexican flags are proof-positive that Mexican Americans are not really American; that we are somehow collaborating on a planned 'invasion'; that we harbor secret loyalties to Mexico; that we're here to displace white people and undermine the American way of life via some Plan Aztlan. In short, none of this is true. In front of Congress Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, cited the presence of 'flags from foreign countries' in LA to legitimize supporting Trump's deployment of the National Guard. This unilateral invocation of Title 10 by the Trump administration, without the consent of the governor, is exceedingly aggressive. So is the deployment of 700 US Marines to be used to crush American protest in an American city. The subtext here is that by many metrics, American's patience for Ice and its antics is wearing thin, even as Ice's deportation numbers are anemic compared to past administrations. The Trump administration realizes something has to change. Fanning outrage about a flag is both a legal pretext to pursue martial law and a diplomatic means of getting consent from the American populace to do unpopular things in the name of security. But what is it about the Mexican flag that triggers so many people? I'd argue that in the American context, the Mexican flag is not a nationalist symbol but something decentered from Mexico as a nation-state. Historically, it was a key banner of the Chicano movement, flown by supporters surrounding Dolores Huerta and Cesar Chavez during the California grape boycott in the 1960s. It flew alongside the United Farm Workers flag, the American flag and banners of the Virgen de Guadalupe as means of fomenting cultural unity. It also served as a reminder of a fundamental truth: we are from here; we are also from there. We're children of the in-between, or what the Tejanx writer Gloria Anzaldúa referred to as nepantla in her seminal work Borderlands/La Frontera. Nepantla is simply Nahuatl for the liminal space between cultures, identities and worlds. To this end, we might think of the Mexican flag as a symbol of double-consciousness in the Mexican American psyche specifically. We understand our middleness, yet we also understand how America sees and defines us: Mexicans. We take that prejudice and transform it into power. It's through this lens that I see the Mexican flag as just one banner among many, a remembrance of roots but also a shared experience between Mexican Americans and Mexican immigrants alike. Night after night, you can see captivating scenes with Mexican flags flying in the downtowns of Dallas and Houston and Atlanta and New York, as a solidarity grows between those explicitly targeted by Ice and those soon-to-be targeted by Ice. This is not hyperbole. Today, phenotype and politics are grounds enough for detention: in order for Ice to meet the Trump administration's goal of 3,000 arrests per day, targets have increasingly included student protesters, tourists and even American citizens. The only rule is to meet the metric at all costs. Amid these burgeoning protests, the Mexican flag is a bold articulation: we are like you; you are like us. We have struggled and persist in this place together. See me and don't be afraid; I see you and I am not afraid. To wield the flag amid a protest is to paint yourself a target, to take both your body and your future into your own hands. This is precisely why the Marines have been called in. To intimidate these bodies. Or to destroy them. What Trump fails to realize is that the bones of Mexican people are the metadata of the land in California and indeed the rest of the country. Our place here is in the food, in the street names, in the name of Los Angeles itself. Already, I can hear some within my own community admonishing my defense of Mexican flags at American protests as treasonous or ungrateful or something along those lines. To them I might ask: why is it that the protester's allegiances are held to higher standards than an American president who seeks to turn the US armed forces against American citizens? From Republican leaders, ​you'll never hear such questioning rhetoric surrounding other foreign flags that fly prominently in America. The Irish flag on St Patrick's Day instantly comes to mind. As does the Israeli flag at both political and non-political events. And, of course, the Confederate flag, though white supremacists have explicitly stated goals of both overthrowing the US government and taking back US land. Heritage is the most commonly used defense. Though wouldn't heritage apply to the Mexican flag as well? I'm reminded of James Baldwin when Mexicans Americans and Mexicans call for restraint from using Mexican imagery in US protests: 'In Harlem,' Baldwin wrote, '…the Negro policemen are feared more than whites, for they have more to prove and fewer ways to prove it.' We think our respectability will protect us. But we know historically and empirically that has not been true. Respectability did not protect Japanese Americans from being interned. Nor did it protect Vietnamese veterans who fought alongside Americans in Vietnam from facing discrimination in the US. Nor did it protect Afghan translators from having their visas revoked. Our American bonafides are not the things that will save us now. Not in the era of detention metrics and collateral targeting and now the prospect of authoritarian violence. It should be said: I don't go looking for these images. For my sins, having clicked on one, the algorithm floods me with them now. Protesters with Mexican flags getting a haircut in front of police. Protesters with Mexican flags forming a human chain. They just keep coming to me. But other images, too. Like one of a guy popping a wheelie past a ton of burning Waymo cars. I mean, come the fuck on – it's cool. The thing that immediately jumps out to me is the frivolity of the image. A body perfectly in balance, perfectly in motion. It moves of its own volition. It is completely in command of its trajectory and space in the landscape. It is beyond the fascist impulse to live so beautifully as this. Luckily, it also is beyond the fascist ability to remove the memory of this body from the land.

ICE raids and riots leave young white Americans mocked for their dramatic take on protests
ICE raids and riots leave young white Americans mocked for their dramatic take on protests

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

ICE raids and riots leave young white Americans mocked for their dramatic take on protests

Social media influencers have been roasted for their eerily similar responses to the LA riots and immigration raids. Anti-ICE protests have swept the nation since agents first conducted raids in Los Angeles on Friday, sparking viral clashes between officers in riot gear and protesters who set vehicles on fire. Critics blasted the dozens of young Americans who posted messages shamming those who have not spoken out against the issue and called others who support Donald Trump or ICE 'bad people.' 'If you're white and see an ICE raid happening and you don't get involved, I think you're a p***y, and I don't respect you at all,' one influencer said. 'If you support ICE, if you support this current administration, if you think anything that's going on in the U.S. is good for the country, I don't think you're very pretty, and I don't think you're very smart,' said Miami influencer Sydney Michelle. One woman even said she was ashamed to have purchased a shirt with an American flag on it. 'I accidentally bought an American flag shirt today, and I'm gonna go return it because I wasn't even thinking,' she said. 'With what's going on in our country right now... trash... I'm not wearing that. People are literally getting seized and deported without the freaking due process.' Others have compared being an illegal immigrant in the United States to a minor traffic offense. 'Being undocumented is not a criminal offense; it's a civil one, and if you've ever jaywalked, congratulations, you've also committed a civil offense,' mommy influencer Allison Kuch said. Another influencer almost parroted that message, saying, 'Being in a country that you're in illegally is a civil offense, not a criminal one. You know what else is a civil offense, jaywalking.' Critics were quick to blast the influencers for posting their dramatic takes and pointed out their messages are all suspiciously similar. 'Morons on TikTok,' one person said. 'They're like all manure,' said another. 'I miss the days when not everyone had an internet connection,' a third person said. 'I always love their false equivalencies,' said a fourth. 'Thank you for repeating the same falsehood-laden NGO statements we've seen from dozens and dozens of other social media accounts. Yawn,' a fifth person said. 'The best immigration policy is articulated from the front seat of your car into your camera phone for online attention,' a sixth person said. 'Struggle session. It reminds me of the "Imagine" celebrities during COVID,' said another. 'This is when you think you're a trailblazer and on the cutting edge when you're really just another follower,' a seventh person said. While physical presence in the United States without proper authorization is a civil violation, entering the country illegally is a federal criminal offense, according to the American Immigration Council. Illegal entry includes crossing the border at a time or place not designated by immigration officers, eluding inspection by officers, or entering with false information such as fake documents. Title 8 of the U.S. Code states that the first offense of illegally entering the country is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in prison. Illegally re-entering the country after previously being deported is a felony with a maximum sentence of up to two years.

Trump launches website for $5m Gold Card – and is mocked for its cheap look
Trump launches website for $5m Gold Card – and is mocked for its cheap look

The Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump launches website for $5m Gold Card – and is mocked for its cheap look

Donald Trump has officially launched his promised gold card which will grants U.S. residency to foreign investors for $5 million – but instantly faced mockery for the supposedly cheap-looking website he's selling them on. 'THE TRUMP CARD IS COMING! Thousands have been calling and asking how they can sign up to ride a beautiful road in gaining access to the Greatest Country and Market anywhere in the World, ' the president wrote on Truth Social. Trump added that the waiting list for the card was 'NOW OPEN' but did not offer further details as to when the cards may be coming available. As if to counter the clunky appearance of the site, a note is included at the top of the page that it is an 'official government site.' The website also does not offer information on a specific launch date – or indeed further information of any kind. A mostly black web page greets visitors with the words: 'Trump Card Is Coming.' Interested parties are encouraged to enter their information into a form to be notified 'the moment access opens.' The site also features a picture of the gold 'Trump Card,' which has the president's photo and signature on the front. Trump showed a version of the card to reporters onboard Air Force One back in April. Social media was quick to react to the news, with one user writing: 'We live in an idiocracy' and another adding: 'This government is a f****** joke, holy f***.' More piled in on the cheap look of the site. 'Lmao this is literally the entire site,' wrote another user, in a short video showing the minimalist page. 'This is the cheesiest thing I've ever seen in my life....' added another. Others noted what they interpreted as a more sinister side of the offer. 'Can we take a moment and realize how disgusting the idea of a trump card is (the instant immigration card for 5 mil),' wrote one user. 'That's so damn dystopian like hey yeah pay me an ungodly amount of money and instantly get treated better than natural born citizens because you're upper class.' 'Abhorrent. Is this what you all voted for? Selling an America fast-pass to people like Russian oligarchs and the like?' added another. The information form on the page to apply for the card requests users fill out their name 'My name is (First, Last),' where they are from, 'from Region' and why they are interested in applying for the card. The gold Trump Card was first announced by the president in February, who said it would grant those with them the same privileges as green card holders, who have permanent residency in the U.S. Administration officials previously suggested that the card will replace the EB-5 immigrant investor visa program, which provides a path for foreign nationals to achieve permanent residence (a green card) in the United States. The program requires a minimum investment of $800,000 in the U.S. to qualify but was 'poorly run,' according to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Trump said in February that the money from the gold cards would be used to 'pay down a lot of debt,' though did not elaborate. The president has also said previously the card was a way to get 'wealthy people' to invest in the U.S. by 'spending a lot of money, paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people.' Asked whether he would consider selling the cards to Russian oligarchs, Trump responded: 'Yeah, possibly. I know some Russian oligarchs that are very nice people.' The president has previously said he does not need the go ahead from Congress to launch the program. It is uncertain how applications for the Trump Card will be processed and who by.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store