logo
A new report says Tunisia has dramatically expanded the use of politically motivated arrests

A new report says Tunisia has dramatically expanded the use of politically motivated arrests

Independent16-04-2025

Tunisia has dramatically expanded the use of politically motivated arrests and prosecutions to intimidate and silence critics, according to a Human Rights Watch report released Wednesday.
In what the group describes as a sweeping rollback of freedoms won during Tunisia's 2011 revolution, authorities in recent years have targeted lawyers, judges, journalists and activists in a crackdown on critics of President Kais Saied.
'Not since the 2011 revolution have Tunisian authorities unleashed such repression,' Bassam Khawaja, the group's deputy Middle East and North Africa director, said in a statement. 'Saied's government has returned the country to an era of political prisoners, robbing Tunisians of hard-won civil liberties.'
More than 50 people are currently detained on political grounds, Human Rights Watch said, citing a January tally. Of those, 22 are held arbitrarily, while 14 face charges that could carry the death penalty if convicted.
Tunisian authorities have not responded to the allegations detailed in the report, which draws a direct line between the judicial system and actions that Saied has taken to consolidate power since 2021.
At the time, citing the COVID-19 pandemic and domestic political crises, he suspended parliament, rewrote the constitution to consolidate his power and began to exert more control over the judiciary.
'The authorities' stranglehold on the judiciary, following repeated attacks on its independence, raises serious concerns about fair trial guarantees for those detained,' the new report says.
Saied was reelected in a landslide last October after a campaign during which his most prominent challengers were imprisoned, kept off the ballot or jailed.
The report cites military courts and what it calls 'overly broad and abusive accusations,' including charges of threatening state security, as among the tools used to suppress dissent. Politicians, lawyers, journalists and activists have been prosecuted for insulting the president or spreading so-called 'fake news.'
Decree-Law 54, a cybercrime statute passed in 2022, has become a key instrument. At least 28 people — including nine journalists — have been prosecuted under the law, which mandates a minimum of five years in prison for anyone found guilty of spreading false information.
Those arbitrarily detained in Tunisia include both prominent figures and private citizens. Among them are Rached Tamboura, a calligraphy student imprisoned for graffiti denouncing Saied and his treatment of Black migrants; right-wing politician Abir Moussi; and numerous members and former officials of Ennahda, the Islamist party sidelined under Saied's rule.
The most prominent detainee is the party's former leader Rached Ghannouchi, arrested in 2023 and now facing multiple charges. His family told Human Rights Watch that some of his requests for routine medical care have been denied.
Also detained is Sihem Bensedrine, a lawyer and former head of Tunisia's Truth and Dignity Commission, which investigated abuses under longtime autocrat Zine El Abidine Ben Ali. Bensedrine was charged and imprisoned under Saied.
Human Rights Watch called on Tunisia's allies and partners — including the European Union — to review agreements with the country to ensure it complies with human rights obligations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michelle Mone makes 'millions in profits' after selling off Glasgow townhouses
Michelle Mone makes 'millions in profits' after selling off Glasgow townhouses

The National

time14 hours ago

  • The National

Michelle Mone makes 'millions in profits' after selling off Glasgow townhouses

The Scottish Mail on Sunday reports that Baroness Mone sold a £19m London townhouse and £6.8m Lady M Yacht last year. It comes after Glasgow-born Mone and her billionaire husband Doug Barrowman had £75m worth of assets frozen by the National Crime Agency (NCA). The couple are at the centre of a fraud probe over the firm PPE Medpro, controlled by Barrowman, that was awarded £203m worth of UK Government contracts through a 'VIP lane' during the Covid-19 pandemic. READ MORE: Supreme Court's sex ruling faces legal tests – will they succeed? In November 2023, Mone finally admitted her involvement with PPE Medpro for the first time, after years of denying any links to the company. It then emerged Barrowman was reportedly paid at least £65m from PPE Medpro's profits, later transferring £29m into a trust for Mone and her three adult children. Several properties were frozen under the Proceeds of Crime Act in 2023. And now, Mone has reportedly sold her Glasgow homes. The Mail on Sunday reports that there is no suggestion any of the property sales breached any existing orders put in place by the NCA. One townhouse in Glasgow's plush Park Circus was bought by Barrowman's Knox business group for £1.7m in 2020. The couple have now reportedly sold this to a photographer for £2m last year. Another nearby townhouse was sold for £2.8m, allegedly to a Scottish musician, who was not named. It was bought in July 2020 for just over £1.4m. A spokesperson for the NCA confirmed an investigation is still ongoing into PPE Medpro. 'The NCA opened an investigation in May 2021 into suspected criminal offences committed in the procurement of PPE contracts by PPE Medpro,' they said. 'This ongoing investigation remains a priority for the agency. READ MORE: Scottish independence 'already begun as UK political culture diverges' 'Investigations must pursue all reasonable lines of enquiry. In serious economic crime investigations these lines of enquiry can be incredibly complex – from worldwide financial tracing exercises to the need to examine large volumes of digital material. 'In such cases it can take considerable time to ensure that a thorough, independent and objective investigation is conducted.' PPE Medpro is also being sued by the Department of Health and Social Care, amid claims that the gown supplied by the firm were not fit for use. We previously told how Mone accused the NCA of "smearing [her] as a criminal".

Why were so many Thai farmers among the hostages held by Hamas?
Why were so many Thai farmers among the hostages held by Hamas?

NBC News

time16 hours ago

  • NBC News

Why were so many Thai farmers among the hostages held by Hamas?

Israel says it has retrieved the body of a 35-year-old Thai hostage who was abducted into Gaza during the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that sparked the war. Nattapong Pinta was among 31 Thais taken by the Hamas militant group. Thailand's foreign ministry in a statement Saturday confirmed that Pinta, the last Thai hostage in Gaza, was confirmed dead. It said the bodies of two others have yet to be retrieved. The ministry has said 46 Thais have been killed during the war. Thais were the largest group of foreigners held captive by Hamas. They were among tens of thousands of Thai workers in Israel. Here's a look at what they were doing. Why are there so many Thais in Israel? Israel once relied heavily on Palestinian workers, but it started bringing in large numbers of migrant workers after the 1987-93 Palestinian revolt, known as the first Intifada. Most came from Thailand, and Thais remain the largest group of foreign agricultural laborers in Israel today, earning considerably more than they can at home. Thailand and Israel implemented a bilateral agreement a decade ago to ease the way for workers in the agriculture sector. Israel has come under criticism for the conditions under which the Thai farm laborers work. A Human Rights Watch report in 2015 said they often were housed in makeshift and inadequate accommodation and 'were paid salaries significantly below the legal minimum wage, forced to work long hours in excess of the legal maximum, subjected to unsafe working conditions and denied their right to change employers.' A watchdog group found more recently that most were still paid below the legal minimum wage. How many Thai nationals work in Israel? There were about 30,000 Thai workers, primarily working on farms, in Israel prior to the attack by Hamas. In the wake of the attack, some 7,000 returned home, primarily on government evacuation flights, but higher wages than those available at home have continued to attract new arrivals. The Thai ambassador to Israel, Pannabha Chandraramya, recently said there are now more than 38,000 Thai workers in the country. What happened after some left? Faced with a labor shortage in the wake of the exodus, Israel's Agriculture Ministry announced incentives to try to attract foreign workers back to evacuated areas. Among other things, it offered to extend work visas and to pay bonuses of about $500 a month. Thailand's Labor Ministry granted 3,966 Thai workers permission to work in Israel in 2024, keeping Israel in the top four destinations for Thais working abroad last year. Thai migrant workers generally come from poorer regions of the country, especially the northeast, and even before the bonuses, the jobs in Israel paid many times what they could make at home.

Andrew Lightbown on ability to discuss sensitive issues
Andrew Lightbown on ability to discuss sensitive issues

South Wales Argus

timea day ago

  • South Wales Argus

Andrew Lightbown on ability to discuss sensitive issues

Where there are no easy answers, great care needs to be taken over the quality of rhetoric, for without such quality control it becomes easy to scapegoat or stigmatize others, making them feel somehow less. It also becomes easier to retreat into our affinity groups, to the exclusion of others. Now to be clear there is nothing wrong with belonging to affinity groups, in fact we need them if we are to feel at home. Religiously I am an Anglican, rugby wise I am Black and Amber through and through. My affinity groups provide me with belonging and meaning. They are places where I can feel, for the most part, comfortable. But, and here's the nub of it: my affinity groups are no better or worse than anyone else's. To refuse to engage with others outside of our affinity groups is to live in a hermetically sealed bubble, where all outsiders are rendered strange. If we are to live life and live it well, we all need to engage beyond our immediate affinity groups and, in our rhetoric, we must ensure that we don't belittle others, even those we might find a little strange. I found the Prime Minister's use of the term 'island of strangers' in his speech on immigration problematic. I am not sure who the phrase was directed at. Was it directed at people living in gated residences in the most prosperous parts of the land, or at people living in inner city areas where most residents belong to a particular class or ethnicity? But more than this I am not sure it is true. Over the last couple of weeks, I have experienced solidarity, support, and compassion from people outside of my natural affinity group. I was delighted to help lead an Interfaith Friendship Evening on Stow Hill, where it quickly became clear that in this city people from very different backgrounds care about the same issues. A second example: my mother is in hospital and the level of care and support, from people very different to her, is tangible. Jesus, in a parable called the Judgment of the Nations said: 'I was a stranger, and you invited me in.' Whatever the complexity of immigration policy – and it is complex – surely it is only right and proper that we all strive to ensure that we speak well, and that whilst prizing our affinity groups we also engage beyond them? Andrew Lightbown is the canon at St Woolos Cathedral, Newport.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store