I'll Never Forget the First Car I Drove To Go Skiing
I rose to a loud, earth-shaking rumble. Had the Juan de Fuca tectonic plate finally slid? Was I about to get a real-life lesson in geology? I raced to my parents' room, encountering a different, albeit much less dramatic, disaster. From there, my memory becomes foggy, dissolving into brief, dim flashes. Loud winds and the night sky. A police spotlight trained on the dangling remnants of the tree that, after being hit by a mighty gust, had snapped and knocked the chimney of our house clean off. But in the driveway, at the base of the tree, stood the family ski chariot: a 1995 metallic blue Toyota Land Cruiser, miraculously untouched. The tree's thick trunk only hung a foot or so above the car—or, as we called it, "the truck." Apparently, the Land Cruiser wasn't done with the Greenwoods quite yet. The ride, a successor to another, older Land Cruiser, was our primary mountain rig. From the rain-slick streets of Seattle, it would mow through ice and slush, carrying us into the Cascades for a reprieve from the glum coastal winters. It could go the distance, too, traveling to Fernie, Big Sky, and, in the summer, Mt. Hood.This piece is part of POWDER's Summer of Ski Nostalgia content series. Stay tuned in daily for more nostalgic articles, and keep an eye out for the upcoming Summer of Ski Nostalgia badge to identify future content.You can also view all of POWDER's summer nostalgia content here.Want to keep up with the best stories and photos in skiing? Subscribe to the new Powder To The People newsletter for weekly updates.
When I was young, I'd bundle up in the backseat, only waking halfway through the drive at our traditional pitstop: McDonald's. Outside, it was still dark—my dad, in true archetypal ski dad form, usually insisted on hitting the road as early as possible—but instead of a hot drink, I'd order a Frappuccino and some sausage burritos. Then, after chowing down, I'd somehow fall back asleep, regaining consciousness in the ski area parking lot, probably with a stomach ache. Sometime after the tree fell, I started learning to drive. My dad had spent years and years carting my brother and me to the mountains. We were ready to take the mantle and give him a much-needed break. At that moment, driving wasn't yet a chore, and when I learned to weave through Seattle's tight streets, nervousness quickly gave way to excitement. I could now go wherever I wanted, including the mountains, provided I shared with my parents a somewhat vague idea of my plans. During one of the first evenings that I could drive without adult supervision, I headed to a bonfire. On the way home, I filled the truck with as many other kids as it could fit, enjoying being a designated driver more than I ever would at any other point in my life. I felt useful. I assume my dad did, too, when he spent the winter weekends instilling a life-long love of skiing in his boys with the Land Cruiser as his accomplice.
Then, it was my partner. We rode with friends, and we rode alone. On those solitary missions to the mountain and back, a cup of coffee from the ski lodge would give me just enough energy on the way home. The radio, which connected to an antenna that sprung from the Cruiser's hood at the touch of a button, helped, too. Over time, as I became a pilot rather than a passenger, stickers from the burritos I continued to eat appeared around the interior. One that read 'beef' got planted in the middle of the steering wheel. My parents never peeled off the stickers, but the markings of a teenage driver weren't always harmless. When a beer can was left in the trunk by one of my friends, I received a stern talking to. The truck also dredged up old, familiar routines, even as I grew. A few years after I got my driver's license, when I was older but still a teenager, my dad happily took over when I became sleepy as we made the nine-hour drive back from Canada at night. Behind the wheel, he settled back into the rhythm he and the truck shared, cruising through the dark with his passengers dozing. To this day, I still joke that I owe my dad several lifetimes' worth of rides to the mountain.
Those future rides with Dad will have to happen in a different car. The outsized rigs that spout thick plumes of sweet-smelling gasoline are, for many skiers, myself included, a touchstone. Still, the march of practicality and technology would, as it does for most everything, make the truck and all its quirks eventually disappear from our lives. At around 250,000 miles, the Land Cruiser developed a rod knock—requiring a too-costly engine repair—and we said goodbye. When I came home from college one year, I met the replacement: a slick, quiet Honda CR-V that still performed admirably in the snow. My parents' decision was easy to understand. Sentimentality works great for a vintage pair of jeans—less so for aging vehicles that chip away at your bank account.Thankfully, I know the truck found a good home. My parents sold it to a company that restores Land Cruisers, and my dad recalled the excitement of the buyer. Somewhere, then, out on the backroads, I imagine it crawling through the mud or snow, doing exactly what it was built to do—and, maybe, taking a different family to the ski hill. I also take comfort in the fact that the old machine has better luck than most cars, let alone people. When the next windstorm hits, I bet it'll be parked in just the right place.This piece is part of POWDER's Summer of Ski Nostalgia content series. Stay tuned in daily for more nostalgic articles, and keep an eye out for the upcoming Summer of Ski Nostalgia badge to identify future content.You can also view all of POWDER's summer nostalgia content here.
I'll Never Forget the First Car I Drove To Go Skiing first appeared on Powder on Jun 17, 2025

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Summit Racing Equipment NHRA Nationals Pairings
Saturday At Summit Racing Equipment Motorsport Park Norwalk, Ohio Sunday's Pairings Top Fuel 1. Justin Ashley, 3.752 seconds, 330.88 mph vs. 16. Scott Farley, 3.973, 257.48; 2. Antron Brown, 3.755, 333.33 vs. 15. Doug Kalitta, 3.953, 294.37; 3. Tony Stewart, 3.755, 327.11 vs. 14. Kyle Wurtzel, 3.895, 305.29; 4. Brittany Force, 3.784, 334.65 vs. 13. Lex Joon, 3.882, 313.73; 5. Shawn Langdon, 3.789, 324.59 vs. 12. Doug Foley, 3.841, 317.49; 6. Steve Torrence, 3.812, 329.34 vs. 11. Shawn Reed, 3.826, 322.42; 7. Dan Mercier, 3.813, 330.15 vs. 10. Clay Millican, 3.823, 324.20; 8. Spencer Massey, 3.816, 319.37 vs. 9. Josh Hart, 3.818, 325.37. Did Not Qualify: 17. Will Smith, 3.997, 283.85. Funny Car 1. Cruz Pedregon, Dodge Charger, 3.890, 318.39 vs. 16. Buddy Hull, Charger, 4.127, 276.75; 2. Austin Prock, Chevy Camaro, 3.900, 331.28 vs. 15. Dale Creasy Jr., Charger, 4.087, 312.57; 3. Ron Capps, Toyota GR Supra, 3.908, 325.06 vs. 14. Paul Lee, Charger, 4.079, 306.26; 4. Jack Beckman, Camaro, 3.913, 321.35 vs. 13. Chad Green, Ford Mustang, 4.072, 311.56; 5. Matt Hagan, Charger, 3.926, 329.67 vs. 12. J.R. Todd, GR Supra, 4.061, 322.50; 6. Alexis DeJoria, Charger, 3.960, 327.11 vs. 11. Dave Richards, Mustang, 4.040, 317.19; 7. Hunter Green, Charger, 3.972, 322.50 vs. 10. Bob Tasca III, Mustang, 4.012, 322.73; 8. Daniel Wilkerson, Mustang, 3.997, 321.50 vs. 9. Spencer Hyde, Mustang, 4.005, 314.97. Did Not Qualify: 17. Julie Nataas, 4.148, 294.11; 18. Chris King, 4.267, 249.72; 19. Bobby Bode, 4.386, 205.19; 20. Mike McIntire, 4.927, 173.14; 21. Joe Morrison, 5.248, 147.04. Pro Stock 1. Greg Anderson, Chevy Camaro, 6.594, 207.30 vs. 16. Derrick Reese, Ford Mustang, 6.721, 203.98; 2. Dallas Glenn, Camaro, 6.596, 207.37 vs. 15. Val Smeland, Camaro, 6.703, 204.82; 3. Matt Hartford, Camaro, 6.603, 207.88 vs. 14. Chris McGaha, Camaro, 6.652, 207.59; 4. Greg Stanfield, Camaro, 6.613, 206.73 vs. 13. Mason McGaha, Camaro, 6.650, 207.53; 5. Cory Reed, Camaro, 6.616, 208.17 vs. 12. Troy Coughlin Jr., Camaro, 6.640, 205.32; 6. Eric Latino, Camaro, 6.619, 206.45 vs. 11. Deric Kramer, Camaro, 6.632, 209.07; 7. Cody Coughlin, Camaro, 6.626, 206.57 vs. 10. Jeg Coughlin, Camaro, 6.631, 205.66; 8. Aaron Stanfield, Camaro, 6.626, 207.05 vs. 9. Erica Enders, Camaro, 6.630, 206.95. Pro Stock Motorcycle 1. Matt Smith, Buell, 6.816, 200.86 vs. Bye; 2. Gaige Herrera, Suzuki, 6.820, 199.11 vs. 13. Odolph Daniels, Suzuki, 7.336, 182.85; 3. John Hall, Beull, 6.832, 199.35 vs. 12. Wesley Wells, Suzuki, 7.233, 183.69; 4. Angie Smith, Buell, 6.839, 198.32 vs. 11. Chris Bostick, Suzuki, 6.970, 193.32; 5. Richard Gadson, Suzuki, 6.853, 197.28 vs. 10. Chase Van Sant, Suzuki, 6.922, 195.76; 6. Ron Tornow, Victory, 6.862, 197.88 vs. 9. Marc Ingwersen, EBR, 6.901, 192.99; 7. Jianna Evaristo, Buell, 6.886, 199.08 vs. 8. Steve Johnson, Suzuki, 6.891, 195.05.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Mechanic: These Are the 5 Cars I Would Never Buy in 2025
Not all cars are reliable. Some vehicles have high maintenance costs and persistent mechanical issues. Even if they have the most attractive designs, it's best to avoid such cars if you don't want to drain your wallet. Read Next: Explore More: Alan Gelfand, a mechanic and owner of German Car Depot, shared five cars he would never buy in 2025 because they're expensive to maintain and are prone to mechanical problems. The Chrysler 200 has been out of production since 2017, but preowned vehicles are still available for purchase. 'They end up being expensive to maintain,' Gelfand said. Besides being costly to service, Gelfand also noted that the Chrysler 200 has poor transmission quality, electrical system issues and uncomfortable driving dynamics. 'The 9-speed automatic transmission is notorious for jerky shifting and premature failure,' he said. Check Out: This midsize sedan has a luxurious look but has a major continuously variable transmission (CVT) issue, which can be costly to replace. 'I would never purchase this vehicle because the CVT is its major flaw,' Gelfand said. 'We have had to replace numerous Altima transmissions because they tend to fail at approximately 60,000 miles.' The Jeep Renegade may appeal to many people because it's a compact SUV, but Gelfand said it's one of the most unreliable cars. 'The vehicle presents itself as modern, yet it experiences multiple electrical breakdowns while its driving comfort remains poor,' he said. 'It will experience powertrain lights and shifting issues and connectivity problems that will require frequent visits to the shop.' This luxury compact SUV's sleek design looks attractive in many ways. However, the Range Rover Evoque will let you visit the repair shop regularly. 'It looks stylish yet lacks reliability. We have observed engine oil leaks together with transmission problems and total electrical shutdowns, which occur frequently below 80,000 miles,' Gelfand said. While the Chevrolet Spark is an affordable car, it's not worth the price. 'The vehicle demonstrates low construction quality together with high noise levels and weak engine performance,' Gelfand said. Rather than settling for this vehicle, Gelfand recommended a used Honda or Toyota since these models cost less and offer better durability. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on I'm a Mechanic: These Are the 5 Cars I Would Never Buy in 2025
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's early birthday present to himself—the first Tesla just drove itself from its factory straight to the customer
In its second milestone in a week, Tesla arranged for a Model Y crossover to drive itself from its Texas factory to a customer in downtown Austin some 30 minutes away. It follows the successful launch of its robotaxi service this past Sunday. City officials, however, told Fortune they had no choice in the matter: 'the City does not have the authority to regulate these vehicles.' Tesla celebrated a historic first on Friday when a new Model Y left the factory in Austin and—without anyone in the vehicle—drove itself to a waiting customer a half-hour away. Already the second milestone this week after the commercial deployment of his robotaxi service, it marks an early birthday present for CEO Elon Musk. The entrepreneur had promised it to Tesla supporters for June 28, which is coincidentally when he turns 54 years old. 'The first fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer home across town, including highways, was just completed a day ahead of schedule,' Musk posted on Friday. 'There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous.' Since this is completely unsupervised full-self driving (FSD) in its first-ever practical application for the brand, Tesla uploaded a video as proof. It documents from various angles the roughly 30-minute drive from the Austin factory to 1515 S. Lamar Blvd. downtown, where its new owner took possession. Whether this delivery is just a one-off test or part of a broader plan to revamp distribution remains unclear. While it might in theory save on at least part of the $1,390 destination fee Tesla charges, it risks scratching or denting the vehicle in transit—or even just arriving at the customer dirty, looking like it had just been through a rainstorm. Additionally, the Model Y's range maxes out at an official 357 miles with real world tests indicating a lower range. Unless it could drive from one Tesla service center to the next, so that an employee could recharge it, the range would limit it to a radius inside Texas. Lastly, regulations on the ground could make it outright illegal as state governments currently determine under what conditions autonomous vehicles, if at all, can drive on their roads. In the case of Austin, for example, city officials told Fortune they had no say in what Musk's company did. 'Tesla made the City aware of their intent to deliver a fully autonomous vehicle,' a spokesman for the Texas state capital said. 'While the City does not have the authority to regulate these vehicles, we will continue to work with the company to provide feedback if public safety issues arise.' The autonomous delivery also elicited skepticism as to whether Tesla might be misleading people into believing the technology is more robust than it really is. Some pointed to the fact the video was not livestreamed, but rather uploaded later. In addition, the robotaxi service that began operation in Austin on Sunday still only operates during certain hours, does not drive to the airport, and features a safety monitor in the front passenger seat at all times. Moreover, the timing is advantageous, as Musk has been attempting to shift investor focus towards the rollout of his robotaxi technology and away from its struggling core business of selling EVs. This coming week, Tesla is expected to publish second-quarter global production and delivery figures that show a 14% decline in deliveries to 383,000 vehicles, according to the median estimate polled by the company's investor relations team. While a few skeptics are bound to remain mistrustful no matter what, the suspicion is rooted in part in experience. Nearly nine years ago, Tesla posted a similar demonstration when it released the 'Paint It Black' video. It claimed that a vehicle was driving entirely on its own and the human behind the wheel was not even there to monitor for safety. 'The person in the driver's seat is only there for legal reasons,' it stated in the video posted in October 2016. 'He is not doing anything. The car is driving itself.' Tesla's AI director Ashok Elluswamy later testified in a sworn deposition the footage was not meant to be an accurate representation of the technology. Both the video and the blog post have since been expunged entirely from Tesla's site, but thanks to YouTube and web archives they are still viewable. There was another, more recent example, as well. In October 2024, Musk showcased prototype robots interacting with human guests at an event without telling anyone they were tele-operated remotely by humans. Tesla didn't respond to a request for comment from Fortune. But Elluswamy, who has risen the ranks at Tesla since working on the 2016 video, denied there was any trickery with the self-driving delivery video on Friday. 'Literally chose a random customer who ordered a Model Y in the Austin area. Vehicle is exactly the same as every Model Y produced in the Tesla factory,' he replied to a question on X. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data