Suspect wanted after throwing Molotov cocktail into Villa Park cannabis store: police
The Brief
A suspect threw a Molotov cocktail into the Cannabist Store in Villa Park around 4:10 a.m. Saturday and fled on foot, police say.
Police say the suspect, believed to be a man in all black with a face mask, was caught on video damaging a window and tossing the device inside.
The flame quickly went out, and authorities are asking anyone with information to contact Villa Park police.
VILLA PARK, Ill. - Police are searching for a suspect who threw a Molotov cocktail into a west suburban cannabis store early Saturday and fled the scene.
What we know
The incident occurred around 4:10 a.m. at the Cannabist Store in the 100 block of East Roosevelt Road, according to Villa Park police.
When officers arrived, they found the store's front window damaged and detected a strong smell of gasoline coming from inside.
Surveillance video showed a person, believed to be a man dressed in all black and wearing a face mask, damaging the window and throwing what appeared to be a Molotov cocktail into the business, police said.
The flame quickly extinguished after landing inside, and the suspect fled on foot.
What's next
The investigation is ongoing. Anyone with information is asked to contact the Villa Park Police Department at (630) 834-7447.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Anti-ICE rioters are just as out of line as anti-black racists in ‘62
On Sept. 30, 1962, the University of Mississippi experienced a 'mostly peaceful' demonstration. As with all such protests, it was peaceful until it wasn't — it became a riot, and a particularly heinous and destructive one. The mob attacked federal officers, including border-patrol agents, with rocks and Molotov cocktails. They burned cars. They smashed street lights. They ransacked buildings. They drove vehicles at the officers. And they did it all to try to prevent the federal government from enforcing the law. This, discerning readers will realize, was the notorious Battle of Oxford, when students at Ole Miss and outside agitators exploded in fury to prevent the enrollment of James Meredith, an African-American, who was under the protection of federal agents. President John Kennedy had federalized the Mississippi National Guard days before the disturbance, and sent in the Army when things got out of hand. Eventually, he drew on 31,000 troops, a necessary exercise of overwhelming force. Now, once again, mobs are in the streets in opposition to federal power and federal law. We are probably at the beginning stages of another titanic struggle over whether the writ of federal law will run in jurisdictions opposed to it, and over the morality of those underlying laws. To use a term borrowed from segregationists in Virginia the 1950s, the opponents of ICE are engaged in a campaign of 'massive resistance.' Virginia Democrat Harry Byrd and his allies came up with an across-the-board strategy to undermine Brown v. Board of Education. 'If we can organize the Southern States for massive resistance to this order,' Byrd said, 'I think that in time the rest of the country will realize that racial integration is not going to be accepted in the South.' Similarly, Democratic officeholders and activists hope to make ICE raids so politically toxic and so painful to implement that the federal government stands down and accepts the status quo of routine lawlessness. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The opposition is relying on a version of another doctrine of the Southern resisters, nullification. This is the idea that states can invalidate federal laws that they deem an offense against our constitutional order. This notion has a long, undistinguished history in this country as a pre-cursor to the Civil War and, later, as a tool to attempt to preserve segregation. Although it is most associated with the South, other parts of the country have tried to resort to it, as well. Now progressive cities and states are joining the list. They have no equivalent of John C. Calhoun, the brilliant, if catastrophically wrong, South Carolina statesman who developed a sophisticated defense of the concept. Instead, they want de facto nullification, or nullification as a practical matter rather than a theory. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass has been quite clear about this. 'We need to stop the raids,' she insists. 'The only thing it does is contribute to chaos.' Her attitude would take Los Angeles well beyond its status as a sanctuary city, which involves not affirmatively cooperating with the feds, and make it something else — effectively a no-go zone for immigration officers and a jurisdiction that affirmatively resists them. Of course, the anti-ICE resistance would reject any association with the massive resistance of yore, arguing that its cause is just, in contrast to the segregationist South. But violent opposition to law-enforcement officers acting within their lawful powers is deeply wrong, whatever the underlying cause (and mass illegal immigration imposes significant costs on our society). If enforcing our laws is offensive to progressives, they should seek to change the statutes in question and to pass a large-scale amnesty, rather than relying on a rioter's veto to dictate what ICE agents can do and where they can go. Violent mobs have no legitimate part to play in our democratic republic, not in Oxford, Miss., in 1962, not in Los Angeles, Calif., or anywhere else inspired by its sordid example in 2025. Twitter: @RichLowry
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Los Angeles protests: Week of unrest in startling images
There has been great unrest in Los Angeles over the past week due to immigration raids conducted by the Department of Homeland Security. There have been numerous protests and arrests. While many have been civil and peaceful, others have erupted into violence with everything from fireworks, cement blocks, and even a street sign thrown at authorities. As of Friday, more than 100 arrested faced charges for failure to disperse. Some have more serious charges, including assault with a deadly weapon and attempted murder with a Molotov cocktail. This article originally appeared on The List Wire: Los Angeles anti-ICE protests and unrest in images


New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
LA riots against immigration raids: Letters to the Editor — June 14, 2025
The Issue: Riots in Los Angeles protesting federal immigration raids. Yet again, Democrats have resorted to violence to achieve their anti-American objectives ('Streets of fury,' June 11). We are a nation of laws that ensure the safety of our citizens. However, Democrats consistently encourage violent criminals to enter our country illegally and then organize mobs to wreak havoc on our cities and destroy property to terrorize us. When will this end? When we have a civil war? Peaceful protest is a fundamental right — violent and destructive riots are not. I strongly encourage my fellow Americans to resolve differences through dialogue and debate, respecting the rule of law, instead of resorting to violence that will bring about our collective ruin. Michael Pravica Henderson, Nev. Protesters are disguising themselves, trespassing and destroying private property. Yet some are calling them 'patriots.' How shameful: America is better than this. All protesters should be arrested. David DeLuca Palm Bay, Fla. What nauseates me is when the media refers to the angry, criminal rioters in many American cities as 'protesters.' When someone throws bottles, concrete, Molotov cocktails, spits at the police, uses explosives, burns the American Flag and then spits on it and assaults the police, they are now part of the criminal element and should now be referred to as 'criminal rioters.' Look at Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago and Atlanta. Those images of radical destructive behavior should be burned into all of your gray matter. Those photos are real images of a society gone mad. Peter Gryzmolowicz Farmingdale, NJ Thank you, New York Post, for covering what is really happening on the streets of Los Angeles. Everyone should take note that Keffiyeh-clad Hamas supporters were on prominent display at both the LA riots and Manhattan protests. One may legitimately ask what the Middle East has to do with securing our borders. The answer is disturbingly simple: It's not about Israel or illegal immigration, and it never was. These protesters and, more importantly, their organizers, are systemically attacking all vestiges of US authorities that seek to enforce the rule of law. Aided and abetted by liberalism run amuck in our schools, universities and mainstream media, these protestors represent a clear and present danger to our national security. Stu Rubinfeld Manhattan Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters In a sane world, which apparently excludes Democrats, no one would oppose deporting criminal illegal aliens. You would think that the more criminals we get out of the country, the safer our nation would be. So what is it with Democrats standing up for these hardened felons? How can Democrats not see what they're doing to the fabric of this country? It's insane, unconscionable and very dangerous to protest in support of keeping these heinous people here in America. Louie Rey Summerville, SC The LA protests are peaceful, President Biden is as sharp as ever, the border is secured and James Comey had no idea what '86' meant. How can any American citizen really feel safe under Democratic leadership? John Avelli Brooklyn Seeing the smiling faces of demonstrators as they are released on recognizance from the courthouse really irks me. I get it. They've made their point, but liberal judges will only throw out any charge they are given, wasting taxpayer time and money. Perhaps a hefty fine that would go toward the cost of dealing with these miscreants would discourage their obnoxious, disruptive behavior. Donna Torres Island Park President Trump advised the gathered crowd on Jan. 6 that if they wanted to protest, to protest peacefully. Democrats were quick to criticize him for not calling for calm quickly enough. Today, the left criticizes Trump for overstepping with the National Guard. The double standard is getting old. Deirdre Harvey Valley Stream Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.