Need for permanent chief medical officer of health 'dire,' says Alberta Medical Association
Alberta's health minister says the search for a permanent chief medical medical officer of health is in the early stages, prompting concerns about health leadership as the province continues to battle its worst measles outbreak in nearly three decades.
The total number of confirmed cases since the outbreaks began in March surged to 210 on Friday. That's the highest case count since 1997, when 242 cases were reported.
The escalating case numbers come at a time when the province is without a permanent top doctor.
The provincial government appointed an interim chief medical officer of health after Dr. Mark Joffe opted not to renew his contract in mid-April. He had been in the role since November 2022.
Joffe left as calls grew for him to take to the podium and speak directly to Albertans about the measles outbreaks. At the time, doctors raised concerns about whether he was allowed to speak publicly on the matter.
The province has not yet found a permanent replacement.
"I think the need to get someone who has expertise in the role is dire," said Dr. Shelley Duggan, president of the Alberta Medical Association.
"It could be tricky. But I think it's important. There's lots of people trained in public health. We need to get somebody in Alberta. And we need to let them develop a campaign and work with their team to get the messaging out."
When asked by CBC News about the search for a replacement, Health Minister Adriana LaGrange did not say how much interest there is in the job. Nor did she say how many candidates have been interviewed.
"We're at the initial stages of the search," she said at a news conference on Thursday.
"We were quite hopeful that Dr. Joffe would have extended his contract. Since that hasn't happened, we are just at the initial stages of the search. And I'll keep you posted as we go along this road."
When it comes to concerns about how the province will handle its surging measles cases without a permanent CMOH in place, she said she's confident in the work of the public health teams.
"It's the local [medical officers of health] that are in the communities, that are on the ground working with those communities, that are most affected. They report up to the CMOH. So there's obviously a lot of interaction that happens."
LaGrange said measles immunizations have increased this year compared to last year due to the work of those teams.
When asked if she ever refused to greenlight any requests Joffe made about how to handle the measles outbreak, LaGrange did not answer directly, noting instead that she had many conversations with him about how to reach impacted communities.
"There are hot spots, but we do not have a provincial outbreak of measles," she said when pressed further.
Recruitment in question
"Recruitment and retention of qualified public health leaders and health leaders, in general in this province, has become increasingly difficult," said Lorian Hardcastle, associate professor in the faculty of law and the Cumming School of Medicine at the University of Calgary.
She said concerns about politicization of public health could be a deterrent.
"And given the revolving door of public health officials — of [Alberta Health Services] CEOs, of the AHS board — I think it's going to be difficult to recruit and retain qualified people to these kinds of roles in this province."
It's problematic, she said, to be facing measles outbreaks with people moving in and out of the job.
"You don't want to have those transitions in the context of a public health crisis. You want consistent, clear messaging from the same trusted authority. And I don't think they're positioned to do that."
The Alberta NDP said it, too, is skeptical about Alberta's ability to recruit a new top doctor.
"[Premier Danielle Smith] ran a leadership campaign showing disrespect to science, to public health, to experts, and it continues. And now she's got control over that office and it's caused a lot of chaos," said NDP health critic Sarah Hoffman, adding she's not surprised a permanent replacement is not in place.
"It is concerning because there should be separation between those who are in charge of gathering evidence and those who are in controlling political messaging."
Changes coming about through the UCP government's health system overall could be a further deterrent, according to Hoffman.
Bill 55, the Health Statutes Amendment Act, was tabled on Thursday. If passed, zone medical officers of health who are now part of Alberta Health Services will move to Alberta Health.
The plan has sparked concern about the consolidation of decision-making power — for matters relating to the health of Albertans — within the ministry.
"It is really important that we have experts that are entrusted to give their very best advice and direction. And when you're within the department, you don't have that same independence," said Hoffman.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

2 hours ago
Dentists praise Canadian Dental Care program, but also express concern over influx of new patients
A northern Ontario dentist says the Canadian Dental Care Plan has generally been positive, but he worries it could cause issues meeting higher demand for dental care over the long term. In June, eligible Canadians between the ages of 18 and 64 can start receiving dental coverage under the plan. Dr. Thomas Detert, a dental surgeon based in Blind River, said the dental plan is bringing in patients who haven't been to a dentist's office in years. Some of them are like over 10 or 15 years because when they retired, they lost their benefits, he said. In some cases, Detert said those patients had good oral hygiene habits and didn't need significant dental care. But in other cases, they put off going to the dentist until they were in serious pain, and needed significant work. While the program has benefited those people, Detert said there's a risk demand for dental care could outstrip the ability of dentists and other oral health professionals to meet it. Much like our socialized medicine in Canada, without proper prevention and education, the demand [has] outstripped any amount of supply that can be thrown at it. And that's what I'm afraid of for socialized dentistry, he said. Around 3.6 million Canadians have been approved by the Canadian Dental Care Plan and around 1.9 million people received care through the plan, as of April. Dr. Jerry Smith, a dentist from Thunder Bay, Ont., and the past president of the Ontario Dental Association, said another 4.5 million Canadians could qualify for the plan with the cohort of people between the ages of 18 and 64. Smith agreed the plan has been positive for people who might not be able to afford dental care otherwise. But he worries a shortage of dental hygienists and assistants will make it challenging for dentists to properly serve an influx of new patients. In Ontario alone, there is a shortage of about 3,400 dental assistants and about 5,500 dental hygienists, he said, quoting figures from a 2022 analysis conducted by the Ontario Dental Association. The Canadian Dental Association estimates that with the increase in patients from the Canadian Dental Care Plan, Canada will need an additional 2,300 dental assistants and over 1,500 dental hygienists in 2025. The numbers from the Ontario Dental Association reference its estimates for the total shortage in the province. In a statement to CBC News Marg Harrington, the CEO of the Ontario Dental Hygienists' Association, said that while some dental practices might struggle attracting dental hygienists, the narrative of a provincewide shortage is inaccurate. The fact is there are more dental hygienists in Ontario than ever before, Harrington said. Registration data from the College of Dental Hygienists of Ontario show a steady increase over the past few years in the number of dental hygienists registered in Ontario. Harrington said that research published last month in the BMC Oral Health journal showed that Ontario had 97 registered dental hygienists per 100,000 population in 2023, which is substantially higher than other provinces. Jonathan Migneault (new window) · CBC News


Canada Standard
3 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Q&A: How Deep Energy Retrofits Can Unlock Health Care Savings in Alberta
Across Canada, provinces like British Columbia, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and Ontario are investing in energy retrofits to cut emissions, lower energy bills, and improve health. But Alberta stands apart-not for what it's doing, but for what it isn't. There, 42% of 598,000 homes built before 1980 need repairs and upgrades. But Alberta is the only province or territory that doesn't allow utilities to engage in demand-side management (DSM) programs-initiatives that help people use less energy by funding things like insulation, heat pumps, and efficient appliances. Amid increasing wildfire smoke, extreme heat, and rising energy prices, retrofit advocates are working to build institutional support for programs to make homes safer for Albertans. Though retrofits can be costly and complex, a new Pembina Institute report shows their full value emerges when health care savings are factored into the equation. For example, researchers in England found that poor housing conditions cost their country's health care system $3 billion each year. Simply fixing homes that were too cold would save the National Health Service $1.8 billion per year in avoided costs, the study found. In New Zealand, researchers uncovered remarkable health and energy savings from retrofits made during a multi-year insulation and clean heating program, writes Pembina. After tracking hospitalization rates, prescription costs, and mortality across retrofitted and non-retrofitted homes, they found that insulation had the most benefit, while the biggest health savings came from reduced mortality. The program had a net return of $1.03 billion in health and energy savings-for every dollar spent, four dollars were returned. The Energy Mix talked with report author Raidin Blue, an analyst with the Pembina Institute's buildings program, about Alberta's retrofit gap, its health and equity impacts, and what's needed to drive policy change. The Mix : Why is it important to highlight both health and energy savings when making the case for deep retrofits? View our latest digests Retrofits aren't just about energy-they have a broader value proposition that we aren't capturing. We believe deep retrofits can be key to making life more affordable for Canadians, which is a huge priority right now. The business case for deep retrofits needs to be expanded to include non-energy benefits: improved health and safety, enhanced resilience, and better insurance coverage. When all of that is factored in, deep retrofits make strong financial sense. The Mix : Who do you hope will act on this report-and what message do you want them to walk away with? Building owners. I want them to understand that health is tied to housing-we spend 90% of our lives indoors. Poor ventilation? Air quality issues can damage your lungs. Struggling to keep your home warm in winter? Chronic cold is linked to cardiovascular issues. Both owners and tenants can face serious health impacts from their buildings, and retrofits are a powerful solution. The Mix: You highlight vulnerable households-like low-income families and seniors-living in poor-quality housing, yet Alberta has no province-wide retrofit strategy. However, we are seeing targeted programs like the Metis Government's federally funded $9.24-million retrofit initiative. What would it take to build broader political or institutional support for retrofits in Alberta? And should the feds step up with funding? People in Alberta want to retrofit. The demand is there. It is great to see this initiative from the Metis Government. The City of Calgary also expanded its Home Upgrades Program, and 20-some communities are involved in Alberta Municipalities' Clean Energy Improvement Program (CEIP). Unfortunately, CEIP programs are often out of reach for vulnerable populations, since the funding is tied to property taxes-and many low-income families and seniors don't own their homes. In provinces and territories where there are utility-led Demand-Side Management (DSM) programs, retrofit initiatives are common, and many focus specifically on low-income housing. These programs offer stable, year-over-year funding that building owners can rely on. So a key first step would be for Alberta-a DSM outlier in Canada-to enable utilities to administer and invest in them. At the federal level, the Canada Greener Homes Affordability Program has allocated C$800 to $900 million across the country to support retrofits in low- to median-income homes. So far, Alberta is the only province not actively working to access those funds. In most other jurisdictions, they're managed through a combination of designated agencies and utilities. To advance deep retrofits in Alberta and across Canada, all levels of government need to work more closely with important players like Natural Resources Canada, Infrastructure Canada, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, insurance companies, and health authorities. We need to better understand the impacts of retrofits on everything from health to resilience to affordability-and then create stable supports and incentives. That's when building owners will begin to see real returns on deep retrofit investments-beyond just utility bill savings and emissions reductions. The Mix : You've drawn on international examples from Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Are conditions in Alberta different enough that more local research is still needed? Where should that work start? It is great to see that Australia saved senior households $840 a winter-I think a health-focused retrofit study in Alberta would see significant health savings. We had hesitations with extrapolations because our examples vary from Alberta in both climate and by types of buildings-so we tried not to make direct comparisons. Alberta-specific pilots would showcase the health benefits of retrofits to building owners, local and provincial governments, and the retrofit industry as a whole. Fortunately, these benefits are likely to emerge even without extensive data collection or formal studies. A good starting point could be post-retrofit surveys, where program managers ask tenants about increased comfort or improvements in their overall health and well-being. From there, deeper research could explore reductions in sick days or asthma symptoms. This means working with health care providers to make stronger links between retrofits, health outcomes, and avoided health care costs. The Mix: Are there any promising examples in Canada-provincial or local-where health research is already influencing retrofit policy or program design? Canadians are really starting to make this connection between our built environment and health. For years people have discussed active transportation, walkable cities, and their health benefits. The University of Alberta has a Climate Change + Health Hub and the Housing for Health initiative because these are important issues to Albertans. Look to the 2021 heat dome, when 619 people died in British Columbia, 66 in Alberta. The B.C. government responded with a formal coroner's investigation and the province worked with utility BC Hydro to provide free air conditioners to vulnerable people. Similar programs were also launched in Oregon and Washington State. These are promising, but still just responses to acute events-they don't take a whole-building approach to deep retrofits. I want policy-makers and researchers to understand that-beyond heat waves-there are chronic health impacts associated with our housing. The Mix : What makes you optimistic that this framing will gain traction? Are decision-makers starting to think differently about the value of deep retrofits? Retrofits do make a difference and that gives me optimism. They are the one form of climate policy that does both climate mitigation and adaptation. They can make our homes healthier, safer, and more affordable. Part of our work over the next year will be to bring together all of these pieces for a complete deep retrofit business case. We just need coordinated efforts from all orders of government, utilities, insurance and investment sectors, and building owners, to keep Canadians healthy and safe. Source: The Energy Mix


CBC
19 hours ago
- CBC
Physicians brace for summer travel season as Alberta tops 800 measles cases
As summer approaches, Alberta's measles case counts are expected to keep climbing and some experts worry transmission will become even more widespread. With 31 new cases reported over the weekend, Alberta's total case count jumped to 809 by midday Monday. Five people are currently hospitalized due to the virus, including two patients who are in intensive care. The outbreaks began in March and while cases have been confirmed in all zones, the south, central and north zones are the hardest hit. "This is not showing signs of slowing at this point," said Caroline Colijn, a professor and Canada Research Chair of Mathematics for Evolution, Infection and Public Health at Simon Fraser University. She predicts Alberta's measles case counts will keep climbing for months. "I would expect it will continue to transmit and find pathways through our population to reach people who are not protected." Dr. Sam Wong, president of the Alberta Medical Association's section of pediatrics, is worried about what's to come. "In a few weeks' time, if the numbers keep going ... I think that we're going to hit over 1,000 [cases]. We're going to hit more measles cases in Alberta than they have in the States," said Wong. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1,168 cases had been confirmed in the entire country, as of June 6. "That is mind-boggling to me," Wong said. "And it speaks to the failure of the [Alberta] government to do their job when they could have done it earlier on." Summer travel At the University of Calgary, Craig Jenne will be watching the trends in the coming weeks. He's concerned summer activities, such as travel, could spark even more widespread transmission. "As we get into the next several weeks people will be starting summer vacations. We will see festivals ... Calgary Stampede is in a few weeks. We may then see community level transmission expand beyond the south zone," said Jenne, a professor in the department of microbiology, immunology and infectious diseases. Experts say a single case of measles transported into an area with low vaccination rates is akin to a spark landing in a tinder dry forest. "I think travel between and among communities with low immunization ... will allow the virus a path to get into a new, close-knit community where vaccination rates are low," said Colijn. The south zone accounts for 71.6 per cent of Alberta's total cases. A standing exposure advisory remains in effect for that part of the province due to widespread transmission. Health officials have warned official case counts are the "tip of the iceberg" in southern Alberta due to unreported and undetected cases. Dr. Paul Parks is seeing that firsthand in the Medicine Hat emergency room where he works. He, too, is bracing for further outbreaks in the province. "It's such a contagious illness," said Parks, who is also the past-president of the Alberta Medical Association. "As people are out at mass gathering events and as Stampede comes and as all these different events happen, we're going to have more and more spread." The measles virus can hang in the air for several hours after an infected person leaves a location. More than 90 per cent of people who are not immune and are exposed to the virus will end up infected, according to the Alberta government. "The other thing to think about is ... Alberta could be a source of measles introductions to other places," said Colijn. "We may see a broader geographic spread because of summer travel from Alberta more than to Alberta. That's very hard to predict." The vast majority of Alberta's cases are among unimmunized individuals, provincial data shows. Measles can lead to serious complications including pneumonia, brain inflammation, premature delivery and even death. Children under the age of five, people with weakened immune systems and pregnant individuals are at the highest risk of severe complications. The province says 64 Albertans have been hospitalized due to measles this year, as of May 31. Ten of those people have ended up in intensive care.