
Tony Hudgell's birth mother Jody Simpson to be freed from prison
The birth mother of Tony Hudgell, who injured him so badly as a baby his legs had to be amputated, is to be released from prison.In 2018 Tony's birth parents Anthony Smith and Jody Simpson were sentenced to 10 years in prison.Tony was adopted by Paula and Mark Hudgell, from Kent, and has since raised millions of pounds for charity through a series of challenges.A spokesperson for the parole board confirmed a panel had directed that Simpson be released following an oral hearing.
Both Simpson and Smith had denied assaulting, ill treating or neglecting their child.Mrs Hudgell posted on social media criticising the release.She said: "Tony has life long injuries every day he suffers due to her hands."In 2024, Tony, from West Malling, underwent surgery to be fitted for new prosthetics to allow him to walk without crutches.He has received the British Empire Medal for services to the prevention of child abuse.
The parole board spokesperson said decisions were "solely focused on what risk a prisoner could represent to the public if released and whether that risk is manageable in the community".They added: "A panel will carefully examine a huge range of evidence, including details of the original crime, and any evidence of behaviour change, as well as explore the harm done and impact the crime has had on the victims."They said hundreds of pages of evidence and reports would have been read in the lead up to an oral hearing.They also said evidence from witnesses such as probation officers, psychiatrists and psychologists, officials supervising the offender in prison as well as victim personal statements may be given at the hearing.They added: "Parole reviews are undertaken thoroughly and with extreme care. Protecting the public is our number one priority."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Furious locals demand action after their beautiful beach is 'taken over by gay nudist men having sex in public'
Furious locals claim a nearby beach has been taken over by gay nudist men having sex in public. Residents of the pretty village of Corton near Lowestoft, Suffolk are demanding an end to what they describe as a growing phenomenon in the area. They suggest men are travelling to the picturesque sands to engage in sexual activities. Local Labour MP Jess Asato has joined residents in a walk along the beach in protest against the trend. She said: 'Residents are fed up with their beach being made a no-go area due to criminal sexual behaviour. 'Our walk was a symbol of their efforts to ensure that no-one is feels afraid to use it - and send a signal that we will not tolerate what amounts to criminal acts.' One local, a retired newspaper executive, said: 'It's no longer safe to take children there to play on their beach. 'It started about three years ago and has got worse every year since since - I was with my two and three-year-old grandchildren last summer and there were naked men deliberately showing off and flaunting themselves. Residents of the pretty village of Corton near Lowestoft, Suffolk are demanding an end to what they describe as a growing phenomenon in the area 'It is so offensive that we can no longer take our grandchildren to play on the beach. 'Unfortunately the beach is now getting a reputation - and becoming famous - so the problem will only get worse. 'Apart from the holidaymakers here there are people who live her all the time and now in the summer they can't go down to the sea.' The Azure Seas village, which has more than 100 holiday and permanent cabins and homes which cost up to £200,000, overlooks the beach and has its own direct access to the sea. Sales manager Duncan Gooch said: 'It's got nothing to do with nudity whatsoever - it is the behaviour of some of the men who go there, a group who think it is okay to indulge in lewd and sexual behaviour on the beach, openly in front of other people. 'It is blatant and deliberate - some men are clearly exhibitionists and we take offence - as does everyone living or staying here - at their behaviour. 'Things have got worse over recent so year and are now so bad that a lot of people simply won't go onto the beach because it is full of naked exhibitionists parading up and down and having sex. 'We have complained to the police and they say they will look into it. 'But they told us there was nothing we could do about it. Callers who complain are simply give a reference number. 'We have 100 holiday and permanent homes here but this perverted sexual activity - which goes on from dawn until after dusk - is not what they want to see.' In a bid to curb the trend, a notice warning against it was erected by the beach. It has since been taken down. The sign read: 'Corton Beach is not a naturist beach. 'Lewd behaviour will not be tolerated and may be recorded by CCTV and reported to the police. 'Causing an offence to others is a criminal offence and all cases will be reported form prosecution. By order of Corton Parish Council.' The local authority said it put up the sign following a string of complaints from resident. A council spokesman said: 'Businesses overlooking the beach have also been severely impacted, reporting substantial financial losses directly attributed to these behaviours. 'The parish council is obligated to support and protect the parishioners and businesses. 'Our stance remains unchanged - we recognise that nudism is a legal activity and our sign was a warning to individuals whose lewd activities were causing distress to other beach-goers.' District councillor Paul Ashdown said: 'Most people are aware that sunbathing in the nude on the beach is not illegal but residents have witnessed lewd behaviour which is offensive and should not be conducted in a public space.' MailOnline has approached Suffolk Police for comment.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Residents' fury after wealthy neighbour extends his 'horrific' £1million 'American-style McMansion' without planning permission sparking 'war for the ages'
Civil war has erupted on a leafy street over a 'horrific' extension on a £1million property which neighbours claim they knew nothing about until it was finished. Locals claim the new property is in breach of planning rules and looks like a ' Los Angeles McMansion'. The row has kicked off in the peaceful village of Stoke Poges in Buckinghamshire, where locals are 'gearing up' for a 'planning battle'. Councillors on Stoke Poges Parish Council and locals have accused owner Jag Bahia of breaching planning permission granted for his extension works on the property. The property's extended garage and roof, as well as altered window layouts, all deviate from the original plans approved by Buckinghamshire Council. Nearby residents agreed with the parish council's objection that the finished works are not in keeping with the traditional English character of the area - with one neighbour saying it was like living across the road from an American mansion. Tracey Harvey, who has lived on the road for 22 years, said: 'It's just shocking to look at. It would look good in Hollywood - not here. 'We are crying out for houses and yet people aren't allowed to build. But they get away with it - it's a joke.' LOST IN TRANSLATION: Before and after plans reveal huge scale of development which neighbours say happened behind their backs LOST IN TRANSLATION: Before and after plans reveal huge scale of development which neighbours say happened behind their backs Tracey's husband Frank, 88, said: 'We're a bit down about it all. It's what people do - they chance it. It's what's going on all over this world - I don't get it.' A resident nearby said the finished works left the house too large for its plot - and strict repercussions should be carried out for any planning breaches. She said: 'Everyone thinks it's oversized for the plot. I feel sorry for the neighbours. I think it's way too big for where it is. It's horrific. She said: 'If they fine them, they should make it more than £20,000. It would send a message. There should be repercussions. 'Rule are there for a reason. Why should one person get away with it? It seems it's about how much money you can throw at it.' One nearby resident, who asked not to be named, said they had made dozens of reports to the Environment Agency due to builders burning material in the property's garden during the works - but there was no indication that the issue was followed-up. They said: 'It's a shame that we have got a situation where rather than the local authority enforcing the rules that make everything work, they put us in a position where they pit neighbour versus neighbour. Who doesn't want to get on with people?' Julie Devonald, 50, who has lived on Gerrards Cross Road for 33 years, said: 'Some people are very cheeky. You give them an inch and they then take a mile. 'Just because you have done it, it doesn't mean you can get away with it.' Another resident said: 'We're all gearing up for a planning battle.' Online records indicate that the property was sold for £1,225,000 in 2020. The parish council has called in the application for a decision by Buckinghamshire Council's East and South Area Planning Committee. In its objection, the parish council argued that the proposed changes result in an inappropriate development due to substantial alterations. They add that the development would harm both the character and setting of the area, representing an overdevelopment of the site with an unsuitable design. The planning committee will meet on Tuesday, June 10, to decide on the application. Councilor Saera Carter said the parish council had to employ an outside expert to 'unpick' the planning application and works. She said: 'The parish council employed for the first time ever a consultant to unpick this mess. We kept looking at it saying, "this doesn't make sense, this doesn't make sense".'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
NHS spent £100 million on post last year
The NHS spent at least £102 million on posting letters last year despite pledging to go digital because of unreliable deliveries. The amount spent on sending mail, which can regularly arrive late and cause missed appointments, was up by 12.5 per cent on the year before, according to new research by the Taxpayers' Alliance. The research results have been released as the health service is about to get £30 billion more over three years in Rachel Reeves's spending review this week, to the detriment of other public services. They also revealed the NHS could make major savings in electricity and laundry costs, as well as reducing the eight million missed appointments that occur each year. The Telegraph previously revealed that the Royal Mail was introducing a new NHS barcode to cut late deliveries and the risk of missed appointments. But health officials have also pledged to do more to communicate with patients online and through the NHS app. Last week, the Department of Health said the app would become the default method of communication for patients seeking appointment reminders, screening invitations and test results as part of a major investment that would mean 50 million fewer letters are posted each year. The research from the Taxpayers' Alliance found that at least £102 million was spent in 2023-24 across 120 NHS hospital trusts, an average of £850,000 each. The researchers said this was a 'growing expense' with the costs rising by 12.5 per cent on the £90.3 million spent in 2022-23. Previous research found that as many as one in four of the eight million appointments that patients miss each year were because letters to patients arrived after the date of the planned appointment. Simon Cook, a research fellow of the Taxpayers' Alliance, said the public 'expect the NHS to double down on cutting any inefficient and wasteful expenditure'. 'With the health service facing financial pressures, there are huge savings to be made through simple, common sense changes,' he said. 'Ministers must recognise that sometimes the biggest savings don't always require major reforms, just the will to act.' The research paper also found that the NHS could save more than £150 million on electricity costs if it utilised its buying power. It said the average cost of electricity across NHS trusts in England was 30.5p per kWh in 2023-24, which was 'typically the rate that medium-sized businesses pay'. £154m potential laundry savings The NHS is the biggest single employer in Europe and 'if every NHS trust paid the average extra-large non-domestic consumer price of 22.6p, the saving would amount to £154 million in 2023-24,' the researchers said. The researchers also found significant discrepancies across the country in the amount being spent on laundry. While the NHS spent £270 million to launder 555 million items at an average cost of 48.7p per item, some areas achieved lower costs of 25p per item, while others spent £1.20. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: 'This government inherited a broken NHS with wasteful spending, in desperate need of reform. 'Yesterday, we announced major investment in the NHS app to turbocharge our digital revolution – saving hundreds of millions in taxpayers' money spent on stamps and envelopes, and enabling push notifications and reminders to help cut missed appointments. We are also cutting NHS energy bills through solar power and renewable energy – delivering further savings for the taxpayer. 'Through our Plan for Change, we are reforming the NHS to ensure that every penny is spent on what matters most.' An NHS England spokesman said: 'Millions of patients are already receiving appointment reminders, screening invitations, and test results direct to their smartphones from the NHS, saving millions of pounds, avoiding the need for letters and freeing-up resources for patient care. 'People without access to smartphones and elderly patients will still receive messages through traditional routes such as letters to ensure they don't miss important information. 'The NHS is continually exploring ways to achieve the best possible value for taxpayers, including making targeted investment in technologies that can enable us to optimise our resources and boost productivity.'