How the Utah Legislature impacted families this year
The Utah Legislature wrapped up its 2025 legislative session late Friday, having passed 582 bills. Utah families will be impacted by these laws — let's look at a few that passed and a few that did not.
SB242 by Sen. Calvin Musselman, R-West Haven, expanded coverage for infertility treatments, including in vitro fertilization, for anyone covered by the Public Employees' Benefit and Insurance Program. According to KSL, the insurance premiums for state employees will increase by about 37 cents per member per month.
Doulas, trained to support and help pregnant, laboring and new mothers, could be covered by Medicaid if approved by the federal government. SB284 by Sen. Luz Escamilla, D-Salt Lake City, passed nearly unanimously and requires Utah to apply to the federal government for permission to expand its Medicaid plan to cover doula services by Oct. 1.
HB129, by Rep. Ray Ward, R-Bountiful, will allow adopted individuals to access their adoption records when they turn 18. All Utah adoptions are currently sealed records.
HB30 by Rep. Angela Romero, D-Salt Lake City, would have allowed Native American tribes in Utah to establish foster home standards and oversee child custody cases, ensuring community-driven, culturally aligned solutions for Native children. This bill never made it out of the Rules Committee after being introduced the first day of the session.
HB100 by Rep. Tyler Clancy, R-Provo, expands the free school breakfast and lunch program in Utah to families who qualify for reduced school lunch under current federal guidelines. This bill was a priority bill for the Utah Policy Project this year.
The Utah Fits All scholarship has some new funding guidelines and accountability guardrails under HB455 by Rep. Candice Pierucci, R-Herriman. Homeschooled Utah Fits All students 5 to 11 years old will have access to $4,000 a year, while those 12 to 18 years old will get $6,000. Private school students are still eligible for $8,000 a year, the previous amount available to all. The new law also limits extracurricular expenses to 20% of the scholarship amount and limits physical education expenses to an additional 20%. Also — families can't buy furniture with this money.
HB209, by Rep. Nicholeen Peck, R-Tooele, removes the requirement for homeschooling parents to attest to their own criminal background when choosing to homeschool their children. That means convictions for child abuse, domestic violence committed in the presence of a child, child abuse homicide, sexual exploitation of a minor and other felony offenses no longer need to be disclosed.
No cellphones, smart watches or other devices in schools under SB178 by Sen. Lincoln Fillmore, R-South Jordan. This bill will go into effect this summer, impacting the 2025/2026 school year. While local schools and districts can create their own policies that are different, this is now the default policy across the state.
HB104 by Rep. Rex Shipp, R-Cedar City, requires schools to teach firearm safety, beginning as early as kindergarten. The instruction would be required three times during elementary school, at least once in junior high and at least once in high school. Parents can opt out if they choose.
SB189 by Escamilla and Rep. Karianne Lisonbee, R-Clearfield, would have allowed vacant, state-owned buildings to be retrofitted for licensed child care facilities. Under the bill, 40% of the slots would have been allocated for state workers and military families. However, this bill did not pass the Legislature for a second year in a row. The day after this bill was killed, and 44 minutes before International Women's Day, the Utah Legislature officially eliminated the Women in the Economy Commission, the group that had advocated for this plan.
HB363 by Pierucci addresses newborn testing via heelstick screen that occurs shortly after birth. This bill requires a privacy consent form, and the destruction of the baby's blood sample, following the Department of Health's retention schedule, or immediately following the test if parents do not consent to the retention schedule. It also requires a newborn hearing screening.
HB81 by Rep. Stephanie Gricius, R-Eagle Mountain, prohibits the use of fluoride in public water systems and prohibits local governments from passing or enforcing any rules or ordinances that would allow or require fluoride to be added to public water systems. Utah will be the first state in the nation to ban fluoride in drinking water once this bill goes into effect on May 7, 2025.
SB24 by Sen. Don Ipson, R-St. George, creates a new criminal offense for child torture and amends definitions of child abuse and aggravated criminal child abuse. This bill was inspired by the Gavin Peterson and Franke-Hildebrandt cases.
There will also be less money to help victims of domestic violence and sexual assault this year, as Utah lawmakers either decreased requests for funding or denied them altogether. Rep. Gay Lynn Bennion, D-Cottonwood Heights, asked for $1.4 million for Utah's 16 domestic violence service providers, in spite of a surge in demand. The Social Services Appropriations Subcommittee prioritized $1.3 million, but the final budget allocated zero dollars. There was also no money for strangulation forensic exam reimbursement, of the $260,000 requested. Rape crisis centers were hoping for $3.25 million in ongoing funding, had $1.625 million prioritized and instead received $600,000 of one-time money. Rep. Angela Romero asked for $300,000 of ongoing funds to staff the 24/7 Statewide Sexual Assault helplines available in both English and Spanish. The helpline received $100,000 of one-time money.
HB106 gives Utahns a fifth year of tax cuts, lowering the income tax rate from 4.55% to 4.5%. The average Utah family will see annual savings of about $45. The bill also gives businesses a 20% tax credit for creating new child care options for employees and expands the child tax credit to include children who are 5 years old and under the age of 1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
30 minutes ago
- Axios
Poll: Rep. Gabe Evans' approval lags behind Trump's
Republican U.S. Rep. Gabe Evans' favorability rating five months into the job is lower than President Trump's among registered voters in the congressman's district, according to a poll released Tuesday. Stunning stat: Evans' favorability (40%) lagged behind Trump's (45%) in Colorado's 8th District, which stretches from the suburbs north of Denver toward Greeley. The big picture: More than half of registered voters in the state's most competitive congressional district would be less likely to vote for a candidate who voted to cut Medicaid funding, per a poll released by Healthier Colorado, a nonprofit that supports expanding the federal safety net program. Why it matters: The poll comes as a major warning for Evans, who's gunning for reelection next year while staunchly defending the "big, beautiful bill" calling for historic reductions in Medicaid spending. Context: The poll, conducted from May 29 to June 4, included 404 registered 8th District voters, per Healthier Colorado. The survey had a margin of error of +/- 4.87% at the 95% confidence interval. State of play: A majority of 8th District voters (53%) share a favorable view of the safety net program, the poll shows, citing the health care access it provides to low-income and vulnerable people. Less than a quarter of respondents (23%) hold an unfavorable opinion of Medicaid. Between the lines: Republicans like Evans are framing the federal spending proposal as a measure to curb fraud and waste in the federal safety net program — but most voters aren't buying that, Healthier Colorado CEO Jake Williams said during a Tuesday press call. What they're saying:"Republicans' plan increases Medicaid spending every single year and makes the program more efficient by cutting out fraud, waste, and abuse," Delanie Bomar, a spokesperson for Evans' reelection campaign, said in a statement.


Gizmodo
44 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Elon Musk's Moment of Regret
On March 15, 2021, a rather unusual detail emerged in a Tesla filing with the SEC: Elon Musk's official title was listed as 'Technoking of Tesla.' The billionaire later clarified this whimsical change as a humorous jab at corporate formalities. Yet, beyond the jest, it perfectly encapsulated his audacious approach: deeply unconventional, unconcerned with tradition, and utterly dismissive of decorum. His self-assigned mission has always been to farcically upend established norms and forcefully impose his unique vision on the world. This distinctive style manifests as an unapologetic infusion of private-sphere behaviors into the corporate realm. Musk, for instance, has never shied away from engaging in heated arguments on social media, often employing colorful language and pointed insults that would undoubtedly lead to a CEO's swift dismissal or at least a stern warning from their board. He routinely uses X (formerly Twitter), the 'public town square' he acquired in late 2022, to settle scores. 'Gates is a huge liar,' he famously declared on May 8, referring to philanthropist and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. Gates's perceived transgression? Daring to criticize the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a brainchild of the Trump administration. Trump had tasked Musk with streamlining the federal government by slashing spending and reducing costs, and DOGE, the agency specifically created for Musk's oversight, quickly alienated nearly every other government member, becoming a lightning rod for public dissatisfaction with the administration. Musk had previously posted an insulting meme targeting Gates, whose 'great sin,' in Musk's eyes, was allegedly shorting Tesla stock years prior, effectively betting on its decline. Throughout these episodes, Tesla's board of directors, largely composed of loyalists and close associates, remained conspicuously silent. Millions of fans on X, however, cheered him on, further solidifying his image as a 'king' adored by his subjects. He largely ignored the few dissenting voices. As his financial power swelled, Musk's sense of invincibility grew. Donald Trump's return to the White House, a victory to which Musk contributed over $290 million according to filings with the Federal Election Commission, ultimately granted him the political influence he had previously lacked. He found himself wielding a rare trifecta of power: immense wealth, political sway, and control over crucial social media platforms (X and xAI). However, on June 5, the tech mogul discovered that even his immense power had its limits. He escalated his criticism of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' Trump's signature budget bill, which includes cuts to Medicaid and Medicare, increased national debt, and the elimination of subsidies for green cars. This time, he directly and personally attacked Trump, bemoaning the former president's 'ingratitude,' claiming Trump wouldn't have won without his support. He went so far as to express support for Trump's impeachment, controversially linking it to the Epstein Files, a fixation within far-right and MAGA circles. A prevalent conspiracy theory among these groups suggests that Jeffrey Epstein, the sex offender who died by hanging in prison in 2019 while facing charges of sexually abusing underage girls, was allegedly murdered to prevent him from revealing a list of powerful clients, many of whom are believed to be prominent liberals. The fact that Epstein died during Trump's presidency is conveniently disregarded by proponents of this theory. This public showdown between the world's richest man and arguably the most powerful man in the world sent shockwaves through right-wing circles, where the alliance between the two had previously been lauded. Unlike his past skirmishes, Musk did not receive the expected and hoped-for support from his legion of followers. Instead, he faced significant criticism, even from Joe Rogan, a long-time friend who had publicly asserted for months that America owed Musk a great deal. This time, however, Rogan believed Musk had overstepped. 'I understand, he owns Twitter,' Rogan commented on Musk during a June 5 episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, his popular podcast. 'I think it's bad for your mental health. Posting things publicly all day and arguing with people constantly is bad for you.' For many, Rogan's sentiment was simply playing the world's smallest violin for a man whose self-inflicted wounds were becoming increasingly apparent. It is within this unprecedented context that Musk did something entirely uncharacteristic: he issued a mea culpa. In a short, ironic post, he engaged in self-criticism, signaling a surprising moment of personal introspection. 'It's outrageous how much character assassination has been directed at me, especially by me,' he posted on the night of June 8. The post quickly garnered over 44 million views as of the time of writing. Musk's statement seems to suggest that he is the primary architect of the criticism he faces, acknowledging that he is, in essence, his own worst enemy. This reveals a rarely seen, vulnerable side of the billionaire, starkly contrasting with the public image of an untouchable figure who believes he can do no wrong. But is this genuine self-criticism, or a strategic move born out of necessity after burning bridges? Indeed, on June 7, Trump informed NBC that he had no desire to mend his relationship with Musk and threatened the billionaire with 'serious consequences' should he fund Democratic candidates against Republicans who voted for the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' in the upcoming midterms. California Congressman Ro Khanna, who has known Musk for many years, extended an olive branch to the billionaire, calling for his party to embrace him. 'Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit-exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration,' Khanna said in an interview with Semafor. 'I look forward to Elon turning his fire against MAGA Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026.' However, it is uncertain whether Democrats will heed Khanna, as Musk has become persona non grata, particularly among the party's left wing. Musk has stated he voted Democratic until Joe Biden's election. Beyond SpaceX, which holds numerous government contracts, Tesla itself is an easy target for Trump, who views the powers of the presidency as inherently personal. Tesla's net profit, in fact, plummeted 71% in the first quarter to $409 million compared to the previous year, primarily due to a sharp decline in vehicle sales. The automaker is also grappling with protests outside its stores globally, with demonstrators denouncing Musk's actions through DOGE in the U.S. and his perceived support for far-right ideologies worldwide. This erosion of goodwill is expected to continue. Initial data for the current second quarter shows a sustained decline in Tesla sales across China and Europe. Sales fell 45% in the UK in May, even as the overall EV market grew by 28%. In Germany, home to Tesla's only European factory, the decline was 36%, contrasting sharply with a 45% jump in the local market. Further demonstrating this trend, Tesla sales are down 67% in France, 54% in Sweden, 20% in Italy, 48% in Denmark, and 29% in Germany. These figures strongly suggest that Musk's reputation has been severely damaged among liberals, who constituted Tesla's core customer base due to their embrace of climate change initiatives and environmental concerns. For them, Tesla once symbolized the quintessential 'green' car. Tesla executives have been working to reassure worried investors since April. Musk himself has indicated a desire to reduce his role within the Trump administration. More significantly, he has promised that in the coming months, self-driving Teslas would be widely available in many cities thanks to advancements in FSD (Full Self-Driving), the software enabling autonomous driving. Unsupervised FSD, he implies, would make people forget this current rough patch and repair his tarnished reputation. 'I'm confident that it will be available in many cities in the US by the end of this year,' he told investors during the quarterly results presentation conference on April 22. However, this ambitious timeline hinges on regulatory approval, particularly from federal agencies. Given the increasingly fractured relationship with Trump, this green light is no longer as guaranteed as it might have seemed just a fortnight ago. The path forward appears considerably less smooth. Whether this mea culpa arrives too late remains uncertain. And Trump is never one to apologize. What is clear, however, is the division among X users. 'To err is human, to forgive is divine,' one user commented on Musk's post. 'The courage to realize that you have erred, apologize, and make amend is protecting the true essence of human to human interaction.' Conversely, another self-proclaimed Trump supporter commented, 'Shouldn't have said the things you did Elon. Burning bridges is something you shouldn't do. and you should know better. everybody took you in and this is how you get back wat everybody when you don't get your way.' For a man who almost never admits he's wrong, the slightest confession that he has painted himself into a corner is significant, though it's just a small blip in the flood of posting he engages in day-to-day. Even his own fans didn't seem to take it as an earth-shattering moment from a man they expect to deliver interplanetary leaps. As it so happens, around the same time last week, physicists at Loughborough University in England were getting their hands dirty with real advancements in nanotechnology and laying the groundwork for the world's tiniest violin. Measuring in at just 35 microns long and 13 microns wide, Musk's haters and boosters picked it up and played a sorrowful tune in his honor.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Three dozen House Republicans urge Senate GOP against ‘budget gimmicks,' deficit increases
More than three dozen House Republicans are warning Senate GOP leaders against approving additional deficit increases or using 'budget gimmicks' to count additional savings in the 'one big beautiful bill' of President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities. 'As the Senate considers changes, we remain unequivocal in our position that any additional tax cuts must be matched dollar-for-dollar by real, enforceable spending reductions,' the 37 members, led by Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.), said in a Tuesday letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), adding that the principle is the 'cornerstone' of the budget resolution framework passed by the House and is the 'minimum standard for our support.' The letter further asserted that the members would consider 'genuine savings only' as established by that House resolution. 'Offsets must come from permanent reforms that make the budget more sustainable, not timing shifts or other budget gimmicks,' the letter said. Among the signatories are House Budget Committee Chair Jodey Arrington (R-Texas), House Republican Conference Vice Chair Blake Moore (R-Utah), and many members of the House Freedom Caucus, including its chairman Andy Harris (R-Md.). The Senate is currently considering and expected to make changes to the House-passed megabill that includes extension of tax cuts that Trump signed into law in 2017; boosts to border, deportation, and defense funding; and new restrictions on Medicaid and food assistance programs that are project to result in millions of individuals losing their health insurance. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the proposed tax cuts in the plan would decrease revenues by more than $3.6 trillion over a decade, while measures to cut federal spending — including reforms to Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program —would reduce outlays by $1.2 trillion over the same period, resulting in a net deficit increase of $2.4 trillion. Several matters under consideration in the Senate would add to the deficit impact of the bill. Some GOP senators are unhappy with provisions to terminate clean energy tax breaks, while others are objecting to the around $800 billion in cuts to Medicaid through provisions like increased work requirements and $267 billion in cuts to food assistance through provisions like making states share the cost of the program for the first time. 'A reconciliation bill that relaxes fiscal discipline reflected in the House-passed bill would invite higher borrowing costs and undermine the economic growth that Americans need to maximize opportunity,' the 37 House GOP members said in the letter. 'We urge Senate leadership to keep the reconciliation measure compatible with the House framework while seizing every opportunity to deepen savings.'