MPs warn social care reforms ‘doomed to fail' without ‘robust financial case'
Recommendations from a newly launched commission into social care will be 'doomed to failure' unless the true cost of inaction in the sector is set out, MPs have warned.
The Health and Social Care Committee said there needs to be a 'robust financial case' laid out for reform, to support the moral case, which it said has 'never been stronger'.
The report comes just days after the formal launch of the Casey Commission into adult social care.
Led by Baroness Louise Casey, the independent commission will comprise of two phases which are aimed at leading to the 'transformation' of a sector which has long been said to be in need of reform.
Low pay for workers, a reliance on unpaid family carers and high costs for those in need of care are among the issues facing the sector.
In their report, published on Monday, MPs said £32 billion was spent on adult social care in the year to March 2024, and that there is 'unsustainable pressure' on local authorities amid the 'high price for a failing system'.
The MPs set out what they described as various 'unaccounted-for costs of inaction', including some two million people aged 65 and over as well as 1.5 million people of working-age not getting the care they require.
They warned of the 'unknowable, and potentially life-changing' charges for care people face, including one in seven older people with costs exceeding £100,000.
The report said 1.5 million unpaid carers are providing more than 50 hours of care weekly, with many having to cut hours or quit jobs entirely as a result, while care workers remain underpaid and twice as likely to be claiming benefits as other workers.
The MPs also warned that local authority budgets are 'buckling under the pressure of adult social care' and the care provider market is 'in distress' as it struggles to cover costs including underfunded recent increases in the National Living Wage and National Insurance.
The moral case for reform has never been stronger, but this must be accompanied by a robust financial case. Without this we fear that the reforms that come out of the Casey Commission will be doomed to failure
Health and Social Care Committee
But the report concluded that the Government 'does not have a robust understanding of the extent of the current system's failings' or good quality data on the outcomes of delivering high quality care.
The MPs said: 'Without this, it will be unable to make a clear case for reform.'
The Casey Commission's first phase is due to report next year, but the recommendations set out from that initial investigation into the sector are to be 'implemented in a phased way over a decade'.
Voices within the sector have raised concerns over this potential timeline of 2036 for some reforms to be introduced, branding it disappointing and adding that it will be 'far too late' for many older people in need of care now.
The second phase of the commission, setting out longer-term reforms, is due to report by 2028.
All recommendations 'must remain affordable', the Government has said, 'operating within the fiscal constraints of Spending Review settlements for the remainder of this Parliament'.
The health and social care committee has called on the Government to commission research to fully quantify the cost of doing nothing on adult social care reform – including costs to unpaid carers, care workers, councils, care providers, the NHS and the overall economy.
This, which just include non-monetary personal costs, such as the impact on individual wellbeing, should be completed before the Casey commission's final report 'to enable a full cost-benefit analysis of any recommendations she puts forward'.
The MPs added: 'The moral case for reform has never been stronger, but this must be accompanied by a robust financial case. Without this we fear that the reforms that come out of the Casey Commission will be doomed to failure, leaving everyone continuing to suffer under the current unsustainable system.'
Committee chairwoman Layla Moran said social care is rarely discussed as a driver of economic activity but that it has 'enormous potential' to contribute to the Government's wider aims for economic growth and employment.
She said: 'In our inquiry, we heard that an investment of £6.1 billion would provide full economic benefits of £10.7 billion – a return on investment of 175%.'
Repeating the report's findings in relation to what Government should do alongside the current commission into social care, Ms Moran added: 'Unless the Government measures the true cost of inaction and can make a convincing case to the Treasury, the recommended reforms that come out of the Casey Commission will be doomed to fail.
'We want this report to change the narrative on social care, and to act as a catalyst for building a strong and long-lasting case for reform. It might seem that reforms will be costly and difficult, but continuing with inaction will cost us all more.'
Care minister Stephen Kinnock said: 'We are grateful for the committee's work and will respond formally in due course.
'Far from inaction, this Government has hit the ground running on social care. We inherited a social care system in crisis and took immediate action with our Plan for Change – with a funding boost of up to £3.7 billion, an extra 15,000 home adaptations for disabled people, a £2,000 uplift to Carer's Allowance, and the first ever Fair Pay Agreement for care workers.
'A lot has been done, but we know there is so much more to do and deep reform is needed. That's why we appointed Baroness Louise Casey to lead the independent commission working to transcend party politics and build consensus on the future of adult social care, with her first report out next year.'
The Liberal Democrats said 'delay is no longer an option' and that there could not be a 'starker contrast' between the Government's approach and the committee's findings.
Helen Morgan, the Lib Dem social care spokesperson, said: 'Now it has been laid out in black and white that inaction is untenable, the Government must see sense and approach social care reform with the urgency it demands.
'To do anything less would be an affront to taxpayers who are currently footing this monstrous bill for a broken system which then only too often fails them in their time of need.
'People cannot be expected to pay for the privilege of their own suffering any longer.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
7 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Thousands gather for anti-austerity demonstration in London
Thousands of people have gathered to 'send a message' to the Government with a demonstration over spending cuts and welfare reform. Campaign group The People's Assembly said it expected trade unionists, campaigners and activists to attend the event in central London on Saturday. MPs Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott are among those expected to give speeches at a rally in Whitehall. The organisers accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could all be seen at the march's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. A People's Assembly spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.' The People's Assembly said it is bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing, and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No to Austerity2.0. There will be also be speeches from trade union leaders, disability rights activists, anti-poverty campaigners and groups calling for more investment in the NHS and other public services. The spokesperson added: 'We face a growing threat from the far right, fuelled by racism, division and failed politics. We need to see people's lives improve, we need to see the vulnerable cared for and an end to child poverty. 'On June 7, we march for education, for our NHS, for welfare, for refugees, against hate, and for a society in which our children can flourish.'


The Herald Scotland
7 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Thousands gather for anti-austerity demonstration in London
MPs Jeremy Corbyn and Diane Abbott are among those expected to give speeches at a rally in Whitehall. The organisers accused the Government of making spending cuts that target the poorest in society. Representatives from the National Education Union, Revolutionary Communist Party, Green Party and the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union could all be seen at the march's start point in Portland Place. The large crowd then set off towards Whitehall shortly before 1pm. Many of the protesters were holding placards that read 'Tax the rich, stop the cuts – welfare not warfare'. Other signs being held aloft said 'Nurses not nukes' and 'Cut war, not welfare'. A People's Assembly spokesperson said: 'The adherence to 'fiscal rules' traps us in a public service funding crisis, increasing poverty, worsening mental health and freezing public sector pay. Thousands of people were taking part in the march (Lucy North/PA) 'Scrapping winter fuel payments, keeping the Tory two-child benefit cap, abandoning Waspi women, cutting £5 billion of welfare by limiting Pip and universal credit eligibility, and slashing UK foreign aid from 0.5% to 0.3% of GDP, while increasing defence spending to 2.5% of GDP, are presented as 'tough choices'. 'Real tough choices would be for a Labour government to tax the rich and their hidden wealth, to fund public services, fair pay, investment in communities and the NHS.' The People's Assembly said it is bringing together trade unionists, health, disability, housing, and welfare campaigners with community organisations under the slogan: No to Austerity2.0. There will be also be speeches from trade union leaders, disability rights activists, anti-poverty campaigners and groups calling for more investment in the NHS and other public services. The spokesperson added: 'We face a growing threat from the far right, fuelled by racism, division and failed politics. We need to see people's lives improve, we need to see the vulnerable cared for and an end to child poverty. 'On June 7, we march for education, for our NHS, for welfare, for refugees, against hate, and for a society in which our children can flourish.'


Wales Online
7 hours ago
- Wales Online
Warning Wales faces exodus of dentists and patients forced to go private
Warning Wales faces exodus of dentists and patients forced to go private Patients would be seen by any dentist available and check-ups will rise in price and be moved to once every two years if a new NHS dental plan for Wales is approved NHS patients will be seen by any dentist available, rather than their regular practice, and check-ups will be moved to every two years in a planned move the profession warned will cause an "exodus" of staff in Wales. More than six in 10 dentists said they would go fully private rather than take on the Welsh Government's planned shake-up. The changes being proposed are "a leap in the dark that could destroy NHS dentistry in Wales", the British Dental Association (BDA) warned. As a consultation on radical changes to NHS dentistry draws to a close the BDA urged the Welsh Government to heed the warnings of the profession "to avoid a wholesale exodus from the workforce". The Welsh Government has said its proposals will improve patients' access to dental service but the BDA said it would mean more forced to go private. Sign up for our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here. Under the shake-up adults would no longer have a regular practice NHS dentist but would be seen by whichever one is available on a first come first served basis. They would stay with that dentist until the course of treatment ends and then be returned the central list. Under-18s would keep the same surgery they are first allocated but dentists warn this could cause problems for families having appointments at multiple surgeries. Prices for NHS check-ups will rise from £20 to £24.75 under the plans. Article continues below "Despite worthy-sounding policy goals – to improve oral health, refocus on prevention, enhance the wellbeing of the workforce, and deliver better value for money – the professional body is warning that the plans as they stand risk achieving the exact opposite results," the BDA said. A survey of dentists across Wales by the BDA found "dentists have been left in an invidious position that risks an exodus from the NHS" with 72% saying they would not be willing to work under the proposed reforms as they stand. More than seven in 10 also said they are likely to reduce their NHS commitment in the event the model is imposed next year and more than six in 10 say they are likely to go fully private. Changes are expected to be fast-tracked for rollout next year. Jeremy Miles, the cabinet secretary for health and social care, has described the package as the "biggest change in nearly 20 years". The BDA said despite "headline focus on prevention" reducing healthier patients to check-up appointments up to 24 months apart could mean diseases, including oral cancers, are not picked up early. Dentists would also be unable to offer timely preventative advice and treatment. There will also be big changes to how NHS dentists are paid with rewards for delivering a 'care package' to patients with ongoing or complex needs. But the proposed level of payment "fails to reflect the true cost of care and risks leaving NHS providers delivering care at a loss", the BDA said. Russell Gidney, chair of the BDA's Welsh General Practice, said: 'On improving access and outcomes and refocusing on prevention the Welsh Government set lofty goals but its reforms risk achieving the exact opposite. 'Now dentists are stuck between the devil and the deep blue sea between a failed status quo and an unpopular untested alternative. "Ministers must be willing to listen, pilot plans, and avoid a leap in the dark that could destroy this service.' In a statement to the Senedd on March 18 Mr Miles said the new general dental services contract will be implemented from April 2026. He said the reforms would be the biggest in nearly 20 years and the central aim will be to make it easier to access NHS dentistry. He said instead of recalling everyone every six months for a routine check-up the new contract will be based on prevention and needs-based provision of treatment. The online BDA survey answered by 176 dentists across Wales also shows only: 2% of dentists responding feel that changes would support the long-term sustainability of NHS dentistry in Wales; 2% agree that reforms would improve population health with only 5% saying that they would enhance prevention; 2% feel reforms would support continuity of care with the same proportion believing it would enhance early detection of oral health conditions; 8% say that reforms would actually improve access to NHS care, and; 6% think the proposed system would provide good value for money for the taxpayer. Responding to the BDA's comments and findings a Welsh Government spokesman said: 'Under the new contract most people would continue their relationship with their practice and continuity would be strengthened for people with poor oral health. 'We are committed to providing better access to NHS dentistry for those most in need and at risk and to making NHS dentistry more attractive to dentists and their teams. The consultation on the proposed new contract is now live for the public and professional alike to have a say in shaping these once-in-a-generation reforms.' Article continues below Get our daily breaking news updates on your phone by joining our WhatsApp community here. We occasionally treat members to special offers, promotions and ads from us and our partners. See our Privacy Notice.