
Galaxy Watch 8 Classic vs Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025): what we know and expect
Intro Samsung's Unpacked is happening in the scorching heat, right in the middle of summer. And, somewhat appropriately, Samsung will be dropping a bunch of hot devices. The expected Galaxy Z Fold 7, Z Flip 7, maybe a FE edition of at least one of those devices. And then the timepieces — we expect yet another Galaxy Watch 8, a re-do of the Watch Ultra — possibly named Galaxy Watch 8 Ultra or Galaxy Watch Ultra 2. And a return of a classic — the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic with a rotating bezel!
Many will be happy to get that mechanical ring back, as it's a nice touch on any Samsung smartwatch that has it. The question now is, how will the Galaxy Watch Classic differ from the Ultra, and which one do you go for?
Well, they are still some weeks away, but here's what we know on the upcoming Galaxy Watch 8 Classic and Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 so far: Traditional circular watch vs a "squircle" shape
Stainless steel vs a rugged titanium build
Only Classic will have the rotating bezel
Ultra will have the programmable Quick Button again
IP68, 5ATM vs IP68, 10ATM, MIL‑STD‑810H
32 GB vs 64 GB storage
Same sensors, including ECG, SpO2, temp on both
~$400-$450 vs ~$650-$700
Table of Contents:
Design and Sizes
Bands
Software
Battery
Models
Specs
Summary
Samsung is reviving the rotating bezel dream, and fans seem to be here for it. The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is apparently set to carry forward the legacy of the Watch 6 Classic—yes, skipping over the "7" moniker like Samsung's in a hurry to catch up with Apple. Expect a polished stainless-steel body, available in one 46 mm size, with that gloriously tactile mechanical bezel. It's the kind of detail that makes you feel like it's a real watch and not a computer on your wrist.
We've also seen a digital crown-like button, located between the typical two "back" and "home" buttons that Samsung watches get. It is yet unknown if that will be rotatable and if it will be customizable like the Ultra's Quick Button.
The new Galaxy Watch Ultra will likely not be a redesign, more of a refinement, as the first gen model was a bit rough around the edges. The squared-off titanium shell should be back, only available in one 47 mm size option. Still built like a smartwatch tank, but rumors say it'll be a bit thinner. Samsung heard the complaints about the Watch Ultra feeling like a hockey puck and seems ready to fix that—without losing the rugged appeal.
It'll probably be overkill again, with MIL-STD-810H, IP68, 10ATM, dual-band GPS, and a ridiculous 3,000-nit AMOLED screen with sapphire glass. Basically: this thing should survive a hike, a dive, and probably a strike or two. The last time we saw a band mechanism redesign was with the Galaxy Watch 6. That is to say — fairly soon, so we imagine the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic will still have that one-button quick-release module. So it should, hopefully, be compatible with any bands you may have amassed over the last couple of years.
Lat year's Galaxy Watch Ultra came with a band mechanism of its own and, again, we would hope that Samsung isn't in a hurry to change it. We haven't heard complaints about its durability, so why fix what works? Software & Features Following Samsung's watch interfaces may be a bit confusing. First, Sammy and Google entered a tight-knit partnership, where Samsung's Tizen was fused to Wear OS. The resulting platform is the Wear we've had since 2021. But Samsung can't help itself, so it has began slightly re-skinning it, now called the One UI Watch interface.
We should get One UI Watch 8 on top of Wear OS 6 when the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic and Watch Ultra 2 launch. Supposedly with new AI features and workout recommendations. But also, we've heard rumors about subscription plans for the more elaborate measurements, workout routines, or coaching. Nothing concrete yet, but at this point — we wouldn't be surprised. Fitness tracker manufacturers are already doing it, and so is Apple. We also may get some innovative measurements, like noninvasive blood measurement tests (for antioxidant levels), and a vascular load measurement to show heart and vascular system health. These should be available on all Galaxy Watch 2025 models.
The Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 should come with the same 590 mAh cell as before. That'd mean about two days of battery life with some excercise thrown in. The Galaxy Watch 8 Classic is rumored to have around 425 mAh, so it may give us a day and a half easy. Of course, the Exynos W1000 energy efficiency may extend that further. These won't be very flexible in terms of size, it seems. The Classic is expected to come in one, 46 mm variant. The Ultra will probably be a 47 mm case.
We also expect them to be available in LTE modem variations if you want to leave your phone at home while jogging.
Here's what we generally expect: Neither the Galaxy Watch 8 Classic nor the Ultra 2 are meant to flip the table. These are iterative updates — refinements for people who already liked where Samsung was going.If you're new to smartwatches or stuck on a Galaxy Watch 4? This might be your year. But if you already own a Watch 6 Classic or the first Ultra? You might want to wait for 2026—when Samsung might finally shake things up again (foldable watch, anyone?).
But hey, there's still room for Samsung to surprise or shock us. Stay tuned for the Galaxy Watch 8 reveal, and our upcoming reviews!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Phone Arena
2 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Google faces trouble in Japan over Pixel phones, even as popular as they have become
A Japanese court has banned Google from selling Pixel 7 series smartphones in the country after ruling that the company violated a patent. This development comes as Pixel phones have become increasingly popular in Japan, where they recently became the second most popular brand behind Apple. According to a new report, the court found that Google had infringed on a patent related to control signal mapping technology. This patent covers the way an acknowledgment signal (ACK) is sent from a base station to a device in an LTE network, which is a core part of 4G communications. The court determined that this technology was used without permission in the Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro. Because of this ruling, Google is now banned from selling, importing, displaying, or transferring Pixel 7 series phones in Japan. The judge also criticized how Google responded to the legal case, describing its approach as having an "insincere attitude," which reportedly influenced the decision to impose the sales ban. Google Pixel 7 Pro. | Image credit — PhoneArena What makes this more concerning is that the issue may not stop here. The company behind the complaint, South Korea-based Pantech, is also seeking to expand the ban to include the newer Pixel 8 and upcoming Pixel 9 series. It's not clear yet whether those efforts will succeed, but it adds pressure on Google in one of its most promising international markets. Japan has become an important region for Pixel. As we previously reported, Google saw strong growth in the country in 2023, largely driven by the popularity of the Pixel 7 series and the affordable Pixel 7a. A wider ban could disrupt that momentum and impact future sales. Pantech, the company involved in the case, no longer makes smartphones. The legal action was handled by IdeaHub, a group that focuses on monetizing patents. While Pantech has been inactive in the smartphone market, its intellectual property is now being used in court to challenge competitors. For now, only the Pixel 7 series is affected. But with more models potentially under review, Google's position in Japan could face more challenges ahead. We will continue to monitor how this story develops, especially if the dispute expands to other Pixel devices. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer


Phone Arena
2 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Samsung Foundry plans to pay for top sales talent to take business away from TSMC
TSMC is the world's largest foundry with a market share in the 65%-67% range. Samsung Foundry is a distant second thanks to the low yields it has achieved on advanced chip production. This makes it more costly for Samsung's customers to use the foundry instead of TSMC since low yields mean fewer chips can be produced at the same price. This is the exact reason why Qualcomm dropped Samsung Foundry in 2022. At the time, Samsung Foundry was manufacturing the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and reportedly had a 35% yield. TSMC's 4nm yield rate was 70% at the time. As a result, Qualcomm picked up all of its marbles from Samsung's playground and moved them to TSMC. The latter built the slightly reconfigured Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and has manufactured all of Qualcomm's flagship Snapdragon application processors since then. There is no denying that the Taiwan-based chip foundry has a star-studded list of clients that are among the top names in tech including Apple, AMD, Nvidia, MediaTek, Qualcomm, and more. Thanks to Samsung Foundry's poor yields, Qualcomm switched to TSMC to make the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. | Image credit-PhoneArena Samsung Foundry might catch a break if it can improve yields on the production of Samsung's own Exynos 2600 application processor which will be built on the foundry's 2nm process node. If Samsung Foundry can get its yield up enough to ensure the production of the number of chips Samsung needs, the Exynos 2600 will power the Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 + in most markets and those models will become the first smartphones to feature a 2nm application processor. Usually, the iPhone has been the device that welcomed the next cutting-edge process node. But next year, if Samsung plays its cards right, this honor will belong to the Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 +. Ironically, the Galaxy S26 Ultra, the top-of-the-line model, will be powered by a 3nm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 for Galaxy and won't be involved in any record-breaking historical moments. Samsung has been supposedly looking to spin off or sell its Foundry. Until a deal can be made to its liking, Samsung hopes to generate more revenue for the unit by trying to convince TSMC's customers to make the switch to Samsung Foundry. The latter hired away a former TSMC sales executive earlier this year and a report out of Korea states that Samsung is willing to pay as much as $300,000 to pros looking to join Samsung Foundry's sales team in the U.S. Both Samsung and TSMC have built U.S. fabs and TSMC has started producing 4nm chips in Arizona and will build 2nm components in 2028. Samsung's timeline has it ahead of TSMC in the States. In Taylor, Texas, Samsung Foundry will mass produce 2nm chips in 2026. Samsung needs a strong order flow to keep the Taylor, Texas line humming, churning out advanced chips. That is why Samsung Foundry will pay California-based salesmen as much as $300,000. A foundry sales director can earn as much as $319,800 and a senior manager inside a foundry's customer service unit, can draw a salary within the $180,950 to $289,050 range. The salaries Samsung is willing to pay in the U.S. top what it is paying for the same jobs in South Korea. The new hires will have the task of increasing Samsung Foundry's market share in the United States. Some of TSMC's customers in Taiwan will also take delivery of chips built in the U.S. including Apple, AMD, Nvidia, and Qualcomm. TSMC is already shipping 4nm chips from its Arizona fab to Apple and Nvidia. Semiconductors built in Arizona will not face any tariffs which is part of the appeal of purchasing domestically manufactured chips. Depending on which report you read, the third largest foundry globally is China's SMIC. The latter manufactures the chips designed by Huawei and is the largest foundry in the country. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer


GSM Arena
3 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Samsung Galaxy Buds Core specs revealed, to offer premium features
Samsung prepares to launch its most affordable buds in the Galaxy lineup, the Galaxy Buds Core. They are expected to hit the Indian market on June 27, and the company has quietly or accidentally jumped the gun and revealed some of the key features on its UAE website. Despite being the cheapest in the lineup, the Galaxy Buds Core will offer active noise cancellation, just like the Galaxy Buds FE and the Buds 3 Pro. Additionally, they boast the longest battery life in the Galaxy Buds family with an advertised 35 hours of continuous music playback without ANC. ANC will reduce battery life significantly. The pair packs a 65 mAh battery each with a 500 mAh rechargeable case. The supported audio codecs are AAC, SBC and SSC over Bluetooth 5.4 connection. This is an impressive set of features for the cheapest Galaxy Buds, and we will know more about them by tomorrow. Source