Benefit and Pip changes could be 'life or death'
Planned cuts to the benefit system could be a matter of life or death for some people, a claimant has said.The government plans to tighten the eligibility criteria for the Personal Independent Payment (Pip), which is paid to about 3.6m people who have a long-term physical or mental health condition.Chancellor Rachel Reeves set out her plans for the UK economy during her Spring Statement on Wednesday.A government spokesperson said all Pip assessments were conducted "rigorously and professionally".
Assessments for the daily living part of Pip will be tightened, which the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) estimates will affect about 800,000 people.
'Guilty until proved innocent'
Shannon Doulis' life changed after she contracted Covid-19 four years ago, later developing chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia as a result of long Covid.The 28-year-old, who lives in Totton, Hampshire, gets £400 a month in Pip to pay for costs that she has incurred as a result of her illnesses."That £400 a month doesn't sound like much but it's a lifeline for me. It means when I do have to go out, I can pay for a taxi," she said."We're treated as if we're guilty of fraud until we're proven innocent by being allowed our benefits."You can't just say: we're not going to pay you, we think you should be working, so [be] better. It doesn't work like that," she said."I could try [going back to work]. But I know how it's going to end. That is why I lost my last job – because I wasn't well enough, I wasn't reliable enough."I would have to work a day and then have two weeks to recover and then maybe work another day. No one is going to employ me on that basis."
Sophie Brudenall, 24, from Slough, Berkshire, has the eye condition aniridia and has been claiming Pip for her visual impairment and mental health reasons since 2020.The university student said, during the "very difficult" assessments, it was as if the government was trying "to catch you out"."For people with more severe disabilities who are deemed to be not as severe as the government deem they should be [for Pip], it could be life or death," she says."They might not be able to pay for medication; they might not be able to pay for their accessible technology. Technology is not cheap if you're disabled."A Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) spokesperson said: "We support millions of people through our welfare system every year and it is a priority people receive the benefits they are entitled to as quickly as possible."All Pip assessments are conducted rigorously and professionally and are independently audited to ensure claimants are receiving the same high-quality service."
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
15 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Acorn carbon capture project funding to finally be announced in Rachel Reeves spending review
Details of funding for the Acorn project are set to be announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves as part of Wednesday's Spending Review. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Funding for the Acorn project in Aberdeenshire is finally expected to be announced in the UK government's spending review. The carbon capture project, based in St Fergus, would take greenhouse gas emissions and store them under the North Sea, in a process known as carbon capture and storage (CCS). Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The planned Acorn carbon capture site. Last month UK energy minister Michael Shanks stressed his department was lobbying the Chancellor to sign off funding for the crucial project, which is now set to be announced in Wednesday's spending review. In the House of Commons on Tuesday, ministers were asked several times about funding for the project. UK energy minister Sarah Jones told MPs they did not have long to wait long for more information. She said: "We have always been clear that we support the Acorn project. We know what an important proposal it is. The decision is a matter for a spending review but we are very close to having those decisions". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Acorn project, which would be based near Peterhead, has been in the pipeline for years and would allow fossil fuels to continue to be burnt without, in theory, releasing harmful carbon emissions. The project is seen as key to scaling up the low-carbon hydrogen sector in Scotland and future plans for Grangemouth, but the technology has not yet been demonstrated at commercial scale. With the project based in his the Aberdeenshire North and Moray East constituency, local SNP Seamus Logan welcomed the announcement. He said: 'As the local MP for the Acorn project, I cautiously welcome this long-overdue commitment that funding and full details will finally be announced for Scottish carbon capture at the spending review tomorrow, after years of campaigning by the SNP and the Scottish energy sector. England has been allocated £22billion for carbon capture, so I would expect investment in Scotland to be at a commensurate level. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'After decades of broken promises, funding snubs and delays from Westminster - including over the past year - it is essential that adequate funding, full details and a concrete commitment to the project is now delivered by the UK government at pace - and the devil will be in the detail of the announcement, which we will study carefully. 'Scotland has repeatedly been treated as an afterthought by the Labour government, with money being ploughed into projects in the south of England instead, and thousands of Scottish energy jobs lost in the north east of Scotland as a result of Keir Starmer's damaging policies. That must now change - and funding for Scottish carbon capture must mark the beginning of a substantial programme of investment in Scotland's energy sector to create jobs, lower energy bills and boost economic growth.' Business leaders and organisations including the Scottish Chambers of Commerce had signed a letter in March urging the chancellor to back the project. It argued that the project had faced two decades of setbacks, and that it is needed to help Scottish industry decarbonise. The project missed out on support in 2021, and Acorn was placed on a reserve list for future backing.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Spending review latest: Fears ‘staggering' cuts may be required by Rachel Reeves
Concerns have been raised that Rachel Reeves may have to make 'staggering' cuts as a result of her spending review plans. The chancellor is set to unveil plans for all department funding until the next election in 2029 during her review on Wednesday. Experts have warned the chancellor will have to make £5 billion worth of cuts to ensure the spending plans are fulfilled - with areas such as housing, policing and border control expected to be affected. The analysis, carried out by researchers at the House of Commons library commissioned by the Lib Dems, found that unprotected departments — which excludes NHS England, the core schools budget and defence — could see the real-terms cuts by 2028/29. The Lib Dems said the scale of the expected cuts was 'staggering'. Spokesperson Daisy Cooper said: 'After years of shameful Conservative neglect, it is household budgets and people relying on these services for vital support who are bearing the brunt. 'From social care to neighborhood policing, this Labour government is at risk of failing to deliver the change that people were promised.' 'We are really going to suffer': Residents' dismay over nuclear plant investment Residents, campaigners and organisations have expressed outrage after the Government allocated more than £14 billion towards building a nuclear plant on the Suffolk coast. The plant is expected to provide 10,000 jobs but residents and campaign groups say it will damage wildlife and impact the community. Jenny Kirtley, a resident from nearby Sibton who chairs the campaign group Together Against Sizewell C, arranged a demonstration against the development at the site last Saturday, which was attended by around 300 people. 'I have lived in this area on and off most of my life and have never seen anything like it,' she said. 'The devastation going on in this area is unbelievable. 'Net zero is supposed to happen by 2030 – there is no way this is going to be completed by then. 'Leiston has a population of fewer than 6,000: where are all these people going to stay? 'Rent is going sky-high at the moment – it's absolutely ridiculous. 'We are really going to suffer.' Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 15:00 Fears 'staggering' cuts may be required by Rachel Reeves Concerns have been raised that Rachel Reeves may have to make 'staggering' cuts as a result of her spending review plans. Experts have warned the chancellor will have to make £5 billion worth of cuts to ensure the spending plans are fulfilled - with areas such as housing, policing and border control expected to be affected. The analysis, carried out by researchers at the House of Commons library commissioned by the Lib Dems, found that unprotected departments — which excludes NHS England, the core schools budget and defence — could see the real-terms cuts by 2028/29. The Lib Dems said the scale of the expected cuts was 'staggering'. Spokesperson Daisy Cooper said: 'After years of shameful Conservative neglect, it is household budgets and people relying on these services for vital support who are bearing the brunt. 'From social care to neighborhood policing, this Labour government is at risk of failing to deliver the change that people were promised.' Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 14:51 What is the spending review? The chancellor will unveil the results of her line by line spending review, setting out the budgets of government departments until the end of the decade on Wednesday. Rachel Reeves' spending review has taken place in two parts, with phase one set out in her October Budget - which included £40 billion of tax hikes and set out departmental spending until 2026. The second phase has seen departments ordered to set out how adopting technologies such as AI and reforming public services can free up government cash and support the delivery of Labour's missions. Wednesday's review will set out day-to-day departmental spending for the next three years and investment spending for the next four. Reeves has ruled out borrowing for day-to-day spending and has insisted she will not raise taxes again, prompting questions about how the policies will be funded and whether cuts will be made. Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 14:38 Pictured: Starmer talks to college students in Ipswich Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 14:23 Watch: Sizewell C nuclear plant to be built with £14.2bn government funding Nuclear plans labelled 'downgrade' by Conservatives The Conservatives have branded the Government's nuclear development plans as a 'downgrade' on the previous government's commitments. Speaking from the frontbench, Conservative MP Nick Timothy (West Suffolk) said: 'This statement is a downgrade on what the last government put in motion. Today, the Energy Secretary has announced only one small modular reactor (SMR). There is no clear target to increase nuclear power generation, and no news on Wylfa. 'The nuclear industry is expecting news of a third gigawatt-scale reactor. The last government purchased the land and committed to build but on this today, the Energy Secretary said nothing. 'So can he commit to the planning inherited for a third gigawatt-scale plant at Wylfa? And will he recommit to the Conservative policy of 24 gigawatts of nuclear power by 2050?' Energy Secretary Ed Miliband replied: 'I do sort of slightly scratch my head, because he sort of says it's a downgrade, I mean, we've announced the largest nuclear building programme in 50 years.' Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 13:41 Exclusive: Rachel Reeves forced 'to make £5bn cuts' to balance books after spending review Rachel Reeves will need to wield the axe and make nearly £5bn worth of cuts to balance the books in the wake of Labour's spending review, new analysis has revealed. The chancellor will on Wednesday announce funding for all departments until the next election in 2029 after a bitter cabinet civil war over what is being dubbed 'austerity 2.0'. But experts have warned Labour will have to make billions of pounds of cuts to ensure Reeves can fulfil her spending plans — with areas such as housing, policing and border control expected to be in the line of fire. Rachel Reeves 'needs to make £5bn cuts' to balance books after spending review Exclusive: The chancellor is set to unveil her spending review on Wednesday but researchers warn she will need to make £5bn of cuts by 2028/29 — even before finding the cash to restore winter fuel payments to pensioners Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 13:24 When is the spending review? Rachel Reeves will this week make one of her biggest statements to MPs since Labour's general election victory. The chancellor will unveil the results of her line by line spending review, setting out the budgets of government departments until the end of the decade. The spending review will take place after Prime Minister's Questions, so at around 12.30pm, on Wednesday, 11 June. Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 13:08 People will be more safe, not less, after spending review, PM insists The Independent's political correspondent Millie Cooke reports: People will be 'more safe' not less after the spending review, the prime minister has insisted, promising there is money going into policing and security. His comments came ahead of Wednesday's review of government departments, amid growing speculation that there could be cuts to police force numbers and a squeezed Home Office budget. Asked whether people will be less safe after the spending review, Sir Keir told GB News: 'They will be more safe. There's money going into policing, into security, and that is really important, particularly coming from my background. 'I was chief prosecutor for five years, prosecuting cases across England and Wales. So this is a core belief. 'Those extra police officers will be neighbourhood police officers, and I think that will give people the reassurance in their communities that they are safe'. Athena Stavrou10 June 2025 13:04 Comment: Could 'going nuclear' finally end Ed Miliband's career? Not far from me, in the lovely Leicestershire village of Nevil Holt, for some reason a replica of the notorious 'Ed Stone' has been erected in a churchyard. It's all part of the small but growing Nevil Holt art and literature festival, and I imagine it's to remind passersby of the ephemeral nature of so much of politics – if not life. The energy secretary is one of politics' great survivors – but his plan to build a £14bn power station on the Suffolk coast could leave a toxic legacy, says Sean O'Grady:
The Herald Scotland
31 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Child Benefit changes on cards after Winter Fuel U-turn
"So then you've got two neighbours who earn just under £60,000, so that's £120,000 for that family. They get Child Benefit. Their next door neighbour, one earns £80,000, one earns nothing, they don't get it. "I have been told for years that we can't split a household payment into a personal tax payment, which is exactly what the government has just done. "So when I got a WhatsApp today from Rachel Reeves telling me, 'sorry I couldn't explain to you in person', because I've been lobbying hard that we need to change on this (winter fuel payment changes), my first reply back is, 'this is wonderful news, and I am relieved, and this is a massive improvement, and I think it will take a lot of pressure off a lot of vulnerable people'. But I did also say, 'by the way, can we now do it for Child Benefit'?." How are Child Benefit high income charges paid? The high-income child benefit charge applies if you or your partner earn more than £60,000. Under current rules, you need to file a self-assessment tax return to pay the charge, but it was mentioned in the Spring Statement that this will soon be available to pay directly through PAYE. Once registered with HMRC, parents should be able to choose to have their HICBC collected through their monthly pay packet, meaning they'll no longer need to file a return for that purpose. "I got a Whatsapp today from Rachel Reeves..." Martin Lewis tells @vicderbyshire he has been texting the Chancellor on how her Winter Fuel U-turn could pave the way for a new approach to Child Benefit payments. #Newsnight — BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) June 9, 2025 How much is Child Benefit and what was the increase for 2025? From April 7 2025, parents receive £26.05 a week (£1,355 a year) for their eldest or only child and £17.25 a week (£897 a year) for each additional child. These figures are a 1.7% increase on the £1,331 a year for the eldest child and £881 a year for each additional child paid in 2024-25 For now, if your income is over the threshold, you can choose to either get Child Benefit payments and pay any tax charge at the end of each tax year, or opt out of getting payments and not pay the tax charge. If you choose to opt out of getting Child Benefit payments You should still fill in the Child Benefit claim form. You need to state on the form that you do not want to get payments. You need to fill in the claim form if you want to: get National Insurance credits, which count towards your State Pension get your child a National Insurance number without them having to apply for one - they'll usually get the number before they turn 16 years old Recommended reading: Is there a two-child cap on Child Benefit? No, and this is the cause of a great deal of confusion, as Martin Lewis has explained on his website Money Saving Expert. "Child Benefit is a universal payment made for every child you have," he says. "It should accurately be called the 'two-child limit for Universal Credit or Tax Credits'. "This one applies to the benefits that people who have low incomes, whether they're working or not working, get. That's what this is about. "And in simple terms, it means if you have more than two children, then you won't get any additional benefit for the costs that they are incurring you (on Universal Credit and Tax Credits)."
