
Super-woke Ben & Jerry's gets a nasty threat that will end its left-wing activism
The bitter feud between Ben & Jerry's and parent company Unilever has escalated.
They have been locked in a battle over the ice cream maker's 'woke' causes, which Unilever is trying to reign in.
At the same time, the co-founders of Ben & Jerry's ice-cream have asked Unilever to sell the brand back to them.
So far, Unilever has said no. And now the parent company is threatening to pull funding for the Ben & Jerry's Foundation, which donates to charities and social justice organizations.
Unilever has demanded an immediate audit of the foundation's donations or it will pull its roughly $5 million contribution, Reuters reported.
The foundation has previously supported the Human Rights Coalition, Homes for All St Louis and Black Workers Matter.
Ben Cohen, who started the much-loved brand with Jerry Greenfield, has been rallying like-minded investors to join him in buying back the company, which has been known for its activism since its founding in Vermont in 1978.
It comes weeks after CEO David Stever was fired by Unilever sparking a lawsuit.
When Unilever acquired Ben & Jerry's for $326 million in 2000, it agreed to let an independent board oversee the brand's social justice mission.
However, that mission has repeatedly clashed with Unilever's corporate priorities.
Tensions escalated in 2021 when Ben & Jerry's halted sales in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, sparking a public battle between the brand and its parent company.
Now, as Unilever considers spinning off its ice cream division — which includes brands like Magnum — Cohen wants Ben & Jerry's to go its own way.
'In the year 2000, Unilever loved us for who we were,' Cohen previously told the Wall Street Journal.
'Now we've gone separate ways in our relationship. We just need them to set us free.'
Unilever has held firm that Ben & Jerry's is an important part of its ice-cream business and is not for sale.
Although Cohen and Greenfield are no longer on the company's board they wrote a letter in support of Stever.
Ben & Jerry's claims its CEO was fired by its parent company because of his political activism
Ben & Jerry's remaining bosses also filed a lawsuit in response accusing the parent company of firing Stever for his political activism.
They also say Unilever violated an agreement struck when the conglomerate bought Ben & Jerry's that allowed it to continue its 'social mission' and advocate for causes.
'We spent a tremendous amount of time and energy working on that document and negotiating it,' Cohen, 74, told the Journal.
'If not for that agreement, Ben & Jerry's would have died by now, and it would be just another ice cream brand.'
Ben & Jerry's claims Unilever went against the agreement when it stopped the brand speaking out against Donald Trump after he won his second presidential election in November 2024.
Ben & Jerry's had planned to take the Trump administration to task on minimum wage, universal health care, abortion, and climate change, per the suit.
'Despite four decades of progressive social activism—and years of challenging the Trump administration's policies, criticizing Trump was now too taboo for the brand synonymous with 'Peace, Love, and Ice Cream,'' Ben & Jerry's said in the lawsuit.
Unilever in turn says the brand has pivoted to supporting 'one-sided, highly controversial, and polarizing topics' that put its other business interests at risk.
However, Cohen - who remains an employee of Ben & Jerry's - is not ready to throw in the towel.
'Ben & Jerry's is a company with a soul,' he told the Journal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Israel's actions in Gaza are genocide, says Ben & Jerry's
The independent board of Ben & Jerry's has claimed that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza in a move that threatens to further inflame tensions with its parent company Unilever. The ice cream brand, known for its outspoken approach to social issues, said: 'We join with those around the world who denounce the genocide in Gaza. 'We stand with all who raise their voices against genocide in Gaza – from petition-signers to street marchers to those risking arrest.' The independent board made the comments in a statement seen by Reuters. Its description of Israel's actions as genocide comes just weeks after one of the brand's co-founders, Ben Cohen, was arrested in the US Senate for protesting against the provision of military aid to Israel during testimony by Robert F Kennedy Jr, the US health secretary. The statement by the independent board threatens to deepen the disagreement between Ben & Jerry's and Unilever. The two sides have been at odds over Israel and Gaza for many months. The ice cream brand sued Unilever in November 2024, claiming that the company had attempted to block it from making public statements about the conflict. The two companies have clashed over Israel before, including in 2021 when Ben & Jerry's stopped selling its ice cream in the occupied West Bank, arguing that doing business there was 'inconsistent' with its values. In response, Unilever sold its Israeli ice cream business, causing a legal battle that was later resolved. Founded by Cohen and Jerry Greenfield in 1978 in Vermont, Ben & Jerry's has repeatedly spoken out on issues such as refugees' rights, LGBTQ+ issues and climate change. Though it has been owned by Unilever since 2000, an agreement was written into its $326m (£241m) acquisition deal to allow the company to continue operating with an independent board. This effectively protected the company's ability to take a stand on social issues. However, Ben & Jerry's has accused its owner of undermining that deal. In March, the brand accused Unilever of ousting Dave Stever, its chief executive, over his outspoken approach to political and social issues, rather than because of performance.


Reuters
17 hours ago
- Reuters
Unilever's Ben & Jerry's calls war in Gaza a 'genocide'
NEW YORK, May 29 (Reuters) - The independent board of Ben & Jerry's said the ongoing conflict in Gaza is a genocide, setting up the ice cream maker for another tussle with its London-based corporate parent Unilever (ULVR.L), opens new tab. "Ben & Jerry's believes in human rights and advocates for peace, and we join with those around the world who denounce the genocide in Gaza," the board said in a statement viewed by Reuters. "We stand with all who raise their voices against genocide in Gaza-from petition-signers to street marchers to those risking arrest."


Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Shein poised to switch float to Hong Kong: Blow for Labour and the City as Chinese regulators shun London listing
Fast fashion giant Shein is reportedly set to switch its blockbuster listing from London to Hong Kong in a huge blow to the City. Chinese regulators have not given it permission to list in the UK, in an embarrassing setback after British regulators and ministers made a big effort to entice it to come here. Shein has now turned to an initial public offering (IPO) in Hong Kong, where it believes it can list within the year, news agency Reuters reported. The retailer, founded in China and now based in Singapore, is expected to file documents with the Hong Kong stock exchange in a huge setback for Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who recently said she would welcome new listings, as well as for London Stock Exchange boss Dame Julia Hoggett. Hoggett has said she would 'fight for everything' to attract firms. It had been hoped Shein would mark a new chapter for the beleaguered Square Mile. Instead, with few significant floats on the horizon, it will be left fighting a rearguard action to hold on to its biggest players. While the New York stock market has seen 136 flotations this year, London has hosted eight, say analysts at AJ Bell. Magnum maker Unilever's choice to list its ice cream division in Amsterdam dealt the City a bitter blow in February, after a protracted charm offensive by UK ministers. And Shell has been eyeing a switch to New York amid a slump in its valuation. Shein was given a green light to list by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in March despite concerns raised about its supply chain in China. But Chinese authorities are likely to have been taken aback at the intense scrutiny of Shein by MPs on the business and trade select committee. In January, Shein's UK top lawyer Yinan Zhu declined to comment on whether its cheap clothes were linked to slave labour. It prompted MPs to accuse her of being 'disrespectful' and 'ridiculous'. Shein has been accused of sourcing cotton from Xinjiang in China where it is claimed Uyghur minorities suffer forced labour and genocide. The company rejects these claims. Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'The barrage of criticism, which looked set to intensify, is considered to be partly why Chinese regulators were reluctant to give the IPO the green light. 'This will be a blow for London's ambitions to attract bigger names, but given the obstacles piling up, it's not surprising that the company seems to be veering off in another direction to raise capital for further expansion.' Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB, said the snub could be a 'blessing in disguise' due to political tensions, adding: 'The difficult relationship between Beijing and Washington, and the UK's desire to stand shoulder to shoulder with the US could have made listing more trouble than it was worth.' The Chancellor last month insisted it would be 'foolish' to stop engaging with China. 'We do want to welcome new listings,' she said. The FCA and the London Stock Exchange declined to comment. Shein was contacted for comment.