logo
Texas students sued to keep their drag show on campus. They won.

Texas students sued to keep their drag show on campus. They won.

Washington Post28-03-2025

Sophia Ahmed delivered the news on Monday with a two-word message in all capital letters: 'WE WON.'
A court had ruled that the annual, on-campus drag show she and classmates at Texas A&M University had organized could still happen this Thursday.
Since May, the students had booked a theater, selected performers and started selling tickets — plans the university system interrupted last month by banning drag events on its campuses, citing President Donald Trump's 'Day 1' executive order on gender ideology.
A week later, the Texas A&M student group hosting 'Draggieland' sued, putting the fate of the drag show in the hands of a federal judge.
Blocking the show 'because it offends some members of the campus community is precisely what the First Amendment prohibits,' U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal wrote Monday in a ruling that temporarily lifted the university system's ban. After the decision came down, Ahmed, president of the group hosting the show, the Texas A&M Queer Empowerment Council, spread the word to fellow organizers.
Preparations — and ticket sales — resumed. Doors will open Thursday at the university's Rudder Theatre in College Station.
'It boils down to being an example of queer joy on campus,' Ahmed said.
Lawyers from the Texas attorney general's office, which is representing the university system, did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday. After the ruling, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) wrote on X that drag shows 'promote radical gender ideology. They are not welcome at Texas universities.'
In Texas and across the country, conservative lawmakers have targeted drag performances in recent years as part of a larger effort aimed at restricting LGBTQ+ rights. Trump has taken this conservative priority to new heights since assuming office, with attempts to hinder access to gender-affirming care for people under 19 and ban transgender adults from military service.
Two years ago, the president of West Texas A&M University — part of the same system as the College Station flagship — canceled a student-organized drag show, writing that drag events 'denigrate and demean women' and comparing them with blackface.
But Texas A&M's 'Draggieland' had never faced a threat of this magnitude in its five-year run. For a time, the university had even sponsored the show, whose title combines drag with students' 'Aggie' nickname. When the school ceased its sponsorship before the 2022 show, students took over fundraising, and they continued putting on the show every year at Rudder Theatre. Hundreds have watched local drag performers compete in a themed pageant for the title of Queen or King of 'Draggieland.'
For this year's show, planning started smoothly.
In the summer, organizers picked showrunners and settled on a theme, 'Slaying the Seven Seas.' In the fall, they held auditions and nailed down finances. Come winter, ticket sales started. Students planned the production in intricate detail, down to purchasing ornaments on clearance after the holidays and painting them an iridescent white to serve as pearls for the show's set design.
'This couldn't have happened had we not started planning so far in advance,' Ahmed said.
They paused their planning on Feb. 28 when the Texas A&M Board of Regents adopted a resolution banning drag shows on its campuses.
Drag performances, the resolution said, 'often involve unwelcome and objectively offensive conduct' and 'are likely to create or contribute to a hostile environment for women.'
The board cited Trump's executive order prohibiting federal funds from being used to 'promote gender ideology' — and Abbott's support of that order — before stipulating that on-campus drag shows 'may be considered promotion of gender ideology' under the new directive. The resolution noted that students seeking to put on drag shows could access off-campus and private spaces near the system's schools.
On March 5, the Queer Empowerment Council sued the board, the system's chancellor and the Texas A&M University president in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
'What's offensive and what's not offensive is purely subjective, and that's a line that the First Amendment forbids government officials from being able to draw on campus or off,' said Adam Steinbaugh, an attorney for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which is representing the students.
'Draggieland' performers frequently — but not always — make clothing choices to 'deliberately contrast with their expected gender presentation,' and are not nude or partially nude, the lawsuit states. It adds that the event is exclusively funded by students, and lists examples of previous and upcoming events at Rudder Theatre. They include a panel by the school's Christian Faculty Network, a speech by Turning Point USA leader Charlie Kirk, a production of the musical 'Chicago' and a 'Ready to Vote Tour' event featuring former Democratic congressman Beto O'Rourke, according to the lawsuit.
While they waited for a ruling, the students considered their options. Could they host the show at a different venue? Would a different date work?
They wanted to put on the show no matter what, Ahmed said, but having it on campus felt crucial.
'It's a display of queer resilience,' she said. 'No matter what you try, queer people will be here to stay.'
On Monday, Rosenthal's temporary ruling made the backup plans unnecessary. The show would go on as scheduled.
On Thursday, when the show begins and the blue and green lights transport attendees to the seas for the night, Ahmed will be there, sitting in the theater with hundreds of other showgoers as in past years.
She will be cheering and screaming from the start, she said, because the students had fought for this moment — and they won.
Daniel Wu contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After Dream Act reversal, undocumented students in Texas face tuition uncertainty
After Dream Act reversal, undocumented students in Texas face tuition uncertainty

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

After Dream Act reversal, undocumented students in Texas face tuition uncertainty

AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Nearly a week has passed since the Texas Dream Act was struck down, and schools still do not have clear answers about changes to undocumented student tuition rates. Undocumented students lost the ability to receive in-state tuition Wednesday after the Trump administration sued Texas, accusing it of violating federal law. The administration said the Dream Act, which passed the Texas legislature with bipartisan support in 2001, was in violation of a 1996 federal law. Because Texas agreed, the suit was settled within hours, and it is unclear if the decision will be appealed. For some undocumented students, the difference between in-state and out-of-state tuition at Texas public universities may be the difference between receiving a college education or not being able to afford one. Edilsa Lopez is a recipient of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program and attended the University of Texas at Austin for her undergraduate degree. She said that because noncitizens are not eligible for federal aid, the Dream Act was essential for her ability to afford college. State of Texas: Abbott approves billions for schools, but is it enough? 'Having in-state tuition for us was such a blessing, because we didn't have to pay three times the in-state tuition rate,' Lopez said. 'Even then, we had a situation that was still very difficult for us, just because of the limited amount of financial aid available to us, undocumented students.' The out-of-state tuition rate ranges from double to nearly quadruple that of in-state tuition, depending on the school. Out-of-state students at UT and Texas A&M University pay the highest amounts, over $40,000 per year. Lopez was brought to the United States from Guatemala at age 12, fleeing poverty and homelessness. Even after arriving in the U.S., she said, she experienced homelessness after her mother had to leave the U.S., leaving Lopez to care for herself and her sister. Lopez said going to college was transformative for her life, as she now works for a Fortune 500 company as an accountant. 'I was brought here [at a] very young age … and so education for me was very important, and I only had one thing in mind, which is to graduate from college,' Lopez said. 'And so it was difficult in itself, but having in-state tuition and then graduating from college changed my life completely. I am now a professional financial accountant.' While in high school, Lopez said she didn't know about college, but her educators urged her to pursue it. She ended up in the top 10% of her class, making her eligible for automatic admission to most public universities in the state. Now, Lopez worries for the undocumented students following in her footsteps. She said that even before the Dream Act was reversed, she at times struggled to pay for her education. 'At the very end, I wasn't able to get all the money that I needed to graduate from college, and I almost dropped out,' Lopez said. 'But it was thanks to my high school teachers who really supported me, and they always believed in my potential, that they sort of helped me and did a fundraiser for me.' State Rep. Roman Romero, D-Fort Worth, shares Lopez's concerns about the future for undocumented students — especially those who are currently in the middle of their college education. Romero, who chairs the Mexican American Legislative Caucus in the Texas House, worries that Texas may lose good students to other states if they can no longer afford a college education in Texas. 'How would we not continue to support those that we have invested, likely over $100,000 into that child, if they were with us through K through 12,' Romero said. 'It's a lot of money to invest and then see them walk away and go to a different state. So we don't want this talent to leave.' State Sen. Carol Alvarado, D-Houston, pointed out the economic impact that allowing undocumented students to pay in-state tuition generates for Texas. She said in 2021 alone, 20,000 undocumented students paid about $80 million in tuition to state universities. 'I think … we're going to take a financial hit from this, because these are students that may choose not to go to school,' Alvarado said. One temporary solution, proposed by State Rep. Donna Howard, D-Austin, is for the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to give undocumented students a temporary designation that allows them to receive in-state tuition until the legislature can address the matter in its next session. Romero said he agrees with Howard. In a statement, THECB Spokesperson Mike Eddleman said the agency does not have an update to share, but is looking into the matter. 'Currently, we are evaluating the scope of the ruling and are actively working to ensure that any THECB rules, policies, and programs comply with the law,' Eddleman said. In the meantime, universities in Texas have to decide how to proceed with billing students for the fall semester. So far, most do not have updates to share. University of Texas Rio Grande Valley spokesperson Melissa Vasquez said, in a statement, that the university understands the decision may affect students' existing financial plans. 'As UTRGV continues its review of the impact of the consent judgment, students who may be affected will be notified directly,' Vasquez said. A spokesperson for Midwestern State University said that MSU is currently reviewing the impact of the decision. A spokesperson for UT Austin said it did not have updates to share. The Texas A&M University System will hold a meeting Friday to discuss the change, according to a spokesperson from West Texas A&M University. Other public universities around the state did not respond to requests for comment. The sudden nature of the decision not only complicates the path forward for universities and students, but it also raises eyebrows at the prospect of collusion between the federal government and the state. Alvarado was frustrated by the timing of the decision, right after the legislative session concluded. 'It's kind of like a boyfriend that cheated on you,' Alvarado said. 'Everybody was recognizing the importance of keeping the in-state tuition for these students, and then as soon as we turn our backs and go home, then they circumvented the legislative process.' Romero called the whole process 'shady,' but said the path forward has to involve more than talking about the issue. 'We're at a time when President Trump is really using every single lawyer at his disposal … to go around and circumvent the priorities of the state of Texas,' Romero said. 'Am I upset? Yes, but we can't just stay upset. We have to do something about it.' Undocumented students will be faced with the reality of being charged significantly more for higher education, and possibly not being able to afford it, if lawmakers or THECB are unable to find a solution before the fall semester. For Lopez, who said she learned English specifically so that she would be able to get an education, that would have made a difference in her life trajectory. 'I mean, the only thing we want in this country is literally opportunity for an education,' Lopez said. 'We want to be able to contribute back to the state we have lived here our entire lives.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Red cards, hotlines and legal tips: How to respond to ICE raids in Los Angeles
Red cards, hotlines and legal tips: How to respond to ICE raids in Los Angeles

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Red cards, hotlines and legal tips: How to respond to ICE raids in Los Angeles

As immigration enforcement efforts spark protests and concerns across Southern California, advocacy organizations are sharing critical resources to help residents understand and protect their rights and report illegal activity. Here's what you need to know: Individuals participating in protests may distribute flyers, chant, picket, and hand out literature in public spaces such as sidewalks, parks, and plazas. These activities are generally protected under the First Amendment, provided they do not block access to buildings or disrupt counter-demonstrations, according to ACLU Southern California. LIVE: Continuing coverage of Los Angeles protests However, protesters may not block sidewalks or entrances, interfere with opposing protests, or engage in obscene or knowingly false speech that incites violence. Marching in the streets often requires a permit, and demonstrators must follow local traffic laws. Speech activity is broadly protected in public areas and many government-owned facilities that are open to the public. However, these protections do not apply in federal buildings, courthouses, or on private property without consent. Some privately owned spaces open to the public, such as shopping malls, may allow limited free speech activity under specific rules. You are not required to answer questions about your immigration status or where you were born. Noncitizens are required to carry immigration documents, but they are not required to present them unless asked to do so by an agent. Never provide false information or documents. If contacted by the FBI, you do not have to answer questions. Politely request to speak with a lawyer. You may decline interviews or agree to speak only with legal counsel present. Mexico's president condemns violence amid protests against ICE raids Individuals have the right to remain silent, refuse searches, and ask for an attorney if arrested. Regardless of immigration status, everyone is protected by the Constitution. If stopped by the police, remain calm and do not attempt to flee, advocates say. Ask if you are free to leave. If not under arrest, you may walk away. You have the right to refuse to answer questions and to decline searches unless an officer has reasonable suspicion of a weapon. In a vehicle stop, drivers must show their license, registration, and also have the right to remain silent and may request to leave if they are free to do so. Officers may search a vehicle without consent only if they believe it contains evidence of a crime. Do not resist arrest. Ask to remain silent and request a lawyer immediately. Do not sign or say anything without legal representation. You have the right to make a local phone call, and police may not listen if you are calling an attorney. Noncitizens should speak only to their lawyer about immigration matters. An arrest may impact an individual's immigration status, and any documents signed without the presence of counsel could have lasting consequences. For more information or legal assistance, click here. Earlier this year, the Los Angeles Unified School District began distributing 'red cards' — small, wallet-sized guides that outline constitutional protections for immigrant families. The cards offer instructions on what to do if approached by immigration agents and are part of a broader campaign to reassure students and families that schools remain safe spaces. Available to citizens and non-citizens alike, the documents were created by the Immigrant Legal Resource Center and are available in 16 languages, from Spanish to Haitian Creole to Tigrinya. Click here to access them. Residents can also call their county's Rapid Response Network to report ICE activity and enforcement actions Here is the contact information Central Valley: 559-206-0151 Kern County: 661-432-2230 Los Angeles: 888-624-4752 Boyle Heights (L.A.): 323-805-1049 Orange County: 714-881-1558 San Bernardino/Riverside: 909-361-4588 CHIRLA: 213-353-1333 ORALE (Long Beach): 562-276-0267 Immigrant Defenders: 213-833-8283 Immigrant Rapid Response Hotline: 805-870-8855 (Santa Barbara, Ventura & San Luis Obispo) In the event of an emergency or if you witness a crime in progress, call 911 immediately. For non-emergencies, tips can be submitted anonymously through L.A. Crime Stoppers or through the city's Bureau of Street Services. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department also allows residents to file police reports online for certain non-violent crimes. To report graffiti in unincorporated areas of the county, residents can use the Public Works reporting system. Additional concerns, including other public nuisances or infrastructure issues, can be reported through the county's general services portal. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

‘Orgasmic Meditation' Leaders Convicted of Forced Labor Charges
‘Orgasmic Meditation' Leaders Convicted of Forced Labor Charges

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘Orgasmic Meditation' Leaders Convicted of Forced Labor Charges

Two leaders of a women's wellness start-up that promoted sexual empowerment through 'orgasmic meditation' were convicted Monday of using psychological abuse, surveillance, indoctrination, and intimidation to coerce employees into forced labor. Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz, the former CEO and former head of sales at the once-buzzy San Francisco venture OneTaste, were found guilty by a jury after a five-week trial in federal court in Brooklyn. More from Rolling Stone Justin Baldoni's $400 Million Countersuit Against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds Dismissed Sean Combs' Ex Testifies Cassie Lawsuit Was Like 'Reading My Own Story' Sean Combs Trial: Second Mistrial Motion, 'Freak-Off' Audio and Peek Inside Mogul's Bank Accounts During the trial, prosecutors said the victims in the case worked long hours, performing highly degrading sex acts and manual labor for little or no compensation, because they believed that if they did not, they would 'lose their entire source of support, community, spirituality, and identity.' Three witnesses testified that they were coerced into becoming a 'handler' for OneTaste investor Reese Jones, who was also Daedone's boyfriend. The victims told jurors they were required to live with the investor, perform demeaning sex acts at his direction, and provide domestic labor such as cooking for him. The defense countered that no physical force or restraint was ever used and that OneTaste's spiritual teachings were protected by the First Amendment. They said any suggestion that Daedone and Cherwitz 'brainwashed' their employees was a violation of their right to religious freedom. 'We are deeply disappointed in today's verdict. We maintain our clients' innocence and look forward to continuing this fight on appeal. This case raised numerous novel and complex legal issues that will require review by the Second Circuit. We find inspiration in our clients, Nicole and Rachel, who have shown incredible strength throughout this entire process,' defense lawyers Jennifer Bonjean, Ceila Cohen, and Michael Robotti said in a statement sent to Rolling Stone. Daedone and Cherwitz each face up to 20 years in prison for the convictions. They're due to be sentenced in late September. 'The jury's verdict has unmasked Daedone and Cherwitz for who they truly are: grifters who preyed on vulnerable victims by making empty promises of sexual empowerment and wellness only to manipulate them into performing labor and services for the defendants' benefit,' Joseph Nocella, Jr., the interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, said in a statement. 'I commend the witnesses who testified at trial notwithstanding the trauma that they experienced at the defendants' direction. It is my hope that the just conclusion of this process will bring them closure, and that future charlatans think twice about exploiting human beings in this manner.' Christopher G. Raia, assistant director of the FBI's New York field office, said in a statement that he hopes the verdict sends a 'clear message' that 'controlling your labor force by relying on lies, manipulation, and abuse is a crime.' Daedone, who founded OneTaste in 2004, has stated she drew inspiration from the traditional teachings of yoga and Buddhism when she started her company. On Monday, she brought up her 'spiritual' objectives when she addressed her supporters outside the courthouse. 'There is nothing but the spiritual aim that I set out for, and that's the liberation of all people, and the liberation of women. I'll do that wherever I am,' she said, according to The New York Times. OneTaste, which enjoyed some mainstream popularity in the mid-2010s, spread its teachings at various locations in New York, Los Angeles, Denver, Austin, and London, prosecutors said. The company offered hands-on classes on 'orgasmic mediation,' also known as OM, which centered on the practice of reaching new levels of intimacy and enlightenment through the stroking a woman's genitals for extended periods of time. The company generated revenue by providing courses, coaching, OM events, and less-publicized courses in other sexual practices in exchange for a fee, prosecutors said. Daedone became somewhat of a celebrity in the wellness field during her heyday. She delivered a TED Talk that went viral and attracted attention and promotion from celebrities including Gwyneth Paltrow and Khloé Kardashian. But OneTaste later became the subject of several exposés and documentaries alleging the group exploited its employees and participants. According to a Bloomberg Businessweek investigation published in 2018, OneTaste morphed from a glamorous, Silicon Valley-backed start-up into a sinister enterprise described by some as a for-profit sex cult. 'In some members' experiences, the company used flirtation and sex to lure emotionally vulnerable targets. It taught employees to work for free or cheap to show devotion. And managers frequently ordered staffers to have sex or OM (orgasmic meditation) with each other or with customers,' the piece reported. During the trial, multiple other witnesses testified that they were coerced by Daedone and Cherwitz into performing various sex acts with OneTaste's potential clients and investors. The coercion involved threats of termination, demotion, ostracism, and financial and spiritual ruin, they testified. In 2017, Ms. Daedone sold OneTaste for $12 million, prosecutors said. The former website now directs visitors to The Eros Platform, a community that still promotes it affiliation with Daedone, Cherwitz and and their Orgasmic Meditation practice. The Eros Coaching Collective still advertises a three-session OM training package for $525. Best of Rolling Stone Every Super Bowl Halftime Show, Ranked From Worst to Best The United States of Weed Gaming Levels Up

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store