Lightning beat Thunder to go second in NSL
Lightning beat Thunder to go second in NSL
Manchester Thunder began the evening tied on points with Loughborough Lightning [Getty Images]
Loughborough Lightning kept up the pressure on Netball Super League leaders London Pulse with a 65-53 win against Manchester Thunder on Friday.
Thunder had the better of the early stages, but Lightning fought back to lead 38-27 at half-time.
The hosts scored 27 more points after the break to secure victory and move three points above Thunder, after starting the evening tied on 16 points.
Samantha Wallace-Joseph scored 23 goals for Lightning, while Thunder's Elmere van der Berg led the scoring with 27 goals.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
Lightning's Shadine van der Merwe was named player of the match for her performance against her former team.
Reigning champions Lightning began the season with two wins and two defeats, but a fourth straight victory puts them second in the standings, two points behind Pulse having played one game more.
Reaction to Lightning v Thunder
Loughborough Lightning's Shadine van der Merwe speaking to Sky Sports: "I've done my homework. It was important for us as a team to suffocate them, and for then be rewarded. That's exactly what happened, but without the players around me I couldn't have done that.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
"With every win we celebrate, but it's such a short turnaround so we have to focus on the next one.
"We've just passed the halfway mark but we've still got so much growth to do. It's exciting what comes ahead."
Manchester Thunder head coach Karen Greig: "I'm not overly happy with the performance, we knew exactly what Loughborough were going to come out and do to us and we played straight into their traps.
"They set some traps where they had their defenders playing in split circle, and we played into their hands numerous times. Not learning in those moments and adapting is not OK.
ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
"We've got to stand up to the physicality of the game.
"We haven't got a 60-minute goal attack at the minute. We're playing with 18 and 19-year-olds out there, we're having to work really hard to keep legs and minds fresh."
Lightning head coach Vic Burgess: "That performance wasn't perfect, but to grind out a performance against a solid team like Thunder - I'm really proud of them, but there's still lots to work on."
Fixtures and results
Round eight
Friday 2 May
Loughborough Lightning 65-53 Manchester Thunder
Saturday 3 May
London Mavericks v Cardiff Dragons (16:00 BST)
Sunday 4 May
Nottingham Forest v London Pulse (16:00 BST)
Birmingham Panthers v Leeds Rhinos (18:00 BST)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
NBA Finals: Pacers, back home in Indiana, have some things to figure out before Game 3 vs. the Thunder
INDIANAPOLIS — The Indiana Pacers simply couldn't wait to get home early Monday. There's a slew of possible reasons for that. Maybe they just wanted to get out of Oklahoma City with their split of the first two games in the NBA Finals. Maybe they couldn't wait to see what finals fever will look like in Indianapolis after a 25-year wait to get back to the title round. Or maybe they just wanted to get back to work. It's probably a little of everything — especially the last part. Yes, the Pacers are tied with the Thunder 1-1 after two games of the NBA Finals. For the lower-seeded team, that's huge; the Pacers took home-court advantage away by winning Game 1. But they know that if they don't take care of their own business at home, starting with Game 3 on Wednesday night, it'll be advantage Thunder again, just like that. 'We're going to have to be a lot better on Wednesday,' Pacers coach Rick Carlisle said. That might sound like coaching hyperbole, but really, it isn't. The Pacers have yet to have anyone score 20 points in a game in these finals. They've led for a total — a total! — of 1 minute, 54 seconds in this series, or just under 2% of the time. (That's a major improvement over the 0.0001% that they led Game 1 for, in a winning effort, somehow.) And in Game 2, the Thunder held the Pacers without a point in the paint for the entirety of the first quarter. Points in the paint isn't a stat that tends to jump off the page. It's possible that a lot of people didn't even notice. But consider this: Before Sunday night, more than nine years had passed since the Pacers didn't manage a single paint point in the first quarter of a game. 'We have to do a better job of getting to the paint,' Pacers guard Tyrese Haliburton said. 'It's a lot easier said than done. … Our offense is built from the inside-out, and we have to do a better job getting downhill. They collapse and make plays from there. I thought we could improve a lot there. But yeah, man, they are flying around. They have got great point-of-attack defenders and great rim protectors.' For a team that has now won 81 of its 100 games this season (not counting the NBA Cup final loss, since that doesn't figure into any records), the Thunder somehow tend to get overlooked on the defensive end. Oklahoma City handcuffed the Pacers in the first two games, daring Indiana to take 3-pointers and barely giving up anything easy around the rim. It starts with bothering Haliburton, which the Thunder have managed to do for the majority of the first two games. 'Most of the guys I guard have the ball most of the time,' said Thunder forward Luguentz Dort, who has drawn the assignment on Haliburton for much of the first two games. 'My main thing is to stay in front of him and make everything tough. He's a great player. He is going to make some tough shots and great reads, so I just have to stay in front of him.' No team gave up fewer paint points in the regular season than the Thunder. It truly is a clash of styles; the Pacers are averaging 46 paint points in their 13 wins in these playoffs as opposed to averaging 36 paint points in their five losses. 'I think we have been one of the better teams scoring in the paint all year and we have to establish that early,' Pacers forward Myles Turner said. 'I think we only had four or six points in the paint in the first half (of Game 2) and that's not Pacers basketball. When you live and die by that three or mid-range shots, it doesn't always fare well for you.' Maybe at home, things will be easier. The Pacers got a split in Oklahoma City; things could be much worse. And now, the Pacers have two days to try to find a way to respond to what the Thunder defense is taking away. 'We'll watch the film, see where we can get better,' Haliburton said. 'We know that the paint is our emphasis and the paint is our friend. The more that we're able to attack the paint, usually better things happen for us.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
How OKC Thunder GM Sam Presti became the best executive in sports
Sam Presti has nothing left to prove. But his team might do some proving anyway. General Manager of the Oklahoma City Thunder; the 2025 NBA Executive of the Year; drafter of Tony Parker, Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, and James Harden; traded for Paul George when the team was floundering, traded Paul George to form the backbone of a juggernaut; finder of Jalen Williams and Lu Dort; hirer of Mark Daigneault; universally considered 'the best general manager in the NBA' by all who know ball. Advertisement There are no master plans in the NBA, only skillful damage control — one never quite knows when a superstar will bolt or who will be available when you're on the clock. But Presti has controlled everyone and everything to such a degree since he took over the Seattle Supersonics in 2007 that it feels like this was all one big scheme. For a team in a small market never itching to pay the luxury tax, Presti has somehow constructed the best team in the NBA that's also the youngest. Trade after trade, draft after draft, Presti has found diamonds in the rough. Jalen Williams has blown through every pre-draft expectation as a scorer, and the undrafted Lu Dort may now be the NBA's best defender. With how many unheralded prospects are getting real minutes in the playoffs, you might think Presti has perfected the art of NBA Moneyball. But that's a mischaracterization, as he's also found plenty of diamonds in the jewelry store. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was an elite young player (though nobody knew this would happen), and acquired only through the Thunder trading George, their best player. Many thought Chet Holmgren could be the number one pick, with Presti selecting him at two. Alex Caruso cost only Josh Giddey in a trade, and he's been critical to Oklahoma City's success this year. Ultimately, Presti hasn't just found the hidden treasures. He's also known when to buy the shiny ones. This all has made the Thunder are a terrifying-horrifying-so-good-very-baller basketball team that could make the next few years in the NBA feel like a zombie apocalypse. Presti has done his job, and the team doesn't need to win the championship to prove him right. He's got years of brilliant management doing that. Advertisement However likely it looks right now, there's a non-zero chance this Thunder team never wins an NBA title. Does that make Presti a bad GM? Of course not! Does that make the Paul George trade, which pulled a league MVP out of a top hat, wrong? Ridiculous! Should the Indiana Pacers actually pull this thing off, it won't because Presti made some critical error in roster construction. Right and wrong in NBA discourse is really just playing the results. Ex post facto declarations that, because of a success or failure, the whole construction of a team was flawed. But I studied history in college, and people told me that you have to wait 20 years before studying results can yield usable opinions. There is no defensible reason to predict the Pacers will win this series beyond believing the outcomes of basketball games are random, the greatest testament to Presti's work. I'm much more interested in why people are right and wrong. If an ESPN analyst picks the Pacers to win, and then they do, does that make them smarter than everyone else? Or did they just load up a public relations lottery ticket and cash it in? Presti's success came every day, and it almost doesn't matter how it ends. So why has Presti been more successful than everyone else? You could argue he's just a genius, able to see things before they happen like some sort of supervillian with telekinetic draft powers. And in that respect, 16-year-old Presti did write a letter to the Boston Globe expounding why his hometown Boston Celtics should change their team-building philosophy and draft a certain guard out of Cal in 1994. Advertisement 'The rebuilding of this once-massive dynasty must begin now. We need to clean house; let players go and clear up salary room for our draft pick. Although the draft is not incredibly deep this year, I do see a future star on the horizon,' Presti wrote to the Globe. 'Jason Kidd from the University of California has the skills and pure basketball sense to be a superstar and a savior to a struggling franchise.' So, you know, not a bad read from a 16-year-old. But behind every genius is a great deal of luck, and behind every great investment is a massive gamble. Had Shai Gilgeous-Alexander become the next D'Angelo Russell rather than the next, like… Kobe Bryant, this Thunder team simply would not work as well as it does. The wrong coach could have likewise torpedoed this wiley collection of ball-handling swings; imagine Tom Thibodeau coaching a team with an average age of 24. He'd combust. But maybe it all works because it works together, within a coherent and committed philosophy that Presti refuses to stray from. Keep reloading, keep a million chips in your pocket and never play them all. Since he took over in 2007, Presti has been refueling the Thunder over and over, never quite able to finish the job but always avoiding complete disaster. If the Thunder lose, some will say they need to go 'all in' and trade their entire war chest of assets for, say, Giannis Antetokounmpo. But Presti has spent a career proving that it's better to be lucky than aggressive, and perhaps more swings of the bat beat one swing from a guy batting .350. Advertisement This team only works because everything is subordinated to his philosophy. It's flexible and ever-changing, but always coherent and powerful. It used to be three of the best scorers in the world in Westbrook, Harden, and Durant. Now it's ball-handling and defense from 1-12 in the rotation. Maybe tomorrow it will be 13 Kyle Korvers all shooting exactly eight threes a game each. But there's nothing left for him to prove. If it's rings you want, Presti already has them — three, in fact, while Assistant General Manager with the San Antonio Spurs. General Managers can't make or miss shots, can't sub players in and out. They're artists who, after painting their masterpiece, have to release it into the world for consumption. Should the Thunder fall short again, Presti will reload again. He'll reconfigure, run damage control, tinker and fix because the 'master plan' was always just making the best out of every situation. Win three straight titles or win none for the next decade, it hardly matters. Presti has shown the proof is in the pudding, and he'll keep cooking until the sun goes down. More from
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Every Thunder-ous exploit by Shai Gilgeous-Alexander makes the Clippers' trade look worse
Paul George (left) was acquired by the Clippers from the Oklahoma City Thunder in 2019 for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (right) and five first-round draft picks. (Wally Skalij / Los Angeles Times; Nate Billings / Associated Press) It screamed watershed moment, the forever luckless Clippers outfoxing the eternally exalted Lakers for the services of not one, but two superstars. The news stunned the NBA: In a matter of hours, the Clippers had traded for Paul George and signed Kawhi Leonard. Advertisement Six years later, the deal for George is considered tragically lopsided, the Clippers fleeced and forced to watch assets they surrendered lift the Oklahoma City Thunder to within three wins of an NBA championship. The trade wouldn't be looked upon harshly had the Clippers won a championship in the five seasons that George and Leonard played together. But the deepest the team advanced was the Western Conference finals in 2021. George left as a free agent in last offseason, signing with the Philadelphia 76ers. Leonard has played in only 266 of 472 games with the Clippers because of injuries. The Clippers paid George $195.9 million and have paid Leonard $194.6 million — with Leonard under contract for another two years and $100.3 million. Read more: Plaschke: I'm fighting Parkinson's one punch at a time Advertisement Meanwhile, one of the two players shipped to the Thunder along with five first-round draft picks, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, has blossomed into the NBA's most valuable player. And the 2022 draft pick acquired from the Clippers was used to select Jalen Williams, a rising star who averaged 21.6 points a game this season. Both are bargains. Gilgeous-Alexander — known as SGA — was paid just $13.5 million his first three seasons with the Thunder before signing a five-year, $173-million contract that will take him through the 2026-27 season. Williams has made $13.7 million in three seasons and will be paid $6.6 million next season, the last of his rookie contract. And it's a deal that just keeps giving — to the Thunder, who as a result of the trade get the Nos. 15 and 24 picks in this year's draft and the Clippers' first-round pick in 2026. Asked to evaluate the deal moments after the Clippers defeated the Thunder in January 2024, George grudgingly acknowledged that the pendulum had swung toward Oklahoma City. Advertisement 'I just think both sides won,' he said. "I did think it was quite a lot that the Clippers were willing to give up. ... When that trade first happened, we knew Shai was going to be really, really good, but he's special." George sighed and continued: "I guess in a way, Oklahoma won that trade with the picks and future MVP, but both sides won.' Read more: Markazi: A behind the scenes look at how the Clippers won Kawhi Leonard and Paul George The fact is, the Clippers couldn't say no to the deal. Why? Because Leonard was a free agent coming off an NBA title with Toronto in which he was Finals MVP, and he was weighing offers from the Lakers and Raptors as well as the Clippers. Advertisement Signing Leonard was paramount, and he had given the Clippers something of an ultimatum: Trade for a star and I'm yours. Otherwise, it's hello Lakers. Knowing the Clippers desperately needed to consummate the deal, Thunder general manager Sam Presti demanded SGA — who was coming off an impressive rookie campaign — respected forward Danilo Gallinari and the slew of draft picks. Unforeseen was that SGA would rapidly rise from promising youngster to foundational piece to perhaps the best player in the NBA. He led the league in scoring this season with 32.7 points a game. He put up 34 points, eight assists and five rebounds in the Thunder's win over the Indiana Pacers in Game 2 of the Finals on Sunday. In Game 1, a stunning Pacers comeback was helped by two late missed shots by SGA. Still, he scored 38 points, and his 72 in his first two NBA Finals games is a league record. Advertisement Read more: Trouble finds ex-NBA star Shawn Kemp once again, and he may serve time for it 'I'm being myself,' Gilgeous-Alexander told reporters. 'I don't think I tried to reinvent the wheel or step up to the plate with a different mindset. Just try to attack the game the right way. I think I've done a pretty good job of that so far." Through 18 playoff games, SGA is averaging 30.4 points, 6.8 assists, 5.6 rebounds and 1.8 steals. Only Michael Jordan and LeBron James have recorded those numbers during a playoff run of 16 or more games. None of this is a complete surprise. SGA provided the Clippers with opportunities to feel seller's remorse soon after the trade. On Dec. 22, 2019, he scored 32 points with five assists and two steals in a 118–112 Thunder victory. Two years later almost to the day, he made a three-pointer at the buzzer to give the Thunder a 104–103 win. Advertisement Next is closing out the Finals and delivering a title to Oklahoma City — something that has proven elusive for the Clippers, the oldest franchise in North American professional sports to have never played in a championship game. "This is where we are, you can't go back in the past," SGA said. "You can only make the future better. That's what I'm focused on.' The Clippers can only do the same. Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
