Removal of beach sea defences given go-ahead
Work to remove sea defences from a Dorset beach is due to begin in September after the scheme to "allow nature to take its course" received planning consent.
The National Trust is proposing "managed realignment" followed by "no intervention" at Middle Beach, Studland, in response to climate change and coastal erosion.
It said the stone gabions were "collapsing and a risk to the public" and their removal would result in a more natural beach within two years.
Dorset Council approved the application after receiving no objections from Natural England, conservation and environment officers and Studland Parish Council.
The site, between South Beach and Knoll Beach, is next to a 120-space car park.
Bracken and sycamore saplings in a neighbouring area will also be removed as part of wider works to create areas of open sand for invertebrate species, breeding birds and reptiles, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
The agent, on behalf of the trust, said: "Once the defences are removed, the shoreline will readjust quite rapidly to a natural alignment, in line with the shoreline management plan, and ensuring the beach future."
The trust said the works would result in a natural cove and an enhanced wildlife habitat for sand lizards and birds.
Work will also be timed to "minimise the impact on beachgoers, and avoid disturbing sand lizards during the egg-laying period".
It said the cafe, toilets and beach would remain open.
A beach cafe which operated at the site for more than 70 years was demolished by the National Trust in 2023 due to erosion, with a replacement opened in the car park.
You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Sea defences could be removed at beauty spot
Cafe on eroding beach closes ahead of demolition
Beach cafe set to be torn down in New Year
National Trust
Dorset Council
Local Democracy Reporting Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
4 hours ago
- Fox News
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 'feared' King Charles delayed their kids' passports over royal titles: report
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle reportedly "feared" that the lengthy delay in the issuance of U.K. passports for their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, was due to King Charles III's alleged opposition to the use of their royal titles. According to the Guardian, the couple considered changing their family's last name to Spencer due to their "sheer exasperation" over the unexplained months-long wait for the legal documents. Per the outlet, the 40-year-old Duke of Sussex had a face-to-face discussion with his uncle, Earl Charles Spencer, about the idea of taking his late mother Princess Diana's surname for his family. However, the idea of the prospective name change was dropped when the passports for Harry and Meghan's son Archie, 6, and daughter Lilibet, 4, arrived almost six months after their applications were first submitted. According to the Guardian, the standard waiting period for passports in the U.K. is three weeks. "There was clear reluctance to issue passports for the kids," a source close to the Sussexes told the outlet. According to a source that spoke with the Guardian, British officials were allegedly "dragging their feet because the passport applications included the titles HRH (His/Her Royal Highness) for both children." The source went on to claim that "the king hadn't wanted Archie and Lili to carry the titles, most of all the HRH, and the British passports, once created, would be the first and perhaps the only legal proof of their names." Fox News Digital has reached out to Buckingham Palace for comment. A representative for Buckingham Palace told the Telegraph that they strongly deny that Charles or palace officials had any involvement in the delay regarding the passports for Archie and Lilibet. The spokesperson told the outlet, "No," when asked if the palace made any suggestion or raised any objection to the children's passports being issued with the HRH titles. Meanwhile, the source told the Guardian that "Harry was at a point where British passports for his children with their updated Sussex surnames (since the death of Queen Elizabeth II) were being blocked with a string of excuses over the course of five months." The source continued, "Out of sheer exasperation he went to his uncle to effectively say: 'My family are supposed to have the same name and they're stopping that from happening because the kids are legally HRH, so if push comes to shove, if this blows up and they won't let the kids be called Sussex, then can we use Spencer as a surname?'" Fox News Digital confirmed that Harry did have a meeting with Earl Spencer in which they discussed the name change. However, a source said that earlier reports that Earl Spencer told the Duke, "the legal hurdles were insurmountable," and his uncle "advised him against taking such a step" were "wholly inaccurate." A spokesperson for the duke told Fox News Digital, "We do not comment on private issues pertaining to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children." According to the Guardian, the Sussexes faced multiple delays while trying to obtain their children's passports. The outlet reported that the children's passports were finally issued shortly after the couple's lawyers sent a letter to the U.K.'s Home Office in which they threatened to submit a data subject access request. Per the Guardian, the request "could have revealed details of the delays – and the nature of any behind-the-scenes discussions between British officials responsible for issuing the documents." Earlier this week, People magazine reported that Archie and Lilbet have Mountbatten-Windsor listed as their last names on their birth certificates. However, the family now uses Sussex as their last name, just as Harry was known as "Harry Wales" during his childhood when his parents held the titles of Prince and Princess of Wales. It's a tradition within the royal family for children to take their parents' titles as a surname. Harry and Meghan no longer use their HRH titles since stepping down as working royals in January 2020. At the time, Buckingham Palace said in a statement, "The Sussexes will not use their HRH titles as they are no longer working members of the Royal Family." However, the Sussexes announced in 2023 that their children would keep their HRH titles and the royal family's website updated their line of succession to include Prince Archie of Sussex and Princess Lilibet of Sussex, listed right after their father. "The children's titles have been a birthright since their grandfather became monarch. This matter has been settled for some time in alignment with Buckingham Palace," a spokesperson for the Sussexes confirmed to Fox News Digital at the time. According to the Guardian, "Prince Harry wants to keep the HRH titles for his children so that when they grow older they can decide for themselves whether they want to become working royals, or stay out of public life."
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
A first look at Greenwich Park's new resident deer
Greenwich Park's new resident deer have begun to settle into their new home one month after arriving. Last month Greenwich Park rangers introduced a new herd of fallow and red deer, marking the return of deer to the park for the first time in four years. Last month Greenwich Park rangers introduced a new herd of fallow and red deer. (Image: The Royal Parks) The park's former herd were relocated to Richmond in 2021 following renovation works to the park. Since 2021 the paddock habitat has undergone improvements, including expanding the size and adding access to the nearby woodland for the new arrivals. Since 2021 the paddock habitat has undergone improvements, including expanding the size and adding access to the nearby woodland. (Image: The Royal Parks) In a statement, Park Manager Claire Lanes said that the deer are 'settling in really well' since arriving last month, and advised visitors that the deer may not be visible initially as they acclimatise to their new surroundings. Park Manager Claire Lanes said that the deer are 'settling in really well'. (Image: The Royal Parks) Clare Lanes, Park Manager of Greenwich Park, said: 'The deer have been back for one month now and are settling in really well. 'They are keeping to themselves as they get used to their new environment which is why they might be harder to spot for the first few months. 'We check on them daily and are very pleased to have them back in the park.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Edinburgh resident fumes after entire construction site appears outside his bedroom
An Edinburgh man has slammed the council for placing a construction office and materials outside of his bedroom window without prior notice. Graeme Heavey, has said he is being woken up at 7am in the morning by delivery trucks on a regular basis and his mental health is suffering as a result. What frustrates the 51-year-old most is the Hailesland Gardens site for the office and materials is over 100metres away from where work is being carried out - and Graeme believes it should be moved closer to the construction site. READ MORE: Edinburgh University boss who 'didn't know his own salary' spent £47k on luxury travel READ MORE: Tragedy as West Lothian man dies in crash after air ambulance lands on busy road 'My neighbour and I are not happy about this,' he said. 'The council have given authority for contractors to have a compound and offices opposite my bedroom window. 'My bedroom window and the proximity to my house is less than 25m from my bedroom window. Come 7am and there are roll on - roll off skips getting dropped off, trucks in the street delivering windows really early. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages. 'I suffer from mental health issues and this has all been inflamed by the noise and being woken up early. Of course this is frustrating on a personal level but what has reality irked those on our street is we were given no notice. 'Something disruptive has been placed right outside our homes and we were given no right of reply. We look at the council enforce their own rules and if someone is constructing something privately, they would rightly have their knuckles wrapped if they did not follow the correct regulations. 'I feel I have been badly treated by the council and their attitude is just to deal with it. We have already had three years of work being done on our own homes but now we have to be the site to store materials for other blocks and we are getting no benefit from it.' Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox Graeme added MP Scott Arthur's office had been extremely helpful in raising the issue on behalf of residents. Edinburgh Council have been approached for comment.
