XQ-58 Valkyrie With Built-In Landing Gear Shown In New Rendering
Kratos has released a rendering offering the first look at a version of its stealthy XQ-58A Valkyrie drone with built-in landing gear. The company first announced that this new version, which might present certain advantages over the original runway-independent design, was in the works last year.
A social media post from Kratos' official account on X included the rendering of the tricycle landing gear-equipped XQ-58, seen at the top of this story. This is the third launch and recovery method the company has developed for the Valkyrie and follows the unveiling of a special launch trolley last year that allows existing versions to take off from traditional runways. The uncrewed aircraft was originally designed for completely runway-independent operation, using expendable rocket boosters to get into the air via ground-based launchers and a parachute recovery system to get back down after a sortie. The company has also shown a concept for a containerized launch system in the past.
'A conventional take-off and landing (CTOL), also referred to as horizontal take-off and landing (HTOL), is the method by which fixed-wing aircraft take off and land using runways,' Kratos' post on X about the new XQ-58 with landing gear also reads. 'Being runway flexible/runway independent delivers maximum operational utility to the warfighter.'
A conventional take-off and landing (CTOL), also referred to as horizontal take-off and landing (HTOL), is the method by which fixed-wing aircraft take off and land using runways. Being runway flexible/runway independent delivers maximum operational utility to the warfighter.… pic.twitter.com/CZNtA3LoyW
— Kratos (@KratosDefense) April 14, 2025
The rendering shows the single wheel nose and main landing gear units. The nose gear is appears to be designed to retract forward into a bay covered by two trapezoidal-shaped doors, while the two main gear units retract into bays on either side of the fuselage that are each covered by a single door.
As depicted, the overall design of the CTOL/HTOL version of the XQ-58 otherwise looks largely unchanged from the standard type. Kratos has not yet released more specific details about how the new configuration differs from the runway-independent one, especially when it comes to its gross and maximum takeoff weights, speed, and endurance.
When asked for more information about how the CTOL/HTOL differs from existing XQ-58 variants, Kratos told TWZ today it could not currently provide any additional details. Runway-independent versions of the drone could 'technically' be converted into landing gear-equipped ones, 'but the intent is that there are multiple Valkyrie configurations to support different mission requirements,' a company representative said.
'You'll be able to do a conventional takeoff and land with retractable gear,' Steve Fendley, President of the Unmanned Systems Division at Kratos, did tell Aviation Week, according to a recent report from that outlet. 'You give up a proportion of your payload volume of your internal payload, but you can still maintain all the external.'
Existing XQ-58s can carry weapons and other stores in an internal bay, as well as a single hardpoint under each wing. Kratos has previously disclosed that there are at least five different Valkyrie variants, including a 'Block 2' runway-independent version with improved performance and a heavier overall weight than the original design.
The company has also said in the past that it is working on a version tailored to U.S. Marine Corps operational needs, tentatively referred to as the MQ-58B, with a focus on being able to launch electronic attacks to suppress enemy air defenses while operating in cooperation with crewed F-35B Joint Strike Fighters. The Marines and the U.S. Air Force, the latter of which is the XQ-58's first known operator, currently fly Valkyries for research and development and test and evaluation use.
TWZ has previously highlighted the benefits of the XQ-58's runway-independent configuration. This capability could be especially valuable in a future high-end fight in the Pacific against China, where large established airbases would be prime targets, and other available traditional runways could be few and far between. The Valkyrie aligns particularly well with the Marine Corps' vision for future island-hopping scenarios that already heavily feature the short takeoff and vertical landing capabilities of its F-35Bs.
At the same time, a runway-independent configuration can present limits on maximum takeoff weight, which, in turn, have impacts on range and payload capacity. Kratos previously told The War Zone that the launch trolley configuration offers an increase that 'is in the 10s of % for both fuel and payload capacity' and 'enables quite an advantage for amount of payload and range / endurance of the system.'
Landing gear presents additional benefits over the static launcher/parachute recovery combination when it comes to sortie generation, as well as making it easier to integrate the drones with normal runway-centric tactical air operations. Kratos has previously pointed out that the trolley-launched configuration would also not be dependent on the availability of rocket motors, which would also be true for operations with CTOL/HTOL types.
The emergence of the landing gear-equipped XQ-58 does follow Kratos' pronounced absence from the competition to build the first tranche of drones for the U.S. Air Force's Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program. General Atomics and Anduril were subsequently selected to build flying prototypes of their designs, now designated YFQ-42A and YFQ-44A, respectively, under CCA's Increment 1. Both of these drones are designed to operate from traditional runways.
Kratos has previously expressed interest in participating in the forthcoming CCA Increment 2 competition, the requirements for which are still being finalized. The Air Force has indicated that it could ask for more performance and capability-wise from the Increment 2 drones than it did with Increment 1, which could lead to higher unit costs.
The XQ-58 has historically been presented as a lower-cost and at least somewhat attritable design, which stands in significant contrast to what has emerged from the Air Force's CCA program so far.
A CTOL/HTOL XQ-58 might also be of interest to the U.S. Navy for operations from carriers and other big-deck ships. The service has its own CCA program that is directly intertwined with the Air Force's effort, but is very much still in the process of defining its particular requirements. In the past, the Navy has also expressed explicit interest in cheaper carrier-based drones that could be 'consumed' as weapons or targets at the end of service lives measured in hundreds of flight hours rather than years.
The Navy did just recently confirm to TWZ that it has a particular interest in the MQ-28 Ghost Bat that Boeing's subsidiary in Australia has been developing for that country's air force. The Navy and the Royal Australian Air Force have been actively collaborating on the ongoing development of the MQ-28. Boeing has also already been pitching a carrier-based version of the Ghost Bat with a tail hook, including to the Royal Navy in the United Kingdom.
Interestingly, back in 2021, the Navy also put out a call for ideas about how to recover runway-independent XQ-58s aboard its then-new Expeditionary Sea Base ships. That notice also raised the possibility of employing similarly-sized drones with landing gear and tail hooks from those vessels.
The XQ-58 family could present an option for the Navy that could be acquired in multiple configurations for operations from carriers and other ships using different launch and recovery methods, including via containerized launchers.
The possibility of foreign sales of variants and derivatives of the XQ-58, as well as other operationalized designs in the company's 'tactical' portfolio, has come up in the past. Kratos has already secured overseas sales of target drones designed for use in training, as well as in support of research and development and test and evaluation activities.
When Kratos' CEO Eric DeMarco first confirmed his company was working on the CTOL/HTOL version of the XQ-58 in August 2024, he indicated that it would flying 'very soon.' Kratos told TWZ it could not provide a timeline for when that first flight might occur.
More information about this version and its capabilities may begin to emerge once it is confirmed to have taken to the skies for the first time.
Contact the author: joe@twz.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19-05-2025
- Yahoo
Our First Look At The YFQ-42 ‘Fighter Drone' Collaborative Combat Aircraft
We now have our first actual look at General Atomics' YFQ-42A 'fighter drone' prototype. The YFQ-42A, as well as Anduril's YFQ-44A, are being developed under the first phase, or Increment 1, of the U.S. Air Force's Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program, and both designs are expected to make their maiden flights later this year. Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force Gen. David Allvin shared the picture of the YFQ-42A seen at the top of this story on social media today. The Air Force had announced the start of ground testing of both Increment 1 CCA designs on May 1, at which time the first images of a Anduril's YFQ-44A were also released. 'THE WORLD's FIRST LOOK AT OUR NEW YFQ-42A!' Allvin wrote in an accompanying post on X. 'As the @DeptofDefense matches threats to capabilities under @SecDef's [Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth's] leadership, Collaborative Combat Aircraft will prove not only cost-effective, but truly lethal…No doubts these uncrewed fighters will put our adversaries on notice!' THE WORLD's FIRST LOOK AT OUR NEW YFQ-42A! As the @DeptofDefense matches threats to capabilities under @SecDef's leadership, Collaborative Combat Aircraft will prove not only cost-effective, but truly lethal…No doubts these uncrewed fighters will put our adversaries on notice! — General David Allvin (@OfficialCSAF) May 19, 2025 'The YFQ-42A is an exciting next step for our company,' David Alexander, President of General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc., said in a separate statement. 'It reflects many years of partnership with the U.S. Air Force of advancing unmanned combat aviation for the United States and its allies around the world, and we're excited to begin ground testing and move to first flight.' What can be seen in the head-on view of the YFQ-42A we have now is largely in line with renderings and physical models that General Atomics has shown in the past. The design has some low-observable (stealthy) features and shares some broad similarities with past company designs like the Avenger. It is also notably less slender than Anduril's YFQ-44A, which could offer advantages and disadvantages. General Atomics has also previously confirmed that its CCA design is derived from the experimental XQ-67A drone originally developed for the Air Force's once-secretive Off-Board Sensing Station (OBSS) program. A core aspect of OBSS was a so-called 'genus/species' concept, involving a core 'genus' set of components from which multiple 'species' of differently configured drones could be crafted, lessons from which the Air Force has said are being incorporated broadly into the CCA program. General Atomics has been further proving that concept out via its Gambit family of drones, which all feature a common 'chassis' that incorporates landing gear, as well as key mission and flight control computer systems. The XQ-67A has been flying for more than a year now, offering General Atomics a valuable risk reduction asset for its CCA work, as well. Though partially obscured by the flight-test data probe, there is a notably different colored section on the bottom of the front of the nose with what looks to be a grill and an additional feature of some kind above it, the purpose of which is not immediately clear. Past renderings of the General Atomics CCA design have shown a trapezoidal window in the same general location, a feature typically associated with forward-facing electro-optical and/or infrared sensor systems. As TWZ has noted in the past, the position under the nose could be a likely location for an infrared search and track (IRST) sensor. IRSTs can spot stealthy targets and offer other benefits, and would align with the air-to-air combat role that is expected to be the main focus of the Increment 1 CCAs, at least initially. General Atomics has been separately using its stealthy Avenger drones to demonstrate potential air-to-air combat capabilities, including while equipped with podded IRST systems. Anduril's YFQ-44A also notably has what appears to be a forward-facing camera system prominently on top of its nose, which could, at least, be used to provide visual inputs for control and additional situational awareness during initial testing. General Atomics' YFQ-42A prototype could have a broadly similar system installed in its nose. What may be the doors for the YFQ-42A's ventral payload bay are also visible, along with the drone's tricycle landing gear. 'I think CCA can actually be, in some cases, a mobility aircraft,' Mike Atwood, vice president for Advanced Programs at General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. (GA-ASI), had said during a panel discussion at the Air & Space Forces Association's (AFA) 2025 Warfare Symposium in March. 'One of the reasons that GA chose to have an internal weapons bay was for carrying not just missiles and kinetics, but to do that logistics.' 'We showed up at these World War II leftover airfields. And we quickly realized these airfields are in really bad shape, really bad shape, and we started to really appreciate runway distance,' Atwood had also said at AFA's annual Warfare Symposium. 'It's hard to make a fast-moving aircraft use a lot less runway. And so what we realized is we needed a trailing-arm landing gear.' A trailing-arm landing gear arrangement helps ease the impact of landing, which in turn can help reduce wear and tear, something that is especially beneficial for operations from short and potentially rough fields. It can also similarly help with rough field takeoffs. The Air Force said that the Increment 1 CCAs are the first aircraft, crewed or uncrewed, to be developed from the ground up to align with its Agile Combat Employment (ACE) concepts of operations. ACE centers heavily on short-notice and otherwise irregular deployments, including to far-flung locations with limited infrastructure. You can read more about how the Air Force's CCA vision aligns with ACE here. As it stands now, the Air Force is still looking to acquire 1,000 CCAs, if not more, across a series of iterative development cycles. Service officials have previously said that between 100 and 150 Increment 1 CCAs could be acquired, but it remains unclear whether that fleet with consist of YFQ-42As, YFQ-44As, or a mix of both types. 'A competitive Increment 1 production decision is expected in fiscal year 2026,' which begins on October 1, 2025, the Air Force had said as part of the announcement about the start of ground testing at the beginning of the month. The Air Force is now in the process of finalizing requirements for Increment 2 of CCA, which are expected to be significantly different from those for Increment 1. In March, Air Force Maj. Gen. Joseph D. Kunkel, director of Force Design, Integration, and Wargaming and deputy chief of staff for Air Force Futures, indicated that the second phase of the program could call for designs that are both less complex and cheaper. More details are likely to continue to emerge about the Increment 1 CCA designs, as well as other plans for the program, as the YFQ-42A and YFQ-44A progress through ground testing toward their first flights. Contact the author: joe@
Yahoo
19-05-2025
- Yahoo
Strong Results Lifted Kratos Defense & Security Solutions (KTOS)
Baron Funds, an investment management company, released its 'Baron Discovery Fund' first quarter 2025 investor letter. A copy of the letter can be downloaded here. In the first quarter, the fund was down 6.17% (Institutional Shares), outperforming the -11.12% return for the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The market began strong in February but faded due to Trump's serious tariff enactment, which the market perceives as inflationary and slowing economic growth. The decline accelerated after April 2nd, causing fears of a trade war and global recession. In addition, please check the fund's top five holdings to know its best picks in 2025. In its first-quarter 2025 investor letter, Baron Discovery Fund highlighted stocks such as Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS). Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS) is a technology company, that offers mission-critical products, services, and solutions. The one-month return of Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS) was 10.31%, and its shares gained 62.71% of their value over the last 52 weeks. On May 16, 2025, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS) stock closed at $35.21 per share with a market capitalization of $5.397 billion. Baron Discovery Fund stated the following regarding Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS) in its Q1 2025 investor letter: "Shares of Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS), a disruptive defense technology provider, rose following a strong quarterly earnings report that demonstrated notable strength across multiple segments and guided to faster than baseline growth in fiscal 2026. We believe Kratos is increasingly well positioned to accelerate growth with its exposure to what are arguably the fastest growing segments of the defense ecosystem, including hypersonic missiles, solid rocket motors, and unmanned aircraft solutions. The company is hitting its stride and is making huge investments now to satisfy what it believes to be very visible future demand." A technician in a laboratory carrying out research and development of microwave electronics. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS) is not on our list of 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 21 hedge fund portfolios held Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS) at the end of the fourth quarter, compared to 20 in the third quarter. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS) reported revenues of $302.6 million, surpassing its guidance range. While we acknowledge the potential of Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS) as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns, and doing so within a shorter timeframe. If you are looking for an AI stock that is as promising as NVIDIA but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about the undervalued AI stock set for massive gains. In another article, we covered Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ:KTOS) and shared the list of best military drone stocks to buy. In addition, please check out our hedge fund investor letters Q1 2025 page for more investor letters from hedge funds and other leading investors. READ NEXT: Michael Burry Is Selling These Stocks and A New Dawn Is Coming to US Stocks. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
09-05-2025
- Yahoo
Two Secretive Loyal Wingman Drones Aimed At European Market In Development From Kratos
Two new drone designs, Apollo and Athena, are in development at Kratos with a particular focus on collaborative operations with other crewed and uncrewed aircraft, and an eye toward sales in Europe. The modular Apollo and Athena designs are smaller than the company's XQ-58 Valkyrie, and could be configured to carry weapons, electronic warfare systems, or additional sensors. Steve Fendley, President of Kratos' Unmanned Systems Division, shared details about Apollo and Athena in an interview with TWZ's Howard Altman on the sidelines of the annual Modern Day Marine exposition last week. In December 2024, Kratos confirmed to us that it secured contracts for both drones, but said it could not provide any additional information. During a quarterly earnings call in August 2024, Kratos CEO Eric DeMarco had disclosed the Apollo contract and said one for Athena was expected in the coming months. The company has yet to release imagery of either design. 'I can't say too much, but there they are high-subsonic systems,' Fendley told TWZ. 'They're quite a bit smaller than the [XQ-58] Valkyrie. So, much smaller footprint.' Fendley also said that Kratos was targeting a sub-$5 million unit price for both Apollo and Athena, which have highly modular designs to allow them to be configured for multiple mission sets. Per Kratos' website at the time of writing, the company says the Valkyrie is 30 feet long, has a 27-foot wingspan, a dry weight of 2,500 pounds, and a maximum takeoff weight of 6,000 pounds. The drone also has a stated cruising speed of 0.72 Mach, a maximum speed of 0.85 Mach, and a maximum range of 3,000 nautical miles. In 2022, the company also announced it had developed a Block 2 version with a heavier overall weight, but did not provide a specific weight figure. A number of additional variants have been developed since then, but specific details about their configurations remain limited. Kratos has also said in the past that its goal is to eventually drive down Valkyrie's unit cost to around $2 million. However, last year, the company told TWZ that the price tag for a single XQ-58 was still between $4 and $6 million, depending on the exact configuration. In general, Kratos has historically focused on lower-cost designs and ones that can be manufactured relatively quickly. Apollo and Athena 'are designed to be hard to detect,' Fendley added, but did not elaborate on. There are various ways to reduce an aircraft's radar cross-section, as well as its infrared, auditory, and visual signatures. For instance, the external moldline, the shape and position of the engine intake and exhaust, and other features of the XQ-58 contribute to that design's low-observability (stealthiness). 'The big focus' with both of the new drones 'is interactive collaboration of multiple aircraft at the same time,' Fendley explained. 'So multiple uncrewed aircraft at the same time, collaborating, [and] performing' missions with, 'basically, any fighter or attack aircraft in the inventory, that's that's the intent.' 'So joining those [Apollo and Athena] aircraft, or even Valkyrie, up with a fifth-gen[eration stealth] fighter, you have some capability to get to go out in front. You have some capability to basically light up the enemy,' he continued. 'But what's really interesting, when you combine it with a [non-stealthy] fourth-gen or even a third-gen system – which, of course, the U.S. doesn't do much of that anymore, but the international customers do – what you really do is you substantially increase the capability of that third or fourth-gen system because now it has off-board capability that's not adding risk to that system.' 'So let's pick an F-16. The F-16 can have a Valkyrie or an Athena or Apollo doing part of a mission that it normally would do, but it would have to be within a risk area to be able to conduct that part,' he added. Speaking in more general terms about drones with the kinds of capabilities that Athena and Apollo are expected to offer, 'one use case is a system that's hard to detect … can, from a, let's say, from an EW [electronic warfare] perspective, can detect potential threats or potential targets of interest without being detected itself, which again, brings a capability that you can't do with a third or fourth-gen fighter system,' Fendley said. 'The other use case is if you have a group of them [the drones] and a handful of them are configured for EW, and a handful of them are carrying actual weapons – either air-to-surface, air-to-ground, or air-to-air – the sensor system can identify the target, can point out the target, basically pass the coordinates, and then the weapons aircraft can conduct the termination mission.' 'One of the other things that allows us to be more cost-effective than others is we don't put all that on one aircraft,' he continued. 'Let's just talk in rough numbers. Let's say there are six useful mission systems. And, again, rough numbers. Let's call three of them sensor-type systems, three of them weapon-type systems. We won't put all six on any one aircraft. We'll distribute that. It allows each aircraft to be much less expensive. It also allows you in a large mission, it allows you to distribute your risk and make it very hard for the enemy to decide 'do I want to shoot down a sensor airplane or a weapons airplane?'' For years now, TWZ has been highlighting the inherent benefits of distributing systems and associated roles among individual drones in a fully networked swarm or other collaborative environment. Beyond helping to reduce the cost of each uncrewed aircraft, including just by allowing them to be smaller and less complex, this also offers valuable operational flexibility since different drones can be performing multiple tasks simultaneously. It also means that the loss of some number of drones is less likely to immediately render the entire group ineffective. That stealthy 'loyal wingman' drones that also feature high degrees of autonomy and collaborative capabilities could be especially valuable force multipliers when paired with fourth-generation crewed combat jets is something TWZ has noted in the past, as well. This was a particular key point in a detailed case we previously laid out for how the trilateral Australia-United Kingdom-United States (AUKUS) defense cooperation agreement could offer an ideal framework for the shared development of loyal wingmen-type drones. In speaking with TWZ, Fendley also talked about out how the modularity of the Apollo and Athena drones could allow them to be better tailored to a customer's particular needs from a regional perspective. 'The European market is very different than the Pacific markets. The European market is more interested in, let's call it, … sensor capability, weapons capability doesn't need the long legs, the long endurance that you do for the Pacific,' he explained. 'What that allows you to do is that allows you to really load that airplane up with more weapons, for example, than you would for an aircraft that's going to the Pacific, but has to fly a long way, so it's carrying fuel. So that's kind of the trade there.' Right now, Kratos is working on Apollo and Athena configurations 'to focus more on that European market,' he added. There is already extensive work ongoing on various tiers of drone 'wingmen' across Europe, including in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Poland, and Turkey. This reflects a global trend, as well. However, if Kratos can offer a particularly low-cost option that is readily adaptable to multiple mission sets, it could be very attractive to smaller air forces looking to bolster their airpower capabilities and overall capacity, and that cannot afford more exquisite crewed or uncrewed platforms. The core attributes of Apollo and Athena could be of interest to larger air arms, as well. The U.S. Air Force has indicated that it may now be leaning toward cheaper and simpler designs for the second iterative development phase, or Increment 2, of its Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) program. Kratos, which was notably absent from the CCA program's Increment 1 competition, has said on several occasions that it is interested in taking part in Increment 2. General Atomics and Anduril are currently developing designs, now designated YFQ-42A and YFQ-44A, respectively, under Increment 1. The Air Force has also previously said that Increment 2 could be the first phase of the CCA program to weave in foreign participation. The U.S. Marine Corps has separately said it is looking into whether certain roles and missions that are typically associated with larger, more exquisite drones, could be performed, at least in part, by smaller designs. It's worth noting here that the Air Force and the Marine Corps are also currently the only two known operators of Kratos' XQ-58. The U.S. Navy has also outlined a vision for future carrier-capable CCA-type drones that would be low-cost enough to be 'consumable,' and then expended as one-way attack munitions, or as targets in training or testing, at the end of relatively short service lives. CCA-related work across the Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy is directly intertwined via a joint service agreement. With Kratos now having secured contracts for both Apollo and Athena, more details about both of these specific designs may begin to emerge. Contact the author: joe@
