Letting cops summon lawyers for advising clients can have chilling effect: SC
NEW DELHI: Allowing the police to summon lawyers for advising their clients can 'shatter the core of legal independence' and constitute a 'serious interference with the administration of justice', the Supreme Court said on Wednesday, as it initiated suo motu proceedings to address the issue and formulate safeguards to protect the legal profession. The Supreme Court observed that summoning lawyers for advising clients can shatter the core of legal independence (PTI)
'The legal profession is an integral component of the process of administration of justice. Counsels who are engaged in their legal practice have certain rights and privileges guaranteed because of the fact that they are legal professionals, and also due to statutory provisions. Permitting investigating agencies or police to directly summon defence counsel or advocates who advise parties in a given case would seriously undermine the autonomy of the legal profession and would even constitute a direct threat to the independence of the administration of justice,' said a bench of justices KV Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh.
The court made the observations during a hearing involving a Gujarat-based lawyer who was summoned by the police for securing bail for his client in a loan dispute case. The police summons, issued under Section 179 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) by the SC/ST Cell in Ahmedabad, was upheld by the Gujarat high court. The top court stayed the order and protected the lawyer from further coercive action.
The development comes just days after the Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued, and subsequently withdrew, summons to two senior Supreme Court advocates, triggering widespread outrage over the perceived breach of lawyer-client privilege and professional independence.
'Summoning lawyers for advising clients can shatter the core of legal independence,' the bench said, adding that such practices, if allowed to persist, would have a chilling effect on legal professionals and impair the justice delivery system.
'This is not just about one lawyer. It is about protecting the spine of the legal system,' it emphasised.
Justice Viswanathan remarked that it was essential to address this issue comprehensively, not just as a one-off incident, but to safeguard the legal profession and preserve the integrity of the justice system.
'Lawyers must be able to advise and represent clients without fear of being summoned or harassed. We are dealing with the very heart of judicial independence and the administration of justice,' the court said.
It went on to frame two critical questions. First, can the police summon a lawyer who has only advised a party in a case; and if there is more than advisory involvement, should judicial oversight be a precondition?
To ensure a comprehensive and principled resolution, the court sought assistance from the Attorney General, Solicitor General, Bar Council of India (BCI) chairman, and presidents of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA).
The matter has also been referred to Chief Justice of India Bhushan R Gavai for appropriate orders on further listing.
'It is a matter which directly impinges the administration of justice,' the court noted.
The top court's intervention comes just days after SCAORA on June 20 flagged the ED summons to the CJI as a grave infringement on the independence of the legal profession and the sanctity of lawyer-client privilege.
Senior lawyer Pratap Venugopal, who was summoned to appear before ED on June 24 under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, was told that the summons had been withdrawn within hours of SCAORA raising the issue in the top court.
The summons pertained to ED's probe into the allotment of Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs) by Care Health Insurance to Rashmi Saluja, former chairperson of Religare Enterprises. Venugopal, in this instance, was the Advocate-on-Record for a legal opinion rendered by senior counsel Arvind Datar. ED had also summoned Datar earlier, but withdrew that notice too amid widespread criticism from the legal fraternity.
In his June 20 letter to the CJI, SCAORA president Vipin Nair described the summons as 'a deeply disquieting development' and warned that coercive measures against lawyers for professional legal opinions strike at the core of the rule of law and the constitutionally protected sphere of legal advice.
'The role of an advocate in offering legal advice is both privileged and protected. Interference by investigative agencies, particularly in respect of opinions rendered in a professional capacity -- strikes at the core of the rule of law,' the letter said, urging the CJI to frame clear guidelines.
The concern was echoed across the legal community. The Delhi High Court Bar Association passed a resolution on June 17 condemning the ED summons to Datar as a direct threat to the constitutional right to legal representation and fair trial. The Gujarat High Court Advocates Association also held an emergency meeting, with its president Brijesh Trivedi calling for urgent amendments to the Indian Evidence Act and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 to safeguard lawyer-client privilege.
In a statement on June 20 evening, ED said the summons to Venugopal was issued in his capacity as Independent Director of Care Health Insurance Ltd (CHIL), not as a legal counsel, and said any further information would be sought through email.
ED also issued a circular directing all field offices not to issue summons to advocates in violation of Section 132 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. It mandated that in exceptional cases where the proviso to Section 132 may apply, prior approval from the ED director would be necessary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
8 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
NHRC seeks ATR after caste assault on kathavachak sparks outrage in Etawah
LUCKNOW: Taking cognisance of an incident in Etawah where some 'upper caste' men allegedly assaulted a kathavachak (religious storyteller) and his associate from the Yadav community and tonsured their heads, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has issued a notice to the Etawah district police, directing the authorities to submit an Action Taken Report (ATR). The development comes a day after a video of the assault surfaced on social media and went viral. Following the incident, district police arrested four persons accused of the act and sent them to jail after registering an FIR in the matter. The accused were identified as Nikki Awasthi (30), Pratham Dubey (24), Ashish Tiwari (21), and Uttam Awasthi (19), all belonging to the Brahmin community. According to police sources, the incident took place at Dadarpur village in Etawah district on Saturday after some villagers objected to kathavachak Mukut Munni identifying himself as a Brahmin. The NHRC sought the ATR from Etawah Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) on the basis of a complaint filed by a Bhopal-based organisation — Dr Ambedkar Jankalyan Samiti — which alleged that the religious speaker and his associate, who belong to a backward class, were assaulted, had their heads tonsured, were compelled to rub their noses at the feet of a woman, and had their instruments damaged. 'The allegations made in the complaint prima facie seem to be a serious violation of human rights of the victims,' the Commission observed in its notice. Mukut Munni said the incident occurred after he disclosed his caste to the villagers. However, in a press statement, the police said that the social media team at police headquarters received an X post on Monday evening carrying a video showing the tonsuring of a kathavachak. Taking cognisance of the post, it was forwarded to the Etawah district police authorities for necessary action. Etawah SSP Brijesh Kumar Srivastava said, 'A video of villagers misbehaving with two individuals and cutting their hair against their will had surfaced. The accused were identified with the help of the video.' Meanwhile, Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav termed the incident an attack on PDA (Pichhde, Dalit, and Alpsankhyak) and felicitated the two men at the party office in Lucknow on Tuesday. Claiming it to be an attack on PDA, Akhilesh said members of the PDA community were being intimidated under the current dispensation. 'If Bhagwat Katha is for everyone to listen to, then everyone can recite it as well. Bhagwat Katha is related to Lord Krishna, and if his true followers are stopped from reciting it, we will not tolerate this disrespect,' he said. The SP chief further alleged that some people from upper castes wanted to maintain a monopoly over religious recitations. 'If these people have hostility towards PDA, then they should stop taking donations from the community,' he added. Earlier in the day, Uttar Pradesh Tourism Minister Jaiveer Singh said unnecessary hype should not be created around the incident, as the accused had already been arrested. 'Caste has no privilege over merit and efficiency. One can do anything based on their ability. The incident is unfortunate. An FIR has been registered and the accused have been arrested. There is no need to give this incident a political turn, as no injustice will be done to anyone under this government,' the minister said.
Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Contractor murder probe in Lko: Close woman friend, family under scanner
Investigations into the murder of a Sultanpur-based contractor, Uma Shankar Singh, have gathered pace after police identified a close woman friend and her family as prime suspects. Singh, 45, was found dead with multiple stab wounds inside his rented flat in Lucknow's Gudamba area on Tuesday. Vaishali, her brother, and lover questioned; financial dispute suspected (Sourced) Singh's second wife, Mamta Singh, has lodged a complaint against the woman, Vaishali, alleging a long-standing affair and financial exploitation. Police said that Vaishali, along with five others, including her parents and alleged lover, has been named in the FIR. 'A case under sections 103(1) and 61 of the BNS has been registered against Vaishali, her parents Dinesh and Sumitra, brother Anurag Singh, friend Avinash Singh, and Sandeep Pandey,' said SHO Gudamba, Prabhatesh Kumar Shrivastava. According to the complaint, Vaishali had been in a relationship with Singh for nearly four years and allegedly used her access to his finances. Mamta claimed that Sandeep Pandey, believed to be Vaishali's lover, had threatened her husband on June 12. She further stated that Vaishali was the last person seen near Singh's flat and suspected that the murder was planned in collusion with her family members. Police officials said Vaishali's brother, Anurag, had allegedly taken ₹ 10 lakh from Singh to start a poultry business, but failed to repay the amount. Singh's repeated demands to recover the money are believed to have caused tension between the two families. Vaishali claimed she found Singh's blood-soaked body on Tuesday morning and informed the landlord. However, police are probing whether the entry was staged. Investigators said Vaishali had a duplicate key to the flat and was a frequent visitor. CCTV footage from the surrounding area is being scanned for movement near the flat on Monday night and early Tuesday. Singh was married twice and had three children. His first wife, Renu, lives in a Sultanpur village with their two daughters, while Mamta, his second wife, lives in Sultanpur city with their son Ayush. No arrests have been made so far, but police said the case is being treated as 'sensitive'.
The Print
17 minutes ago
- The Print
How license fee hikes by Karnataka's Congress govt are driving distillers to neighbouring states
'Is this @INCIndia idea of ease of doing business……' Urs posted late Monday, tagging Lok Sabha Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi and Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. The offer came less than 24 hours after Urs posted on X, threatening to move out of Karnataka, which increased the distillery licence fee by a whopping 50 percent. Bengaluru: Aruna Urs, co-founder of Mysuru-based craft rum distiller, Huli, was driving for work Tuesday when he received a call from a friend delivering an unusual message on behalf of Andhra Pradesh minister Nara Lokesh. Lokesh extended an offer of a 'tailor-made excise policy' and red carpet welcome to encourage Urs to relocate his craft rum micro-distillery to the neighbouring state, according to a source from Lokesh's office. It had been more than a month since Urs wrote to the Karnataka government, asking it to reconsider its original 100 percent license fee increase that was later reduced by half. He received no response. The state government is literally forcing #huli to move out of Mysuru to Goa or Maharashtra. The annual distillery licensee fee has been increased by 50%! Is this @INCIndia idea of ease of doing business @RahulGandhi @siddaramaiah? — Aruna Urs (@Arunaurs) June 23, 2025 'For one year of licence fees in Karnataka, I can operate for nearly five years in Goa,' Urs told ThePrint. The upstart company, which pays Rs 63.10 lakh for various licence fees, will now have to pay Rs 90 lakh to do business in Karnataka. 'This is pure extortion,' Urs said. He compared this to Goa, where he would pay around Rs 20 lakh for the first year and then Rs 17 lakh for each subsequent year. Karnataka's decision to hike the licence fee has opened the door for the neighbouring states to position themselves as more investor-friendly. Each time professionals have complained, whether it's about language or Bengaluru's crumbling infrastructure, neighbouring states like Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have reacted promptly and invited companies or individuals with the promise of a better business environment. Since the rollout of Goods and Services Tax, states rely on excise duties, stamp duty and motor vehicle taxes, as well as other levies, to raise revenues as revenue inflows from the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led Union government continue to dry up. For Karnataka, excise, in particular, has been a steady revenue generator. Successive governments have increased excise rates of liquor and beer at every given opportunity to shore up revenues to make up for revenue shortfalls, said industry representatives. 'In less than 24 months, the additional excise duty on the beer industry has been increased three times and excise duty has been increased once in Karnataka. So, four tax increases in less than 24 months in Karnataka. As a result, prices of a bottle (of beer) have gone up from around Rs 160 to Rs 200,' Vinod Giri, director general of The Brewers Association of India (BAI), told ThePrint. Also Read: What's the brewery controversy that has united Congress & BJP against the Left in Kerala 'Open or shut, excise dept forces targets' In the past three financial years, Karnataka has raised its excise targets by over Rs 10,000 crore combined, according to the state economic survey. In 2022-23, the government of Karnataka met its target, earning Rs 29,920.36 crore from the sale of liquor and beer. The target for the ongoing fiscal year is Rs 40,000 crore. But the state's revenue from excise in 2024-25 stood at Rs 36,500 crore compared with the target of Rs 38,525 crore. Trends from at least the past five fiscal years show that revenues and targets from excise on liquor and beer have seen an upward trend. Retailers, hoteliers and other liquor vendors in Bengaluru said high targets only add to pressure from the department to sell more, even though sales have slumped as outlets are forced to shut for elections and processions. 'For even small MLC elections, which have less than 10,000-15,000 voters in some distant place, they make us close our business. Even when a major procession passes through our establishments, we have been forced to close our hotel,' said a Bengaluru-based hotelier, requesting anonymity. 'But this does not mean that we get some concession on the minimum stock purchase. Open or shut, we are expected to buy a quota of liquor every month from the government.' The hotelier added that only in Karnataka does the excise department force closure of restaurants that serve liquor and not just the beverage section, as is the norm in other states. Industry members underlined excise is a heavily regulated sector in Karnataka but several business owners allege the excise department routinely demands bribes during renewals or every month. They alleged that excise inspectors and other officials even land up at hotels to eat and drink for free. At least two people said it was 'harassment' to all those in the liquor business or even remotely connected to the sector. Industry leaders have often cited Karnataka's complex and time-consuming permit process, as well as allegations of widespread corruption, as key deterrents to investing in the state's liquor sector. In November last year, the state wine merchants association accused the excise department of demanding bribes between Rs 30-70 lakh by the state excise minister for allotment of CL-7 licences. 'Govt earns more than the producer' Karnataka has among the highest excise duties, according to multiple people aware of the developments. But, so far, this has not stopped investments in the state, which has 11 major brewers, the highest of all states in the country. Urs said he is a small brewer who needs government support and should not be clubbed with larger players. He added that for every bottle of Huli, its signature jaggery-based rum, the company earns a total revenue of Rs 630, while the government taxes amount to Rs 1,537.50. This takes the price per 750 ml bottle to Rs 2,167. Urs said that the Rs 630 his company earns per bottle has to cover operational expenses – including salaries, electricity bills, raw materials and other production costs, leaving little room for profit. India is one of the fastest-growing alcoholic beverage markets. In 2023, the market size was about $55 billion. It is expected to increase at a CAGR of seven per cent to $73 billion in 2027. However, Giri said Karnataka's liquor industry is under threat since it has become harder to sell investment pitches where operational costs are going up and sales are coming down. There is a misconception that a hike in prices does not affect consumption at all, he added. He said that the 'tendency to overtax' will lead to the industry and government turning into 'net losers'. 'Karnataka was always an investment-friendly state and is the only state that has 11 breweries, the highest in the country. And there were more plans for investments. But when the sales start contracting, what do we tell the companies and why would they invest?' said Giri. The government, however, stood by its decision to increase prices and operating costs for distilleries. Ritesh Kumar Singh, principal secretary in the Karnataka finance department, defended the government's decision, saying that while underlying inflationary pressures affect all products, liquor is relatively insulated. Singh told ThePrint that an increase in taxes actually helps producers increase prices of end products in a tightly controlled market where prices cannot be raised or dropped by market forces. 'The original plan was to double it (licence fee) since it hadn't been increased for the last eight years. But there was a lot of hue and cry and people with many stating that it was too high, then we settled for a 50 percent increase,' he said. Adding, 'And if you distribute this 50 percent increase over eight years and do an annual CAGR, it is 5 percent. Why are people complaining?' (Edited by Sugita Katyal) Also Read: Another hike in diesel price, how Karnataka govt is fishing for funds to bankroll poll promises
