Tories: Labour interested in protecting their own rather than grooming victims
Tories: Labour interested in protecting their own rather than grooming victims
The Government is more interested in 'protecting their own' than getting justice for the victims of grooming gangs, the Conservatives have suggested.
In a heated exchange in the Commons, shadow equalities minister Mims Davies repeated calls for a national public inquiry into the sexual exploitation of children.
Home Office minister Jess Phillips hit back, saying: 'I will absolutely protect my own in this, and my own in this are the women.'
The issue hit the headlines in January after billionaire X owner Elon Musk criticised the Prime Minister and Ms Phillips over the UK's handling of child grooming scandals.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Government has knocked back calls for a national approach in favour of locally-led inquiries, saying it is focused on implementing recommendations from Professor Alexis Jay's Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA).
A rapid national audit, led by Baroness Casey, looking at the scale of grooming gangs across the country, is also being conducted.
During women and equalities questions, Ms Davies said: 'Despite plenty of good women on the frontbench, I have to ask, is this Government simply more interested in protecting their own, rather than staying true to their manifesto pledge, which says we will use every tool to target perpetrators?
'Yet Labour are turning their back, you can hear it, once again with the Leader of this House (Lucy Powell) calling it dog whistle politics on national radio.
'So why won't this minister and her frontbench commit to deliver a proper national statutory public inquiry and finally, put victims first?'
Shadow equalities minister Mims Davies (Roger Harris/PA)
Ms Phillips, who has responsibility for safeguarding, replied: 'I will absolutely protect my own in this, and my own in this are the women in our country who for the last 14 years have had no effort made.
ADVERTISEMENT
'And people say terrible things, and the Leader of the House was right to apologise.
'I wonder how many of those on the opposite bench asked the former prime minister (Boris Johnson) to apologise for saying that the exact girls that he was talking about, that their lives and looking into them, in an inquiry that already happened, that was statutory, was spaffing money up the walls.
'Where was the outrage?'
Speaking on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme, the Health Secretary Wes Streeting said his colleague Lucy Powell was 'mortified' after she made comments that appeared to describe grooming gangs as a 'dog whistle'.
The Leader of the House of Commons was on BBC Radio 4's Any Questions programme on Friday when a recent Channel 4 documentary about five women's stories of being groomed and abused by gangs was raised.
ADVERTISEMENT
Responding to Reform UK member Tim Montgomerie, Ms Powell replied: 'Oh, we want to blow that little trumpet now, do we? Let's get that dog whistle out, shall we?'
In the Commons, Conservative MP Bob Blackman also called for a national inquiry, saying 'council staff, councillors, social workers and possibly the police have been complicit, or at least turned a blind eye to it'.
He added: 'Given these circumstances, local inquiries are not going to be good enough. So will she now call for a nationwide, national inquiry, judge-led with witnesses being required to give evidence under oath, so those people that turned a blind eye could actually be brought to justice?'
Ms Phillips, in her reply, said: 'National statutory inquiries don't actually send anyone to prison, just to be clear on that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pro-choice group opposes Stella Creasy's abortion amendment
A leading pro-choice group has come out against Labour MP Stella Creasy's plan to overhaul abortion laws, warning the move is being rushed through without enough scrutiny. Rachel Clarke, head of advocacy at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), said the NC20 amendment to the Criminal Justice Bill does not have the backing of abortion providers. The amendment would remove criminal penalties for abortion in England and Wales, effectively decriminalising the procedure in all circumstances. 'We are not supporting NC20, and neither are any of the abortion providers in the country,' Ms Clarke told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday. She said a separate proposal, NC1, has the support of more than 50 pro-choice organisations – unlike Creasy's. 'Abortion law is incredibly complex. It governs 250,000 women's healthcare every single year,' she said. 'Because of that, it is essential that any huge change to abortion law is properly considered. 'That means involvement with providers, medical bodies, regulators – and proper debate time in Parliament.' She warned that MPs are being asked to back a 'generational change' after just three hours of debate next week. 'For us, unfortunately, although we truly believe that we need overwhelming and generational change for abortion law, Stella Creasy's amendment is not the right way to do it,' she said. The amendment has also been heavily criticised by anti-abortion campaigners, who say it would amount to the most extreme liberalisation of the law since the 1967 Abortion Act. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) said NC20 could allow abortions on the basis of a baby's sex and would remove protections that allow abusers who harm unborn children to be prosecuted. SPUC said the amendment, along with another tabled by MP Tonia Antoniazzi, represents 'the greatest threat to unborn children and their mothers since the Abortion Act'. They urged supporters to lobby their MPs to vote against both proposals, warning that abortion 'up to birth' could become possible under the changes. Votes on the amendments are due to take place on June 17 and 18 during the report stage of the Criminal Justice Bill.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Diane Abbott is pushing the Left's biggest myth about immigration
The Labour Left were always bound to loathe Sir Keir Starmer's recent speech about the downsides of mass immigration. All the same, one of their objections to it strikes me as somewhat peculiar. At a rally on Saturday, the veteran Labour MP Diane Abbott thundered that Sir Keir's speech was 'nonsense' – because, as she stoutly reminded her audience, 'immigrants built this land'. Stirring stuff. I can see only one small problem. It's not strictly true, is it? Clearly Ms Abbott disagrees. Indeed, she proudly declared that her own parents 'helped to build this country'. As she herself acknowledged, though, they only arrived here from Jamaica in the 1950s. What precisely does Ms Abbott think Britain looked like, before her parents' ship pulled in? A barren, primitive, uncivilised wilderness, whose humble natives dwelt in bushes and subsisted on nettles and raw shrew? Did her parents look around, sigh, and then patiently set about erecting St Paul's Cathedral and Blenheim Palace? I'm not convinced that they did. In fact, I'm reasonably sure that most of this country was built a fair bit earlier, largely by people who were born in it. This is because, until quite recently, only a very small percentage of the population was born abroad. Between 1951 and 2001, the average annual net immigration figure was 7,800. In 2023, by contrast, it was 906,000. It doesn't take a mathematician of Ms Abbott's stature to recognise that this is quite a sharp increase. Still, I don't mean to pick on her. She's far from alone. In recent years, any number of Left-wing politicians and pundits have taken to pushing the line that 'immigrants built Britain'. On last week's edition of the BBC's Question Time, for example, the retired trade union leader Mark Serwotka informed viewers that Britain is only 'the great country it is because of centuries of immigration'. From the Left's point of view, I suppose I can see this tactic's advantages. Any time a voter dares suggest that net immigration of almost a million a year is a touch on the high side, and possibly not entirely sustainable in the longer term, shut them up by telling them that a) it's always been like this, and b) they should be grateful. The risk, though, is that some voters might feel a tiny bit insulted. Because the claim that 'immigrants built Britain' implies that the natives were so ignorant, lazy and useless, they achieved nothing until their superiors arrived from abroad to lift them out of savagery. Come to think of it, I'm reasonably sure that the Left used to have a word for that type of attitude. It was 'colonialism'. 'Way of the World' is a twice-weekly satirical look at the headlines while aiming to mock the absurdities of the modern world. It is published at 6am every Tuesday and Saturday Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cumbria Chamber urges Government to back business growth in spending review
Fresh calls have been made for the Government to prioritise business growth ahead. Cumbria Chamber of Commerce has joined the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) and chambers across the UK to urge the Government to put business growth at the centre of its spending plans. The call comes ahead of Wednesday's Comprehensive Spending Review, which will set out the Government's budget priorities. Suzanne Caldwell, managing director of Cumbria Chamber of Commerce, said: "Wednesday's Comprehensive Spending Review will impact the future shape of our economy for years. "So the Government can't afford to get this wrong. "At the end of the day it's businesses that create wealth and growth in our economy. "So fundamentally the Government needs to put more time, money and effort into supporting business. "That's a downpayment on our future prosperity." The chambers have outlined a series of recommendations under three themes: Get Britain Thriving, Get Britain Working, and Get Britain Trading. These calls focus on improved investment in infrastructure, people, and international trade. Recommendations include funding for transport and energy projects, better grid connectivity, long-term support for Project Gigabit, and practical help for SMEs to adopt artificial intelligence (AI). When it comes to getting Britain working, the chambers want more Apprenticeship Levy funding redirected to the Department for Education to boost training, and a broader Youth Guarantee for 18- to 24-year-olds. The chambers want more employers to be involved in skills planning by extending investment in Local Skills Improvement Plans and addressing gaps in training provision. On trade, the chambers are calling for investment in 'digital trade', better export support for SMEs, and a stronger pipeline of overseas investment. The recommendations were developed through consultation between the 51 chambers across the UK, the BCC, and the BCC's Business Council. They are also backed by research from the BCC's Insights Unit, which gathered feedback from more than 5,000 businesses on the biggest barriers to growth. Ms Caldwell said: "If the Government wants strong and consistent economic growth, it has to look at three key areas. "It must promote consistent investment in people, in infrastructure and in trade. "If it provides the support businesses need to thrive, in an increasingly competitive and protectionist global market, then the future can still be bright."
