
Pakistan links train hijacking to ‘Afghan handlers' and Indian mastermind
Islamabad, Pakistan – Pakistan on Friday claimed that the hijacking of the Jaffar Express train earlier this week was carried out by 'terrorists' who were communicating with 'handlers in Afghanistan', while alleging that India was the mastermind behind it.
'We must understand that in this terrorist incident in Balochistan, and others before, the main sponsor is eastern neighbour [India],' Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, the director general for the military's media wing Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), said during a news conference in Islamabad.
Chaudhry also referred to the media coverage carried out by Indian mainstream channels, which relied on videos shared by the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), the separatist group responsible for the attack, and accused them of using images generated by artificial intelligence or old incidents.
During the briefing which lasted more than an hour, Chaudhry, along with Balochistan's Chief Minister Sarfraz Bugti, offered some details of the military operation — named Operation Green Bolan — that culminated in the release of hundreds of passengers from the train following a 36-hour standoff that began on March 11.
According to Chaudhry, a total of 354 passengers were rescued, while 26 passengers and security officials were killed. In addition, 33 fighters belonging to the BLA were also killed.
While the military had earlier said that 21 civilians or security personnel had been killed, Chaudhry stated that as security officials cleared the area, more injured individuals were found, some of whom later died.
Of the 26 killed, 18 belonged to the army or paramilitary forces, three were railway staff members and five were civilian passengers.
'Aerial Units' for reconnaissance
Chaudhry said that four hours after the train had departed from Quetta, the BLA attackers intercepted the train 32km (20 miles) from Sibbi city, just before it entered a tunnel in the Bolan Pass region, known for its rugged, mountainous landscape.
'The BLA terrorists intercepted the train using an improvised explosive device. Before that, they began their raid in large numbers and encountered a paramilitary checkpoint, eliminating three soldiers there. Once the train was stopped, they kept the women and children inside while taking the men outside as hostages,' he said.
'As soon as the incident happened, we activated our response teams and started to monitor the situation while maintaining an appropriate distance,' Chaudhry said.
While Chaudhry did not disclose specifics, visual evidence from the briefing indicated that the Pakistani military relied heavily on drones to monitor the situation.
Intelligence sources also confirmed that reconnaissance teams and aerial units were deployed within an hour of the train being stopped.
The general said that the BLA segregated passengers based on ethnicity, a fact that was confirmed to Al Jazeera by survivors, as well.
'They divided people into smaller groups based on ethnicity. While a large number of BLA fighters moved away to their hideouts in the mountain, a smaller group remained with the hostages,' he said. Many of the fighters who remained at the site 'were suicide bombers,' he added.
Chaudhry stated that intelligence monitoring revealed the abductors were using walkie-talkies to allegedly communicate with their 'handlers in Afghanistan.'
How did the operation unfold?
The military said that on the night of March 11, more than eight hours after the hijacking, a group of women, children, and elderly passengers were released, who walked to the nearest train station, 6km (four miles) away.
Intelligence monitoring by security agencies at the time suggested the potential presence of suicide bombers among the hostages. On the morning of March 12, Chaudhry said, military snipers killed several BLA fighters, enabling some hostages to escape amid the chaos.
The main ground operation was then prepared, to be led by the Zarrar Company, an elite unit of the Army's Special Services Group (SSG), which specialises in operations against armed groups.
'It is a highly trained unit uniquely equipped for counterterrorism situations, including hostage crises. The company commander is a major-ranked officer,' an intelligence source said.
Showing a video clip, Chaudhry noted that as the operation commenced, many hostages sitting outside the train ran for safety.
'By midday on March 12, Zarrar Company had completed its situational assessment. Tracking BLA communications revealed potential suicide bombers were stationed near the hostages. They were eliminated first, after which the troops made their way inside the train,' the general added.
'It demonstrates the professionalism and competence of our troops that there was not a single hostage casualty during the rescue operation,' he said.
All the fighters were killed. Security officials told Al Jazeera that they could not capture anyone alive due to the nature of the operation.
'As a matter of policy, capturing insurgents remains important to our doctrine, but a hostage situation offers little room for that. If you want to rescue the hostages, actions must be precise and surgical,' a security official said, requesting anonymity as he was not authorised to speak to the media.
How have India and Afghanistan responded?
Following the news conference, neither India nor Afghanistan issued an immediate response.
However, earlier on Friday, officials from both countries strongly reacted to Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs statement on Thursday, which also blamed both nations.
'India has been involved in terrorism in Pakistan. In the attack on Jaffar Express, the terrorists were in contact with their handlers and ring leaders in Afghanistan,' Pakistan's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan said during his weekly news briefing in Islamabad yesterday.
Khan added that intercepted communications confirmed links between the attackers and Afghanistan.
'The terrorists have safe havens in Afghanistan, and Pakistan has repeatedly urged the Afghan interim government to prevent groups like the BLA from using its soil for terrorism,' he said.
The Indian government categorically rejected Pakistan's allegations.
'We reject the baseless accusations made by Pakistan. The whole world knows where the epicentre of global terrorism is. Pakistan should look within itself instead of blaming others for its internal problems and failures,' Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in a statement on Friday.
Afghanistan also denied any connection between the attackers and its territory.
'Pakistan should focus on its security and resolving its internal issues instead of making irresponsible statements,' a statement from Kabul read.
The Taliban-led government's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Abdul Qahar Balkhi also urged Pakistan on social media to 'focus on resolving its security and internal issues instead of making such irresponsible comments'.
Balkhi also claimed that no BLA members were present in Afghanistan and denied any connection between the group and Afghanistan.
Last month, a United Nations report stated that the Afghan Taliban, in power since August 2021, provides support to the Pakistan Taliban (Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan or TTP), which has carried out multiple attacks in Pakistan.
It further said that the BLA reportedly has ties with both the Pakistan Taliban and the ISIL affiliate in Khorasan Province (ISKP), indicating a broader convergence of armed groups with distinct, but intersecting agendas.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Qatar Tribune
4 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
ICBF felicitates Divakar Poojary for exemplary service to Indian community in Qatar
In celebration of dedication and service to the Indian community in Qatar, the Indian Community Benevolent Forum (ICBF) organised a distinguished felicitation ceremony on June 2, honouring Divakar Poojary, former General Secretary of ICBF, who came to Qatar for a short visit. Poojary, who has previously served as general secretary of both the Indian Cultural Centre (ICC) and the Indian Business and Professionals Network (IBPN)—all apex bodies under the Embassy of India—was recognised for his leadership and unwavering commitment to the Indiandiaspora. The evening commenced with a gracious welcome address by Jafer Thayyil, secretary of ICBF, followed by the presidential address delivered by Shanavas Bava. Thoughtful reflections on Poojary's journey were shared by KS Prasad (Advisory Council Chairman), KV Boban (Program Committee Chairman), Sam Basheer (Former Advisory Chairman), and past ICBF Presidents Abdul Kadar and Neelangshu Dey. After this moving set of speeches, ICBF General Secretary Deepak Shetty formally introduced the Guest of Honou Divakar Poojary. In the spotlight of the evening, Poojary was felicitated amidst a gathering of distinguished community leaders and supportive well-wishers. He then took the floor to address the audience, sharing personal anecdotes and enriching experiences from his decades of service. These moments were further enriched by contributions from Aparna Sharath, president of Billawas Qatar, whose reflections on Poojary's impact resonated deeply with all present. The ceremony was warmly concluded with a vote of thanks delivered by Nirmala Guru, head of finance, ICBF. Behind the scenes, the event was deftly coordinated by ICBF Managing Committee members Mani Bharathi, Shankar Goud, Irfan Ansari, Mini Siby—and Advisory Council member Satheesh V. True to its mission since 1984 of offering support and compassion to underprivileged Indians across Qatar, ICBF continues to uphold its core values of service, solidarity, and benevolence through such heartfelt recognitions.


Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
UK aims to ‘deepen' India ties
London: British Foreign Secretary David Lammy will seek to deepen UK-India economic ties as he visits New Delhi this weekend, saying Britain's recently agreed trade deal with the country is 'just the start of our ambitions.' Trade and migration will be at the top of the agenda for the Foreign Secretary's trip, during which he will meet Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and external affairs minister S Jaishankar. The Foreign Office said Lammy, who was expected in New Delhi on Saturday, would also raise 'the recent escalation in tensions following the Pahalgam terrorist attack, and how the welcomed sustained period of peace can be best supported in the interests of stability in the region.' Pakistan and India agreed to a US-brokered ceasefire last month after rising hostilities between the two nuclear-armed rivals followed a deadly attack on tourists in Pahalgam, Kashmir. Ahead of the visit, Lammy said: 'Signing a free trade agreement is just the start of our ambitions - we're building a modern partnership with India for a new global era.' (PA Media/dpa)


Qatar Tribune
4 days ago
- Qatar Tribune
AI chatbots: New frontier of misinformation, not fact-checking
Agencies As misinformation exploded during India's four-day conflict with Pakistan, social media users turned to an AI chatbot for verification -- only to encounter more falsehoods, underscoring its unreliability as a fact-checking tool. With tech platforms reducing human fact-checkers, users are increasingly relying on AI-powered chatbots -- including xAI's Grok, OpenAI's ChatGPT, and Google's Gemini -- in search of reliable information. 'Hey @Grok, is this true?' has become a common query on Elon Musk's platform X, where the AI assistant is built in, reflecting the growing trend of seeking instant debunks on social media. But the responses are often themselves riddled with misinformation. Grok -- now under renewed scrutiny for inserting 'white genocide,' a far-right conspiracy theory, into unrelated queries -- wrongly identified old video footage from Sudan's Khartoum airport as a missile strike on Pakistan's Nur Khan airbase during the country's recent conflict with India. Unrelated footage of a building on fire in Nepal was misidentified as 'likely' showing Pakistan's military response to Indian strikes. 'The growing reliance on Grok as a fact-checker comes as X and other major tech companies have scaled back investments in human fact-checkers,' McKenzie Sadeghi, a researcher with the disinformation watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP. 'Our research has repeatedly found that AI chatbots are not reliable sources for news and information, particularly when it comes to breaking news,' she warned. NewsGuard's research found that 10 leading chatbots were prone to repeating falsehoods, including Russian disinformation narratives and false or misleading claims related to the recent Australian election. In a recent study of eight AI search tools, the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University found that chatbots were 'generally bad at declining to answer questions they couldn't answer accurately, offering incorrect or speculative answers instead.' When AFP fact-checkers in Uruguay asked Gemini about an AI-generated image of a woman, it not only confirmed its authenticity but fabricated details about her identity and where the image was likely taken. Grok recently labeled a purported video of a giant anaconda swimming in the Amazon River as 'genuine,' even citing credible-sounding scientific expeditions to support itsfalse claim. In reality, the video was AI-generated, AFP fact-checkers in Latin America reported, noting that many users cited Grok's assessment as evidence theclip was real. Such findings have raised concerns as surveys show that online users are increasingly shifting from traditional search engines to AI chatbots for information gathering and verification. The shift also comes as Meta announced earlier this year it was ending its third-party fact-checking program in the United States, turning over the task of debunking falsehoods to ordinary users under a model known as 'Community Notes,' popularized by X. Researchers have repeatedly questioned the effectiveness of 'Community Notes' in combating falsehoods. Human fact-checking has long been a flashpoint in a hyperpolarized political climate, particularly in the United States, where conservative advocates maintain it suppresses free speech and censors right-wing content -- something professional fact-checkers vehemently reject. AFP currently works in 26 languages with Facebook's fact-checking program, including in Asia, Latin America, and the European Union. The quality and accuracy of AI chatbots can vary, depending on how they are trained and programmed, prompting concerns that their output may be subject to political influence or control. Musk's xAI recently blamed an 'unauthorized modification' for causing Grok to generate unsolicited posts referencing 'white genocide' in SouthAfrica. When AI expert David Caswell asked Grok who might have modified its system prompt, the chatbot named Musk as the 'most likely' the South African-born billionaire backer of President Donald Trump, has previously peddled the unfounded claim that South Africa's leaders were 'openly pushing for genocide' of white people. 'We have seen the way AI assistants can either fabricate results or give biased answers after human coders specifically change their instructions,' Angie Holan, director of the International Fact-Checking Network, told AFP. 'I am especially concerned about the way Grok has mishandled requests concerning very sensitive matters after receiving instructions to provide pre-authorized answers.'